Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1264-1272.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210068

Previous Articles    

Comparison of injuries in front impact between Hybird III dummy model and CHUBM human biomechanical model

Xiong LI1,2(),Feng-chong LAN1,2,Ji-qing CHEN1,2(),Fang TONG1,2   

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China
    2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Automotive Engineering,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China
  • Received:2021-01-22 Online:2022-06-01 Published:2022-06-02
  • Contact: Ji-qing CHEN E-mail:lixiong1008@163.com;chjq@scut.edu.cn

Abstract:

First, the Hybird III dummy and CHUBM human were used to build 50 km/h frontal 100% rigid barrier virtual collision simulation platform to conduct preliminary exploratory study. Then,three finite element models of the vehicle collision were established under the Hybird III dummy seat position A and CHUBM human seat position A and B. And three cases under the driver's head, chest and thigh injuries were compared by analysis in simulation. The results showed that Hybird III dummy of seat position A and CHUBM human of seat position B had a good consistency in the dynamic response. The head and chest injuries of CHUBM human under different seat positions were higher than Hybird III dummy. The injury indicators of CHUBM human at seat position A were higher than that at seat position B, and the fracture of human ribs was occurred. The research results show that the CHUBM human has more realistic human anatomy and bionic fidelity, and has higher requirements for the safety evaluation of vehicle restraint systems, which can provide corresponding reference for the safety protection design of vehicle.

Key words: vehicle engineering, CHUBM human model, Hybird III dummy model, vehicle collision, injury comparison

CLC Number: 

  • U461.91

Fig.1

Hybird III dummy and CHUBMhuman finite element model"

Fig.2

Establishment of the vehicle collision finite lement model (partial view)"

Fig.3

Comparison of dynamic response of vehicle collision"

Fig.4

Comparison of human dynamic response of cab restraint system"

Fig.5

Seatbelt shoulder force of tension"

Fig.6

Seatbelt abdomen force of tension"

Fig.7

Comparison of head resultant acceleration curve"

Table 1

Comparison of head injury parameters"

指标Model 1Model 2Model 3
HIC36736.91926.951203.36
Acc_max/g73.6180.8188.21
Acc_3 ms/g72.1278.2484.01

Fig.8

Comparison of chest compression"

Table 2

Comparison of chest injury parameters"

指标Model 1Model 2Model 3
C_max/mm324653
VC_max0.1680.3900.428

Fig.9

Comparative analysis of axialforce on driver’s thigh"

Table 3

Comparison of femur compression peak force"

指标Model 1Model 2Model 3
右侧股骨压缩力/kN1.6380.4120.693
左侧股骨压缩力/kN1.7620.2640.450

Fig.10

Comparison of Hybird III dummy and CHUBM human knee structure"

Fig.11

CHUBM human rib stress cloud at different seat position"

