Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (3): 1015-1027.

Previous Articles    

Lightweight image super⁃resolution network based on adaptive large kernel attention fusion

De-qiang CHENG1(),Gui LIU1,Qi-qi KOU3,Jian-ying ZHANG1,He JIANG1,2()   

  1. 1.School of Information and Control Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China
    2.Key Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Intelligent Information Processing,Institutions of Higher Education of Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610106,China
    3.School of Computer Science and Technology,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China
  • Received:2023-10-26 Online:2025-03-01 Published:2025-05-20
  • Contact: He JIANG E-mail:cdqcumt@126.com;jianghe@cumt.edu.cn

Abstract:

To address the issue of large parameter quantities in high-performance image super-resolution networks, a lightweight model was proposed. First, three kinds of large kernel attention were integrated, namely dual-path large kernel attention, large kernel pixel attention and large kernel channel attention, aiming to expand the model perceptual field and establish the long-range dependence of pixels. Second, an adaptive attention fusion mechanism was introduced to enhance the characterization of features and improve the model performance. Experiments demonstrate that the model performs well on visual perception and quantitative tests. On the Urban100 dataset, the mean value of peak signal-to-noise ratio of ×4 reconstruction results was improved by 0.25 dB compared with the currently popular ARRFN algorithm. The reconstructed images have more realistic visual effects, clearer and more natural texture information, which fully demonstrates the proposed algorithm effectiveness.

Key words: computer version, super-resolution, large kernel attention, lightweight, adaptive feature fusion

CLC Number: 

  • TP391.41

Fig.1

Framework of adaptive large kernel attention fusion network"

Table 1

Effects of the LKA and multi-path mechanism on the performance of DLKA"

LKA

3-5-1

LKA

5-7-1

LKA

7-9-1

参数量/K浮点运算量/G

Set5

PSNR/SSIM

Set14

PSNR/SSIM

B100

PSNR/SSIM

Urban100

PSNR/SSIM

××767.96113.6937.93/0.958733.43/0.915232.08/0.897531.74/0.9237
××778.20115.2037.94/0.959233.46/0.915932.10/0.897831.74/0.9238
××791.01117.3137.93/0.958433.44/0.915432.09/0.897731.73/0.9234
×837.08123.7337.97/0.959833.50/0.916832.12/0.898331.80/0.9243
×864.25127.3537.98/0.960133.51/0.917132.11/0.898131.78/0.9238
×853.47125.8437.96/0.959433.50/0.916632.10/0.897631.77/0.9235
904.38133.4737.98/0.960433.52/0.917032.11/0.898431.80/0.9246

Table 2

Ablation experiment of the LKCA"

1×1Conv7×7DPConv1×1Conv参数量/M浮点运算量/G

Set5

PSNR/SSIM

Set14

PSNR/SSIM

B100

PSNR/SSIM

Urban100

PSNR/SSIM

×

×

×

××0.5866.5637.76/0.959033.22/0.913531.92/0.896031.12/0.9171
×0.6068.9837.78/0.959533.23/0.913631.93/0.896131.13/0.9173
×0.5968.4137.79/0.959633.24/0.913931.93/0.896231.13/0.9172
×0.6171.3737.77/0.959233.23/0.913631.93/0.896231.12/0.9172
0.6373.2237.81/0.959333.26/0.914231.94/0.896331.14/0.9175

Fig.2

Reconstruction results of woman in Set5"

Table 3

Effects of the DLKA, LKPA and AWLM on the performance of ALKA"

DLKALKPAAWLM参数量/M浮点运算量/G

Set5

PSNR/SSIM

Set14

PSNR/SSIM

B100

PSNR/SSIM

Urban100

PSNR/SSIM

×

×

××0.74109.9937.81/0.957333.34/0.914232.03/0.896931.62/0.9213
××0.84123.7337.97/0.959833.50/0.916832.12/0.898331.80/0.9243
×0.77113.3737.93/0.958933.47/0.916132.11/0.898031.73/0.9234
×0.86127.1138.02/0.960833.50/0.916932.12/0.898331.98/0.9270
0.88127.1838.04/0.961033.52/0.917132.14/0.898732.01/0.9275

Table 4

Effects of the ALKA and LKCA on the performance of LAFB"

ALKALKCA参数量/M浮点运算量/G

Set5

PSNR/SSIM

Set14

PSNR/SSIM

B100

PSNR/SSIM

Urban100

PSNR/SSIM

×

×

×0.74109.9937.81/0.957333.34/0.914232.03/0.896931.62/0.9213
×0.88127.1838.04/0.960933.52/0.917132.14/0.898732.01/0.9275
0.92116.7337.96/0.959433.43/0.915232.06/0.897231.65/0.9217
1.06133.9038.05/0.961033.56/0.917532.16/0.899132.04/0.9279

Table 5

Influence of dual-path reconstruction strategy on network model performance"

双路重建

Set5

PSNR/SSIM

Set14

PSNR/SSIM

B100

PSNR/SSIM

Urban100

PSNR/SSIM

×38.04/0.960933.51/0.916932.15/0.898732.00/0.9269
38.05/0.961033.56/0.917532.16/0.899132.04/0.9279

Fig.3

Reconstruction results of Img011 in Urban100"

Fig.4

Reconstruction results of Img005 in Urban100"

Fig.5

Reconstruction results of Img033 in Urban100"

Fig.6

Reconstruction results of 182053 in B100"

Table 6

Index comparison under benchmark dataset when scaling factor is 2,3 and 4"

缩放因子模型参数量/M浮点运算量/G

Set524

PSNR/SSIM

Set1425

PSNR/SSIM

B10026

PSNR/SSIM

Urban10027

PSNR/SSIM

x2SRCNN100.0552.736.66/0.954232.42/0.906331.36/0.887929.50/0.8946
FSRCNN280.016.037.00/0.955832.63/0.908831.53/0.892029.88/0.9020
VDSR290.66612.637.53/0.958733.03/0.912431.90/0.896030.76/0.9140
DRCN301.7717974.037.63/0.958833.04/0.911831.85/0.894230.75/0.9133
CARN311.59222.837.76/0.959033.52/0.916632.09/0.897831.92/0.9256
EDSR-baseline121.37316.237.99/0.960433.57/0.917532.16/0.899431.98/0.9272
IMDN320.69158.838.00/0.960533.63/0.917732.19/0.899632.17/0.9283
LAMRN351.39320.138.09/0.960833.78**/0.9195**32.22/0.900332.31/0.9299
FMEN340.75172.038.10*/0.9609*33.75*/0.9192*32.26**/0.9007**32.41/0.9311
A2F-L331.36306.138.09/0.960733.78**/0.9192*32.23/0.900232.46*/0.9313*
ARRFN360.98-38.01/0.960633.66/0.917932.20/0.899932.27/0.9295
ALSR(本文)1.51189.338.14**/0.9616**33.74/0.918732.24*/0.9004*32.48**/0.9317**
x3SRCNN100.0552.732.75/0.909029.28/0.820928.41/0.786326.24/0.7989
FSRCNN280.015.033.16/0.914029.43/0.824228.53/0.791026.43/0.8080
VDSR290.66612.633.66/0.921329.77/0.831428.82/0.797627.14/0.8279
DRCN301.7717974.033.82/0.922629.76/0.831128.80/0.796327.15/0.8276
CARN311.59118.834.29/0.925530.29/0.840729.06/0.803428.06/0.8493
EDSR-baseline121.55160.434.37/0.927030.28/0.841729.09/0.805228.15/0.8527
IMDN320.7071.534.36/0.927030.32/0.841729.09/0.804628.17/0.8519
LAMRN351.41145.334.55*/0.9285*30.41*/0.843129.17*/0.8067*28.43*/0.8571
FMEN340.7677.234.45/0.927530.40/0.843529.17*/0.806328.33/0.8562
A2F-L331.37136.334.54/0.928330.41*/0.8436*29.14/0.806228.40/0.8574*
ARRFN360.99-34.38/0.927230.36/0.842229.09/0.805028.22/0.8533
ALSR(本文)1.69122.534.58**/0.9293**30.47**/0.8451**29.18**/0.8069**28.44**/0.8576**
x4SRCNN100.0552.730.48/0.862827.49/0.750326.90/0.710124.52/0.7221
FSRCNN280.014.630.71/0.865727.59/0.753526.98/0.715024.62/0.7280
VDSR290.66612.631.35/0.883828.01/0.767427.29/0.725125.18/0.7524
DRCN301.7717974.031.53/0.885428.02/0.767027.23/0.723325.14 /0.7510
CARN311.5990.932.13/0.893728.60/0.780627.58/0.734926.07/0.7837
EDSR-baseline121.51114.232.09/0.893828.58/0.781327.57/0.735726.04/0.7849
IMDN320.7040.932.21/0.894828.58/0.781127.56/0.735326.04/0.7838
LAMRN351.4185.032.37*/0.8971*28.70*/0.7839*27.61/0.7384*26.32*/0.7925
FMEN340.7744.232.24/0.895528.70*/0.7839*27.63/0.737926.28/0.7908
A2F-L331.3777.232.32/0.896428.67/0.783927.62*/0.737926.32*/0.7931*
ARRFN361.00-32.22/0.895228.60/0.781727.57/0.735526.09/0.7858
ALSR(本文)1.6669.932.40**/0.8976**28.71**/0.7843**27.65**/0.7386**26.34**/0.7937**

Table 7

Comparisons with the Transformer-based algorithms"

尺度因子LBNet37ESRT18NGswin38ALSR(本文)
2-38.03/0.960038.05/0.961038.14/0.9616
334.47/0.927734.42/0.926834.52/0.928234.58/0.9293
432.29/0.896032.19/0.894732.33/0.896332.40/0.8976

Fig.7

Difference map of Img092 in Urban100"

Fig.8

Difference map of 351093 in B100"

Table 8

Effect of model complexity on model performance"

LAFB个数输出通道数参数量/M浮点运算量/G

Set5

PSNR/SSIM

Set14

PSNR/SSIM

B100

PSNR/SSIM

Urban100

PSNR/SSIM

4641.06133.9038.09/0.960933.64/0.916432.19/0.899532.17/0.9286
4962.33295.0738.15/0.961933.72/0.918432.26/0.900932.45/0.9311
6641.51189.0338.14/0.961633.74/0.918732.24/0.900432.48/0.9317
6963.33417.7838.18/0.962133.83/0.919732.29/0.901132.60/0.9327
1 Cheng D Q, Chen L L, Lv C, et al. Light-guided and cross-fusion U-Net for anti-illumination image super-resolution[J]. IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2022, 32(12): 8436-8449.
2 Jebkins W K, Mather B C, Jr D C M. Nearest neighbor and generalized inverse distance interpolation for fourier domain image reconstruction[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Tampa, USA, 1985:1069-1072.
3 Blu T, Thevenaz P, Unser M. Linear interpolation revitalized[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2004, 13(5): 710-719.
4 Lin C, Shen M, Chang H, et al. The efficient VLSI design of BICUBIC convolution interpolation for digital image processing[C]∥Proceedings of the International Symposium on Circuitsand Systems (ISCAS), Seattle, USA, 2008:480-483.
5 Dai S, Han M, Xu W,et al. Soft-cuts: a soft edge smoothness prior for color image super-resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009, 18(5): 969-981.
6 Sun J, Xu Z, Shun H Y. Image super-resolution using gradient profile prior[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2008: 1-8.
7 Yan Q, Xu Y, Yang X, et al. Single image super resolution based on gradient profile sharpness[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2015,24(10):3187-3202 .
8 iang H J, Mujtaba A S A D, Liu J J, et al. Single image detail enhancement via metropolis theorem[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications,2024, 83: 36329-36353.
9 程德强, 郭昕, 陈亮亮, 等. 多通道递归残差网络的图像超分辨率重建[J].中国图象图形学报, 2021, 26(3): 605-618.
Cheng De-qiang, Guo Xin, Chen Liang-liang, et al. Image super resolution reconstruction by multi-channel recursive residual networks[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2021, 26(3): 605-618.
10 Dong C, Loy C C, He K M, et al. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 38(2): 295-307.
11 Shi W, Caballero J, Huszár F,et al. Real-time single image and video super-resolution using an efficient sub-pixel convolutional neural network[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016:1874-1883.
12 Lim B, Son S, Kim H,et al. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Honolulu,USA, 2016:1132-1140.
13 郭继昌, 吴洁, 郭春乐, 等. 基于残差连接卷积神经网络的图像超分辨率重构[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版,2019, 49(5): 1726-1734.
Guo Ji-chang, Wu Jie, Guo Chun-le, et al.Image super-resolution reconstruction based on residual-connected convolutional neural networks[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition,2019, 49(5): 1726-1734.
14 Zhang Y, Li K. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks[C]∥Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich Germany, 2018: 286-301.
15 Niu B, Wen W L, Ren W Q,et al. Single image super-resolution via a holistic attention network[C]∥ 2020 European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Glasgow, USA, 2020:191-207.
16 Vaswan A, Shazeer N, Parmar, et al. Attention is all you need[J/OL].[2023-09-15].
17 Liang J Y, Cao J Z, Sun G L,et al. Image restoration using swin transformer[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, Canada, 2021: 1833-1844.
18 Lu Z S, Li J C, Liu H, et al. Transformer for single image super-resolution[C]∥Proc IEEE/CVF Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Workshops, New Orleans, USA, 2022: 456-465.
19 Kou Q Q, Cheng D Q, Zhang H et al. Single Image super resolution via multi-attention fusion recurrent network[J]. IEEE Access,2023(11): 98653-98665.
20 Wang Z, Gao G, Li J,et al. Lightweight image super-resolution with multi-scale feature interaction network[C]∥IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Shenzhen, China, 2021: No.9428136.
21 Lan R, Sun L, Liu Z,et al. MADNet:a fast and lightweight network for single-image super resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2021,51(3):1443-1453.
22 Guo M H, Lu C Z, Liu Z N,et al. Visual attention network[J/OL].[2023-09-18].
23 Jie H, Li S, Samuel A, et al. Squeeze-and-excita⁃tion networks[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni⁃tion, Wellington, New Zealand, 2018: 7132-7141.
24 Bevilacqua M, Roumy A, Guillemot C, et al. Low-complexity single image super-resolution based on nonnegative neighbour embedding[C]∥British Machine Vision Conference, Oxford,UK, 2012:1-10.
25 Zeyde R, Elad M, Protter M. On single image scale-up using sparse-representations[C]∥International Conference on Curves and Surfaces,Avignon, France, 2010: 711-730.
26 Kim J, Lee J K, Lee K M. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks[C]∥2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016:1646-1654.
27 Huang J B, Singh A, Ahuja N. Single image super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Boston, USA, 2015:5197-5206.
28 Dong C, Loy C C, Tang X. Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network[C]∥European Conference on Computer Vision,Amsterdam, Holland, 2016:391-407.
29 Kim J, Lee J K, Lee K M. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 1646-1654.
30 Kim J, Lee J K, Lee K M. Deeply-recursive convolutional network for image super-resolution[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA,2016:1637-1645.
31 Ahh N, Kang B, Sohn K A. Fast, accurate, and lightweight super-resolution with cascading residual network[C]∥European Conference on Computer Vision(ECCV), Munich, Germany, 2018: 256-272.
32 Hui Z, Gao X, Yang Y, et al. Lightweight image super-resolution with information multi-distillation network[C]∥Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Xi'an, China, 2019: 2024-2032.
33 Wang X H, Wang Q, Zhao Y Z, et al. Lightweight single-image super-resolution network with attentive auxiliary feature learning[C]∥Asian Conference on Computer Vision(ACCV),Kyoto, Japan, 2020: 3023-3041.
34 Du Z C, Liu D, Liu J, et al. Fast and memory-efficient network towards efficient image super-resolution[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,New Orleans, USA, 2022 :853-862.
35 Yan Y, Xu X, Chen W, et al. Lightweight attended multi-scale residual network for single image super-resolution[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 52202-52212.
36 Qin J, Zhang R. Lightweight single image super-resolution with attentive residual refinement network[J].Neurocomputing, 2022, 500: 846-855.
37 Gao G W, Wang Z X, Li J C, et al. Lightweight bimodal network for single-image super-resolution via symmetric CNN and recursive transformer[C]∥International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,Shenzhen, China, 2022: 913-919.
38 Choi H, Lee J, Yang J. N-Gram in swin transformers for efficient lightweight image super-resolution[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, Canadian, 2023: 2071-2081.
39 Jie H, Li S, Samuel A, et al. Squeeze-and-excitation networks[C]∥Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Wellington, New Zealand, 2018: 7132-7141.
[1] Hua-song DONG,Yuan-feng LIAN. Lightweight detection algorithm for lossless transcoding and heavy compression of massive digital media videos [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 741-747.
[2] Hua CAI,Yan-yang ZHENG,Qiang FU,Sheng-yu WANG,Wei-gang WANG,Zhi-yong MA. Three-dimensional object detection algorithm based on multi-scale candidate fusion and optimization [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 709-721.
[3] Hua CAI,Ting-ting KOU,Yi-ning YANG,Zhi-yong MA,Wei-gang WANG,Jun-xi SUN. Three-dimensional vehicle multi-target tracking based on trajectory optimization [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(8): 2338-2347.
[4] Xin-gang GUO,Ying-chen HE,Chao CHENG. Noise-resistant multistep image super resolution network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(7): 2063-2071.
[5] Zi-chao ZHANG,Jian CHEN. A mapping method using 3D orchard point cloud based on hawk-eye-inspired stereo vision and super resolution [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1469-1481.
[6] Guang HUO,Da-wei LIN,Yuan-ning LIU,Xiao-dong ZHU,Meng YUAN,Di GAI. Lightweight iris segmentation model based on multiscale feature and attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2591-2600.
[7] Ben-huai LI,Yan-wen LIU,Lu WANG,Xue-qian CHEN,Wen-jie ZUO. Crashworthiness optimization for frontal⁃end structure of rail vehicle constrained with absorbed energy and crushed displacements [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(4): 982-988.
[8] Bin-xiang JIANG,Hong-kui XU,Dan HE. Drug Efficiency improvement of drug detection big data based on blockchain [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(7): 1666-1678.
[9] Fei-yue DENG, LYUHao-yang,Xiao-hui GU,Ru-jiang HAO. Fault diagnosis of high⁃speed train axle bearing based on a lightweight neural network Shuffle⁃SENet [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(2): 474-482.
[10] Yong CHEN,Chen-tao LU,Zhen WANG. Detection of foreign object intrusion in railway region of interest based on lightweight network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(10): 2405-2418.
[11] Yan-lei XU,Run HE,Yu-ting ZHAI,Bin ZHAO,Chen-xiao LI. Weed identification method based on deep transfer learning in field natural environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2304-2312.
[12] Chao MA,Yun-kai GAO,Zhe LIU,Yue-xing DUAN,Lin-li TIAN. Optimization of multi⁃material and beam cross⁃sectional shape and dimension of skeleton⁃type body [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1583-1592.
[13] Li-sheng JIN,Bai-cang GUO,Fang-rong WANG,Jian SHI. Dynamic multiple object detection algorithm for vehicle forward based on improved YOLOv3 [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(4): 1427-1436.
[14] Zhe-ming YUAN,Hong-jie YUAN,Yu-xuan YAN,Qian LI,Shuang-qing LIU,Si-qiao TAN. Automatic recognition and classification of field insects based on lightweight deep learning model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(3): 1131-1139.
[15] Hui YE,Chang LIU,Kang-kang YAN. Application of fiber reinforced composite in auto⁃body panel [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 417-425.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!