吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 1984-1993.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20231277

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

封闭式景区纯电动客车调度方法

闫晟煜(),程铭杰,田宏策,王洪瑀,周永恒,马博浩   

  1. 长安大学 汽车学院,西安 710018
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-20 出版日期:2025-06-01 发布日期:2025-07-23
  • 作者简介:闫晟煜(1987-),男,副教授,博士.研究方向:公路运输规划,智慧交通运营.E-mail:leo9574@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFB3209803);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2021JQ-292);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(21YJC790137);山东省科技型中小企业创新能力提升工程项目(2023TSGC0335)

Scheduling algorithm for battery electric vehicle in closed scenic area

Sheng-yu YAN(),Ming-jie CHENG,Hong-ce TIAN,Hong-yu WANG,Yong-heng ZHOU,Bo-hao MA   

  1. School of Automobile,Chang'an University,Xi'an 710018,China
  • Received:2023-11-20 Online:2025-06-01 Published:2025-07-23

摘要:

为满足封闭式景区纯电动客车(BEV)调度的需要,提出了一种多目标调度模型。以BEV购置、发班频次、停靠时间和充电价差等4个运营成本最优为目标,基于UI规则设计发车时刻表求解算法,运用启发式算法求解车次链集合,设计BEV性能测试方案,通过限制试验样车的行驶速度,获得单次往返行程时间,提出CRUISE仿真与实车测试相结合的最大往返次数推算方法。以五台山景区南线为实例,验证BEV调度模型和求解算法的可行性。结果表明:基于UI规则的分时段BEV调度求解算法可实现分钟级BEV发车时刻表;实例线路的BEV购车数求解结果与理想最小购车数的偏差率为2.99%,求解时间为0.89 s;在模拟日均客流量为0.3万~3.0万人规模的调度计划时,实际运力供需的最大偏差率为1.00%。研究成果可用于封闭式景区BEV动态调度算法和车数规模测算模型。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 封闭式景区, 纯电动客车, 多目标调度, 成本最优模型, 启发式算法

Abstract:

To meet the scheduling needs of battery electric vehicle (BEV) in closed scenic areas, a multi-objective scheduling model was proposed. With the goal of optimizing the operating costs of BEV procurement, frequency of departure, stopping time, and charging price difference, a departure schedule solving algorithm was designed based on UI rules. Heuristic algorithms were used to solve the train number chain set, and a BEV performance testing plan was designed. By limiting the driving speed of the test sample vehicle, the single round trip time was obtained, and a maximum round trip calculation method combining CRUISE simulation and real vehicle testing was proposed. Taking the south line of Mount Wutai scenic spot as an example, the feasibility of BEV scheduling model and solution algorithm was verified. The results indicate that the UI rule-based time slot BEV scheduling algorithm can achieve minute level BEV departure schedules. The deviation rate between the calculated number of BEV cars purchased on the example route and the ideal minimum number of cars purchased is 2.99%, with a solution time of 0.89 seconds. When simulating a scheduling plan with a daily passenger flow from 3 000 to 30 000, the maximum deviation rate of actual transportation capacity supply and demand is 1.00%. The research results can be applied to the BEV dynamic scheduling algorithm and vehicle scale calculation model for enclosed scenic spots.

Key words: engineering of communication and transportation system, closed scenic area, battery electric vehicle(BEV), multi-objective scheduling, optimal cost model, heuristic algorithm

中图分类号: 

  • U492.2

图1

发车时刻表求解算法"

图2

启发式算法流程图"

图3

参数最优化过程"

表1

BEV的行驶车速要求"

弯道分类坡度

上坡车速/

(km·h-1

下坡车速/

(km·h-1

多弯道

路段

3%以内[30,70][40,70]
3%~8%20,60][30,50]
8%以上20,50]20,40]

少弯道

路段

3%以内[40,80][40,80]
3%~8%[30,60][40,60]
8%以上20,40][30,50]

图4

电耗经济性CRUISE模型"

表2

BEV车型基本参数"

试验样车型号与技术参数
车型ZK6127BEV
整备质量/kg10 600
长×宽×高/(mm×mm×mm)11 970×2 550×3 635
动力电池额定功率/(kW·h)350
座位数/座49+1
驱动电机型号TZ400XSYTB49
开启空调的续驶里程/km305

表3

南线基本运营参数与充电桩参数"

参数数值
Q/(人·日-124 000
Wmax/次3
t1/min6
t2/min20
t3/min70
320 kW直流单枪快充电流/A500
320 kW直流双枪充电电流/A250
320 kW直流单枪快充功率/kW320
320 kW直流双枪充电功率/kW160

图5

运力供需适配图"

图6

调度排班计划甘特图"

图7

不同客流量下的实际购车数偏差率"

图8

算法稳定性验证图"

[1] 汪洋, 田韶鹏. 纯电动城市客车动力参数匹配与优化分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报: 信息与管理工程版, 2015, 37(6): 688-692.
Wang Yang, Tian Shao-peng. Dynamic parameter matching and optimization analysis of pure electric city bus[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Information and Management Engineering Edition), 2015, 37(6): 688-692.
[2] 朱凌, 王秋成. 空间几何约束下新能源汽车驱动系统协调控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2022, 52(7): 1509-1514.
Zhu Ling, Wang Qiu-cheng. New energy vehicle drive system coordinated control method under spatial geometric constrains[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(7): 1509-1514.
[3] 王雪然, 刘文峰, 李斌, 等. 考虑服务水平的纯电动快速公交发车间隔优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(1): 171-175.
Wang Xue-ran, Liu Wen-feng, Li Bin, et al. Research on optimization of departure interval of pure electric rapid bus considering service level[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information, 2017, 17(1): 171-175.
[4] 朱文韬, 钱国敏, 马东方, 等. 考虑路上游停靠站影响的公交延误模型[J]. 浙江大学学报:工学版, 2020, 54(4): 796-803, 815.
Zhu Wen-tao, Qian Guo-min, Ma Dong-fang, et al. Bus delay model considering influence of stop at upstream of intersection[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(4): 796-803, 815.
[5] 陈治亚, 欧阳灏, 徐光明, 等. 基于出行可靠性的城轨线路多时段发车频率优化[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(12): 3526-3535.
Chen Zhi-ya, Ouyang Hao, Xu Guang-ming, et al. Optimization of multi time departure frequency of urban rail transit lines based on travel reliability[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 3526-3535.
[6] 管德永, 吴晓芳, 赵杰, 等. 需求响应型公交车辆调度及路径优化[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39(5): 140-148.
Guan De-yong, Wu Xiao-fang, Zhao Jie, et al. Demand response bus dispatching and route optimization[J]. Highway Traffic Science and Technology, 2022, 39(5): 140-148.
[7] 沈吟东, 陈晨. 电动公交车辆调度问题研究综述[J]. 物流科技, 2021, 44(4): 62-66.
Shen Yin-dong, Chen Chen. Overview of research on the dispatching problem of electric bus vehicles[J]. Logistics Technology, 2021, 44(4): 62-66.
[8] 王晓娟, 刘磊, 王井邵. 考虑纯电动公交车辆续航里程的行车计划编制方法[J]. 城市公共交通, 2021(9): 39-43.
Wang Xiao-juan, Liu Lei, Wang Jing-shao. Method for developing a driving plan considering the range of pure electric bus vehicles[J]. Urban Public Transport, 2021(9): 39-43.
[9] Ceder A A. Public-transport vehicle scheduling with multi vehicle type[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2011, 19(3): 485-497.
[10] Hassold S, Ceder A A. Public transport vehicle scheduling featuring multiple vehicle types[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2014, 67(2): 129-143.
[11] Amir M F, Mostafa H, Reza T. Red deer algorithm (RDA): a new nature-inspired meta-heuristic[J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24(19): 1-29.
[12] Liu Wei-li, Gong Yue-jiao, Chen Wei-neng, et al. Coordinated charging scheduling of electric vehicles: a mixed-variable differential evolution approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 99(10): 1-16.
[13] 李斌, 刘畅, 陈慧妙, 等. 基于混合整数规划的电动公交车快速充电站有序充电策略[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(9): 2623-2630.
Li Bin, Liu Chang, Chen Hui-miao, et al. Ordered charging strategy of electric bus rapid charging stations based on hybrid integer programming[J]. Power Grid Technology, 2016, 40(9): 2623-2630.
[14] 杨少兵, 吴命利, 姜久春, 等. 快换式电动公交充电站经济运行优化策略[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(2): 335-340.
Yang Shao-bing, Wu Ming-li, Jiang Jiu-chun, et al. Optimization strategy for economic operation of fast swap electric bus charging stations[J]. Power Grid Technology, 2014, 38(2): 335-340.
[15] Zhang R Y, Liu Z J, Feng X H. A novel flexible shuttle vehicle scheduling problem in scenic areas: Task-divided graph-based formulation and algorithm[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 156(6): No.107295.
[16] Costa A, Fernandez-viagas V, Framinan J M. Solving the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with limited human resource constraint[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 146(8): No.106545.
[17] Wu W T, Lin Y, Liu R H, et al. The multi-depot electric vehicle scheduling problem with power grid characteristics[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2022, 155(1): 322-347.
[18] Yao J, Shao C W, Xia X M, et al. A multi-objective emergency vehicle scheduling optimization model[J]. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 2020, 34(4): 236-243.
[19] Mo Y D, Lam Y H, Xu W K, et al. Design of flexible vehicle scheduling systems for sustainable paratransit services[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(14): 1-18.
[20] Lin Y. VSSHA: A vehicle scheduling scheme for tourist attractions based on intelligent heuristic algorithm[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1802(3): No.032048.
[21] 梁海强, 何洪文, 代康伟, 等. 融合经验老化模型和机理模型的电动汽车锂离子电池寿命预测方法研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(5): 825-835, 844.
Liang Hai-qiang, He Hong-wen, Dai Kang-wei, et al. Research on lithium ion battery life prediction method based on empirical aging model and mechanism model for electric vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway Transportation, 2023, 45(5): 825-835, 844.
[22] Gkiotsalitis K, Berkum V E. An exact method for the bus dispatching problem in rolling horizons[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2020, 110(1): 143-165.
[23] Palma D A, Kilani M, Proost S. Discomfort in mass transit and its implication for scheduling and pricing[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2015, 71(1): 1-18.
[24] Ceder A, Hassold S, Dano B. Approaching even-load and even-headway transit timetables using different bus sizes[J]. Public Transport, 2013, 5(3): 193-217.
[25] 靳立强, 孙志祥, 王熠, 等. 基于模糊控制的电动轮汽车再生制动能量回收研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2017, 39(10): 1101-1105, 1197.
Jin Li-qiang, Sun Zhi-xiang, Wang Yi, et al. A research on regenerative braking energy recovery of electric-wheel vehicle based on fuzzy control[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2017, 39(10): 1101-1105, 1197.
[26] 李浩, 陈浩. 考虑充电排队时间的电动汽车混合交通路网均衡[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2021, 51(5): 1684-1691.
Li Hao, Chen Hao. Mixed traffic network equilibrium with battery electric vehicles considering charging queuing time[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1684-1691.
[27] Oukil A, Amor H B, Desrosiers J, et al. Stabilized column generation for highly degenerate multiple-depot vehicle scheduling problems[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2007, 34(3): 817-834.
[28] 闫晟煜, 赵佳琪, 尤文博, 等.高速公路货车差异化通行费折扣的双层规划模型[J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2025, 65(7): 1347-1358.
Yan Sheng-yu, Zhao Jia-qi, You Wen-bo, et al. Bi-level programming model for differentiated toll discounts for expressway trucks[J].Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2025, 65(7): 1347-1358.
[1] 赵红专,吴泽健,张鑫,石胜文,李文勇,展新,许恩永,王佳明. 基于密度离散度和信息传输延迟的网联商用车弯道格子模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 2015-2029.
[2] 潘福全,牛远征,张丽霞,杨金顺,陈秀锋,陈德启. 智能网联环境下无信号交叉口车辆通行控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1948-1962.
[3] 苏命峰,王国军,周聪,王田. 边云协作下时延和能耗约束的启发式任务卸载方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1648-1663.
[4] 潘义勇,徐家聪,尤逸文,全勇俊. 网约车出行需求影响因素多尺度空间异质性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1567-1575.
[5] 卢凯明,陈艳艳,仝瑶,张健,李永行,罗莹. 数据驱动的信号交叉口排队尾车驶离状态预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1275-1286.
[6] 周成栋,宋菲,赵小梅,姚俊杰. 基于多模式双动态演化的拥堵收费模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1319-1327.
[7] 张河山,范梦伟,谭鑫,郑展骥,寇立明,徐进. 基于改进YOLOX的无人机航拍图像密集小目标车辆检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1307-1318.
[8] 秦严严,肖腾飞,罗钦中,王宝杰. 雾天高速公路车辆跟驰安全分析与控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1241-1249.
[9] 宋现敏,湛天舒,李海涛,刘博,张云翔. 考虑用户成本和泊位利用率的停车预约分配模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1287-1297.
[10] 郭祎,魏书威,姜涛. 基于区位势能和多源数据的城市客运交通规划算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1328-1335.
[11] 潘义勇,徐翔宇. 数据不平衡的MobileViT网络交通事故严重程度预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(3): 947-953.
[12] 陈永恒,杨家伟,孙经宇. 借道左转交叉口的网联左转车辆最佳轨迹控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 614-622.
[13] 陈发城,鲁光泉,林庆峰,张浩东,马社强,刘德志,宋会军. 有条件自动驾驶下驾驶人接管行为综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 419-433.
[14] 何永明,冯佳,魏堃,万亚楠. 超高速公路曲线路段车辆制动侧滑影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 591-602.
[15] 吴娇蓉,刘旭东. 不同住房类型空间单元的建成环境对通勤方式选择的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 554-565.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李瑰贤,于广滨,温建民,管竹 . 求解齿轮系统非线性动力学微分方程的多尺度方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(01): 75 -79 .
[2] 苏岩,刘忠长,许允,郭亮,王志伟 . 直喷式柴油机起动过程排放历程分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2007, 37(04): 762 -766 .
[3] 乔英娟,陈静云,王哲人,徐光辉 . 考虑沥青混合料泊松比影响的路面结构应力分析
[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(01): 50 -55 .
[4] 陈俊, 胡平, 马丽丽. 基于DBR的再制造系统时间缓冲控制机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(05): 1197 -1201 .
[5] 马萍,王松艳,秦莉,杨明. 小脑模型神经网络控制器在天线跟踪指向控制中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(04): 1091 -1095 .
[6] 刘衍珩, 周鹏, 王健, 邓钧忆. 用于车载网络的自适应情境感知中间件[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(02): 410 -416 .
[7] 刘光达,邓广福 . 激光成像仪器中的行、场扫描同步控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2006, 36(05): 736 -0739 .
[8] 曲昭伟,王殿海,姚荣涵 . 信号交叉口起动波的运动学模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(02): 268 -0272 .
[9] 肖宗成,王忠恕, 金文华, 刘忠长. 进气温度对车用柴油机排放性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2005, 35(03): 263 -266 .
[10] 张裕卿,黄晓明. 基于微观力学的沥青混合料黏弹性预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(01): 52 -0057 .