吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 114-119.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201601017

• • 上一篇    下一篇

高速公路驾驶人超车过程中的扫视行为

李鹏辉1, 张文会1, 2, 胡孟夏1, 李一兵1, 吴彪3, 4   

  1. 1.清华大学 汽车安全与节能国家重点实验室,北京 100084;
    2.东北林业大学 交通学院,哈尔滨 150040;
    3.大连海事大学 交通运输管理学院,辽宁 大连 116026;
    4.黑龙江省工程学院 汽车与交通工程学院,哈尔滨 150050
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-11 出版日期:2016-01-30 发布日期:2016-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 张文会(1978-),男,副教授,博士.研究方向:交通运输安全.E-mail:rayear@163.com
  • 作者简介:李鹏辉(1991-),男,博士研究生.研究方向:汽车主被动安全,驾驶人行为.E-mail:liph2013@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAG13A07); 汽车安全与节能国家重点实验室自主课题项目(ZZ2014-032)

Analysis on saccade behavior of driver during overtaking on freeway

LI Peng-hui1, ZHANG Wen-hui1, 2, HU Meng-xia1, LI Yi-bing1, WU Biao3, 4   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
    2.Traffic School, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China;
    3.School of Transportation Management,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China;
    4.School of Automobile and Traffic Engineeiring,Heilongjiang Institute of Technology,Harbin 150050,China
  • Received:2014-08-11 Online:2016-01-30 Published:2016-01-30

摘要: 在驾驶模拟器内植入高速公路超车静态和动态场景,招募30位驾驶人完成超车过程的驾驶模拟试验,并采集驾驶人扫视频率、时间、角度和角速度等参数。将驾驶人视觉区域划分为5个部分,统计计算各区域之间的扫视概率。研究结果表明:超车过程中,目标车辆的速度不影响驾驶人的扫视频率,但对扫视时间、扫视角度和扫视角速度产生正相关影响;与目标车辆为小型车相比,同一速度水平下,超越大型车时驾驶人的扫视时间较长、扫视角度较大、扫视频率较低、扫视角速度较小;驾驶人在原车道和超车道之间的视觉转移概率最高,原车道和超车道是超车过程中驾驶人最为关注的区域。

关键词: 道路工程, 高速公路, 驾驶人, 超车, 扫视行为

Abstract: Dynamic and static scenarios of overtaking on freeway were embedded into a driving simulator. Thirty drivers completed driving simulation and their saccade frequency, duration, angle and angular velocity were obtained. The driver's visual area was divided into five regions and the probability of viewpoint transition between any two regions was calculated. The results indicate that destination vehicle speed does not influence the saccade frequency, but shows positive correlation with saccade duration, saccade angle and saccade angular velocity. While the destination vehicle speed is the same, when overtaking a truck the driver's saccade duration is longer, saccade angle is bigger, saccade frequency and angular velocity are lower than that overtaking a small car. The driver's viewpoint transition frequency between initial lane and destination lane is the highest and the driver pays the most attention to these two lanes.

Key words: road engineering, freeway, drivers, overtaking, saccade behavior

中图分类号: 

  • U491
[1] Underwood Geoffrey, Chapman Peter, Bowden Karen, et al. Visual search while driving: skill and awareness during inspection of the scene[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2002, 5(6): 87-97.
[2] Underwood Geoffrey. Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver[J]. Ergonomics, 2007, 50(8): 1235-1249.
[3] Konstantopoulos Panos, Chapman Peter, Crundall David. Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility: using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010,42(3):827-834.
[4] Konstantopoulos Panos, Chapman Peter, Crundall David. Exploring the ability to identify visual search differences when observing drivers eye movements[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2012,15(5): 378-386.
[5] Salvucci Dario D, Liu Andrew. The time course of a lane change: Driver control and eye-movement behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2002,5(2): 123-132.
[6] Shahar Amit, van Loon Editha, Clarke David, et al. Attending overtaking cars and motorcycles through the mirrors before changing lanes[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2012,44(1):104-110.
[7] 裴玉龙,于涛. 车道变换进程中驾驶员视点转移特性研究[J]. 交通信息与安全,2009,27(2):92-95.
Pei Yu-long, Yu Tao. Driver's eye movement law during lane-change[J]. Traffic Information and Safety, 2009,27(2):92-95.
[8] 王芳,陈飞,倪富健,等. 公路平面线形与驾驶员视觉搜索模式相关性分析[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版,2009,39(5):1070-1074.
Wang Fang, Chen Fei, Ni Fu-jian, et al. Correlation analysis between highway horizontal alignment and drivers visual search behavior[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2009,39(5):1070-1074.
[9] 徐慧智,裴玉龙,于涛,等. 驾驶员车道变换视点转移模型及其参数标定[J]. 公路交通科技,2010,27(11):118-121.
Xu Hui-zhi, Pei Yu-long, Yu Tao, et al. A model of driver's fixation point shift during lane change and its parameter calibration[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010,27(11):118-121.
[10] 郭应时,马勇,付锐,等. 汽车驾驶人驾驶经验对注视行为特性的影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2012,12(5):91-99.
Guo Ying-shi, Ma Yong, Fu Rui, et al. Inference of driving experience on gazing behavior characteristic for car driver[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2012,12(5):91-99.
[11] 袁伟,付锐,郭应时,等. 基于马尔可夫链的驾驶人视觉转移特征[J]. 长安大学学报:自然科学版,2012,32(6):88-93.
Yuan Wei, Fu Rui, Guo Ying-shi, et al. Driver's visual transition characteristics based on the markov chain[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition ), 2012,32(6):88-93.
[12] 王润琪,周永军,肖传恩. 双车道公路超车视距计算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2011,11(3):68-73.
Wang Run-qi,Zhou Yong-jun,Xiao Chuan-en.Calculation method of overtaking sight distance for dual lane highway[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2011,11(3):68-73.
[13] 黄德天, 刘雪超, 张红胜, 等. 基于人类视觉的快速自动调焦法[J]. 液晶与显示, 2014,29(5): 768-776.
Huang De-tian, Liu Xue-chao, Zhang Hong-sheng, et al. Fast auto-focusing method based on human visual system[J]. Chinese Journal of Liquid Crystals and Displays,2014,29(5): 768-776.
[14] 赵永平,杨少伟,赵一飞. 具有中央分隔带公路弯道外侧超车车道的视距[J]. 长安大学学报:自然科学版,2004,24(5):31-34.
Zhao Yong-ping, Yang Shao-wei, Zhao Yi-fei. Passing lane stopping sight distance outside of median divider in freeway[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2004,24(5):31-34.
[1] 李伊,刘黎萍,孙立军. 沥青面层不同深度车辙等效温度预估模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1703-1711.
[2] 臧国帅, 孙立军. 基于惰性弯沉点的刚性下卧层深度设置方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1037-1044.
[3] 念腾飞, 李萍, 林梅. 冻融循环下沥青特征官能团含量与流变参数灰熵分析及微观形貌[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1045-1054.
[4] 宫亚峰, 申杨凡, 谭国金, 韩春鹏, 何钰龙. 不同孔隙率下纤维土无侧限抗压强度[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 712-719.
[5] 程永春, 毕海鹏, 马桂荣, 宫亚峰, 田振宏, 吕泽华, 徐志枢. 纳米TiO2/CaCO3-玄武岩纤维复合改性沥青的路用性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 460-465.
[6] 张仰鹏, 魏海斌, 贾江坤, 陈昭. 季冻区组合冷阻层应用表现的数值评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 121-126.
[7] 季文玉, 李旺旺, 过民龙, 王珏. 预应力RPC-NC叠合梁挠度试验及计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 129-136.
[8] 马晔, 尼颖升, 徐栋, 刁波. 基于空间网格模型分析的体外预应力加固[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 137-147.
[9] 孙宗元, 方守恩. 高速公路出入口运动车辆轨迹分层聚类算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1696-1702.
[10] 罗蓉, 曾哲, 张德润, 冯光乐, 董华均. 基于插板法膜压力模型的沥青混合料水稳定性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1753-1759.
[11] 李显生, 孟凡淞, 郑雪莲, 任园园, 严佳晖. 基于应激响应的驾驶人视觉特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1403-1410.
[12] 李烨, 王炜, 邢璐, 王昊, 董长印. 自动巡航与可变限速协同控制对高速公路基本路段通行效率的改善[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1420-1425.
[13] 尼颖升, 马晔, 徐栋, 李金凯. 波纹钢腹板斜拉桥剪力滞效应空间网格分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1453-1464.
[14] 郑传峰, 马壮, 郭学东, 张婷, 吕丹, 秦泳. 矿粉宏细观特征耦合对沥青胶浆低温性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1465-1471.
[15] 于天来, 郑彬双, 李海生, 唐泽睿, 赵云鹏. 钢塑复合筋带挡土墙病害及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(4): 1082-1093.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!