Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 159-169.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210557
Shun LIU1,2(),Xiao-wei TANG1(),Yi-xiao LUAN1
CLC Number:
1 | Liu H, Song E. Seismic response of large underground structures in liquefiable soils subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2005, 32(4): 223-244. |
2 | Zhuang H, Hu Z, Wang X, et al. Seismic responses of a large underground structure in liquefied soils by FEM numerical modelling[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13(12): 3645-3668. |
3 | 胡记磊,刘华北. 改进碎石排水措施的地铁结构液化上浮响应数值试验[J]. 隧道建设, 2017, 37(): 82-86. |
Hu Ji-lei, Liu Hua-bei. Numerical experiment of liquefaction induced uplift response of metro station by improved gravelly soil method[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2017, 37(Sup.2):82-86. | |
4 | Park D, Hashash Y M A. Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 8(2): 249-274. |
5 | Kwok A O L, Stewart J P, Hashash Y M A, et al. Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear seismic ground response analysis procedures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1385-1398. |
6 | Hardyniec A, Charney F. An investigation into the effects of damping and nonlinear geometry models in earthquake engineering analysis[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(15): 2695-2715. |
7 | 邹德高,徐斌,孔宪京. 瑞利阻尼系数确定方法对高土石坝地震反应的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3): 797-803. |
Zou De-gao, Xu-Bin, Kong Xian-jing. Study of influence of different methods for calculating rayleigh damping coefficient on high earth rock dam seismic response[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(3):797-803. | |
8 | 王豪,高广运,杨成斌. 瑞利阻尼对砂土场地非线性地震响应的影响分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 2016, 38(6): 909-915. |
Wang Hao, Gao Guang-yun, Yang Cheng-bin. Influence of rayleigh damping on nonlinear seismic response of sand sites[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 206, 38(6): 909-915. | |
9 | Tang X W, Shao Q. Numerical simulation on seismic liquefaction by adaptive mesh refinement due to two recovered fields in error estimation[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 49: 109-121. |
10 | Tang X W, Zhang X W, Uzuoka R. Novel adaptive time stepping method and its application to soil seismic liquefaction analysis[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 71: 100-113. |
11 | Uzuoka R. Analytical study on the mechanical behavior and prediction of soil liquefaction and flow[D]. Gifu: Gifu University, 2000. |
12 | Oka F, Yashima A, Shibata T, et al. FEM-FDM coupled liquefaction analysis of a porous soil using an elasto-plastic model[J]. Applied Scientific Research, 1994, 52(3): 209-245. |
13 | Idriss I M, Lysmer J R H. QUAD4: a computer program for evaluating the seismic response of soil structures by variable damping finite element procedures[R]. Berkeley: University of California, 1973. |
14 | Yoshida N, Kobayashi S, Suetomi I, et al. Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping[J]. Soil dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(3): 205-222. |
15 | Sun Q, Dias D. Significance of Rayleigh damping in nonlinear numerical seismic analysis of tunnels[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 115: 489-494. |
16 | Oka F, Yashima A, Tateishi A, et al. A cyclic elasto-plastic constitutive model for sand considering a plastic-strain dependence of the shear modulus[J]. Géotechnique, 1999, 49(5): 661-680. |
17 | Matsuo O, Shimazu T, Uzuoka R, et al. Numerical analysis of seismic behavior of embankments founded on liquefiable soils[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(2): 21-39. |
[1] | Ying-xin HUI,Jia-wei CHEN. Squeezed branch pile groups optimization method based on improved genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(7): 2089-2098. |
[2] | Liang TANG,Pan SI,Jie CUI,Xian-zhang LING,Xiao-feng MAN. Pseudo-static analysis method of pile group earthquake response in liquefying mild inclined sloping ground [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 847-855. |
[3] | Ping JIANG,Lin ZHOU,Tian-hao MAO,Jun-ping YUAN,Wei WANG,Na LI. Damage model and time effect of cement⁃modified waste slurry [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(12): 2874-2882. |
[4] | Fei ZHANG,Yu-ming ZHU,Shang-chuan YANG,Shu-mao WANG. Emission mitigation analysis of geosynthetic⁃reinforced walls [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 631-637. |
[5] | Wen-bin TAO,Jun-ling HOU,Tie-lin CHEN,Bin TANG. Mechanical analysis of full⁃length anchorage with high pretension post⁃tensioning method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 631-640. |
[6] | Deng-hui GAO,Yi-chuan XING,Min-xia GUO,Ai-jun ZHANG,Xian-tao WANG,Bao-hong MA. Modified hyperbola model of interface between unsaturated remolded loess and concrete [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 156-164. |
[7] | GU Hai-dong,LUO Chun-hong. Experiment on soil arching effect of pit supporting structure with scattered row piles and soil nail wall [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1712-1724. |
|