Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1638-1649.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20221511

Previous Articles    

Analysis of transient wind⁃induced response of long⁃span bridge under nonstationary wind field

Yu FENG1(),Jian-ming HAO1,2(),Feng WANF1,2,Jiu-peng ZHANG1,Xiao-ming HUANG3   

  1. 1.School of Highway，Chang'an University，Xi'an 710064，China
    2.Wind Tunnel Laboratory，Chang'an University，Xi'an 710064，China
    3.School of Transportation，Southeast University，Nanjing 211189，China
  • Received:2022-11-25 Online:2023-06-01 Published:2023-07-23
  • Contact: Jian-ming HAO E-mail:Rainingfeng@chd.edu.cn;jianminghao@chd.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 2   

PDF (PC)

386

Abstract:

To study the influence of transient effects of nonstationary wind field on wind-induced bridge response， the nonstationary wind field was simulated based on the Hilbert spectrum， and the wind field spatial correlation was introduced by the Cholesky decomposition. The 2-D indicial response function was applied to the nonstationary wind-induced bridge buffeting response analysis method considering the transient effects. The Hilbert spectrum was obtained from the measured data of downburst and typhoon to reappear the real downburst/typhoon wind field with high accuracy. A long-span suspension bridge was selected to implement the nonstationary buffeting response analysis， the influence of transient effects embedded in nonstationary wind field on the aerodynamics and buffeting response of the bridge was discussed. The results show that the downburst presents significant nonstationarity， and the time-varying mean wind-induced transient effects significantly modify the aerodynamics of the wind-bridge interaction system， which exerts a significant impact on the indicial response function and buffeting response of long-span bridges. However， the time-varying mean wind-induced transient effects are insignificant in typhoon case， and the influence on the aerodynamics and the buffeting response is almost negligible.

Key words: bridge engineering, transient effects, nonstationary wind field, buffeting, long-span bridges

CLC Number: 

  • U442

Fig.1

Schematic diagram of discrete convolution integrals under nonstationary wind speed case"

Fig.2

Wind field simulation based on Hilbert spectrum"

Fig.3

Nonstationary wind speed time history and mean wind"

Fig.4

Simulations of fluctuating wind"

Fig.5

Hilbert spectrum of downburst"

Fig.6

Hilbert spectrum of typhoon"

Fig.7

Schematic diagram of example bridge （Unit： m）"

Fig.8

Finite element model of example bridge"

Table 1

Modal properties of example bridge"

模态阶次振型特点频率相对误差/%
本文风洞试验本文风洞试验
1一阶正对称横弯一阶正对称横弯0.048 9000.049 411.03
2一阶反对称竖弯一阶反对称竖弯0.087 9100.087 950.05
3一阶反对称横弯一阶反对称横弯0.122 3410.121 740.49
4一阶正对称竖弯一阶正对称竖弯0.125 1180.123 761.10
5二阶正对称竖弯二阶正对称竖弯0.1704010.168 551.10
6二阶反对称竖弯二阶反对称竖弯0.187 9920.185 591.29
7主缆振动主缆振动0.212 4800.207 312.49
8主缆振动主缆振动0.212 6100.215 371.28
9扭转扭转0.217 0200.218 920.87
10主缆振动主缆振动0.220 1800.219 960.10

Table 2

Parameters of aeroelastic indicial response function"

参数a1a2a3b1b2b3
φLh

-3.669

E-01

-1.288E+02

1.302

E+02

3.721

E+00

1.293

E-01

1.271

E-01

φLα

1.280

E+04

7.918

E+00

-1.280E+04

3.218

E-01

5.282

E-01

3.219

E-01

φMh

1.663

E+02

-1.826E-04-1.656E+02

1.142

E-02

1.051

E+00

1.121

E-02

φMα

2.752

E-01

1.348

E+03

-1.348E+03

6.814

E-01

1.691

E-01

1.692

E-01

Fig.9

Self-excitation step response function"

Fig.10

Aerodynamic indicial response function"

Fig.11

Downburst-induced buffeting response at mid-span of the bridge"

Fig.12

Typhoon-induced buffeting response at mid-span of the bridge"

Fig.13

Downburst-induced buffeting response RMS at mid-span of the bridge"

Fig.14

Typhoon-induced buffeting response RMS at mid-span of the bridge"

1 陶天友, 王浩, 姚程渊. 非平稳风速的 HHS 时频状态表征[J]. 振动工程学报, 2019, 32(1): 49-55.
Tao Tian-you, Wang Hao, Yao Cheng-yuan. HHS-based time-frequency characterization of non-statioanry wind velocities[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2019, 32(1): 49-55.
2 Hao J, Wu T. Downburst-induced transient response of a long-span bridge: a CFD-CSD-based hybrid approach[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 179: 273-286.
3 Chen L, Letchford C W. Proper orthogonal decomposition of two vertical profiles of full-scale nonstationary downburst wind speeds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2005, 93(3): 187-216.
4 Xu Y L, Chen J. Characterizing nonstationary wind speed using empirical mode decomposition[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(6): 912-920.
5 Huang G, Su Y, Kareem A, et al. Time-frequency analysis of nonstationary process based on multivariate empirical mode decomposition[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 142(1): No.04015065.
6 Su Y, Huang G, Xu Y L. Derivation of time-varying mean for non-stationary downburst winds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2015, 141: 39-48.
7 Priestley M B. Evolutionary spectra and non‐stationary processes[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1965, 27(2): 204-229.
8 Deodatis G. Non-stationary stochastic vector processes: seismic ground motion applications[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1996, 11(3): 149-167.
9 Huang G. An efficient simulation approach for multivariate nonstationary process: hybrid of wavelet and spectral representation method[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 37: 74-83.
10 Li Y, Kareem A. Simulation of multivariate nonstationary random processes by FFT[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1991, 117(5): 1037-1058.
11 Xu Y L, Hu L, Kareem A. Conditional simulation of nonstationary fluctuating wind speeds for long-span bridges[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 140(1): 61-73.
12 Wen Y, Gu P. Description and simulation of nonstationary processes based on Hilbert spectra[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(8): 942-951.
13 Wang H, Wu T. Hilbert-wavelet-based nonstationary wind field simulation: a multiscale spatial correlation scheme[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 144(8): No.04018063.
14 Kareem A. Numerical simulation of wind effects: a probabilistic perspective[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(10/11): 1472-1497.
15 Cao B, Sarkar P P. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of a long-span bridge to assess its vulnerability to non-synoptic wind[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 84: 67-75.
16 Butler K, Cao S, Kareem A, et al. Surface pressure and wind load characteristics on prisms immersed in a simulated transient gust front flow field[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(6/7): 299-316.
17 Shirato H, Maeta K, Kato Y, et al. Transient drag force on 2-D bluff bodies under gusty wind condition[C]∥7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Taipei, China, 2009: 1-8.
18 Hu L, Xu Y L, Huang W F. Typhoon-induced non-stationary buffeting response of long-span bridges in complex terrain[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 57: 406-415.
19 Chen X. Analysis of multimode coupled buffeting response of long-span bridges to nonstationary winds with force parameters from stationary wind[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(4): No.04014131.
20 Hao J, Wu T. Nonsynoptic wind-induced transient effects on linear bridge aerodynamics[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 143(9): No. 04017092.
21 陶天友, 王浩. 大跨度桥梁主梁节段模型非平稳抖振时域模拟与分析[J]. 振动工程学报, 2019, 32(5): 830-836.
Tao Tian-you, Wang Hao. Time-domain simulation and analysis of nonstationary buffeting responses of girder section model of a long-span bridge[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2019, 32(5): 830-836.
22 Wu T, Kareem A. Revisiting convolution scheme in bridge aerodynamics: comparison of step and impulse response functions[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 140(5): No.04014008.
23 Scanlan R H, Béliveau J G, Budlong K S. Indicial aerodynamic functions for bridge decks[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1974, 100(4): 657-672.
24 Gabor D. Theory of communication. Part 1: the analysis of information[J]. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers-part III: Radio and Communication Engineering, 1946, 93(26): 429-441.
25 Boashash B. Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. I. Fundamentals[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1992, 80(4): 520-538.
26 Olhede S, Walden A. The Hilbert spectrum via wavelet projections[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2004, 460(2044): 955-975.
27 Wang L, Mccullough M, Kareem A. A data-driven approach for simulation of full-scale downburst wind speeds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2013, 123: 171-190.
28 Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1998, 454(1971): 903-995.
29 Wu T. Simulation of nonstationary wind velocity field utilizing multi-scale spatial correlation nested Hilbert-wavelet scheme[C]∥14th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2015: 1-16.
30 Zhang S, Solari G, De Gaetano P, et al. A refined analysis of thunderstorm outflow characteristics relevant to the wind loading of structures[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 54: 9-24.
31 Song L, Chen W, Wang B, et al. Characteristics of wind profiles in the landfalling typhoon boundary layer[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 149: 77-88.
32 Chen L, Letchford C. Numerical simulation of extreme winds from thunderstorm downbursts[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007, 95(9-11): 977-990.
33 陈艾荣. 润扬长江公路大桥悬索桥抗风性能试验研究[R]. 上海:同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,2001.
34 Jones R T. The unsteady lift of a wing of finite aspect ratio[R]. Washington DC: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1940.
[1] Chun-li WU,Shi-ming HUANG,Kui LI,Zheng-wei GU,Xiao-ming HUANG,Bing-tao ZHANG,Run-chao YANG. Analysis of pier action effect under flood based on numerical simulation and statistical analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1612-1620.
[2] Guo-jin TAN,Qing-wen KONG,Xin HE,Pan ZHANG,Run-chao YANG,Yang-jun CHAO,Zhong YANG. Bridge scour depth identification based on dynamic characteristics and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1592-1600.
[3] Hui JIANG,Xin LI,Xiao-yu BAI. Review on development of bridge seismic structural systems： from ductility to resilience [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1550-1565.
[4] Zi-yu LIU,Shi-tong CHEN,Mo-mo ZHI,Xiao-ming HUANG,Zhe-xin CHEN. Ultimate bearing capacity of temporary⁃permanent conversion rush⁃repair steel pier for emergency use [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1601-1611.
[5] Yue ZHANG,Chuan-sen LIU,Fei SONG. Influence of abutment back wall on continuous girder bridge's seismic fragility [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(5): 1372-1380.
[6] Shu-wei LAN,Dong-hua ZHOU,Xu CHEN,Nan-ming MO. Practical calculation method for the critical bearing capacity of double column bridge with high piers [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(4): 1105-1111.
[7] Qi-kai SUN,Nan ZHANG,Xiao LIU,Zi-ji ZHOU. Dynamic reduction coefficients of steel⁃concrete composite beam based on Timoshenko beam theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 488-495.
[8] Hua-wen YE,Zhi-chao DUAN,Ji-lin LIU,Yu ZHOU,Bing HAN. Wheel⁃load diffusion effect on orthotropic steel⁃concrete composite bridge deck [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1808-1816.
[9] Li-feng WANG,Zi-wang XIAO,Sai-sai YU. New risk analysis method based on Bayesian network for hanging basker system of multi-tower cable-stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 865-873.
[10] Yan-ling ZHANG,Can WANG,Xu ZHANG,Ang-yang WANG,Yun-sheng LI. Human⁃induced vibration analysis and pedestrian comfort evaluation for suspension footbridge with different hunger systems [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2644-2652.
[11] Chang-jun ZHONG,Zhong-bin WANG,Chen-yang LIU. Influencing factors and structural optimization of main cable saddle bearing capacity of suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
[12] Wei CHEN,Tian-bao WAN,Zhong-bin WANG,Xuan LI,Rui-li SHEN. Design and performance of internal air supply conduit for dehumidification in main cables of suspension bridges [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1749-1755.
[13] Shu-lun GUO,Tie-yi ZHONG,Zhi-gang YAN. Calculation method of buffeting response for stay cables of long⁃span cable⁃stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1756-1762.
[14] Kai GAO,Gang LIU. Effective strength improvement of global critical strength branch and bound method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 597-603.
[15] Ya-feng GONG,Jia-xiang SONG,Guo-jin TAN,Hai-peng BI,Yang LIU,Cheng-xin SHAN. Multi⁃vehicle bridge weigh⁃in⁃motion algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 583-596.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd