吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (增刊1): 135-138.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Structure reliability analysis based on Fourier orthogonal neural network response surface method

MENG Guang-wei1,2, LI Guang-bo2, ZHOU Zhen-ping2, ZHOU Li-ming2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China;
    2. College of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
  • Received:2011-12-07 Online:2012-09-01 Published:2012-09-01

Abstract: Fourier orthogonal neural network response surface method was used to estimate the failure probability of structure. Based on numerical approximation principle, a special feed-forward neural network using Fourier orthogonal polynomial activation function was proposed. A pseudo-inverse of random variable input matrix was used to determine the network weights without iterative training. The failure probability was calculated by Fourier orthogonal neural network response surface method instead of traditional polynomial response surface method. The numerical analysis shows that the proposed method is effective, meanwhile the formula of the proposed method is simple and easy to programming, providing a new method for solving the structure reliability analysis.

Key words: structure reliability, Fourier orthogonal basis, neural network, response surface method, generalized inverse matrix

CLC Number: 

  • TB114.3
[1] 赵国藩. 工程结构可靠性理论与应用[M]. 大连:大连理工大学出版社,1996.

[2] Guan X L,Melchers R E. Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates[J]. Structural Safety,2001,23(4): 429-444.

[3] Gupta S,Manohar C S. An improved response surface method for the determination of failure probability and importance measures[J]. Structural Safety,2004,26(2):123-139.

[4] Gavin H P,Yau S C. High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety,2008,30(2): 162-179.

[5] Irfan Kaymaz,Chris A McMahon. A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics,2005,20(1): 11-17.

[6] Gomes H M,Awruch A M. Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety,2004,26(1): 49-67.

[7] 阎宏生,胡云昌,牛勇. 基于神经网络响应面的结构可靠性分析方法研究[J]. 海洋工程,2002,20(2):1-6. Yan Hong-sheng, Hu Yun-chang, Niu Yong. Approximate structural reliability analysis based on NN-RSM[J]. The Ocean Engineering,2002,20(2):1-6.

[8] Deng J,Gu D S,Li X B,et al. Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network[J]. Structural Safety,2005,27(1):25-48.

[9] Emad W Saad,Donald C Wunsch II. Neural network explanation using inversion[J]. Neural Networks,2007,20(1): 78-93.

[10] Ashit Talukder,David Casasen. A closed-form neural network for discriminatory feature extraction from high-dimensional data[J]. Neural Networks,2001,14(9): 1201-1218.
[1] XI Li-he,ZHANG Xin,SUN Chuan-yang,WANG Ze-xing,JIANG Tao. Adaptive energy management strategy for extended range electric vehicle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1636-1644.
[2] JIANG Tao,LIN Xue-dong,LI De-gang,YANG Miao,TANG Xue-lin. Effect of control parameters on heat release rate with ANN method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1747-1754.
[3] XU Yan,SUN Mei-shuang. Enhancing underwater image based on convolutional neural networks [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1895-1903.
[4] GONG Ya-feng, SHEN Yang-fan, TAN Guo-jin, HAN Chun-peng, HE Yu-long. Unconfined compressive strength of fiber soil with different porosity [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 712-719.
[5] LI Xiong-fei, FENG Ting-ting, LUO Shi, ZHANG Xiao-li. Automatic music composition algorithm based on recurrent neural network [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 866-873.
[6] DI Xiao-qiang, WANG Ying-zheng, LI Jin-qing, CONG Li-gang, QI Hui. Video encryption method based on hyperchaos of quantum cellular neural networks [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 919-928.
[7] WANG Fang-shi, WANG Jian, LI Bing, WANG Bo. Deep attribute learning based traffic sign detection [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 319-329.
[8] LIU Dong-liang, WANG Qiu-shuang. Instantaneous velocity extraction method on NGSLM data [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 330-335.
[9] XIE Zhi-jiang, WU Xiao-yong, FAN Nai-ji, GUO Zong-huan, YUAN Yue-jun, WANG Kang. Kinematics analysis of a precision assembly platform of SG-III [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1504-1511.
[10] MA Miao, LI Yi-bin. Multi-level image sequences and convolutional neural networks based human action recognition method [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(4): 1244-1252.
[11] WANG De-jun, LYU Zhi-chao, WANG Qi-ming, ZHANG Xian-da, WANG Zi-jian. Engine misfire fault diagnosis based on cylinder pressure identification [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3): 917-923.
[12] HUANG Xuan, GUO Li-hong, LI Jiang, YU Yang. Target threat assessment based on BP neural network optimized by modified particle swarm optimization [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3): 996-1002.
[13] LI Lin-hui, LUN Zhi-mei, LIAN Jing, YUAN Lu-shan, ZHOU Ya-fu, MA Xiao-yi. Convolution neural network-based vehicle detection method [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 384-391.
[14] WANG Qing-nian, DUAN Ben-ming, WANG Peng-yu, GONG Yin-sheng, ZHU Qing-lin. Optimization of powertrain transmission parameters of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 1-7.
[15] GUO Ying-shi, FU Rui, ZHAO Kai, MA Yong, YUAN Wei. Evaluation and test of real-time identification models of driver's lane change intention [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(6): 1836-1844.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!