城市公共汽车全生命周期碳排放测算

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20230673

Abstract

Abstract:

To measure the carbon emissions at each stage of buses throughout life cycle， this paper divided the life cycle of buses into process cycle and energy cycle. Considering the production， assembly， transportation， and recycling stages of each bus system， carried out research to obtain bus production data， combined the data provided by the company and GREET internal data， used Gabi to measure CO₂ emissions of process cycle. Constructed a CO₂ emissions measurement model that included the stages of energy extraction， production processing， transportation， and usage to estimate the energy cycle CO₂ emissions of electric buses and diesel buses. The result shows that the CO₂ emissions of electric buses are 39.2% higher than those of diesel buses during the process cycle. In the energy cycle， the CO₂ emissions of electric buses are 14.2% lower than those of diesel buses. In a comprehensive life-cycle comparison， the CO₂ emissions of electric buses are 9.73% lower than those of diesel buses.

Key words: transportation engineering, urban buses, life cycle, carbon emissions calculation

CLC Number:

U491

Wen-hui ZHANG,Bo FU,Ge ZHOU,Xiao-tian QIAO. Carbon emissions calculation for urban buses throughout lifecycles[J].Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1232-1240.

Figures/Tables 22

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Fig.2

Table 9

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

Table 13

Table 14

Table 15

Table 16

Table 17

Fig.3

Table 18

Fig.4

References 19

[1]	肖红, 邓梓浩, 任艳娟, 等. 城市交通运输碳排放预测模型及碳减排策略[J]. 重庆交通大学学报: 自然科学版, 2023, 42(9): 85-92, 98.
	Xiao Hong, Deng Zi-hao, Ren Yan-juan, et al. Urban transportation carbon emission prediction model strategies[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2023, 42(9): 85-92, 98.
[2]	Bieker G. A global comparison of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of combustion engine and electric passenger cars[J]. Washington D.C.: Communications, 2021, 49(30): 847129-102.
[3]	Wong E Y C, Ho D C K, So S, et al. Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles using the greet model—a comparative study[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(9): 4872.
[4]	王雪然, 刘文峰, 张龙文, 等. 基于能源链的纯电动公交车全生命周期CO₂减排效果研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(1): 19-25.
	Wang Xue-ran, Liu Wen-feng, Zhang Long-wen, et al. CO₂ emission reduction effect of electric bus based on energy chain in life cycle[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2019(1): 19-25.
[5]	宋大凤, 吴西涛, 曾小华, 等. 基于理论油耗模型的轻混重卡全生命周期成本分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2018, 48(5): 1313-1323.
	Song Da-feng, Wu Xi-tao, Zeng Xiao-hua, et al. Life cycle cost analysis of mild hybrid heavy truck based on theoretical fuel consumption mode[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1313-1323.
[6]	王童, 杜轶群, 陈轶嵩, 等. 基于结构轻量化的城市客车车身生命周期评价[J]. 汽车工程, 2022, 44(5):778-788.
	Wang Tong, Du Yi-qun, Chen Yi-song, et al. Life cycle assessment of city bus body based on structural lightweighting[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2022(5): 778-788.
[7]	田成诗, 张诗雅. 中国行业供应链碳足迹的来源分解分析——基于投入产出的生命周期评价模型[J]. 环境经济研究, 2019, 4(2): 58-75.
	Tian Cheng-shi, Zhang Shi-ya. Source decomposition analysis of carbon footprint in China's industry supply chain: based on IO-LCA model[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2019, 4(2): 58-75.
[8]	Harris A, Soban D, Smyth B M, et al. Assessing life cycle impacts and the risk and uncertainty of alternative bus technologies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 97: 569-579.
[9]	Chang C C, Liao Y T, Chang Y W. Life cycle assessment of alternative energy types-including hydrogen-for public city buses in Taiwan[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(33): 18472-18482.
[10]	Ferrao P, Nhambiu J. A comparison between conventional LCA and hybrid EIO-LCA: analyzing crystal giftware contribution to global warming potential[M]∥Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology,Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009: 219-230.
[11]	余大立, 张洪申. 纯电动与柴油货车全生命周期能耗及排放分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(6): 2043-2052.
	Yu Da-li, Zhang Hong-shen, The life cycle analysis of energy consumption and emission of pure electric van and diesel van[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2019(6): 2043-2052.
[12]	丁舟波, 李彬, 牛继高, 等. 电动汽车燃料生命周期评价研究[J]. 森林工程, 2017, 33(6): 56-59, 66.
	Ding Zhou-bo, Li Bin, Niu Ji-gao, et al. Research on life cycle assessment of electric vehicle fuel[J]. Forest Engineering, 2017, 33(6): 56-59, 66.
[13]	施羽, 张华, 于智涵. 电动汽车全生命周期节能减排效益分析及环境影响评价[J]. 资源与产业, 2021,23(2): 100-109.
	Shi Yu, Zhang Hua, Yu Zhi-han. Energy-saving benefits and environment impacts of electric vehicles lifecycle[J]. Resources ＆ Industries, 2021(2): 100-109.
[14]	李娟, 杨沿平, 陈轶嵩. 铝合金与铸铁缸盖的生命周期评价对比分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(11):5642-5648.
	Li Juan, Yang Yan-ping, Chen Yi-song. Comparative analysis on life cycle assessment between aluminum alloy and cast iron cylinder cover[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015(11): 5642-5648.
[15]	张雷, 刘志峰, 王进京. 电动与内燃机汽车的动力系统生命周期环境影响对比分析[J]. 环境科学学报,2013, 33(3): 931-940.
	Zhang Lei, Liu Zhi-feng, Wang Jin-jing. Comparative analysis of life cycle environmental impact between power system of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae. 2013(3): 931-940.
[16]	程冬茹. 汽柴油全生命周期碳排放计算[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学化学工程与环境学院, 2016.
	Cheng Dong-ru. Carbon emissions calculation of gasoline and diesel fuel based on life cycle assessment[D]. Beijing: College of Chemical Engineering and Environment, China University of Petroleum, 2016.
[17]	欧训民, 张希良. 中国终端能源的全生命周期化石能耗及碳强度分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(): 208-214.
	Xun-min Ou, Zhang Xi-liang. Fossil energy consumption and GHG emissions of final energy by LCA in China[J]. China Soft Science,2009(Sup.2): 208-214.
[18]	Ou X M, Yan X Y, Zhang X L. Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation and supply in China[J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(1): 289-297.
[19]	井晓燕. 天然气净化系统能耗分析及其节能优化研究[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学化学化工学院, 2019.
	Jing Xiao-yan. Research on energy consumption analysis and energy saving optimization of natural gas purification system[D]. Xi´an: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xi´an Shiyou University,2019.

