吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 2978-2984.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250579

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

基于用户满意度的停车预约服务智能体行为仿真

张云翔(),宋现敏(),谢渝,湛天舒   

  1. 吉林大学 交通学院,长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-29 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 宋现敏 E-mail:zayn2727@126.com;songxm@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张云翔(1995-),男,博士研究生.研究方向:停车控制.E-mail:zayn2727@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(52131202)

Agent⁃based behavioral simulation of parking reservation services driven by user satisfaction

Yun-xiang ZHANG(),Xian-min SONG(),Yu XIE,Tian-shu ZHAN   

  1. College of Transportation,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2025-06-29 Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-11-14
  • Contact: Xian-min SONG E-mail:zayn2727@126.com;songxm@jlu.edu.cn

摘要:

为识别行为转化过程中的关键机制,构建了涵盖用户期望、感知服务质量、整体满意度、投诉行为和持续使用意愿的多路径结构模型,并基于实证数据估计变量间的作用关系。在此基础上,构建了停车用户“未采纳、初步接触、活跃使用、持续采纳”4种状态智能体演化模型,模拟服务过程中的行为变化路径,并进行了仿真分析。结果表明:“活跃使用→持续采纳”的转化率仅为36.36%,且持续采纳状态的降级风险高达53.81%,是平台运营中的结构性瓶颈。在策略干预模拟中,服务可靠性提升将持续采纳者比例从28.7%提高至32.4%,并将其降级率降至50.15%;相较之下,投诉缓释策略主要作用于负面反馈路径,该策略虽能在短期内提升持续采纳者比例至31.5%,但未能有效抑制后续流失,降级率反而上升至55.73%,表明其在稳定用户行为方面的能力不足,难以支撑长期使用关系的维系。研究结果可为平台在服务流程优化和用户结构治理方面提供了策略支持。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 用户行为演化, 满意度结构模型, 智能体仿真, 服务可靠性, 投诉管理

Abstract:

To identify the key mechanisms underlying behavioral transitions, a multi-path structural model was developed encompassing user expectations, perceived service quality, overall satisfaction, complaint behavior, and continued usage intention. Empirical data were used to estimate the relationships among these variables. Building on this foundation, an agent-based simulation model was constructed, dividing users into four behavioral states “non-adoption, initial contact, active use, and regular adoption”. The model simulates the evolution of user behavior throughout the service process. Simulation results indicate that the transition rate from “active use to regular adoption” is only 36.36%, while the downgrade risk for regular adopters reaches 53.81%, representing a structural bottleneck for platform operations. Under strategy intervention scenarios, improving service reliability increases the proportion of regular adopters from 28.7% to 32.4% and reduces their downgrade rate to 50.15%. In contrast, a complaint mitigation strategy mainly targets the negative feedback pathway; although it can temporarily increase the proportion of regular adopters to 31.5%, it fails to effectively curb subsequent attrition, with the downgrade rate rising to 55.73%. This suggests that its capacity to stabilize user behavior is limited and insufficient for sustaining long-term usage relationships. The findings provide strategic support for optimizing platform service processes and managing user structure.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, user behavioral evolution, satisfaction structural model, agent-based simulation, service reliability, complaint management

中图分类号: 

  • U491.1

表1

影响因素特征"

潜变量观测变量符号均值标准差

可靠性

(RE)

信息展示一致性RE14.090.65
及时帮助的有效性RE24.170.75
预约服务的可靠性RE34.120.75
对成功预约的信任程度RE44.160.69

感知价值

(PV)

服务性价比感知PV14.170.72
预约服务的便利性PV24.150.68
定价公平性感知PV34.130.70

响应性

(RS)

服务流程迅速性RS14.120.75
响应时长合理性RS24.160.77
问题咨询即时回应性RS34.070.72

保证性

(AS)

停车信息准确性AS14.140.74
技术支持可靠性AS24.140.76
车位可用性的保障AS34.160.76

同理心

(EM)

致力于体验提升EM14.190.74
个性化预约设计EM24.210.74
停车时间选择灵活性EM34.220.75

有形性

(TA)

预约流程简便性TA14.160.68
用户界面友好性TA24.220.73
视觉美观与操作流畅性TA34.250.72

用户期望

(EX)

服务持续升级的预期EX14.160.74
期望更快捷的预约流程EX24.140.72
期望提供更多停车选择EX34.090.75
期望更迅速的响应速度EX44.130.73

满意度

(SA)

总体服务满意度高SA14.110.68
对服务过程和结果感到满意SA24.130.73
对提供解决方案的愉悦感受SA34.100.65

投诉处理

(CT)

投诉反馈效率低CT13.411.14
投诉流程复杂CT23.401.24
投诉等待时间长CT33.231.20

忠诚度

(LO)

未来持续使用意愿LO14.140.68
向他人推荐服务倾向LO24.140.68
即使有其他选择仍偏好在线预约LO34.220.70
整体服务评价积极LO44.140.66

图1

满意度路径系数"

图2

用户状态分布对比图"

图3

用户行为转移率对比图"

