吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 407-415.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240758

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

钢筒内置可更换橡胶穿心式摩擦阻尼器滞回特性及其在自复位桥墩中的应用

刘正楠(),唐佳伟,张维科,陈兴冲,马华军   

  1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-09 出版日期:2026-02-01 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:刘正楠(1993-),男,副教授,博士. 研究方向:桥梁抗震. E-mail: zhengnan_liu@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(52178142);甘肃省科技计划项目(23JRRA1807);天佑博士后科学基金项目(TYBSH_KJ_202304)

Hysteresis characteristic of the friction damper with replaceable rubber in steel pipe and its application in self-centering bridge pier

Zheng-nan LIU(),Jia-wei TANG,Wei-ke ZHANG,Xing-chong CHEN,Hua-jun MA   

  1. School of Civil Engineering,Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Lanzhou 730070,China
  • Received:2024-07-09 Online:2026-02-01 Published:2026-03-17

摘要:

兼顾阻尼器的经济性及震后可更换性,提出了由高强螺栓、钢套筒、活动挡板、固定挡板、钢拉杆及可更换橡胶组成的铜筒内置可更换橡胶穿心式摩擦阻尼器(SPRFD),并介绍其基本构造及工作原理。通过往复加载试验,考察了不同预紧力下阻尼器滞回曲线的变化规律,分析了不同加载位移下的滞回反应特征、等效刚度及等效阻尼比的变化规律,获得了可更换橡胶的摩擦损伤特征;将SPRFD应用于铁路自复位桥墩中,通过往复加载分析研究了其抗震性能。结果表明:在较小的预紧力下,阻尼器的滞回性能稳定,滞回曲线具有刚塑性模型的特征;随着预紧力的增大,往复循环及大位移加载均会因橡胶损伤导致阻尼力减小,滞回曲线具有弹塑性模型的特征。整个加载过程中,阻尼器具有较稳定的等效黏滞阻尼比。不同预紧力的SPRFD对自复位桥墩滞回曲线的影响不同,预紧力的大小影响滞回曲线卸载刚度的变化,预紧力越大,滞回曲线越捏拢,提供给自复位桥墩的抗侧强度越大。

关键词: 桥梁与隧道工程, 摩擦阻尼器, 滞回行为, 自复位桥墩, 抗震性能

Abstract:

Considering the economy of the damper and the replaceability after the earthquake, the friction damper with replaceable rubber in steel pipe (SPRFD) composed of high-strength bolts, steel pipe, movable baffles, fixed baffles, steel tie rods, and replaceable rubbers was proposed, and its basic structure and working principle were introduced. Through reciprocating loading test, the change rule of the hysteresis curve of the damper under different preloads were investigated, the change rule of the hysteresis response characteristics, equivalent stiffness and equivalent damping ratios under different loading displacements were analyzed, and the friction damage characteristic of the replaceable rubber was obtained. The seismic performance of railway self-centering bridge pier equipped with SPRFD was investigated through cyclic loading analyses. The results showed that the hysteresis performance of the damper was stable under the smaller preload, and the hysteresis loop had the characteristics of rigid-plastic model; As the preload increasing, the reciprocating cycle and large displacement loading decreased the damping force causing by rubber damage, and the hysteresis loop had the characteristics of elastic-plastic model. During the whole loading process, the dampers had a relatively stable equivalent viscous damping ratio. SPRFD with different preload had different effects on the hysteresis curve of the self-centering bridge piers. The value of the preload affected the unloading stiffness of hysteresis curve. The hysteresis curve had an obvious pinching under the larger preload. The larger preload helped the self-centering bridge pier enhance lateral strength.

Key words: bridge and tunnel engineering, friction damper, hysteresis behavior, self-centering bridge pier, seismic performance

中图分类号: 

  • U443.22

图1

SPRFD的基本构造"

图2

试验加载装置"

图3

不同预紧力下阻尼器的力-位移曲线"

图4

100 N·m预紧力下阻尼器的滞回环"

图5

阻尼器中橡胶的磨损"

图6

最大加载位移下滞回环的比较"

图7

割线刚度比较"

图8

等效黏滞阻尼比比较"

图9

耗能能力的比较"

图10

数值计算和试验结果的比较"

图11

自由摇摆桥墩拟静力试验"

图12

摇摆-自复位桥墩的设计信息(单位:cm)"

图13

试验与模拟结果对比"

图14

配置SPRFD的铁路自复位桥墩滞回曲线"

图15

配置SPRFD的铁路自复位桥墩滞回曲线对比"

[1] Zhang P, Li S L, Liu Z L, et al. Hysteretic behavior degeneration mechanism and damage evaluation of self-centering bridge pier system[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 270: 114895.
[2] 江辉, 李新, 白晓宇. 桥梁抗震结构体系发展述评:从延性到韧性[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2023, 53(6): 1550-1565.
Jiang Hui, Li Xin, Bai Xiao-yu. Review on development of bridge seismic structural systems: From ductility to resilience[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6):1500-1565.
[3] 孙治国, 赵泰儀, 王东升, 等. 基于RSC体系的双层桥梁排架墩地震损伤控制设计[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(3): 97-106.
Sun Zhi-guo, Zhao Tai-yi, Wang Dong-sheng, et al. Seismic damage control design for double-deck bridge bents based on rocking self-centering system[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2020,33(3):97-106.
[4] 王城泉, 宗延威, 孙苗苗, 等. 外置拱形耗能装置的节段拼装钢管混凝土桥墩抗震性能分析[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2024, 55(2): 690-705.
Wang Cheng-quan, Zong Yan-wei, Sun Miao-miao, et al. Seismic performance analysis of sectional assembled steel pipe concrete pier of external arch energy-consuming links[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2024, 55(2): 690-705.
[5] 韩冰, 何一宽, 解会兵, 等. 多级耗能后张预应力筋预制节段墩的抗震性能分析[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2024, 54(3): 549-558.
Han Bing, He Yi-kuan, Xie Hui-bing, et al. Analysis on seismic performance of precast segmental pier with multi-stage energy dissipation post tensioned tendons[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 54(3): 549-558.
[6] 金双双, 李盈开, 周建庭, 等. 全装配式自复位防屈曲支撑滞回模型及其性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(7): 49-57.
Jin Shuang-shuang, Li Ying-kai, Zhou Jian-ting, et al. Hysteresis model and experimental investigation of assembled self-centering bucking-restrained braces[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(7): 49-57.
[7] Zhou Y L, Han Q, Du X L, et al. Additional viscous dampers for double-column rocking bridge system: Seismic response and overturning analysis[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 141: 106504.
[8] 石岩, 钟正午, 秦洪果, 等. 装配铅挤压阻尼器的摇摆-自复位双柱墩抗震性能及设计方法[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(8): 166-177.
Shi Yan, Zhong Zheng-wu, Qin Hong-guo, et al. Seismic performance and corresponding design method of rocking self-centering bridge bents equipped with lead-extrusion dampers[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(8): 166-177.
[9] Cai X N, Zhu Y Z, Wang J J, et al. Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge piers with external auxetic steel shear panel dampers[J]. Structures, 2023, 58: 105647.
[10] Gui S H, Long X H, Ma Y T, et al. Study on hysteretic behavior of self-centering double-column pier with energy dissipation link beam[J]. Structures, 2024, 61: 106092.
[11] 闫丽娟, 张春巍. 方形转动摩擦阻尼器工作原理及滞回性能研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2023, 43(6): 112-118.
Yan Li-juan, Zhang Chun-wei. Research on working principle and hysteretic performance of square rotating friction damper[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2023, 43(6): 112-118.
[12] 李澈, 张健豪, 王兵, 等. U-T坡面变摩擦阻尼器力学性能及减震效果研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(6): 97-106.
Li Che, Zhang Jian-hao, Wang Bing, et al. Research on mechanical performance and seismic energy dissipation effect of U-T slope variable friction damper[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45(6): 97-106.
[13] 左恒, 张龙飞, 陶忠, 等. 一种新型钢管橡胶摩擦耗能器试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2020, 50(1): 118-121.
Zuo Heng, Zhang Long-fei, Tao Zhong, et al. Experimental study on a new type of steel tube rubber friction energy dissipater[J]. Building Structure, 2020, 50(1): 118-121.
[14] 曾传旺, 袁维娜, 黄兆明, 等. 橡胶型摩擦阻尼器的性能研究[J]. 橡胶工业, 2020, 67(1): 52-56.
Zeng Chuan-wang, Yuan Wei-na, Huang Zhao-ming, et al. Performance study of rubber type friction dampers[J]. Rubber Industry, 2020, 67(1): 52-56.
[15] 马华军. 铁路桩基础桥墩墩底摇摆隔震机理及抗震设计方法研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学土木工程学院, 2019.
Ma Hua-jun. Research on rocking isolated mechanism of the railway bridge pier with pile foundation and its seismic design method[D]. Lanzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong Univeristy, 2019.
[16] 夏修身. 铁路高墩抗震设计方法研究[D]. 兰州:兰州交通大学土木工程学院, 2012.
Xia Xiu-sheng. Research on seismic design of tall piers for railway bridges[D]. Lanzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2012.
[1] 张皓,陈宜言,叶俊宇,董桔灿,赵秋. 超大跨波形钢腹板箱梁弯扭耦合性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(1): 209-218.
[2] 王方旭,刘世忠,杨霞林,姜宁,刘欣益,马驰. 考虑腹杆变形的钢桁腹组合箱梁挠度计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2619-2629.
[3] 周福成,张元海,魏彦红. 考虑钢腹板畸变翘曲应力分布范围影响的横向弯矩分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(11): 3498-3506.
[4] 张朝,赵峥嵘,许有俊,聂绪致. 地基对预制综合管廊接头剪切变形及破坏特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(10): 3262-3273.
[5] 韦芳芳,李丽萍,徐庆鹏,赵有正,杨晶晶. 受火双钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙加固后抗震性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(1): 230-244.
[6] 刁延松,任义建,杨元强,赵凌云,刘秀丽,刘芸. 带有摩擦耗能组件的可更换钢梁柱拼接节点抗震性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(6): 1643-1656.
[7] 秦拥军,陈奇,张驰,王建虎. 含起波钢筋预制梁柱节点抗震性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(6): 1677-1687.
[8] 何华飞,李兆平,符瑞安,马绍麟,黄明利. 考虑地层约束效应的预制侧墙节点抗震性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(6): 1601-1611.
[9] 雷鸣,尹思阳,王德玲,张继承,路世伟. 基于静力推覆分析算法的高层建筑混凝土核心筒抗震性能模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(9): 2573-2580.
[10] 邸振勇,杨新辉,林霄. 基于荷载⁃位移滞回曲线的建筑双梁⁃柱节点抗震性能分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(7): 2061-2066.
[11] 王林峰,夏万春,徐浪,黄晓明,谭国金,张继旭. 板簧式减震锚头结构及抗震性能分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(6): 1842-1852.
[12] 卜建清,郭至博,张吉仁,荀敬川,黄晓明. 多损伤钢-混组合梁桥力学性能有限元分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(6): 1621-1637.
[13] 毛亚娜,刘世忠,杏剑,杨华,焦峪波. 超高性能玻璃砂混凝土-高强钢筋粘结滑移特性及其声发射参数表征[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(6): 1686-1694.
[14] 韩智强,谢刚,周勇军,刘世忠,晋民杰. 曲线桥梁车桥耦合振动数值分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2): 515-522.
[15] 闫清峰,张纪刚,王涛,陈德刚,郁有升,杨迎春. 预制预装修模块化建筑连接节点抗震性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2): 505-514.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!