Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1601-1611.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20230095

Previous Articles    

Ultimate bearing capacity of temporary⁃permanent conversion rush⁃repair steel pier for emergency use

Zi-yu LIU1,2(),Shi-tong CHEN1,2,3(),Mo-mo ZHI1,2,3,Xiao-ming HUANG4,Zhe-xin CHEN5   

  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center for Performance and Security of Large-scale Infrastructure，Shijiazhuang Tiedao University，Shijiazhuang 050043，China
    2.Hebei Eng. Research Center for Traffic Emergency and Guarantee，Shijiazhuang Tiedao University，Shijiazhuang 050043，China
    3.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures，Shijiazhuang Tiedao University，Shijiazhuang 050043，China
    4.School of Transportation，Southeast University，Nanjing 210096，China
    5.Jinan Kingyue Highway Engineering Company Limited，Jinan 250101，China
  • Received:2023-02-02 Online:2023-06-01 Published:2023-07-23
  • Contact: Shi-tong CHEN E-mail:2202101008@student.stdu.edu.cn;chst@stdu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 1   

PDF (PC)

260

Abstract:

A temporary-permanent conversion rush-repair steel pier was developed. Based on ABAQUS three-dimensional simulation， the selection of main material was determined by analyzing the influence factors of ultimate bearing capacity. On this basis， the ultimate bearing capacity of steel pier structures in non-damaged and damaged state was studied. The results show that， the ultimate load bearing capacity of steel pier decreases with the increase of pier diameter to thickness ratio and increases with the increase of steel strength grade. When steel pier damage position is same， the deeper the damage degree is， the more sensitive the ultimate load coefficient is. When the damage degree of steel pier is same， the closer the damage position is to the bottom， the more significant the influence on the ultimate load coefficient is. In the local segmental damage， compared with material stiffness degradation， with the change of reduction coefficient， the impact of section size reduction and material strength degradation on the ultimate load coefficient is similar and more obvious. In the overall damage， the reduction of cross section size has the greatest effect， followed by material strength degradation and material stiffness degradation.

Key words: bridge engineering, rush-repair steel pier, temporary-permanent conversion, ultimate bearing capacity, emergency use

CLC Number: 

  • U24

Fig.1

Diagram of temporary-permanent conversion rush-repair steel pier"

Fig.2

Space model of emergency repair steel pier"

Fig.3

Schematic diagram of load"

Fig.4

Ultimate load coefficient and ultimate displacement at different diameter to thickness ratios"

Fig.5

Ratio of diameter-thickness to specific gravity of different factors"

Fig.6

Ultimate load factor under different steel materials"

Table 1

Load condition under normal service condition"

工况荷载组合荷载图式
DG1

双孔重载

（ZKH单列）

DG2

双孔重载

（抢修单列）

Fig.7

Ultimate load factor under normal service condition"

Table 2

Load condition under eccentric compressive"

工况荷载组合荷载图式偏压方式
B1

单孔轻载

（ZKH双列）

单压
B2

单孔重载

（ZKH双列）

单压
B3

单孔轻载

（抢修双列）

单压
B4

单孔重载

（抢修双列）

单压
B5

单孔轻载

（ZKH单列）

双压
B6

单孔重载

（ZKH单列）

双压
B7

单孔轻载

（抢修单列）

双压
B8

单孔重载

（抢修单列）

双压

Fig.8

Ultimate load factor under unidirectional eccentric compressive behavior"

Fig.9

Ultimate load factor under bidirectional eccentric compressive behavior"

Fig.10

Ultimate load factor at different damage locations"

Fig.11

Ultimate displacement at different damage locations"

Fig.12

Displacement-live load factor curves at different damage locations"

Fig.13

Boundary failure condition"

Fig.14

Ultimate load factor of missing connection system"

Fig.15

Ultimate load factor and ultimate displacement of local damage"

Fig.16

Ultimate load factor and ultimate displacement of segment damage"