1 Zhu F, Dong L, Jin X, et al. Testing and modeling the responses of hybrid III crash-dummy lower extremity under high-speed vertical loading[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2015, 59: 521-536.
2 Fildes B, Fitzharris M, Gabler H C, et al. Chest and abdominal injuries to occupants in far side crashes[C]∥Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 2007:1-8.
3 Ma Z W, Jing L L, Wang J L, et al. Biomechanical analysis of occupant's brain response and injury in vehicle interior second impact utilizing a refined head finite element model[J]. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2017, 17(1): No. 1740018.
4 Mroz K, Bostrom O, Pipkorn B, et al. Comparison of hybrid III and human body models in evaluating thoracic response for various seat belt and airbag loading conditions[C]∥Proceedings of the International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Injury, Hanover, Germany, 2010: 265-279.
5 Arun M W J, Umale S, Humm J R, et al. Evaluation of kinematics and injuries to restrained occupants in far-side crashes using full-scale vehicle and human body models[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2016, 17(Sup.1): 116-123.
6 Ye X, Gaewsky J P, Miller L E, et al. Numerical investigation of driver lower extremity injuries in finite element frontal crash reconstruction[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2018, 19(Sup.1):21-28.
7 Golman A J, Danelson K A, Miller L E, et al. Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 64: 1-8.
8 阮世捷, 胡习之, 曲杰. 汽车安全与人体损伤生物力学的有限元模拟研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 35(6): 1-7.
Ruan Shi-jie, Hu Xi-zhi, Qu Jie. Finite element simulation research of automotive safety and injury biomechanics of human body[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2007, 35(6): 1-7.
9 Mueller B C, Sherwood C P, Arbelaez R A, et al. Comparison of Hybrid III and THOR dummies in paired small overlap tests[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2011, 55: 379-409.
10 中国汽车技术研究中心. C-NCAP管理规则[EB/OL]. [2020-12-21].
11 陈吉清, 杜天亚, 兰凤崇. 钝性碰撞中人体肝脏生物力学响应数值分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2018, 48(2): 398-406.
Chen Ji-qing, Du Tian-ya, Lan Feng-chong. Numerical analysis of human liver biomechanical response to blunt impacts[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(2): 398-406.
12 兰凤崇, 黄伟, 陈吉清, 等. 行人下肢高精度数值模型与损伤参数研究[J]. 湖南大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 43(10): 42-51.
Lan Feng-chong, Huang Wei, Chen Ji-qing, et al. Development and injury parameters research of a FE model of lower limb with high precision for adult pedestrians[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2016, 43(10): 42-51.
13 蔡志华, 兰凤崇, 陈吉清, 等. 基于汽车碰撞损伤的人体胸部有限元模型构建与验证[J]. 医用生物力学, 2013, 28(1): 36-43.
Cai Zhi-hua, Lan Feng-chong, Chen Ji-qing, et al. Development and validation for finite element model of human thorax based on automotive impact injuries[J]. Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2013, 28(1): 36-43.
14 陈吉清, 吴凯, 兰凤崇, 等. 中国成年男性全颈椎生物力学建模与验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2016, 38(11): 1305-1311, 1318.
Chen Ji-qing, Wu Kai, Lan Feng-chong, et al. Biomechanics modeling and validation for all cervical vertebrae of chinese adult male[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2016, 38(11): 1305-1311, 1318.
15 Ma Z W, Chen J Q, Lan F C. Biomechanical response and injury effects on occupant's thorax-abdomen under seat belt loading[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 2015, 8(1): 1-21.
16 Du T Y, Chen J Q, Lan F C, et al. Thoracic response of the Chinese human body model in 50th percentile male size (CHUBM-M50) in blunt impacts-investigation in speed, direction and location[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2019, 24(1): 71-85.
17 张学荣, 刘学军, 陈晓东, 等. 正面碰撞安全带约束系统开发与试验验证[J]. 汽车工程, 2007, 29(12): 1055-1058.
Zhang Xue-rong, Liu Xue-jun, Chen Xiao-dong, et al. Development and test validation of safety belt restraint system for frontal impact[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2007, 29(12): 1055-1058.
18 韩勇, 杨济匡, 水野幸治, 等. 车辆碰撞速度对行人致命损伤风险的影响研究[J]. 汽车工程学报, 2011, 1(4): 399-406.
Han Yong, Yang Ji-kuang, Mizuno Koji, et al. Effects of vehicle impact velocity on pedestrian fatal injury risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2011, 1(4): 399-406.
19 张学荣, 黄硕, 许长龙, 等. 侧面碰撞中儿童测试假人与人体模型动态响应差异性研究[J]. 汽车工程学报, 2016, 6(6): 454-459.
Zhang Xue-rong, Huang Shuo, Xu Chang-long, et al. Study on dynamic response differences between child dummy and child human model in side impacts[J]. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2016, 6(6): 454-459.
[1] Chen HUA,Run-xin NIU,Biao YU. Methods and applications of ground vehicle mobility evaluation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1229-1244.
[2] Wen-ku SHI,Shu-guang ZHANG,You-kun ZHANG,Zhi-yong CHEN,Yi-fei JIANG,Bin-bin LIN. Parameter identification of magnetorheological damper model with modified seagull optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 764-772.
[3] Jie LI,Tao CHEN,Wen-cui GUO,Qi ZHAO. Pseudo excitation method of vehicle non-stationary random vibration in space domain and its application [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 738-744.
[4] Wei LI,Hai-sheng SONG,Hao-yu LU,Wen-ku SHI,Qiang WANG,Xiao-jun WANG. Linear identification method of hysteresis characteristic of composite leaf springs [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 829-836.
[5] Wei-min ZHUANG,Shen CHEN,Di WU. Influence of strengthening form of CFRP on transverse impact performance of steel tube [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 819-828.
[6] Ying-chao ZHANG,Yun-hang LI,Zi-yu GUO,Guo-hua WANG,Zhe ZHANG,Chang SU. Optimization of the aerodynamic drag reduction of a cab behind engine vehicle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 745-753.
[7] Liang DUAN,Chun-yuan SONG,Chao LIU,Wei WEI,Cheng-ji LYU. State recognition in bearing temperature of high-speed train based on machine learning algorithms [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 53-62.
[8] Wei-min ZHUANG,Shen CHEN,Nan WANG. Influence on thermal stress of autobody steel-aluminum clinch-adhesive connection structure [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 70-78.
[9] Jian-bin CHEN,Song-ze ZHOU,Feng-yong FEI,Yong-long CHEN,Guo-ping LING. Influences of interference fit and knurling connection type on press fitting failure of assembled camshaft [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1959-1966.
[10] Xing-jun HU,Jing-long ZHANG,Yu-fei LUO,Li XIN,Sheng LI,Jin-rui HU,Wei LAN. Influence investigation of cooling tube structure and airflow direction on thermal⁃hydraulic performance of air⁃cooled charge air cooler [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1933-1942.
[11] Yong LUO,Yong-heng WEI,Huan HUANG,Ren-jie XIAO,Lin REN,Huan-yu CUI. Starting control of P2.5 plug⁃in hybrid configuration dual⁃clutch based on driver's intention recognition [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1575-1582.
[12] Xiao-hua ZENG,Mei-jie SONG,Da-feng SONG,Yue WANG. Data processing method of bus driving cycle based on vehicular network information [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1692-1699.
[13] Chao MA,Yun-kai GAO,Zhe LIU,Yue-xing DUAN,Lin-li TIAN. Optimization of multi⁃material and beam cross⁃sectional shape and dimension of skeleton⁃type body [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1583-1592.
[14] Feng-chong LAN,Ji-wen LI,Ji-qing CHEN. DG-SLAM algorithm for dynamic scene compound deep learning and parallel computing [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(4): 1437-1446.
[15] Jian YANG,Qi XIA,Hai-chao ZHOU,Guo-lin WANG. Noise reduction mechanism of truck radial tire based on modified carcass string contour design [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(4): 1198-1203.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!