[1] Parmar J, Das P, Dave S M. Study on demand and characteristics of parking system in urban areas: a review[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2020, 7(1): 111-124.
[2] 李思奇, 安正阳, 孙迅, 等. 基于停车预约模式的差异化泊位定价优化[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2023, 47(3): 79-86.
Li Si-qi, An Zheng-yang, Sun Xun.Differentiated parking pricing optimization based on parking reservation mode[J].Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2023, 47(3): 79-86.
[3] 关宏志, 张春晖, 韩艳. 考虑心理因素的旅游景区停车泊位预约选择行为研究[J]. 大连交通大学学报,2024, 45(3): 1-7.
Guan Hong-zhi, Zhang Chun-hui, Han Yan. Study on parking reservation choice behavior in tourist attractions considering psychological factors[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2024, 45(3): 1-7.
[4] Wang A, Guan H, Guo J,et al. An empirical study on the segmentation of potential users of shared parking spaces considering individual heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022,336:No.130403.
[5] Kim D J, Hwang Y. A study of mobile internet user´s service quality perceptions from a user´s utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2012, 14: 409-421.
[6] Niu Z, Hu X, Qi S, et al. Determinants to parking mode alternatives: a model integrating technology acceptance model and satisfaction-loyalty model[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 152: 216-234.
[7] Zhang C, Liu Y, Lu W, et al. Evaluating user satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: evidence from Chinese public transport service[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 120:149-164.
[8] Zainal S K, Ismail A. Assessment of factors affecting student's satisfaction and loyalty on the crossed parking system at residential colleges of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia[J]. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 2019, 31(1): 123-129.
[9] Akai K, Aoki K, Ueda Y,et al. Redesigning parking facilities using a parking service satisfaction survey at Izumo local airport in Japan[J]. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2021, 11:No.100433.
[10] Tsami M, Adamos G, Nathanail E, et al. A decision tree approach for achieving high customer satisfaction at urban interchanges[J]. Transport and Telecommunication, 2018, 19: No.194.
[11] 熊志华, 董黛悦, 董春娇, 等. 考虑个人偏好的观赛人群组合决策选择行为[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版,2024, 54(4): 979-986.
Xiong Zhi-hua, Dong Dai-yue, Dong Chun-jiao, et al. Combined decision-making choice behavior of spectator groups considering individual preferences[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 979-986.
[12] Channamallu S S, Kermanshachi S, Rosenberger J M, et al. Determinants of user satisfaction in smart parking applications[J].Transport Economics and Management, 2025,3: 214-221.
[13] Xie M H, Lin S Y, Wei S,et al. Online configuration of reservable parking spaces: an agent-based deep reinforcement learning approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,2025, 194: No.103887.
[14] Doga I, Sakman E. Successful complaint handling on social media predicts increased repurchase intention: the roles of trust in company and propensity to trust[J].European Management Journal, 2024, 42(1): 11-22.
[1] 曲昭伟,王铭阳,王喆,宋现敏,张云翔,黄镜尘. 基于自动驾驶模块化车辆主辅功能分配的公交自适应调度方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2946-2957.
[2] 王琳虹,刘宇阳,刘子昱,鹿应佳,张宇恒,黄桂树. 基于YOLOv5的轻量化桥梁缺陷识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2958-2968.
[3] 穆长儒,徐亮,程国柱. 基于能量合理分配的外包U型钢-混凝土组合护栏防撞性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2669-2680.
[4] 李艳波,汪静远,陈圆媛,程绍峰,吕浩楠,陈俊硕. 面向高速公路服务区自洽能源系统的RAMS评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2243-2250.
[5] 戢晓峰,邓若凡,乔新,关昊天. 建成环境对共享单车时间集聚模式的非线性影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2233-2242.
[6] 于江波,翁剑成,林鹏飞,孙宇星,柴娇龙. 基于混合Transformer的对外客运枢纽抵站客流预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2251-2259.
[7] 柴树山,周志强,李海涛,徐炅旸. 基于图时空模式学习网络的路网实时交通事件自动检测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2145-2161.
[8] 赵红专,吴泽健,张鑫,石胜文,李文勇,展新,许恩永,王佳明. 基于密度离散度和信息传输延迟的网联商用车弯道格子模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 2015-2029.
[9] 闫晟煜,程铭杰,田宏策,王洪瑀,周永恒,马博浩. 封闭式景区纯电动客车调度方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1984-1993.
[10] 潘福全,牛远征,张丽霞,杨金顺,陈秀锋,陈德启. 智能网联环境下无信号交叉口车辆通行控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1948-1962.
[11] 潘义勇,徐家聪,尤逸文,全勇俊. 网约车出行需求影响因素多尺度空间异质性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1567-1575.
[12] 秦严严,肖腾飞,罗钦中,王宝杰. 雾天高速公路车辆跟驰安全分析与控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1241-1249.
[13] 张河山,范梦伟,谭鑫,郑展骥,寇立明,徐进. 基于改进YOLOX的无人机航拍图像密集小目标车辆检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1307-1318.
[14] 宋现敏,湛天舒,李海涛,刘博,张云翔. 考虑用户成本和泊位利用率的停车预约分配模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1287-1297.
[15] 卢凯明,陈艳艳,仝瑶,张健,李永行,罗莹. 数据驱动的信号交叉口排队尾车驶离状态预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1275-1286.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!