吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 31-43.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240676

• 车辆工程·机械工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

电动汽车制动模式切换过程电液协调控制策略

张向文1,2(),王子豪1   

  1. 1.桂林电子科技大学 电子工程与自动化学院,桂林 541004
    2.桂林电子科技大学 智能综合自动化广西高校重点实验室,桂林 541004
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-17 出版日期:2026-01-01 发布日期:2026-02-03
  • 作者简介:张向文(1976-),男,研究员,博士. 研究方向:电动汽车控制技术. E-mail: zxw@guet.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(62263006)

Electro-hydraulic coordinated control strategy for braking mode switching process of electric vehicles

Xiang-wen ZHANG1,2(),Zi-hao WANG1   

  1. 1.School of Electronic Engineering and Automation,Guilin University of Electronic Technology,Guilin 541004,China
    2.Key Laboratory of Intelligence Integrated Automation in Guanxi Universities,Guilin University of Electronic Technology,Guilin 541004,China
  • Received:2024-06-17 Online:2026-01-01 Published:2026-02-03

摘要:

针对在电动汽车复合制动过程中,电机与液压制动系统响应速度存在差异,当两种制动系统切换时会引起冲击,从而影响驾驶舒适性的问题,本文提出了一种应用于制动模式切换过程的电液协调控制策略。通过模糊PID控制液压制动系统,同时通过模型预测控制电机制动系统,并采用海鸥优化算法优化模型预测控制权重系数,消除两种制动系统响应特性的差异。搭建半实物仿真系统平台进行了实验验证,结果显示,在恒制动强度与变制动强度工况下,不同模式切换过程,冲击度至少降低13.9 m/s3,冲击持续时间至少缩短0.15 s,因此,本文设计的控制策略可以实现制动模式切换过程的平稳过渡,提高电动汽车制动的稳定性和舒适性。

关键词: 车辆工程, 复合制动, 电液协调, 模式切换, 冲击度

Abstract:

During the composite braking process of electric vehicles, there is a response speed difference between the motor and the hydraulic braking system, so the switching process between the two braking systems can cause impacts on the vehicle, affecting driving comfort. Therefore, an electro-hydraulic coordinated control strategy is proposed in this paper for braking mode switching process. A fuzzy PID control algorithm is used for the hydraulic braking system, and a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm is used for the motor braking system, and the seagull optimization algorithm is used to optimize the MPC weight coefficients to eliminate the dynamic response difference between the two braking systems. A semi-physical simulation platform was built to verify the designed control strategy. The results show that, under constant and variable braking intensity conditions, the impact degree during different mode switching processes was reduced by at least 13.9 m/s3, and the impact duration was reduced by at least 0.15 s. Therefore, the designed control strategy can achieve a smooth transition during the braking mode switching process and improve the stability and comfort of braking mode switching in the composite braking process of electric vehicles.

Key words: vehicle engineering, composite braking, electro-hydraulic coordination, mode switching, impact degree

中图分类号: 

  • U463.5

表1

汽车结构参数"

载荷状况m/kghg/ma/mb/mL/m
空载141 80.5101.0641.5962.66
满载173 90.5531.2391.4212.66

表2

不同制动强度下的β值"

制动强度z0.20.30.40.50.6
分配系数β0.638 30.657 50.676 70.695 90.715 0

图1

主制动缸等效模型"

图2

活塞制动力与活塞位移之间的关系图"

表3

电机主要参数"

参数数值
额定功率/峰值功率/kW15.7/31.4
峰值转矩/(N?m200
额定转速/最高转速/(r?min-11 500/6 000

图3

动态协调控制结构图"

图4

模糊PID控制器结构示意图"

表4

模糊PID规则库"

E/ECNBNMNSZOPSPMPB
NBPB/NBPB/NBPB/NMPM/NMPB/NSPB/ZOPB/ZO
/PS/NS/NB/NB/NB/NM/PS
NMPB/NBPB/NBPM/NMPM/NSPM/NSPM/ZOPS/ZO
/PS/NS/NB/NM/NM/NS/ZO
NSPM/NBPM/NMPM/NSPS/NSPS/ZOPS/PSPS/PS
/ZO/NS/NM/NM/NS/NS/ZO
ZOPM/NMPM/NMPS/NSZO/ZOPS/PSPM/PMPM/PM
/ZO/NS/NS/NS/NS/NS/ZO
PSPS/NMPS/NSZO/ZOPS/PSPS/PSPM/PMPM/PB
/ZO/ZO/ZO/ZO/ZO/ZO/ZO
PMPM/ZOPM/ZOPS/PSPS/PSPM/PMPM/PBPB/PB
/PB/PS/PS/PS/PS/PS/PB
PBPB/ZOPB/ZOPB/PSPM/PMPM/PMPB/PBPB/PB
/PB/PM/PM/PM/PS/PS/PB

图5

半实物仿真实验平台"

图6

恒制动强度下电机退出的仿真结果"

图7

变制动强度下电机退出的仿真结果"

图8

恒制动强度电机加入仿真结果"

图9

变制动强度电机加入仿真结果"

[1] 马建, 刘晓东, 陈轶嵩, 等. 中国新能源汽车产业与技术发展现状及对策[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(8): 1-19.
Ma Jian, Liu Xiao-dong, Chen Yi-song, et al. Current situation and countermeasures of China's new energy vehicle industry and technology development[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(8): 1-19.
[2] 申伟, 陆敏恂.中国新能源汽车产业的发展现状与展望[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2020, 45(22): 239-242.
Shen Wei, Lu Min-xun. Current situation and prospects of China's new energy vehicle industry[J]. Automotive Practical Technology, 2020, 45(22): 239-242.
[3] Niu G, Shang F, Krishnamurthy M, et al. Design and analysis of an electric hydraulic hybrid powertrain in electric vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2017, 3(1): 48-57.
[4] Li L, Zhang T, Sun B, et al. Research on electro-hydraulic ratios for a novel mechanical-electro-hydraulic power coupling electric vehicle[J]. Energy, 2023, 270: No.126970.
[5] 王健, 盘朝奉, 陈燎, 等. 基于模糊规则的电动汽车机电复合制动力分配策略[J]. 重庆理工大学学报:自然科学, 2021, 35(9): 66-72, 82.
Wang Jian, Pan Chao-feng, Chen Liao, et al. Electromechanical composite braking force distribution strategy for electric vehicles based on fuzzy rules[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Natural Science), 2021, 35(9): 66-72, 82.
[6] Zhao Y, Deng W, Wu J, et al. Torque control allocation based on constrained optimization with regenerative braking for electric vehicles[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2017, 18(4): 685-698.
[7] Xu S, Tang Z, He Y, et al. Regenerative braking control strategy of electric truck based on braking security[J]. Information Technology and Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 455: 263-273.
[8] Tang M, Zhang X. Optimal regenerative braking control strategy for electric vehicles based on braking intention recognition and load estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024, 73(3): 3378-3392.
[9] 刘杨, 孙泽昌, 王猛. 一体式电液复合制动系统制动力协调控制及试验[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2016, 46(3): 718-724.
Liu Yang, Sun Ze-chang, Wang Meng. Coordinated control and experiment of integrated electro-hydraulic composite braking system[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2016, 46(3): 718-724.
[10] Yang Y, He Y, Yang Z, et al. Torque coordination control of an electro-hydraulic composite brake system during mode switching based on braking intention[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(8): No.2031.
[11] Zhang Z, Ma R, Wang L, et al. Novel PMSM control for anti-lock braking considering transmission properties of the electric vehicle[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67(11): 10378-10386.
[12] 刘平, 姚宇, 刘阳, 等. 电动汽车电-液复合制动协调控制方法[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2023(4): 251-256.
Liu Ping, Yao Yu, Liu Yang, et al. Coordinated control method of electro-hydraulic composite braking for electric vehicles[J]. Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, 2023(4): 251-256.
[13] 杨阳, 何云东, 罗倡, 等. 电动汽车制动模式切换扭矩协调控制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(10): 304-314.
Yang Yang, He Yun-dong, Luo Chang, et al. Coordinated control of torque during braking mode transition for electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(10): 304-314.
[14] 余卓平, 史彪飞, 熊璐, 等. 集成式电子液压制动系统的复合制动协调控制[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 47(6): 851-856.
Yu Zhuo-ping, Shi Biao-fei, Xiong Lu, et al. Coordinated control of composite braking in integrated electro-hydraulic braking system[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(6): 851-856.
[15] He Q, Yang Y, Luo C, et al. Energy recovery strategy optimization of dual-motor drive electric vehicle based on braking safety and efficient recovery[J]. Energy, 2022, 248: No.123543.
[16] 靳立强, 孙志祥, 郑迎, 等.电动轮汽车复合再生制动系统防抱协调控制[J].吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2017, 47(5): 1344-1351.
Jin Li-qiang, Sun Zhi-xiang, Zheng Ying, et al. Coordinated anti-lock braking control of compound regenerative braking system in electric-wheel vehicle[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2017, 47(5): 1344-1351.
[17] 王骏骋, 吕林峰, 李剑敏, 等. 分布驱动电动汽车电液复合制动最优滑模ABS控制[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2022, 52(8): 1751-1758.
Wang Jun-cheng, Lin-feng Lü, Li Jian-min, et al. Optimal sliding mode ABS control of electro-hydraulic composite braking for distributed drive electric vehicles[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1751-1758.
[18] Luo Y, Liu C. Pre- and post-fault tolerant operation of a six-phase PMSM motor using FCS-MPC without controller reconfiguration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 68(1): 254-263.
[19] 高逍男, 陈希有. 一种改进的永磁同步电机模型预测控制[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2017, 37(4): 197-202, 217.
Gao Xiao-nan, Chen Xi-you. An improved model predictive control of permanent magnet synchronous motor[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2017, 37(4): 197-202, 217.
[20] Mynar Z, Vesely L, Vaclavek P. PMSM model predictive control with field-weakening implementation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(8): 5156-5166.
[21] Wang F, Li J, Li Z, et al. Design of model predictive control weighting factors for PMSM using gaussian distribution-based particle swarm optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(11): 10935-10946.
[22] 高金武, 孙少龙, 高炳钊. 基于电机转矩补偿的增程器转速波动抑制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2025, 55(8): 2475-2486.
Gao Jin-wu, Sun Shao-long, Gao Bing-zhao. Speed fluctuation suppression strategy of range extender based on motor torque compensation[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(8): 2475-2486.
[23] 邓新阳, 李伟, 胡春艳, 等. 旋转直驱阀的双闭环模糊PID控制仿真分析[J].吉林大学学报:理学版, 2021, 59(4): 915-921.
Deng Xin-yang, Li Wei, Hu Chun-yan, et al. Simulation analysis of dual closed-loop fuzzy PID control for rotary direct-drive valve[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Science Edition), 2021, 59(4): 915-921.
[24] 史文库, 张曙光, 张友坤, 等. 基于改进海鸥算法的磁流变减振器模型辨识[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2022, 52(4): 764-772.
Shi Wen-ku, Zhang Shu-guang, Zhang You-kun, et al. Model identification of magnetorheological damper based on improved seagull algorithm[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 764-772.
[1] 高镇海,鲍明喜,赵睿,唐明弘,高菲. 基于目标锚点驱动的多模态轨迹预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(1): 21-30.
[2] 兰巍,周政,王冠宇,王伟,张苗苗. 基于机器学习的汽车设计智能拟合方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2858-2863.
[3] 孙天骏,杨惠喆,蔡荣贵,冯嘉仪,冉锐,刘斌. 面向纯电动汽车自适应巡航系统的人性化起停控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2847-2857.
[4] 李寿涛,贾湘怡,朱军,郭洪艳,于丁力. 基于Level-K的智能驾驶汽车无信控交叉路口决策方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 3069-3078.
[5] 朱冰,孟鹏翔,刘斌,韩嘉懿,赵健,陈志成,宋东鉴,陶晓文. 基于交通环境信息的虚拟车道线拟合方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2935-2945.
[6] 赵俊武,曲婷,胡云峰. 基于自适应采样的智能车辆轨迹规划方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2802-2816.
[7] 于贵申,陈鑫,唐悦,赵春晖,牛艾佳,柴辉,那景新. 激光表面处理对铝-铝粘接接头剪切强度的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2555-2569.
[8] 高金武,孙少龙,王舜尧,高炳钊. 基于电机转矩补偿的增程器转速波动抑制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2475-2486.
[9] 贾美霞,胡建军,肖凤. 基于多软件联合的车用电机变工况多物理场仿真方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1862-1872.
[10] 宋学伟,于泽平,肖阳,王德平,袁泉,李欣卓,郑迦文. 锂离子电池老化后性能变化研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1817-1833.
[11] 肖纯,易子淳,周炳寅,张少睿. 基于改进鸽群优化算法的燃料电池汽车模糊能量管理策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1873-1882.
[12] 李伟东,马草原,史浩,曹衡. 基于分层强化学习的自动驾驶决策控制算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1798-1805.
[13] 卢荡,索艳茹,孙宇航,吴海东. 基于无量纲格式的轮胎侧倾侧偏力学特性预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1516-1524.
[14] 高镇海,郑程元,赵睿. 真实与虚拟场景下自动驾驶车辆的主动安全性验证与确认综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1142-1162.
[15] 张涛,林黄达,余中军. 混合动力车辆换挡的实时滚动优化控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1215-1224.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!