吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 893-899.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200230

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑碳排放的大型制造企业甩挂运输牵引车调度优化

成耀荣(),杨谦,郑国华()   

  1. 中南大学 交通运输工程学院,长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-10 出版日期:2021-05-01 发布日期:2021-05-07
  • 通讯作者: 郑国华 E-mail:yaorong@csu.edu.cn;zgh@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:成耀荣(1964-),男,教授,博士生导师. 研究方向:大型制造企业物流系统诊断与优化. E-mail:yaorong@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71672193)

Tractor scheduling optimization of drop and pull transport in large⁃scale manufacturing enterprises considering carbon emission

Yao-rong CHENG(),Qian YANG,Guo-hua ZHENG()   

  1. School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering,Central South University,Changsha 410075,China
  • Received:2020-04-10 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-07
  • Contact: Guo-hua ZHENG E-mail:yaorong@csu.edu.cn;zgh@csu.edu.cn

摘要:

为了在完成既定运输任务的前提下减少大型制造企业内的碳排放量,阐述了大型企业采用甩挂运输的可行性和优越性。以吨公里CO2排放量为目标函数,构建了硬时间窗约束下的考虑碳排放的大型制造企业内牵引车优化调度模型,并设计了两阶段启发式算法求解该模型。该算法首先应用扫描算法获得模型初始可行解;然后,分别采用模拟退火算法和禁忌搜索算法提高初始可行解质量;最后,将优化模型和算法运用于以湖南华菱钢铁公司实例为基础的11个算例,并进行求解。结果表明:优化调度模型及两阶段启发式求解算法是可行、有效的。本文优化调度方法具有良好的节能减排效果,同时也说明大型制造企业内牵引车的中心节点选址能有效降低甩挂运输的碳排放量。

关键词: 公路运输, 甩挂运输, 碳排放, 牵引车调度, 模拟退火, 禁忌搜索

Abstract:

In order to reduce the carbon emissions based on the premise of specified transportation tasks in the large manufacturing enterprises, first, the account of the feasibility and superiority of adopting drop and pull transport is given out. Second, an optimization dispatching model of tractors is constructed under the constraint of hard time window, with t·km CO2 emission as the objective function. Third, a two-stage algorithm is designed for solving the optimization dispatching model. The algorithm presented applies scan algorithm to get the initial feasible solution first, then adopts the simulated annealing algorithm and tabu search algorithm respectively to improve the solution. The optimization model and the algorithm proposed are applied to the 11 data sets of Hunan Hualing Iron and Steel Company. The experimental results indicate that the optimization dispatching model and the two-stage algorithm are feasible and effective. The dispatching optimization method for tractors with carbon emission consideration proposed in this paper has a good effect on energy saving and emission reduction. It also indicates that the reasonable location of the center node of tractors in large manufacturing enterprises can effectively decrease the carbon emissions of drop and pull transportation.

Key words: highway transportation, drop and pull transport, carbon emission, tractor scheduling, simulated annealing, tabu search

中图分类号: 

  • U492.2

表1

各网络节点的坐标"

主要生产单位节点编号X坐标/mY坐标/m
中心节点100
棒材厂2-3200-800
棒材成品库33800-1000
2250热轧板厂4-1400800
2250热轧板成品库52200-200
冷轧板厂6-4600-1000
冷轧板厂成品库73400-1000
一炼轧厂8-46000
CSP热轧板成品库9-3000800
210转炉厂10800-1000
VAMA板厂11-3000-1000

表2

算例R1~R11的中心节点坐标"

算例 编号X坐标/mY坐标/m

算例

编号

X坐标/mY坐标/m
R100R70200
R210000R80400
R320000R90600
R430000R100800
R540000R1101000
R650000

表3

公司某日运输任务和时间窗"

任务trEtrL运输量/t
(1,2,8)10:4811:4011
(2,2,7)7:459:0918
(3,2,7)10:5712:0918
(4,2,9)11:0312:0423
(5,2,9)12:3213:3518
(6,2,8)7:238:1112
(7,3,9)12:3013:4229
(8,9,4)10:0311:1226
(9,9,4)12:4813:5325
(10,9,8)14:0814:5311
(11,9,7)7:478:5016
(12,9,7)14:3215:3712
(13,4,5)14:0715:0519
(14,4,9)7:368:4618
(15,4,6)7:128:0512
(16,4,6)11:0211:5423
(17,4,6)13:5214:4520
(18,4,11)9:2410:2718
(19,7,5)13:3614:4520
(20,7,10)7:248:2325
(21,7,6)7:097:5921
(22,7,6)13:4714:3623
(23,7,11)8:009:0318
(24,7,11)14:1515:1422

表4

算例R1求解结果"

参 数单车调度初始解SATS

吨公里CO2排放量/

[g·(t·km)-1]

525.82227.28191.26184.56
较初始解减少百分比/%--15.818.8
运行时间/s-0.0110.9250.56

表5

算例R1最优解的牵引车调度方案"

牵引车编号牵引车路径
11→7→6→7→10→7→11→4→6→3→9→4→6→1
21→4→6→9→7→2→7→2→9→7→5→9→8→1
31→2→8→4→9→4→11→9→4→2→8→4→5→1
41→2→7→2→9→9→4→7→6→7→11→9→7→1

图1

算例R1~R11求解结果"

1 Frédéric S, Taillard E. Solving real-life vehicle routing problems efficiently using tabu search[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 1993, 41(4):469-488.
2 Chao I M. A tabu search method for the truck and trailer routing problem[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2002, 29(1):33-51.
3 梁波. 大型钢铁企业厂内车辆循环甩挂运输模式研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学交通运输工程学院,2009.
Liang Bo. Reasearch on semi-trailer loop swap transportation applied in large-scale iron and steel works[D]. Changsha:School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, 2009.
4 张磊磊. LPG循环甩挂运输调度优化研究[D]. 大连:大连海事大学交通运输工程学院,2013.
Zhang Lei-lei. Research on LPG cycle drop and pull transport optimization scheduling[D]. Dalian:College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, 2013.
5 杨光敏,罗志勇,杨珍花,等. 轴辐式网络结构下的集装箱甩挂运输调度优化[J].大连海事大学学报,2016,42(3):63-69.
Yang Guang-min, Luo Zhi-yong, Yang Zhen-hua, et al. Scheduling optimization of container tractor-and-trailer transportation under hub-spoke network[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2016,42(3):63-69.
6 Lin S W, Yu V F, Chou S Y. Solving the truck and trailer routing problem based on a simulated annealing heuristic[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2009, 36(5):1683-1692.
7 Cheng Y R, Liang B, Zhou M H. Optimization for vehicle scheduling in iron and steel works based on semi-trailer swap transport[J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2010, 17(4):873-879.
8 Li Hong-qi, Li Yan-ran, Zhao Qiu-hong, et al. The tractor and semitrailer routing considering carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 2013(1):1-12.
9 Derigs U, Pullmann M, Vogel U. A short note on applying a simple LS/LNS-based metaheuristic to the rollon-rolloff vehicle routing problem[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2013, 40(3): 867-872.
10 Li Hong-qi, Lv Tan, Li Yan-ran. The tractor and semitrailer routing problem with many-to-many demand considering carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2015, 34(Complete):68-82.
11 Tang L, Li F, Liu J. Integrated scheduling of loading and transportation with tractors and semitrailers separated[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2015, 62(5):416-433.
12 杨光敏,曹馨湖,杨珍花,等. 集装箱甩挂运输车辆调度优化模型的三阶段启发式算法[J].上海海事大学学报, 2016, 37(1):42-48.
Yang Guang-min, Cao Xin-hu, Yang Zhen-hua,et al. Three-stage heuristic algorithm of container tractor-and-trailer transportation scheduling optimization model[J]. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2016, 37(1):42-48.
13 胡增,成耀荣,刘晋文. 厂内甩挂运输中车辆同步调度问题及求解[J]. 合肥工业大学学报:自然科学版,2019,42(8):1028-1033.
Hu Zeng, Cheng Yao-rong, Liu Jin-wen. Synchronous dispatching of tractors and semi-trailers for in-plant transportation problem and its solving method[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural Science), 2019, 42(8):1028-1033.
14 吴琼. 集装箱港区集卡甩挂运输调度问题研究[D]. 大连:大连海事大学交通运输工程学院,2015.
Wu Qiong. Study of container vehicle scheduling problem under truck-trailer transport mode in a container port[D]. Dalian: College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, 2015.
15 李红启,卢越,朱晓宁. 城际干线甩挂运输牵引车调度问题的模拟退火算法研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报,2015,13(4):77-84, 95.
Li Hong-qi, Lu Yue, Zhu Xiao-ning. A simulated annealing approach to the tractor dispatching problem of intercity dropping and pulling transport[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2015,13(4):77-84, 95.
16 徐光明,王英姿,史峰,等. 基于出行时间可靠性的支路网络均衡分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版,2015,45(3):755-760.
Xu Guang-ming, Wang Ying-zi, Shi Feng, et al. Traffic flow equilibrium analysis of branch network based on travel time reliability[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition),2015,45(3):755-760.
17 杨兆升,莫祥伦,于尧,等. 非常态下路段行程时间估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2013,43(6):1459-1464.
Yang Zhao-sheng,Mo Xiang-lun,Yu Yao, et al. Estimation of travel time under abnormal state[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition),2013, 43(6):1459-1464.
18 于德新,高学英,杨兆升. 基于GPS数据及车辆运行特性分析的单车路段行程时间估计[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版,2010,40(4):965-970.
Yu De-xin,Gao Xue-ying,Yang Zhao-sheng.Individual vehicle travel-time estimation based on GPS data and analysis of vehicle running characteristics[J].Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition),2010,40(4):965-970.
[1] 滕志军,张宇,李昊天,孙铭阳. 复杂路网的自适应D⁃S证据理论地图匹配算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 524-530.
[2] 吴禄慎,程伟,胡赟. 应用改进布谷鸟算法优化多阈值图像分割[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(1): 358-369.
[3] 王义君,张有旭,缪瑞新,豆佳敏. 5G中基于系统中断概率的D2D资源分配算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(1): 331-339.
[4] 张云龙,郭阳阳,王静,梁东. 钢-混凝土组合梁的固有频率及其振型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 581-588.
[5] 代存杰,李引珍,马昌喜,柴获,牟海波. 不确定条件下危险品配送路线多准则优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1694-1702.
[6] 李晖晖, 滑立, 杨宁, 刘坤. 基于MSA特征和模拟退火优化的遥感图像多目标关联算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 1353-1359.
[7] 韩啸,刘淑芬,徐天琦. 基于遗传模拟退火算法的改进K-medoids算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(2): 619-623.
[8] 方莹莹, 滕奇志, 何小海, 杨晓敏, 李征骥. 岩石三维图像重建算法分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(增刊1): 11-15.
[9] 王国林, 傅乃霁, 张建, 裴紫嵘. 基于K-R动力学模型的子午线轮胎硫化过程仿真[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 659-664.
[10] 刘逻, 郭立红, 肖辉, 王建军, 王改革. 基于结合模拟退火算法的动态模糊神经网络的软件可靠性增长模型[J]. , 2012, 42(05): 1225-1230.
[11] 王晶, 张成春, 张春艳, 任露泉. 客车侧围格栅对发动机舱内热环境的影响 [J]. , 2012, (03): 563-568.
[12] 王占中, 任园园. 基于协同理论的公路运输与国民经济适应性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊1): 101-105.
[13] 张晨1,郑攀2,胡思继2. 基于航班间晚点传播的机场停机位分配模型及算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(6): 1603-1608.
[14] 孟松鹤, 高慧婷, 孙莉安, 史洪军. 硅灰-矿渣对聚丙烯纤维混凝土性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(增刊): 214-0217.
[15] 王京, 王殿海, 曲昭伟. 适应长春-吉林高速铁路建设的公路诱增客流量预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(06): 1518-1522.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!