Related Articles 15

[1]	Hui-zhao TU,Chang LU,Miao-jia LU,Hao LI. Risk factors for autonomous vehicle road testing based on risk-avoiding disengagement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(7): 1935-1943.
[2]	Zhao-zheng HU,Xun-pei SUN,Jia-nan ZHANG,Ge HUANG,Yu-ting LIU. Vehicle-infrastructure-map cooperative localization method based on spatial-temporal graph model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1246-1257.
[3]	Qing-jin XU,Rui FU,Ying-shi GUO,Fu-wei WU. Roadside prediction method for truck rollover on the curve [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1302-1310.
[4]	Can-can SONG,Di-fei JING,Jun-feng XIE,Ke-xin KANG. Analysis on driving behaviors on flat curved sections of highways with advertising signs [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(5): 1345-1354.
[5]	Jin LI,Yu-tong SUN,Xiao-zhong WEI,Yu-ling JIAO. Design of bus priority signal considering flexible lane setting [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 448-456.
[6]	Wen-yong LI,Cong-ruo MA,Qing-wei HU,Cheng-kun LIU,Guan LIAN,Guo-bin GU,Dan ZHOU. Bus speed guidance model based on station capacity limit and section green wave control [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(11): 3088-3103.
[7]	SONG Da-feng, WU Xi-tao, ZENG Xiao-hua, YANG Nan-nan, LI Wen-yuan. Life cycle cost analysis of mild hybrid heavy truck based on theoretical fuel consumption model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1313-1323.
[8]	XU Hong-feng, GAO Shuang-shuang, ZHENG Qi-ming, ZHANG Kun. Hybrid dynamic lane operation at signalized intersection [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 430-439.
[9]	WANG Hai-wei, WEN Hui-ying, LIU Min. Experimental evaluation of nighttime driver's physiological characteristics in driving simulator [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 420-428.
[10]	JIANG Gui-yan, LIU Bin, SUI Xiao-yan, MA Ming-fang. Real time information collection of passenger flow in public transportation based on bus IC card charging system [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 1076-1082.
[11]	LI Shi-wu, XU Yi, SUN Wen-cai, WANG Lin-hong, GUO Meng-zhu, CHAI Meng. Pupil diameter based construction conflict self-feedback discrimination method [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(2): 418-425.
[12]	ZHAO Shu-zhi, LIANG Shi-dong, MA Ming-hui, LIU Hua-sheng, ZHU Yong-gang. Real-time queue length estimation at signalized intersection [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(1): 85-91.
[13]	ZHU Jin-cheng, XIAO Feng, SHUAI Bin, LIU Xiao-bo. Impact and feasibility of charging taxis in pricing zone [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 89-96.
[14]	ZHAO Shu-zhi, TIAN Qing-fei, CAO Yang. Transit efficiency network design model based on the restriction of station capacity [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊1): 81-84.
[15]	HU Hong-yu, WANG Qing-nian, QU Zhao-wei, LI Zhi-hui. Spatial pattern recognition and abnormal traffic behavior detection of moving object [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(6): 1598-1602.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	LI Shoutao, LI Yuanchun. Autonomous Mobile Robot Control Algorithm Based on Hierarchical Fuzzy Behaviors in Unknown Environments[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2005, 35(04): 391 -397 .
[2]	Liu Qing-min，Wang Long-shan，Chen Xiang-wei，Li Guo-fa. Ball nut detection by machine vision[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(04): 534 -538 .
[3]	Li Hong-ying; Shi Wei-guang;Gan Shu-cai. Electromagnetic properties and microwave absorbing property of Z type hexaferrite Ba_3-xLa_xCo₂Fe₂₄O₄₁[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(06): 856 -0860 .
[4]	Yang Shu-kai, Song Chuan-xue, An Xiao-juan, Cai Zhang-lin . Analyzing effects of suspension bushing elasticity on vehicle yaw response character with virtual prototype method[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(05): 994 -0999 .
[5]	. [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(06): 1284 -1287 .
[6]	Che Xiang-jiu，Liu Da-you，Wang Zheng-xuan . Construction of joining surface with G¹ continuity for two NURBS surfaces[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(04): 838 -841 .
[7]	Liu Han-bing, Jiao Yu-ling, Liang Chun-yu,Qin Wei-jun . Effect of shape function on computing precision in meshless methods[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(03): 715 -0720 .
[8]	Zhang Quan-fa，Li Ming-zhe，Sun Gang，Ge Xin . Comparison between flexible and rigid blank-holding in multi-point forming[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(01): 25 -30 .
[9]	. [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(04): 0 .
[10]	Li Yue-ying，Liu Yong-bing，Chen Hua . Surface hardening and tribological properties of a cam materials[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(05): 1064 -1068 .

参数	柴油公共汽车	纯电动公共汽车
尺寸/mm	12 000×2 550×3 150	12 000×2 550×3 290
整备质量/kg	11 600	13 000
动力源	柴油	锂离子动力电池
动力电池质量/kg	—	1 324.5
电池容量/（kW·h）	—	210.56
附加电源	铅蓄电池	铅蓄电池
附加电源质量/kg	28	28

系统	质量/kg
系统	柴油公共汽车	纯电动公共汽车
车身	6 026	5 677.3
动力总成系统	1 775	521.6
传动系统/齿轮箱	731	638.7
底盘（不含电池）	2 946.4	2 774.4
牵引电机	—	1 040.5
电子控制器	—	654

系统	原材料	质量/kg	系统	原材料	质量/kg
车身	钢	4007	传动系统	钢	219.2
	普通塑料	1 331.6		普通塑料	36.5
	玻璃	270		锻造铝	219.2
	铜	116.6		铸铁	219.2
	锻造铝	190.2	底盘	橡胶 —	36.5 —
	橡胶	110.6		橡胶 —	36.5 —
动力总成系统	钢	752.5		钢	1968.2
	锻造铝	85.2		铸铝	548
	铸铝	395.8		锻造铝	44.2
	铜	120.7		铜	38.3
	橡胶	39		普通塑料	67.8
	普通塑料	337.2		橡胶	271.1
	玻璃纤维增强塑料	44.4		镁 —	8.8 —

系统	原材料	质量/kg	系统	原材料	质量/kg
车身	钢	3776.6	传动系统	钢	388
	普通塑料	1254		铜	121.2
	玻璃	257		锻造铝	128.2
	铜	109.8		普通塑料	1.3
	锻造铝	177.6	底盘	钢	1856.3
	橡胶	102.3		铸铝	516.9
动力总成系统	钢	260.8		锻造铝	41.9
	铜	106.9		铜	36.8
	普通塑料	159.9		镁	2.8
牵引电机	钢	544.1		橡胶	254.4
	不锈钢	12		普通塑料	65.3
	铸铝	343.7	电子控制器	玻璃纤维	4.5
	铜	110.5		镍	1.1
	钕（镝）铁硼磁铁	30.2		尼龙	0.5
电子控制器	钢	18.5		PET	20.1
	铸铝	357.9		聚丙烯	28.8
	铜	183.6		聚氨酯	14.3
	橡胶	7.4		锌	7.4
	普通塑料	6.5		—	—
	氧化铝	1.8		—	—
	环氧树脂	1.6		—	—

材料	质量/kg	材料	质量/kg
锰酸锂	331	LiPF₆	12
石墨	188.1	钢	321.9
铜	98	不锈钢	58.3
锻造铝	160.3	乙二醇	42.1

Carbon emissions calculation for urban buses throughout lifecycles

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)