路堤挡土墙主动土压力计算方法修正

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210013

Abstract

Abstract:

In the existing calculation methods of embankment retaining wall stability， the position of soil fracture surface behind the wall is assumed first， and the fracture angle θ is calculated according to the corresponding formula， then compare it with the assumed rupture angle to determine the calculation results.When the height H of the retaining wall changes， the calculation formula that the fracture surface intersects the outside， inside and middle of the load should be adopted respectively， and the obtained θ value is not unique or has no solution within a certain range of height， the hypothesis is not tenable， the specific position of the fracture surface cannot be judged， and the maximum active earth pressure of the retaining wall cannot be calculated. In view of the above problems， this paper proposes to change the vehicle load on the retaining wall from rectangular load to trapezoidal load when converting it into soil column， so as to make it closer to the nature of the soil behind the wall， and deduces a new formula for calculating the fracture angle. The value range of the angle $φ α$ between the trapezoidal load and the horizontal line is analyzed to make the revised formula more universal and applicable. By changing the subgrade parameters such as subgrade width， wall back inclination angle， slope height and slope rate， through comparison with the standard calculation method and actual case analysis， it is shown that the modified calculation formula has a unique solution to judge the position of the fracture surface， and the correctness and rationality of the modified formula are verified.

Key words: road engineering, embankment retaining wall, corrected fracture angle, stability calculation

CLC Number:

U416

Cheng-lin SHI,Yong WANG,Chun-li WU,Wen-zhu SONG. Modification of calculation method for active earth pressure on embankment retaining wall[J].Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1394-1403.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Table 3

References 19

1	薛殿基,冯仲林. 挡土墙设计实用手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
2	彭明祥. 挡土墙主动土压力的库仑统一解[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(2): 379-386.
	Peng Ming-xiang. Coulumb's unified solution of active earth pressure on retaining wall[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(2): 379-386.
3	顾慰慈. 挡土墙土压力计算手册[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2005.
4	田恒银. 挡土墙主动土压力计算的研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学土木工程学院, 2016.
	Tian Heng-yin. Study on calculation of active earth pressure on retaining wall[D]. Chongqing: College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, 2016.
5	Fathipour H, Siahmazgi A S, Payan M, et al. Limit analysis of modified pseudodynamic lateral earth pressure in anisotropic frictional medium using finite-element and second-order cone programming[J/OL]. [2021-01-05].
6	Rao P P, Chen Q S, Zhou Y T, et al. Determination of active earth pressure on rigid retaining wall considering arching effect in cohesive backfill soil[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2016, 16(3): 1-9.
7	刘洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状与主动土压力分析[J].岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516, 528.
	Liu Yang, Yu Peng-qiang. Analysis of soil arch shape and active earth pressure in translation mode of rigid retaining wall[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 506-516, 528.
8	谢明星, 郑俊杰, 曹文昭, 等.有限填土路堤挡土墙主动土压力研究[J].华中科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 47(2): 1-6.
	Xie Ming-xing, Zheng Jun-jie, Cao Wen-zhao, et al. Research on active earth pressure of retaining wall of limited fill embankment[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(2): 1-6.
9	谢清泉, 刘昌清, 王卉, 等. 悬臂式挡土墙土压力计算方法对比研究[J]. 路基工程, 2020(5): 110-114, 125.
	Xie Qing-quan, Liu Chang-qing, Wang Hui, et al. Comparative study on earth pressure calculation methods of cantilever retaining wall[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2020(5):110-114, 125.
10	王闫超, 晏鄂川, 陆文博, 等. 无黏性有限土体主动土压力解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(9): 2513-2520.
	Wang Yan-chao, Yan E-chuan, Lu Wen-bo, et al. Analytical solution for active earth pressure of non-cohesive finite soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(9): 2513-2520.
11	顾嵋杰. 基于不同破裂面类型的挡土墙土压力的分析计算[J]. 西北水电, 2020(4):52-56.
	Gu Mei-jie. Analysis and calculation of earth pressure on retaining wall based on different fracture surface types[J]. Northwest Hydropower, 2020(4):52-56.
12	竺明星, 姜开渝, 龚维明, 等. 考虑c-φ回填土坡面倾角影响的挡土墙非线性主动土压力研究[J]. 天津大学学报, 2019, 52(): 70-75.
	Zhu Ming-xing, Jiang Kai-yu, Gong Wei-ming, et al. Study on nonlinear active earth pressure of retaining wall considering the influence of slope angle of c-φ backfill [J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2019, 52(Sup.1): 70-75.
13	黄旺, 杨建军, 黄娟. 几种挡土墙主动土压力理论对比及墙体应力分析[J]. 长沙理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 14(3): 29-34.
	Huang Wang, Yang Jian-jun, Huang Juan. Theoretical comparison and wall stress analysis of several retaining walls[J]. Journal of Changsha University of science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 14(3): 29-34.
14	张东卿, 薛元, 罗强, 等. 中欧(法)挡土墙设计规范对比研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2020, 37(2): 30-34, 39.
	Zhang Dong-qing, Xue Yuan, Luo Qiang, et al. Comparative study of China-Europe (French) retaining wall design code[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2020, 37(2): 30-34, 39.
15	柯才桐, 陈奕柏, 朱嘉. 挡土墙土压力线性分布解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学, 2014, 33():3312-3317.
	Ke Cai-tong, Chen Yi-bo, Zhu Jia. Linear distribution solution of earth pressure on retaining wall[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(Sup.1):3312-3317.
16	党发宁, 张乐, 王旭, 等. 基于弹性理论的有限位移条件下挡土墙上土压力解析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(10): 2094-2103.
	Dang Fa-ning, Zhang Le, Wang Xu, et al. Analysis of earth pressure on retaining wall under limited displacement conditions based on elastic theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(10): 2094-2103.
17	吴艾祺. 车辆动荷载作用下公路挡土墙的力学响应研究[D]. 西安:长安大学地质工程与测绘学院, 2019.
	Wu Ai-qi. Research on the mechanical response of highway retaining walls under dynamic vehicle load[D]. Xi'an: College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, 2019.
18	刘宁, 刘杰. 国内外标准中砂性土内摩擦角确定方法对比[J]. 水运工程, 2021, 45(1): 42-47.
	Liu Ning, Liu Jie. Comparison of methods for determining the internal friction angle of sandy soil in domestic and foreign standards[J]. Water Transport Engineering, 2021, 45(1): 42-47.
19	刘寒冰, 张互助, 王静. 失水干燥对路基压实黏质土抗剪强度特性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2017, 47(2): 446-451.
	Liu Han-bing, Zhang Hu-zhu, Wang Jing. Effect of dehydration and drying on shear strength characteristics of subgrade compacted clayey soil[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2017, 47(2): 446-451.

Related Articles 15

[1]	Qing-lin GUO,Qiang LIU,Chun-li WU,Li-li LI,Yi-ming LI,Fu-chun LIU. Local temperature field and healing level of crack in conductive asphalt and mixture [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1386-1393.
[2]	Yu-quan YAO,Jian-gang YANG,Jie GAO,Liang SONG. Optimal design on recycled hot⁃mix asphalt mixture based on performance⁃cost model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(3): 585-595.
[3]	Quan-ping XIA,Jiang-ping GAO,Hao-yuan LUO,Qi-gong ZHANG,Zhi-jie LI,Fei YANG. Low⁃temperature performance of composite modified hard asphalt used in high modulus asphalt concrete [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(3): 541-549.
[4]	Wu-ping RAN,Hui-min CHEN,Ling LI,Li-qun FENG. Evolution law and model estimation and modification of resilience modulus of coarse grained soil subgrade under wet and dry cycle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2079-2086.
[5]	Wei-zhi DONG,Shuang ZHANG,Fu ZHU. Evaluation of pavement performance of asphalt mixture based on extension analytic hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2137-2143.
[6]	Zhe-pu XU,Qun YANG. Short⁃term maintenance operation start time optimization based on real⁃time traffic map data [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1763-1774.
[7]	Chang-ping WEN,Huan-xia REN. Constitutive relation with double yield surfaces of bioenzyme⁃treated expansive soil based on Lade model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1716-1723.
[8]	Yuan-yuan WANG,Lu SUN,Wei-dong LIU,Jin-shun XUE. Constraint improvement of binocular reconstruction algorithm used to measure pavement three-dimensional texture [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(4): 1342-1348.
[9]	Yong PENG,Han-duo YANG,Xue-yuan LU,Yan-wei LI. Effect of void characteristics on virtual shear fatigue life of asphalt mixtures using discrete element method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(3): 956-964.
[10]	Wei-gang ZHU,Chao ZHU,Ya-qiu ZHANG,Hai-bin WEI. Construction and quality evaluation of digital elevation model based on convolution grid surface fitting algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(3): 1073-1080.
[11]	Yong-chun CHENG,He LI,Li-ding LI,Hai-tao WANG,Yun-shuo BAI,Chao CHAI. Analysis of mechanical properties of asphalt mixture affected by aggregate based on grey relational degree [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(3): 925-935.
[12]	Ya-feng GONG,Yun-ze PANG,Bo WANG,Guo-jin TAN,Hai-peng BI. Mechanical properties of new prefabricated box culvert structure based on road conditions in Jilin Province [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(3): 917-924.
[13]	En-hui YANG,Jia-qiu XU,You-zhi TANG,Ao LI,Yan-jun QIU. Effect of warm mixing agents on fracture and aging properties of asphalt [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 604-610.
[14]	Wen-ting DAI,Ze-hua SI,Zhen WANG,Qi WANG. Test on road performance of soils stabilized by sisal fiber and ionic soil stabilizer with cement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 589-593.
[15]	Yu FANG,Li-jun SUN. Urban bridge performance decay model based on survival analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 557-564.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

边界高度H/m	破裂角θ/（°）			处于荷载中部破裂角θ的变化范围/（°）
边界高度H/m	交于荷载内侧	交于荷载中部	交于荷载外侧	处于荷载中部破裂角θ的变化范围/（°）
6.14	27.03	28.95	-	28.93~58.91
6.98	26.60	28.16	-	26.62~56.37
27.11	-	24.89	24.43	8.79~24.88
27.70	-	24.88	24.44	8.62~24.44

高度/m	计算公式	破裂角/（°）	主动土压力/kN	抗滑动稳定系数	抗倾覆稳定系数
6.14	荷载内侧	27.03	81.75	1.82	2.94
6.14	荷载中部	28.95	81.03	1.84	2.93
6.98	荷载内侧	26.60	103.36	1.75	2.69
6.98	荷载中部	28.16	104.02	1.74	2.68

计算公式		H=6.14 m		H=6.98 m		H=27.11	H=27.70
计算公式		荷载内侧	荷载中部	荷载内侧	荷载中部	H=27.11	H=27.70
现有公式计算	抗滑动稳定系数K_c	1.82	1.84	1.75	1.74	-	-
现有公式计算	抗倾覆稳定系数K₀	2.94	2.93	2.69	2.68	-	-
修正后公式计算	抗滑动稳定系数K_c	1.83		1.74		1.32	1.32
修正后公式计算	抗滑动稳定系数K₀	2.93		2.68		1.56	1.55

Modification of calculation method for active earth pressure on embankment retaining wall

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)