中国陆相油页岩含油率与总有机碳的响应机理

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190309

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 368-377.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190309

• 油页岩成矿与资源评价 • 上一篇下一篇

中国陆相油页岩含油率与总有机碳的响应机理

贾建亮¹, 刘招君², 孟庆涛², 孙平昌², 徐进军³, 柳蓉², 白悦悦⁴

1. 中国地质科学院地质研究所, 北京 100037;
2. 吉林大学地球科学学院, 长春 130061;
3. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院, 青岛 266580;
4. 中国地质科学院地球深部探测中心, 北京 100037

收稿日期:2019-12-25 出版日期:2020-03-26 发布日期:2020-03-31
作者简介:贾建亮(1982-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事石油地质学、沉积地球化学研究,E-mail:jiajl0228@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41772114，41402123）；中国地质调查局项目（DD2019005）；中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项（JYYWF20180901）

Response Mechanism Between Oil Yield and Total Organic Carbon of Non-Marine Oil Shale in China

Jia Jianliang¹, Liu Zhaojun², Meng Qingtao², Sun Pingchang², Xu Jinjun³, Liu Rong², Bai Yueyue⁴

1. Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;
2. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China;
3. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, China;
4. SinoProbe Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China

Received:2019-12-25 Online:2020-03-26 Published:2020-03-31
Supported by:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772114, 41402123), Project of China Geological Survey (DD2019005) and Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (JYYWF20180901)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了建立稳定可靠的利用油页岩总有机碳预测含油率的模型，揭示中国陆相不同成因类型油页岩含油率与总有机碳的内在关系极其重要。通过不同类型盆地油页岩钻井取心测试的关键参数，结合沉积学、有机地球化学、热模拟等学科技术，探讨油页岩含油率与总有机碳的响应机理。结果表明：不同盆地类型与沉积背景下发育的油页岩含油率与总有机碳质量分数均呈现良好的正相关性（R²=0.81~0.97）；中国陆相油页岩的成因类型进一步划分为5种类型，制约着含油率与总有机碳的内在关系；油页岩的升温加热模拟呈现3个失重阶段（温度<150、300~550、600~750℃），明确了含油率与总有机碳参数的物理意义；相同类型盆地与沉积背景下形成的油页岩具有相近的母质生源组合，从而具有大致相当的再生烃效率。中国陆相油页岩成因类型的细划、含油率与总有机碳物理意义的明确、油页岩再生烃能力的分析，有助于理解中国陆相油页岩含油率与总有机碳的内在响应关系。

关键词: 陆相盆地, 油页岩, 含油率, 总有机碳, 成因类型, 热模拟, 生烃效率, 响应机理

Abstract: In order to establish the reliable model between oil yield and total organic carbon (TOC) of oil shale to predict oil yield, it is very important to reveal the response mechanism between oil yield and TOC in different genetic types of oil shale of continental basins. In this paper, the response mechanism between oil yield and TOC in non-marine oil shale was studied by using the key parameters of borehole cores in various types of basins combined with sedimentology, organic geochemistry, and thermal simulation. The results show that an excellent correlation (R²=0.81-0.97) between oil yield and TOC exists in oil shales from different types of basins and sedimentary backgrounds. Firstly, the non-marine oil shale is divided into five genetic types, which control the relationship between oil yield and TOC. Secondly, three weight-loss stages of oil shales were presented during heating simulation, which clarifies the specific physical significance of oil yield and TOC parameters. Finally, the oil shale formed in similar basin and sedimentary background has similar organic matter source, so it has roughly equivalent hydrocarbon regeneration efficiency. The genetic types of non-marine oil shale, the physical significance of oil yield and TOC parameters, and the hydrocarbon regeneration capacity of oil shale were used to understand the internal relationship between oil yield and TOC of non-marine oil shale in China.

Key words: continental basin, oil shale, oil yield, total organic carbon, genetic type, thermal simulation, hydrocarbon generation efficiency, response mechanism

中图分类号:

P618.12

贾建亮, 刘招君, 孟庆涛, 孙平昌, 徐进军, 柳蓉, 白悦悦. 中国陆相油页岩含油率与总有机碳的响应机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 368-377.

Jia Jianliang, Liu Zhaojun, Meng Qingtao, Sun Pingchang, Xu Jinjun, Liu Rong, Bai Yueyue. Response Mechanism Between Oil Yield and Total Organic Carbon of Non-Marine Oil Shale in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 368-377.

参考文献

[1] 贾建亮, 刘招君, 陈永成. 油页岩的地震识别与评价技术[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 46(7):2581-2589. Jia Jianliang, Liu Zhaojun, Chen Yongcheng. A Seismic Technique for Recognition and Evaluation of Oil Shale[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 46(7):2581-2589.
[2] 刘招君, 孟庆涛, 贾建亮. 油页岩成矿作用研究中的关键方法和技术[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(1):133-148. Liu Zhaojun, Meng Qingtao, Jia Jianliang. Key Methods and Technologies in the Study of Oil Shale Mineralization[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(1):133-148.
[3] 贺君玲, 邓守伟, 陈文龙, 等. 利用测井技术评价松辽盆地南部油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(6):909-914. He Junling, Deng Shouwei, Chen Wenlong, et al. Evaluation of Oil Shale in the Southern Songliao Basin Using Logging Techniques[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):909-914.
[4] Jia J L, Liu Z J, Meng Q T, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Oil Shale Based on Well Log and 3-D Seismic Technique in the Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Oil Shale, 2012, 29(2):128-150.
[5] 柳少鹏, 周世新, 王保忠, 等. 烃源岩评价参数与油页岩品质指标内在关系探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(3):561-569. Liu Shaopeng, Zhou Shixin, Wang Baozhong, et al. Relationship Between Industrial Indexes and Source Rock Evaluation Parameters of Oil Shale[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(3):561-569.
[6] 贾建亮. 基于地球化学-地球物理的松辽盆地上白垩统油页岩识别与资源评价[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2012. Jia Jiangliang. Research on the Recognition and Resource Evaluation of the Upper Cretaceous Oil Shale Based on Geochemistry-Geophysics Technique in the Songliao Basin, China[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2012.
[7] 李宝毅, 王建鹏, 徐银波, 等. 断陷和坳陷盆地富有机质泥岩测试参数及研究意义[J]. 世界地质, 2012, 31(4):778-784. Li Baoyi, Wang Jianpeng, Xu Yinbo, et al.Testing Parameters of Organic-Rich Mudstone in Faulted Basin and Depressed Basin and Their Significance[J]. Global Geology, 2012, 31(4):778-784.
[8] Зеленин Н И, Oзеров N M. Справочник по Горючим Сланцам[M]. Л:Недра, 1983.
[9] 刘招君, 孟庆涛, 柳蓉.中国陆相油页岩特征及成因类型[J]. 古地理学报, 2009, 11(1):105-114. Liu Zhaojun, Meng Qingtao, Liu Rong. Characteristics and Genetic Types of Continental Oil Shales in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(1):105-114.
[10] Yu Fengning,Sun Pingchang,Zhao Kang'an,et al. Experimental Constraints on the Evolution of Organic Matter in Oil Shales During Heating:Implications for Enhanced in Situ Oil Recovery from Oil Shales[J/OL]. Fuel, (2019-10-02)[2019-12-23] doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116412.
[11] 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 等. 中国陆相盆地油页岩成因类型及矿床特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2016, 18(4):525-534. Liu Zhaojun, Sun Pingchang, Liu Rong, et al. Genetic Types and Deposit Features of Oil Shale in Continental Basin in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2016, 18(4):525-534.
[12] Bechtel A, Jia J L, Strobl A I S, et al.Palaeoenvironmental Conditions During Deposition of the Upper Cretaceous Oil Shale Sequences in the Songliao Basin (NE China):Implications from Geochemical Analysis[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2012, 46:76-95.
[13] Jia J, Liu Z J, Bechtel A, et al. Tectonic and Climate Control of Oil Shale Deposition in the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation (Songliao Basin, NE China)[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2013, 102(6):1717-1734.
[14] Jia J, Bechtel A, Liu Z J, et al. Oil Shale Formation in the Upper Cretaceous Nenjiang Formation of the Songliao Basin (NE China):Implications from Organic and Inorganic Geochemical Analyses[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 113(4):11-26.
[15] 贾建亮, 刘招君, Achim B, 等. 松辽盆地嫩江组油页岩发育控制因素[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2014, 39(2):174-186. Jia Jianliang, Liu Zhaojun, Achim B, et al.Major Factors Controlling Formation of Oil Shale in Nenjiang Formation of Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2014, 39(2):174-186.
[16] Xu J, Liu Z, Bechtel A, Meng Q T, et al.Basin Evolution and Oil Shale Deposition During Upper Cretaceous in the Songliao Basin (NE China):Implications from Sequence Stratigraphy and Geochemistry[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 149:9-23.
[17] 孙平昌. 松辽盆地东南部上白垩统含油页岩系有机质富集环境动力学[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2013. Sun Pingchang. Environmental Dynamics of Organic Accumulation in the Oil Shale Bearing Layers in the Upper Cretaceous, Southeast Songliao Basin (NE China)[J]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2013.
[18] 王君贤, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 等. 柴北缘鱼卡地区中侏罗统油页岩类型及成矿差异[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2017, 36(4):168-174. Wang Junxian, Liu Zhaojun, Sun Pingchang, et al. Types and Mineralizing Differences for Middle Jurassic Oil Shale in Yuqia Region of North Margin in Qaidam Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2017, 36(4):168-174.
[19] Meng Q T, Sun P C, Liu Z, et al. Characteristic and Accumulation of Middle Jurassic Oil Shale in the Yuqia Area, Northern Qaidam Basin, Northwest China[J]. Oil Shale, 2018, 35(1):1-25.
[20] 曾文人, 孟庆涛, 刘招君, 等.柴北缘团鱼山地区中侏罗统石门沟组油页岩有机地球化学特征及古湖泊条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5):1270-1284. Zeng Wenren, Meng Qingtao, Liu Zhaojun, et al.Organic Geochemical Characteristics and Paleo-Lake Conditions of Oil Shale of Middle Jurassic Shimengou Formation in Tuanyushan Area of Northern Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth science edition), 2019, 49(5):1270-1284.
[21] 孙平昌, 刘招君, 孟庆涛, 等. 桦甸盆地古近纪充填特征及对油页岩成矿的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(7):1110-1116. Sun Pingchang, Liu Zhaojun, Meng Qingtao, et al. Effect of the Basin-Fill Features on Oil Shale Formation in Paleogene, Huadian Basin[J]. Journal of Coal, 2011, 36(7):1110-1116.
[22] 孟庆涛, 刘招君, 胡菲, 等. 桦甸盆地始新世古湖泊生产力与有机质富集机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(5):38-44. Meng Qingtao, Liu Zhaojun, Hu Fei, et al.Productivity of Eocene Ancient Lake and Enrichment Mechanism of Organic Matter in Huadian Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2012, 36(5):38-44.
[23] Sun P C, Sachsenhofer R F, Liu Z J, et al.Organic Matter Accumulation in the Oil Shale-and Coal-Bearing Huadian Basin (Eocene; NE China)[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 105(1):1-15.
[24] Strobl S A I,Sachsenhofer R F, Bechtel A, et al. Deposition of Coal and Oil Shale in NE China:The Eocene Huadian Basin Compared to the Coeval Fushun Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 64(6):347-362.
[25] 刘招君, 杨虎林, 董清水, 等. 中国油页岩[M]. 北京:石油出版社, 2009. Liu Zhaojun, Yang Hulin, Dong Qingshui, et al. Oil Shale in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

中国陆相油页岩含油率与总有机碳的响应机理

Response Mechanism Between Oil Yield and Total Organic Carbon of Non-Marine Oil Shale in China

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘招君, 柳蓉, 孙平昌, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 中国典型盆地油页岩特征及赋存规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 313-325.
[2]	王嗣敏, 臧东升, 王熙琼, 李杰, 韩嵩, 李建中. 辽西建昌盆地油页岩发育特征及沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 326-340.
[3]	孟庆涛, 李金国, 刘招君, 胡菲, 徐川. 茂名盆地羊角含矿区始新统油柑窝组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 356-367.
[4]	宋宇, 刘招君, Achim Bechtel, 徐银波, 孟庆涛, 孙平昌, 朱凯. 老黑山盆地下白垩统穆棱组油页岩与煤含油率控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 378-391.
[5]	郑国栋, 孟庆涛, 刘招君. 松辽盆地北部青一段油页岩地球化学特征及其记录的古湖泊学信息[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 392-404.
[6]	曾文人, 孟庆涛, 刘招君, 徐银波, 孙平昌, 王克兵. 柴北缘团鱼山地区中侏罗统石门沟组油页岩有机地球化学特征及古湖泊条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1270-1284.
[7]	马中良, 王强, 郑伦举, 张彩明. 油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(2): 394-399.
[8]	日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
[9]	马中良, 郑伦举, 赵中熙. 不同边界条件对油页岩原位转化开采的影响及启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 431-441.
[10]	尤金凤, 邢立新, 潘军, 单玄龙, 樊瑞雪, 曹会. 基于Hyperion数据的油砂分布遥感研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1589-1597.
[11]	刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.
[12]	杜佰伟, 谢尚克, 董宇, 彭清华, 郑博. 伦坡拉盆地渐新统丁青湖组油页岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 671-680.
[13]	温志良, 姜福平, 钟长林, 姜雪飞, 王果谦, 齐岩. 松辽盆地东南隆起超大型油页岩矿床特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 681-691.
[14]	郭亮亮, 张延军, 许天福, 金显鹏. 大庆徐家围子不同储层改造的干热岩潜力评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 525-535.
[15]	钱铮, 张松航, 梁宏斌, 唐书恒, 杨宁. 冀中坳陷东北部石炭—二叠系烃源岩生烃潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1332-1341.