1 张瞩熹. 铁路桥梁抢修器材应急保障能力现状与思考[J]. 国防交通工程与技术, 2020, 18(6): 30-33.
Zhang Zhu-xi. My reflection on the current situation of the emergency support capability of rush-repair equipment of railway bridges[J]. Traffic Engineering and Technology for National Defence, 2020, 18(6): 30-33.
2 陈士通, 刘子玉, 支墨墨. 中国桥墩抢修器材现状及思考[J]. 铁道技术标准: 中英文, 2022, 4(11): 14-19.
Chen Shi-tong, Liu Zi-yu, Zhi Mo-mo. Current situation and thinking on rush-repair equipment for bridge piers in China[J]. Railway Technical Standard(Chinese & English), 2022, 4(11): 14-19.
3 刘子玉, 陈士通, 支墨墨. “临-永”转换抢修钢墩应急使用结构稳定因素影响研究[C]∥第31届全国结构工程学术会议, 南宁, 中国,2022: 176-185.
4 杨绿峰, 赵玉峰, 解威威. 方形钢管混凝土框架二阶效应下极限承载力的高效线弹性迭代分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55(2): 1-10.
Yang Lü-feng, Zhao Yu-feng, Xie Wei-wei. Linear elastic iteration with high efficiency for ultimate bearing capacity of square-profile CFST frame with second order effect[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2022, 55(2): 1-10.
5 Iman M. The old derrick steel truss structure in linear buckling analysis(eigenvalue)[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 832(1): No.12027.
6 Aziz H Y, Sultan H K, Abbas B J. Simulation and style design of bridge stability supported on large diameter piles[J]. MMEP, 2021, 8(6): 961-966.
7 Khaled O, Kathryn F, Deniel P, et al. An in vitro evaluation of resonant frequency analysis to measure fixed bridge stability[J]. BDJ Open, 2015, 1(1): No.15001.
8 钟昌均, 王忠彬, 柳晨阳. 悬索桥主索鞍承载力影响因素及结构优化[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
Zhong Chang-jun, Wang Zhong-bin, Liu Chen-yang. Influencing factors and structural optimization of main cable saddle bearing capacity of suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
9 Song Guo-hua, Li Ming-hui, Che De-lu. Geometrically nonlinear stability of curved continuous rigid frame bridges with initial high pier imperfections at largest cantilever stage[J]. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2019, 11(1): 16-22.
10 双超, 周东华, 陈旭, 等. 圆形截面柱二阶承载力的简便计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2020, 50(6): 2178 -2185.
Shuang Chao, Zhou Dong-hua, Chen Xu, et al. Simplified calculation method for second-order bearing capacity of circular section columns[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(6): 2178-2185.
11 王钧利, 贺拴海. 高墩大跨径弯桥在悬臂施工阶段刚构的非线性稳定分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2006(2): 30-34.
Wang Jun-li, He Shuan-hai. Nonlinear stability analysis of long-span curve bridge with high piers during cantilever construction[J]. Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2006(2): 30-34.
12 施洲, 张勇, 张育智, 等. 大跨度铁路下承式钢桁梁柔性拱桥稳定性研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2019, 40(4): 52-58.
Shi Zhou, Zhang Yong, Zhang Yu-zhi, et al. Study on stability of long-span railway through bridge with steel truss girder and flexible arch[J]. China Railway Science, 2019, 40(4): 52-58.
13 王紫超, 杨切. 两节段装配式钢筋混凝土桥墩受压极限承载力研究[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2022, 42(7): 17-22.
Wang Zi-chao, Yang Qie. Research on ultimate bearing capacity of two segment prefabricated reinforced concrete pier under compression[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2022, 42(7): 17-22.
14 顾森华. 混凝土薄壁高墩桥梁结构的稳定性分析及试验研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学建筑工程学院, 2008.
Gu Sen-hua. Experimental research and stability analysis on structure of concrete thin wall-high pier bridge[D]. Hangzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, 2008.
15 熊志洪. 钢管混凝土叠合柱高墩极限承载力有限元分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学建筑工程学院, 2012.
Xiong Zhi-hong. The analysis of the ultimate bearing capacity of concrete filled steel tubular columns high pier[D]. Hangzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, 2012.
16 李海青, 杨万里, 高璇. 预应力混凝土薄壁高墩刚构桥梁极限承载力分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2013, 26(6): 128-134.
Li Hai-qing, Yang Wan-li, Gao Xuan. Analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of pre-stressed concrete frame bridge with high piers[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26(6): 128-134.
17 薛鹏飞, 吴光宇, 汪劲丰. 考虑非线性行为的PC结构桥梁极限承载力分析[J]. 公路, 2011(3): 50-54.
Xue Peng-fei, Wu Guang-yu, Wang Jin-feng. Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of PC structure bridges considering nonlinear behavior[J]. Highway, 2011(3): 50-54.
18 Das D, Ayoub A. Mixed formulation for geometric and material nonlinearity of shear-critical reinforced concrete columns[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 229:No.11587.
19 崔苗苗. 铁路钢桁梁柔性拱桥极限承载力分析研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学土木工程学院, 2011.
Cui Miao-miao. Analysis on ultimate carrying capacity of steel truss beam and flexible arch railway bridge[D]. Chengdu: School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011.
20 赵曼, 陈士通, 孙志星, 等. 128 m大跨度铁路应急钢桁梁极限荷载[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2021, 42(5): 85-93.
Zhao Man, Chen Shi-tong, Sun Zhi-xing, et al. Ultimate load of 128 m large span railway emergency steel truss girder[J]. China Railway Science, 2021, 42(5): 85-93.
21 . 铁路桥涵设计规范 [S].
[1] Guo-jin TAN,Qing-wen KONG,Xin HE,Pan ZHANG,Run-chao YANG,Yang-jun CHAO,Zhong YANG. Bridge scour depth identification based on dynamic characteristics and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1592-1600.
[2] Hui JIANG,Xin LI,Xiao-yu BAI. Review on development of bridge seismic structural systems： from ductility to resilience [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1550-1565.
[3] Yue ZHANG,Chuan-sen LIU,Fei SONG. Influence of abutment back wall on continuous girder bridge's seismic fragility [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(5): 1372-1380.
[4] Shu-wei LAN,Dong-hua ZHOU,Xu CHEN,Nan-ming MO. Practical calculation method for the critical bearing capacity of double column bridge with high piers [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(4): 1105-1111.
[5] Qi-kai SUN,Nan ZHANG,Xiao LIU,Zi-ji ZHOU. Dynamic reduction coefficients of steel⁃concrete composite beam based on Timoshenko beam theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 488-495.
[6] Hua-wen YE,Zhi-chao DUAN,Ji-lin LIU,Yu ZHOU,Bing HAN. Wheel⁃load diffusion effect on orthotropic steel⁃concrete composite bridge deck [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1808-1816.
[7] Li-feng WANG,Zi-wang XIAO,Sai-sai YU. New risk analysis method based on Bayesian network for hanging basker system of multi-tower cable-stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 865-873.
[8] Yan-ling ZHANG,Can WANG,Xu ZHANG,Ang-yang WANG,Yun-sheng LI. Human⁃induced vibration analysis and pedestrian comfort evaluation for suspension footbridge with different hunger systems [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2644-2652.
[9] Jing ZHOU,Ya-jun LI,Wei-feng ZHAO,Zong-jian LUO,Guo-bin BU. Eccentric compression behavior of bamboo⁃plywood and steel⁃tube dual⁃confined dust⁃powder concrete columns [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2096-2107.
[10] Chang-jun ZHONG,Zhong-bin WANG,Chen-yang LIU. Influencing factors and structural optimization of main cable saddle bearing capacity of suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
[11] Wei CHEN,Tian-bao WAN,Zhong-bin WANG,Xuan LI,Rui-li SHEN. Design and performance of internal air supply conduit for dehumidification in main cables of suspension bridges [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1749-1755.
[12] Shu-lun GUO,Tie-yi ZHONG,Zhi-gang YAN. Calculation method of buffeting response for stay cables of long⁃span cable⁃stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1756-1762.
[13] Kai GAO,Gang LIU. Effective strength improvement of global critical strength branch and bound method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 597-603.
[14] Ya-feng GONG,Jia-xiang SONG,Guo-jin TAN,Hai-peng BI,Yang LIU,Cheng-xin SHAN. Multi⁃vehicle bridge weigh⁃in⁃motion algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 583-596.
[15] Qing-wen KONG,Guo-jin TAN,Long-lin WANG,Yong WANG,Zhi-gang WEI,Han-bing LIU. Analysis of free vibration characteristics of cracked box girder bridge based on finite element method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(1): 225-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd