Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 1405-1413.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200280

Previous Articles    

Real-time torque tracking control based on BPNN online learning prediction model

Yan-hua DONG1(),Jing-wei LIU1,2,Jing-hua ZHAO1,3(),Liang LI1,Fang-xi XIE3   

  1. 1.College of Computer，Jilin Normal University，Siping 136000，China
    2.College of Information Technology，Changchun Finance College，Changchun 130028，China
    3.State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control，Jilin University，Changchun 130022，China
  • Received:2020-04-28 Online:2021-07-01 Published:2021-07-14
  • Contact: Jing-hua ZHAO E-mail:computerdyp@jlnu.edu.cn;zhaojh08@mails.jlu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 6   

PDF (PC)

176

Abstract:

An online learning prediction model for fuel injection based on a large amount of experimental data is designed by utilizing back propagation neural network (BPNN), and a real-time torque tracking controller consisting of the BPNN predictive feedforward and a PID feedback is proposed. A simplified and discretized real-time model is adopted in the BPNN prediction model. The threshold value of the BPNN prediction model with parameter adaptability can be learned and updated online. Several experimental results show that the BPNN prediction model with online variable threshold proposed in this paper has higher prediction accuracy comparing with the model with fixed threshold, and that the torque tracking controller proposed in this paper can satisfy the real-time control requirement and has smaller error rate under the transient condition comparing with the PID controller.

Key words: back-propagation neural network （BPNN）, artificial intelligence, parameter adaptation, torque tracking control

CLC Number: 

  • TP399

Fig.1

BPNN prediction model structure of fuel injection"

Fig.2

Data set of speed， torque， and fuel injection"

Fig.3

Error sensitivity analysis for neurons number of hidden layer"

Fig.4

Linear regression analysis for the model"

Fig.5

Part of working conditions of FTP75"

Fig.6

Prediction effect of fuel injection BPNN model under FTP75 condition"

Fig.7

Tracking effect comparison of torque step target"

Fig.8

Zoom in of Fig.7"

Fig.9

Tracking effect comparison of torque sine target"

Fig.10

Zoom in of Fig.9"

Table 1

Error analysis of torque tracking"

误差指标阶跃扭矩目标工况正弦扭矩目标工况
MADRMSEMADRMSE
PID2.15184.60004.39725.3276
BPNN?PID1.68854.01382.62583.5417

Fig.11

VTBPNN-PID torque tracking control system"

Fig.12

Prediction effect of fuel injection VTBPNN model under FTP75 condition"

Fig.13

Tracking effect comparison of torque transient target"

Fig.14

Zoom in of Fig.13"

Fig.15

Error comparison of torque tracking"

Fig.16

Zoom in of Fig.15"

1 Liu B, Wang R, Zhao G, et al. Prediction of rock mass parameters in the TBM tunnel based on BP neural network integrated simulated annealing algorithm[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020,95(c):103103-103103.
2 Moskwa J J, Hedrick J K. Modeling and validation of automotive engines for control algorithm development[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of The ASME, 1992, 114(2): 278-285.
3 Hirahara H, Yoshida K, Iwase M, et al. Torque estimation based on nonlinear engine model considering crankshaft torsion[C]∥IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Piscataway, USA,2010: 682-687.
4 Anjum R, Yar A, Yousufzai I K, et al. Second order sliding mode based speed tracking control for torque management of gasoline engines[C]∥Asian Control Conference, Kitakyushu-shi, Japan,2019: 555-560.
5 Anjum R, Yar A, Bhatti A I, et al. Dual loop speed tracking control for torque management of gasoline engines[C]∥European Control Conference, Naples, Italy,2019: 3084-3089.
6 陈虹,郭露露,宫洵,等. 智能时代的汽车控制[J]. 自动化学报, 2020, 46(7): 1313-1332.
Chen Hong, Guo Lu-lu, Gong Xun, et al. Automotive control in the age of intelligence[J]. Journal of Automation, 2020, 46(7): 1313-1332.
7 Zhao J, Hu Y, Gao B, et al. Sequential optimization of eco-driving taking into account fuel economy and emissions[J]. IEEE Access,2019,7:130841-130853.
8 Park J, Choi S B, Oh J, et al. Adaptive torque tracking control during slip engagement of a dry clutch in vehicle powertrain[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019,134: 249-266.
9 Kang M, Shen T. Modeling and optimal control for torque tracking of spark-ignition engines with low pumping loss[C]∥Chinese Control Conference, Chendu, China, 2016: 8956-8961.
10 Vuelvas J, Archbold G, Ruiz F. MPC Weighted sum approach applied to torque tracking and CO2emission reduction on engines[C]∥ IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC), Cartagena, Colombia, 2017: 1-6.
11 Bouvenot J B,Andlauer B,Stabat P,et al. Gas stirling engine µ CHP boiler experimental data driven model for building energy simulation[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2014, 84: 117-131.
12 尤晓东,苏崇宇,汪毓铎. BP神经网络算法改进综述[J]. 民营科技,2018, 23(4):146-147.
You Xiao-dong,Su Cong-yu,Wang Yu-duo. Summary of improvement of BP neural network algorithm[J]. Private Technology, 2018,23(4):146-147.
13 Ong C K,Yao T K, Alfred R, et al. A Comparison of BPNN,RBF, and ENN in Number Plate Recognition[C]∥ Second International Conference on Soft Computing in Data Science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,2016: 37-47.
14 He J, Yang W, Wang J, et al. Fast HEVC coding unit decision based on BP-neural network[J]. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 2015, 8(4): 289-300.
15 Venayagamoorthy G K, Rohrig K, Erlich I. One step ahead: short-term wind power forecasting and intelligent predictive control based on data analytics[J]. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, 2012, 10(5): 70-78.
16 Rahman M A, Hoque M A. On-line adaptive artificial neural net-work based vector control of permanent magnet synchronous motors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 1998, 13 (4):311-318.
17 Hu Y, Chen H, Wang P, et al. Nonlinear model predictive controller design based on learning model for turbocharged gasoline engine of passenger vehicle[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018,109: 74-88.
[1] Ya-hui ZHAO,Fei-yang YANG,Zhen-guo ZHANG,Rong-yi CUI. Korean text structure discovery based on reinforcement learning and attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(4): 1387-1395.
[2] Fu-hua SHANG,Mao-jun CAO,Cai-zhi WANG. Local outlier data mining based on artificial intelligence technology [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 692-696.
[3] Hai-ying ZHAO,Wei ZHOU,Xiao-gang HOU,Xiao-li ZHANG. Double-layer annotation of traditional costume images based on multi-task learning [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(1): 293-302.
[4] Dan-tong OUYANG,Cong MA,Jing-pei LEI,Sha-sha FENG. Knowledge graph embedding with adaptive sampling [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 685-691.
[5] Yi-bin LI,Jia-min GUO,Qin ZHANG. Methods and technologies of human gait recognition [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 1-18.
[6] Qian XU,Ying LI,Gang WANG. Pedestrian-vehicle detection based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1661-1667.
[7] Wan-fu GAO,Ping ZHANG,Liang HU. Nonlinear feature selection method based on dynamic change of selected features [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(4): 1293-1300.
[8] Dan⁃tong OUYANG,Jun XIAO,Yu⁃xin YE. Distant supervision for relation extraction with weakconstraints of entity pairs [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(3): 912-919.
[9] GU Hai-jun, TIAN Ya-qian, CUI Ying. Intelligent interactive agent for home service [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1578-1585.
[10] DONG Sa, LIU Da-you, OUYANG Ruo-chuan, ZHU Yun-gang, LI Li-na. Logistic regression classification in networked data with heterophily based on second-order Markov assumption [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1571-1577.
[11] WANG Xu, OUYANG Ji-hong, CHEN Gui-fen. Measurement of graph similarity based on vertical dimension sequence dynamic time warping method [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1199-1205.
[12] ZHANG Hao, ZHAN Meng-ping, GUO Liu-xiang, LI Zhi, LIU Yuan-ning, ZHANG Chun-he, CHANG Hao-wu, WANG Zhi-qiang. Human exogenous plant miRNA cross-kingdom regulatory modeling based on high-throughout data [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1206-1213.
[13] LI Xiong-fei, FENG Ting-ting, LUO Shi, ZHANG Xiao-li. Automatic music composition algorithm based on recurrent neural network [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 866-873.
[14] LIU Jie, ZHANG Ping, GAO Wan-fu. Feature selection method based on conditional relevance [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 874-881.
[15] HUANG Lan, JI Lin-ying, YAO Gang, ZHAI Rui-feng, BAI Tian. Construction of disease-symptom semantic net for misdiagnosis prompt [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 859-865.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd