吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 2828-2836.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240238

• 车辆工程·机械工程 • 上一篇    

隔热涂层活塞对汽油机性能的影响

王向阳1(),刘宇1(),杜家坤2,陈泓2,解方喜1,芦大佑1   

  1. 1.吉林大学 汽车底盘集成与仿生全国重点实验室,长春 130022
    2.广州汽车集团股份有限公司汽车工程研究院,广州 511434
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-09 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 刘宇 E-mail:753403128@qq.com;liuyu1981@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王向阳(1998-),男,博士研究生.研究方向:能源多元化与新型动力总成.E-mail:753403128@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51876079);吉林省科技发展计划项目(20210201039GX);动力机械与工程教育部重点实验室开放课题项目(4914683);吉林大学大学生创新训练国家级项目(202310183119)

Effect of thermal insulation coating piston on performance of gasoline engine

Xiang-yang WANG1(),Yu LIU1(),Jia-kun DU2,Hong CHEN2,Fang-xi XIE1,Da-you LU1   

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Automotive Chassis Integration and Bionics,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
    2.GAC Automotive Research & Development Center,Guangzhou 511434,China
  • Received:2024-03-09 Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-11-14
  • Contact: Yu LIU E-mail:753403128@qq.com;liuyu1981@jlu.edu.cn

摘要:

采用试验研究方法在不同负荷和过量空气系数下研究了隔热活塞对汽油机性能的影响。结果表明:采用隔热涂层活塞,小负荷工况下最佳点火时刻提前,着火延迟期和燃烧持续期延长;相反,大负荷工况下,燃烧中心推迟。此外,采用隔热涂层活塞会导致NO x 排放量上升,CO和HC排放量下降;在大负荷空气稀释燃烧和当量比燃烧下,隔热涂层活塞对发动机性能影响相同。

关键词: 动力机械及工程, 隔热涂层活塞, 当量比燃烧, 空气稀释燃烧, 发动机性能

Abstract:

An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effects of an insulated piston on gasoline engine performance under different loads and excess air ratios. The results show that the optimal ignition time is advanced at low load, the ignition delay period and the combustion duration are prolonged;conversely, the combustion center is postponed at high load. Additionally the use of thermal insulation coating pistons has led to an increase in NO x emissions and a decrease in CO and HC emissions; the thermal insulation coating pistons has the same effect on engine performance during both and stoichiometric air dilution combustion at high loads combustion.

Key words: power machinery and engineering, thermal insulation coating piston, stoichiometric combustion, air dilution combustion, engine performance

中图分类号: 

  • TK41

表1

发动机技术参数"

参数数值
缸径/mm79
活塞行程/mm102
排量/L0.5
压缩比15.8
连杆长度/mm152

图1

活塞隔热涂层的材料分布"

图2

试验前、后隔热涂层活塞对比"

表2

发动机测控主要仪器设备型号及精度"

仪器设备型号精度
进气模拟增压系统AVL 515±50 108 Pa
油水恒温控制单元AVL 577±1 ℃
喷油控制单元Scienlab DICU
瞬态测功机ACWA-100 5-4-290

扭矩:±0.03%

转速:±1 r/min

缸压传感器Kistler 6054BR±0.3%
角标仪AVL 365C± 0.5 °CA
燃烧分析仪AVL INDIMCRO 602
瞬态油耗仪AVL 7361 CST±0.05%
气体排放分析仪HORIBA MEXA-7500D

校准检查:±0.5%

重复试验:±0.5%

图3

试验装置示意图"

图4

当量比燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞最佳点火时刻MBT对比"

图5

当量比燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞着火延迟期和燃烧持续期对比"

图6

当量比燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞的平均缸内压力和平均缸内温度对比"

图7

当量比燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞CA50对比"

图8

当量比燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞常规排放物对比"

图9

当量比燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞GITE、未燃损失、排气损失和传热损失对比"

图10

大负荷空气稀释燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞MBT对比"

图11

大负荷空气稀释燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞着火延迟期和燃烧持续期对比"

图12

大负荷空气稀释燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和绝热涂层活塞CA50对比"

图13

大负荷空气稀释燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞COVIMEP对比"

图14

大负荷空气稀释燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞常规排放物对比"

图15

大负荷空气稀释燃烧下汽油机采用普通活塞和隔热涂层活塞GITE、未燃损失、排气损失和传热损失对比"

[1] Chen B, Zhang L, Han J, et al. A combination of electric supercharger and Miller Cycle in a gasoline engine to improve thermal efficiency without performance degradation[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2019, 14: No.100429.
[2] Zhao J, Xi Q, Wang S, et al. Improving the partial load fuel economy of 4-cylinder SI engines by combining variable valve timing and cylinder-deactivation through double intake manifolds[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 141: 245-256.
[3] 周龙保. 内燃机学[M]. 3版. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2012.
[4] 李晓娜, 解方喜, 窦慧莉, 等. 气门重叠角对GDI发动机性能和微粒排放的影响[J]. 汽车工程,2023,45(4): 654-662.
Li Xiao-na, Xie Fang-xi, Dou Hui-li, et al. Effects of valve overlap angle on GDI engine performance and particulate emissions[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(4): 654-662.
[5] 杨尚升, 黄勇成, 曹银波. 停缸技术对缸内直喷点燃式发动机燃烧与排放及燃油经济性的影响[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2020, 54(7): 68-74.
Yang Shang-sheng, Huang Yong-cheng, Cao Yinbo. Effects of cylinder shutdown technology on combustion, emissions and fuel economy of in-cylinder direct injection ignition engine[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2020, 54(7): 68-74.
[6] Woschni G, Spindler W, Kolesa K. Heat insulation of combustion chamber walls—A measure to decrease the fuel consumption of I.C. engines[C]∥SAE Technical Paper, 870339.
[7] Kamo R, Bryzik W. Adiabatic turbocompound engine performance prediction[C]∥SAE Technical Paper, 780068.
[8] Taymaz I. An experimental study of energy balance in low heat rejection diese engine[J]. Energy, 2006, 31(2/3): 364-371.
[9] Yan Z, Gainey B, Gohn J, et al. The effects of thick thermal barrier coatings on low-temperature combustion[C]∥SAE Technical Paper, 2020-01-0275.
[10] 胡艳娇, 李敏, 刘宇平, 等. 高强化活塞等离子喷涂涂层隔热性能研究[J]. 热加工工艺, 2019, 48(6):141-145.
Hu Yan-jiao, Li Min, Liu Yu-ping, et al. Research on thermal insulation performance of high-strength piston plasma spray coating[J]. Thermal Processing Technology, 2019, 48(6): 141-145.
[11] 张利敏, 王延荣, 许春光, 等. 复合隔热组合活塞结构设计及优化[J]. 内燃机学报, 2020, 38(5): 472-479.
Zhang Li-min, Wang Yan-rong, Xu Chun-guang, et al. Design and optimization of composite thermal insulation composite piston structure[J]. Transactions of Csice, 2020, 38(5): 472-479.
[12] 姬亚萌, 张卫正, 原彦鹏, 等. 复合隔热结构活塞界面材料接触热阻实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报,2020, 41(7): 1728-1734.
Ji Ya-meng, Zhang Wei-zheng, Yuan Yan-peng, et al. Experimental study on contact thermal resistance of piston interface materials with composite thermal insulation structure[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2020, 41(7): 1728-1734.
[13] 陈国争, 张卫正, 原彦鹏, 等. 活塞隔热性能有限元分析及试验验证[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2021, 41(6): 603-610.
Chen Guo-zheng, Zhang Wei-zheng, Yuan Yanpeng, et al. Finite element analysis and experimental verification of piston thermal insulation performance[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021,41(6): 603-610.
[14] Osada H, Uchida N, Zama Y. An analysis on heat loss of a heavy-duty diesel engine by wall-impinged spray flame observation[C]∥SAE Technical Paper,2015-01-1832.
[15] 程章, 黄昭明, 吕冬梅, 等.绝热涂层涂覆活塞耦合预燃室射流点火技术的试验研究[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2025, 44(3): 404-411.
Cheng Zhang, Huang Zhao-ming, Dong-mei Lyu, et al. Experimental research on coupling pre-ignition chamber jet ignition technology of thermal insulation coating coated piston[J].Mechanical Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 404-411.
[16] Wang B, Xie F X, Hong W, et al. Extending ultra-lean burn performance of high compression ratio pre-chamber jet ignition engines based on injection strategy and optimized structure[J]. Energy, 2023, 282: No.128433.
[17] Cheng Y L, Cao J H, Mao M K, et al. High growth rate, wear resistant coatings on an Al-Cu-Li alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation in concentrated aluminate electrolytes[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2015, 269: 74-82.
[18] Wang K, Kim Y J, Hayashi Y, et al. Ceramic coatings on 6061 Al alloys by plasma electrolytic oxidation under different AC voltages[J]. Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 2009,10(4): 562-566.
[19] Tavares M M, Vitoriano J O, Silva R C L, et al. Effect of duty cycle and treatment time on electrolytic plasma oxidation of commercially pure Al samples[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019, 8(2): 2141-2147.
[20] Brendon B. Analysis of combustion in plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings of the piston surface in spark ignition engines[D]. Canada: University of Windsor, 2022.
[21] Li D C, Yu X M, Du Y D, et al. Study on combustion and emissions of a hydrous ethanol/gasoline dual fuel engine with combined injection[J]. Fuel, 2022, 309: No.122004.
[22] Iodice P, Amoresano A, Langella G, et al. A review on the effects of ethanol/gasoline fuel blends on NO x emissions in spark-ignition engines[J]. Biofuel Research Journal, 2021, 8: 1465-1480.
[23] Bertsch M, Koch T, Velji A, et al. Thermodynamic and optical investigations on particle emissions in a DISI engine at boosted operation[C]∥SAE Technical Paper, 2015-01-1888.
[1] 方钰,梅德清,郑会龙,杨肖芳,武海龙,张晓武. 中国空间站燃烧科学柜火焰传播速度地面测量试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(9): 2460-2468.
[2] 魏明亮,李志丹,田波,李青,颜伏伍,王宇. 长径比对颗粒物捕集器压降交点及内部流场的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(11): 3125-3134.
[3] 顾忠华,颜培刚,刘泮宏,王祥锋. 应用数据驱动算法提高涡粘模型分离流动模拟精度[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(11): 2532-2541.
[4] 汤东,韩宇彬,华伦,潘金冲,刘胜. 润滑油灰分对直喷汽油机颗粒捕集器性能影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(11): 2501-2507.
[5] 王乔,孙万臣,郭亮,程鹏,范鲁艳,李国良. 丁醇/柴油混合燃料对压燃式发动机燃烧及微粒排放特征的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1920-1928.
[6] 江涛,林学东,李德刚,杨淼,汤雪林. 基于人工神经网络的放热规律的量化预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1747-1754.
[7] 孙正, 黄钰期, 俞小莉. 径向滑动轴承润滑油膜流动-传热过程仿真[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 744-751.
[8] 刘忠长, 孙士杰, 田径, 徐瑞辰, 汪泊舟. 瞬态工况下喷油参数对柴油机排放及燃烧特性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 1639-1646.
[9] 包堂堂, 胡宗杰, 胡俊超, 阮逸平, 邓俊, 吴志军. 基于超声雾化的柴油/汽油混合燃料液滴群燃烧特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(04): 903-908.
[10] 于秀敏,谭兴闻,马君,李国良,董伟,齐万强,崔峰云. 缸内直喷汽油机起动控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(6): 1554-1558.
[11] 刘成材,高青,马纯强,金英爱,李玥. 发动机可变组分进气系统的膜气体分离特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(03): 625-0629.
[12] 刘发发,谷艳华,彭亚平,李华,郭英男 . 乙醇均质压燃燃烧的化学反应动力学模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(01): 21-26.
[13] 谭满志,郭英男,刘金山,黄为钧. 化油器发动机燃用不同比例乙醇汽油的性能和排放试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2005, 35(01): 24-0028.
[14] 高青, 金英爱, 李明, 方瑛. 点燃式发动机临界爆震控制及其特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2003, (4): 7-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!