Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1229-1244.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210893

   

Methods and applications of ground vehicle mobility evaluation

Chen HUA1,2(),Run-xin NIU1,Biao YU1()   

  1. 1.Hefei Institutes of Physical Science，Chinese Academy of Sciences，Hefei 230031，China
    2.Science Island Branch of Graduate School，University of Science and Technology of China，Hefei 230026，China
  • Received:2021-09-08 Online:2022-06-01 Published:2022-06-02
  • Contact: Biao YU E-mail:ba20168187@mail.ustc.edu.cn;byu@hfcas.ac.cn

RICH HTML

 55   

PDF (PC)

764

Abstract:

Firstly， the definition of mobility was discussed， and then the main existing ground vehicle mobility evaluation methods， i.e.， empirical model， semi-empirical model， numerical simulation and machine learning， were analysed and summarized comprehensively， also the advantages and disadvantages of each method were compared. In order to describe the vehicle mobility completely， application of these methods are discussed，such as military vehicles， sea-floor operation， planetary exploration and agricultural vehicles. Finally， according to the problems existing in the vehicle mobility evaluation methods， this paper proposed some key technologies and exploratory research directions from real-time evaluation of vehicle mobility and real-time terrain perception， path planning on deformed terrain and autonomous mobility evaluation for unmanned systems， so as to provide a beneficial reference to the development of vehicle mobility elevation methods.

Key words: vehicle engineering, terramechanics, mobility evaluation, off-road, numerical simulation

CLC Number: 

  • U461.5

Fig.1

Mobility map"

Fig.2

Flow chart of mobility evaluation method based on cone index"

Table 1

Average maximum pressure expectations"

地表条件平均最大应力/（kN·m-2）

理想值

（多次通过）

良好的

最大允许值

（大多数可在一次通过情况下通过）

温带浸粒烟土150200300
热带浸粒烟土90140240
沼泽地305060
沼泽地流动层/欧洲沼泽区51015
雪地1025~3040

Fig.3

Bevameter"

Fig.4

GO/NOGO map and path planning result"

Fig.5

Soil trafficability evaluation framework"

Fig.6

Wheel and soil interaction simulation"

Fig.7

Grid used to simulate the soil characteristics with different sizes"

Fig.8

Model of the particle interaction force"

Fig.9

Simulation experiment of soil parameters calibration"

Fig.10

Multi-body dynamics simulation ofwheeled and tracked vehicles driving on the DEM terrain"

Fig.11

Simulation of tire interacting with SPH soil model"

Fig.12

Simulation of the vehicle driving on the snow"

Table 2

Large scale soil modeling technologylevel evaluation"

评估指标Lagrangian/ALE FEMEulerian FEMDEMSPHMPM
总 计2736474240
土壤形变范围49999
嵌入障碍物能力37999
车辆交互保真度56888
仿真计算速率57659
实验验证精度53753
当前应用趋势54865

Fig.13

Interaction between tire and soil RVE model"

Fig.14

Mobility distribution results based on ANN"

Fig.15

Test scenario in simulation environment"

Table 3

Comparison of mobility evaluation methods"

方法评估手段评估对象方法局限性应用前景
经验方法实地试验常见轮式、履带式车辆实地测试数据泛化性差较差
半经验方法实地试验和理论推导不受限制半经验公式存在模型简化与假设一般
数值模拟法理论推导和计算机仿真不受限制仿真时间较长、建模难度较大较好
机器学习法训练数据和机器学习算法不受限制训练数据获取困难，泛化性差好

Fig.16

Framework of NRMM"

Fig.17

Framework of NG-NRMM"

Fig.18

Mobility distribution map"

1 杨帆. 基于车轮力测试的车辆地面通过性关键技术研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学仪器科学与工程学院, 2016.
Yang Fan. Research on key techniques of vehicle trafficability based on wheel force test[D]. Nanjing: School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, 2016.
2 Wong J Y, Jayakumar P, Toma E, et al. A review of mobility metrics for next generation vehicle mobility models[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2020, 87: 11-20.
3 李灏, 刘新全. 基于圆锥指数评估车辆机动性能综述[J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2011, 49(7): 16-20.
Li Hao, Liu Xin-quan. Summary of evaluating the mobility of vehicle based on cone index[J]. Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering, 2011, 49(7):16-20.
4 宁俊帅, 李军, 李灏, 等. 军用车辆机动性评估方法[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2009, 30(5): 49-51.
Ning Jun-shuai, Li Jun, Li Hao, et al. Military vehicle mobility evaluation methods[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2009, 30(5): 49-51.
5 白意东, 孙凌宇, 张明路, 等. 履带机器人地面力学研究进展[J]. 机械设计, 2020, 37(10): 1-13.
Bai Yi-dong, Sun Ling-yu, Zhang Ming-lu, et al. Progress of research on terramechanics for tracked mobile robots[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2020, 37(10): 1-13.
6 刁增祥,余建星. 军用车辆的机动性等级和模型[J]. 汽车工程, 2005, 27(3): 354-357.
Diao Zeng-xiang, Yu Jian-xing. Mobility grade and model of military vehicles[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2005, 27(3): 354-357.
7 Ahlvin R B, Haley P W. NATO reference mobility model edition II[R]. Vicksburg: USA Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, 1992.
8 Sohne W. Four-wheel drive or rear-wheel drive for high power farm tractors[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 1968, 5(3): 9-28.
9 张克健. 车辆地面力学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2002.
10 Bekker M G. Introduction to Terrain-vehicle Systems[M]. Ann Arbor,MI:University of Michigan Press,1969.
11 Rula A A, Nuttall C J. An analysis of ground mobility models (ANAMOB)[R]. Vicksburg: USA Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, 1971.
12 Rowland D. A review of vehicle design for soft ground operation[C]∥International Conference of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Vicksburg, USA, 1975:179-219.
13 Wong J Y. Terramechanics and off-road vehicles[R]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1989.
14 Wong J Y. Theory of Ground Vehicles[M]. New York: Wiley-Inter Science, 2001.
15 Lessem A, Mason G, Ahlvin R. Stochastic vehicle mobility forecasts using the NATO reference mobility model[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 1996, 33(6): 273-280.
16 Zhou Q M, Liu X J. Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties[J]. Journal of Computer & Geosciences, 2004, 30(4): 369-378.
17 Ishigami G, Kewlani G, Iagnemma K. Predictable mobility: a statistical approach for planetary surface exploration rovers in uncertain terrain[J]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2009, 16(9): 61-70.
18 Peynot T, Lui S, McAllister R, et al. Learned stochastic mobility prediction for planning with control uncertainty on unstructured terrain[J]. Journal of Field Robotics, 2014, 31(6): 969-995.
19 Gonzalez R, Jayakumar P, Iagnemma K. Stochastic mobility prediction of ground vehicles over large spatial regions: a geostatistical approach[J]. Auton Robot, 2017, 41(2): 311-331.
20 Gonzalez R, Jayakumar P, Iagnemma K. Generation of stochastic mobility maps for large-scale route planning of ground vehicles: a case study[J]. Journal of Terramechanic, 2017, 69(2): 1-11.
21 李坤伟,游雄,张欣,等. 基于多源数据的土壤越野通行性评估[J]. 测绘科学技术学报, 2018, 35(2): 206-210.
Li Kun-wei, You Xiong, Zhang Xin, et al. Evaluation of soil trafficability based on multi-source data[J]. Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, 2018, 35(2): 206-210.
22 Ti K S, Huat B B K, Noorzaei J. A review of basic soil constitutive models for geotechnical application[J]. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 14(1):1-18.
23 Drucker P. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis for limit design[J]. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1952, 10(2): 157-165.
24 Sandler I S, Rubin D. An algorithm and a modular subroutine for the cap model[J]. Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1979, 3(2): 173-186.
25 Grujicic M, Bell W C, Arakere G, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of up-armouring on the off-road braking and sharp-turn performance of a high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle[J]. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2009, 223(11): 1419-1434.
26 Ragheb H, EI-Gindy M, Kishawy H A. Multi-wheeled combat vehicle modeling on rigid and soft terrain[C]∥NDIA Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposum, Modeling & Simulation, Testing and Validation (MSTV), Michigan, USA, 2013: 325-336.
27 Shoop S A, Richmond P W, Lacombe J. Overview of cold regions mobility modeling at CRREL[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2006, 43(1): 1-26.
28 Wright A. Tire/soil interaction modelling withing a virtual proving ground environment[D]. Berkeley: Institute of Defence and Security, University of Cranfield, 2012.
29 Ravula P, Acar G, Balachandran B. Discrete element method-based studies on dynamic interactions of a lugged wheel with granular media[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2021, 94: 49-62.
30 张锐,李建桥,李因武,等. 部件复杂表面影响土壤扰动行为的离散元宏细观分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2009, 39(5): 1218-1223.
Zhang Rui, Li Jian-qiao, Li Yin-wu, et al. DEM macroscopic and mesoscopic analysis in disturbed behavior of soil acted by part with complex surface[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2009, 39(5): 1218-1223.
31 Dasch J, Jayakumar P, Bradbury M, et al. Next-generation NATO reference mobility model (NG-NRMM)[R]. Aarhus: the NATO Science & Technology Organization, 2020.
32 Melanz D, Jayakumar P, Negrut D. Experimental validation of a differential variational inequality-based approach for handling friction and contact in vehicle/granular-terrain interaction[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2016, 65: 1-13.
33 Tasora A, Magnoni D, Negrut D, et al. Deformable soil with adaptive level of detail for tracked and wheeled vehicles[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Performance, 2019, 5(1): 60-76.
34 Serban R, Taylor M, Negrut D, et al. Template-based ground vehicle modeling and simulation[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Performance, 2019, 5(1):2-17.
35 Recuero A, Serban R, Peterson B, et al. A high-finitely approach for vehicle mobility simulation: nonlinear finite element tires operating on granular material[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2017, 72: 39-54.
36 Cundall P A, Strack O D L. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies[J]. Geotechnique, 1979, 29(1): 47-65.
37 Cundall P A. A computer model for simulating progressive large-scale movements in block rock mechanics[C]∥International Symposium on Visual Computing, Nevada, USA, 1971: 8-11.
38 Smith W, Peng H. Modeling of wheel-soil interaction over rough terrain using the discrete element method[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2013, 50(5/6): 277-287.
39 Negrut D, Melanz D, Mazhar H, et al. Investigating through simulation the mobility of light tracked vehicles operating on discrete granular terrain[J]. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 2013, 6(1): 369-381.
40 Wasfy T M, Wasfy H M, Peters J M. Coupled multibody dynamics and discrete element modeling of vehicle mobility on cohesive granular terrains[C]∥ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, USA, 2014: 8-13.
41 Wasfy T M, Wasfy H M, Peters J M. High-fidelity multi-body dynamics vehicle model coupled with a cohesive soil discrete element model for predicting vehicle mobility[C]∥International Conference on Multi-body Systems, Boston, USA, 2015:202-208.
42 Wasfy T M, Jayakumar P, Mechergui D, et al. Prediction of vehicle mobility on large-scale soft-soil terrain maps using physics-based simulation[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Performance, 2018, 4(4): 347-381.
43 Akinci N, Cornelis J, Akinci G, et al. Coupling elastic solids with smoothed particle hydrodynamics fluids[J]. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 2013, 24(3/4): 195-203.
44 Lescoe R, El-Gindy M, Koudela K, et al. Tire-soil modeling using finite element analysis and smooth particle hydrodynamics techniques[C]∥ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2010: 3-18.
45 Lescoe R, El-Gindy M, Koudela K,et al. Improvement of soil modeling in a tire-soil interaction using finite element analysis and smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Mechanical Engineering, 2010(10): 3-18.
46 Sulsky D, Zhou S J, Schreyer H. Application of particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 1996, 87(1/2): 236-252.
47 王宇新, 顾元宪, 孙明. 无网格MPM法在冲击载荷问题中的应用[J]. 工程力学, 2006, 23(5): 46-51.
Wang Yu-xin, Gu Yuan-xian, Sun Ming. Application of material point method to shock load problems[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 23(5): 46-51.
48 Stomakhin A, Schroedery C, Chai L, et al. A material point method for snow simulation[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2013, 32(4): 1-10.
49 Letherwood M, Gerth R, Jayakumar O, et al. Cooperative demonstration of technology next-generation NATO reference mobility model (NG-NRMM)[R]. Michigan: Collaboration Support Office Applied Vehicle Technology Pane, 2018.
50 Yamashita H, Chen G, Ruan Y, et al. Hierarchical multiscale modeling of tire-soil interaction for off-road mobility simulation[J]. ASME Journal of Computational Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 14(6): No. 061007.
51 Nishiyama K, Nakashima H, Shimizu H, et al. 2D FE-DEM analysis of contact stress and tractive performance of a tire driven on dry sand[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2017, 74(12): 25-33.
52 Nishiyama K, Kashima H, Shida T, et al. FE-DEM with interchangeable modeling for off-road tire traction analysis[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2018, 78: 15-25.
53 Guo N, Zhao J. A coupled FEM/DEM approach for hierarchical multiscale modeling of granular media[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2014, 99(11): 789-818.
54 Liu Y, Sun W C, Yuan Z, et al. A nonlocal multiscale discrete-continuum model for predicting mechanical behavior of granular materials[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 106(2): 129-160.
55 Nakashima H, Oida A. Algorithm and implementation of soil-tire contact analysis code based on dynamic FE-DE method[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2004, 41(4): 127-137.
56 Mechergui D, Jayakumar P. Efficient generation of accurate mobility maps using machine learning algorithms[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2020, 88: 53-63.
57 Kirchdoerfer T, Ortiz M. Data-driven computational mechanics[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 304: 81-101.
58 Ghaboussi J, Garrett J H, Wu X. Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1991, 117(1): 132-153.
59 Ellis G W, Yao C, Zhao R, et al. Stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering, 1995, 121(5): 429-435.
60 Furukawa T, Yagawa G. Implicit constitutive modelling for vis-coplasticity using neural networks[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 43(2): 195-219.
61 Wang K, Sun W C. A multiscale multi-permeability poroplasticity model linked by recursive homogenizations and deep learning[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 334: 337-380.
62 Leiter K W, Barnes B C, Becker R, et al. Accelerated scale-bridging through adaptive surrogate model evaluation[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2018, 27: 91-106.
63 Yamashita H, Chen G C, Ruan Y F, et al. Parallelized multiscale off-road vehicle mobility aimulation algorithm and full-scale vehicle validation[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2020, 15(9): No. 091007.
64 Chen G C, Yamashita H, Ruan Y F, et al. Enhancing hierarchical multiscale off-road mobility model by neural network surrogate model[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, 16(8): No. 081005.
65 Tw A, Pj B. Next-generation NATO reference mobility model complex terramechanics: definition and literature review[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2021, 96: 45-57.
66 Priddy J D. Stochastic vehicle mobility forecasts using the NRMM[R]. Warren: US Army TARDEC, 1995.
67 Ma R, Chemistruck H, Ferris J B. State-of-the-art of terrain profile characterization models[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2013, 61(1): 285-304.
68 Vong T T, Haas G A, Henry C L. NATO reference mobility model (NRMM) modeling of the DEMO II experimental unmanned ground vehicle[R]. Nevada: Army Research Lab, 1999.
69 Willoughby W E, Jones R A, Mason G L, et al. Application of historical mobility testing to sensor-based robotic performance[J]. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 2006: 6230(4): 25-39.
70 Choi K K, Jayakumar P, Funk M, et al. Framework of reliability-based stochastic mobility map for next generation NATO reference mobility model[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2020, 14(2): No. 021012.
71 Homer C, Dewitz J, Yang L M, et al. National land cover database for the conterminous United States representing a decade of land cover change information[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2015, 81(5): 345-354.
72 Chemistruck H M, Ferris J B. Developing compact models of terrain surfaces[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2013, 135(6): No. 061008.
73 Cressie N, Johannesson G. Fixed rank kriging for very large spatial data sets[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 2008, 70(1): 209-226.
74 Hosseini S Z, Kappas M, Bodaghabadi M B, et al. Comparison of different geostatistical methods for soil mapping using remote sensing and environment variables in Poshtkouh rangelands, iran[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2014, 23(3): 737-751.
75 Yamashita H, Jayakumar P, Alsaleh M, et al. Physics-based deformable tire-soil interaction model for off-road mobility simulation and experimental validation[J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2018, 13(2):11-26.
76 Reid A A, Shoop S, Jones R, et al. High-fidelity ground platform and terrain mechanics modeling for military applications involving vehicle dynamics and mobility analysis[C]∥Asia-Pacific ISTVS Conference and Annual Meeting of Japanese Society for Terramechanics, Fairbanks, USA, 2007:23-26.
77 Raymond J B, Jayakumar P. The shearing edge of tracked vehicle-soil interactions in path clearing applications utilizing multi-body dynamics modeling & simulation[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2015, 58: 39-50.
78 张滔, 戴瑜, 刘少军, 等. 深海履带式集矿机多体动力学建模与行走性能仿真分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(6): 173-180.
Zhang Tao, Dai Yu, Liu Shao-jun, et al. Multi-body dynamic modeling and mobility simulation analysis of deep ocean tracked miner[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(6): 173-180.
79 Ma W B, Rao Q H, Feng K, et al. Experimental research on grouser traction of deep-sea mining machine[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2015, 36(9): 1243-1252.
80 Li J, Liu S, Dai Y. Effect of grouser height on tractive performance of tracked mining vehicle[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 2459-2466.
81 Xu F, Rao Q H, Ma W B. Turning traction force of tracked mining vehicle based on rheological property of deep-sea sediment[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2018, 28(6): 1233-1240.
82 Trease B, Arvidson R, Lindemann R, et al. Dynamic modeling and soil mechanics for path planning of the Mars exploration rovers[C]∥ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Washington DC, USA, 2011: 755-765.
83 Ghotbi B, Gonzalez F, Jozsef Kovecses J, et al. Mobility evaluation of wheeled robots on soft terrain[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2016, 100: 259-282.
84 王宪良,王庆杰,李洪文,等. 农业机械土壤压实研究方法现状[J]. 热带农业科学, 2015, 35(6): 72-76.
Wang Xian-liang, Wang Qing-jie, Li Hong-wen, et al. Current research status of soil compaction by agriculture machinery[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2015, 35(6): 72-76.
85 杨晓娟, 李春俭. 机械压实对土壤质量、作物生长、土壤生物及环境的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 48(7): 2008-2015.
Yang Xiao-juan, Li Chun-jian. Impacts of mechanical compaction on soil properties, growth of crops, soil-borne organisms and environment[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 48(7): 2008-2015.
86 Keller T, Arvidsson J. A model for prediction of vertical stress distribution near the soil surface below rubber-tracked under carriage systems fitted on agricultural vehicles[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016, 155: 116-123.
87 丁肇,李耀明,唐忠. 轮式和履带式车辆行走对农田土壤的压实作用分析[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5): 10-18.
Ding Zhao, Li Yao-ming, Tang Zhong. Compaction effects of wheeled vehicles and tracked on farmland soil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(5): 10-18.
88 王亮,戴宪彪,居鹤华. 一种基于单应的月球车车轮沉陷视觉测量方法[J]. 宇航学报, 2011, 32(8): 1701-1707.
Wang Liang, Dai Xian-biao, Ju He-hua. Homography based visual measurement of wheel sinkage for a lunar rover[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2011, 32(8): 1701-1707.
89 Hegde G M, Ye C, Robinson C A, et al. Computer-vision-based wheel sinkage estimation for robot navigation on lunar terrain[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2013, 18(4): 1346-1356.
90 Shirai T, Ishigami G. Development of in-wheel sensor system for accurate measurement of wheel terrain interaction characteristics[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2015, 62: 51-61.
91 Goldberg S, Maimone M, Matthies L. Stereo vision and rover navigation software for planetary exploration[C]∥Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 2002: 25-36.
92 Thrun S, Montemerlo M, Aron A. Probabilistic terrain analysis for high speed desert driving[C]∥Robotics: Science & Systems, Pennsylvania, USA, 2006: 16-19.
93 Loh J. Speed map for autonomous rovers over rough terrain[D]. Santa Cruz: School of Engineering, University of California, 2012.
94 Durst P J, Goodin C T, Anderson D T, et al. A reference autonomous mobility model[C]∥Winter Simulation Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2017: 4026-4037.
95 Durst P J, Goodin C. High fidelity modelling and simulation of inertial sensors commonly used by autonomous mobile robots[J]. World Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 2012, 8(3): 172-184.
[1] Jie LI,Tao CHEN,Wen-cui GUO,Qi ZHAO. Pseudo excitation method of vehicle non-stationary random vibration in space domain and its application [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 738-744.
[2] Wei LI,Hai-sheng SONG,Hao-yu LU,Wen-ku SHI,Qiang WANG,Xiao-jun WANG. Linear identification method of hysteresis characteristic of composite leaf springs [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 829-836.
[3] Wei-min ZHUANG,Shen CHEN,Di WU. Influence of strengthening form of CFRP on transverse impact performance of steel tube [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 819-828.
[4] Wen-ku SHI,Shu-guang ZHANG,You-kun ZHANG,Zhi-yong CHEN,Yi-fei JIANG,Bin-bin LIN. Parameter identification of magnetorheological damper model with modified seagull optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 764-772.
[5] Ying-chao ZHANG,Yun-hang LI,Zi-yu GUO,Guo-hua WANG,Zhe ZHANG,Chang SU. Optimization of the aerodynamic drag reduction of a cab behind engine vehicle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 745-753.
[6] Long XUE,Meng YAO,Li-ben LI,Yin-wu LI,Xiang-jin DENG,Jian-qiao LI,Meng ZOU. Experimental analysis of mechanical properties of surface lunar soil based on lunar indentation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(3): 497-503.
[7] Liang DUAN,Chun-yuan SONG,Chao LIU,Wei WEI,Cheng-ji LYU. State recognition in bearing temperature of high-speed train based on machine learning algorithms [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 53-62.
[8] Wei-min ZHUANG,Shen CHEN,Nan WANG. Influence on thermal stress of autobody steel-aluminum clinch-adhesive connection structure [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 70-78.
[9] Jian-bin CHEN,Song-ze ZHOU,Feng-yong FEI,Yong-long CHEN,Guo-ping LING. Influences of interference fit and knurling connection type on press fitting failure of assembled camshaft [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1959-1966.
[10] Xing-jun HU,Jing-long ZHANG,Yu-fei LUO,Li XIN,Sheng LI,Jin-rui HU,Wei LAN. Influence investigation of cooling tube structure and airflow direction on thermal⁃hydraulic performance of air⁃cooled charge air cooler [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1933-1942.
[11] Yong-hui SHANG,Lin-rong XU,Wei-zheng LIU,Yu CAI. Dynamic features of transition section between improved soil and A⁃filled of heavy⁃haul railway [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2128-2136.
[12] Yan-feng JIA,Da-yi QU,Lu LIN,Rong-han YAO,Xiao-long MA. Coordinated speed control of connected mixed traffic flow based on trajectory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2051-2060.
[13] Chao MA,Yun-kai GAO,Zhe LIU,Yue-xing DUAN,Lin-li TIAN. Optimization of multi⁃material and beam cross⁃sectional shape and dimension of skeleton⁃type body [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1583-1592.
[14] Yong LUO,Yong-heng WEI,Huan HUANG,Ren-jie XIAO,Lin REN,Huan-yu CUI. Starting control of P2.5 plug⁃in hybrid configuration dual⁃clutch based on driver's intention recognition [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1575-1582.
[15] Zong-wei YAO,Xu-dong GAO,Gang LIU,Qiu-shi BI. Research on working performance of vertical screw stirring mill based on numerical simulations [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1642-1650.
Viewed
Full text
824
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 55 0 0 769

  From Others local
  Times 99 725
  Rate 12% 88%

Abstract
2347
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 2347
  From Others local
  Times 2344 3
  Rate 100% 0%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd