吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 1493-1500.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170253

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    

基于重磁异常的新生代丽水—椒江凹陷基底分布特征研究

马国庆, 明彦伯, 黄大年   

  1. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-29 发布日期:2018-11-20
  • 作者简介:马国庆(1984-),副教授,博士,主要从事多参量重磁联合处理与解释技术的研发,E-mail:maguoqing@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0602203,2017YFC0601606);国家油气重大专项项目(2016ZX05027-002-003);国家自然科学基金项目(41604098,41430322)

Distribution Characteristics Study of Cenozoic Basement of Lishui-Jiaojiang Sag Based on Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies

Ma Guoqing, Ming Yanbo, Huang Danian   

  1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2017-12-29 Published:2018-11-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0602203, 2017YFC0601606), National Oil and Gas Major Sub Project (2016ZX05027-002-003) and National Natural Science Fundation of China (41604098, 41430322)

摘要: 丽水—椒江凹陷位于东海陆架盆地西南部,是在中生代残留盆地基础上发育起来的新生代具有典型东断西超特点的断陷,是油气勘探的新区域。区域地质条件复杂、构造叠加、沉积厚度大,地震勘探无法获得较好的反射数据,因此采用面积广、深度大的重磁数据结合地震数据来描述基底构造和火成岩岩性特征,通过重磁数据的阶跃边界识别技术划分区域断裂。丽水—椒江凹陷内断裂呈北东向分布,控制凹陷的形状,且断裂作用使凹陷形成多个小型次凹,断陷特征明显。中—新生代火成岩具有较高的重磁异常,结合质量较好的地震剖面来获得地层、火成岩及岩性分布特征,并建立了多联通域地层的计算公式。区域内中—古生界较为发育,但凹陷内中—新生代火成岩侵入较少,不会对于油气构造造成大的破坏,因此该凹陷具有良好的油气前景。

关键词: 丽水—椒江凹陷, 重磁, 断裂, 多联通域地层, 火成岩

Abstract: Located in the southwestern part of the East China Sea continental shelf basin, the Lishui-Jiaojiang sag is a Cenozoic fault depression with typical east fault and west overpassing characteristics developed on the basis of the Mesozoic residual basins,and it is a new area for oil and gas exploration. Due to the complex geological conditions in this area such as the superimposed structure and the sedimentary thickness, the useful reflection data are not available through seismic exploration. The authors adopted the combination of gravity and magnetic data that are used for a wide area and large depth with seismic data to describe the structure, igneous rock,and lithological characteristics of the basement, and divided the regional faults by using the step boundary recognition technology of gravity and magnetic data. The inner faults in the sag show a north-eastward distribution, which control the shape of the sag. The fault depression is characterized by many small secondary depressions formed by the faults. The Mesozoic and Cenozoic igneous rocks have high gravity and magnetic anomalies. We obtained the strati-graphic, igneous and lithology distribution characteristics from the seismic profile with good quality,and established the formula for the calculation of the mulch-continuous domain strata. The Mesozoic strata are relatively developed in the region, and there are less Mesozoic and cenozoic igneous rocks in the sag, which will not cause the great damages to oil and gas structure. Therefore, this sag has a good oil and prospects.

Key words: Lishui-Jiaojiang sag, gravity and magnetic, fracture, multi connected domain strata, igneous rocks

中图分类号: 

  • P631.1
[1] 杨艳秋,李刚,戴春山. 东海陆架盆地西部坳陷带中生界分布特征及其有利区探讨[J]. 世界地质,2011,30(3):396-403. Yang Yanqiu, Li Gang, Dai Chunshan. Characteristics of Mesozoic Distribution and Discussion on Its Favorable Area in Western Depression Zone of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2011, 30(3):396-403.
[2] 贾军涛, 郑洪波. 东海的形成与构造演化[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2010,26(1):1-5. Jia Juntao, Zheng Hongbo. Formation and Tectonic Evolution of the East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology Letters, 2010, 26(1):1-5.
[3] 龚建明,李刚,杨传胜,等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界分布特征与油气勘探前景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2013,43(1):20-27. Gong Jianming, Li Gang, Yang Chuansheng, et al. Hydrocarbon Prospecting of Mesozoic Strata in Southern East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(1):20-27.
[4] 冯晓杰,蔡东升,王春修,等. 东海陆架盆地中新生代构造演化特征[J].中国海上油气:地质,2003, 17(1):33-37. Feng Xiaojie, Cai Dongsheng, Wang Chunxiu, et al. The Meso-Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution in East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas:Geology, 2003, 17(1):33-37.
[5] 杨艳秋,杨长清,李刚,等. 东海陆架盆地南部构造样式及分布特征[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012,32(3):113-118. Yang Yanqiu, Yang Changqing, Li Gang, et al. Structural Styles and Their Distribution Pattern in the Southern East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(3):113-118.
[6] 王国纯. 东海盆地构造区划及其特征[J]. 台湾海峡,1992,11(3):218-226. Wang Guochun. Tectonic Districts and Its Characteristics in East China Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait, 1992, 11(3):218-226.
[7] 杨传胜,李刚,杨长清,等. 东海陆架盆地及其邻域岩浆岩时空分布特征[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012,32(3):125-133. Yang Chuansheng, Li Gang, Yang Changqing, et al. Temporal and Spatial Distribution of the Igneous Rocks in the East China Sea Shelf Basin and Its Adjacent Regions[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(3):125-133.
[8] 王毅, 姜亮, 杨伟利.丽水-椒江凹陷断裂构造运动学[J].地质科学,2000,35(4):441-442. Wang Yi, Jiang Liang, Yang Weili. Kinematical Analysis on Faults in the Lishui-Jiaojiang Sag[J]. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 2000, 35(4):441-442.
[9] 蒋玉波,龚建明,曹志敏,等. 东海陆架盆地南部及邻区陆域中生界对比[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29(10):1-7. Jiang Yubo, Gong Jianming, Cao Zhimin, et al. Correlation of the Mesozoic Between Southern East China Sea Shelf Basin and Its Adjacent Areas[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2013, 29(10):1-7.
[10] 祝建军, 王琪, 梁建设,等. 东海陆架盆地南部新生代地质结构与构造演化特征研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2):222-229. Zhu Jianjun, Wang Qi, Liang Jianshe, et al. Cenozoic Geological Structure and Tectonic Evolution of Southern East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2):222-229.
[11] 陈国俊, 李超, 梁建设,等. 东海陆架盆地瓯江凹陷明月峰组沉积相及沉积特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(5):760-769. Chen Guojun, Li Chao, Liang Jianshe, et al. Sedimentary Facies of Mingyuefeng Formation in Oujiang Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(5):760-769.
[12] 杨长清, 杨传胜, 李刚,等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生代构造演化与原型盆地性质[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2012,32(3):105-111. Yang Changqing, Yang Chuansheng, Li Gang, et al. Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution and Prototype Basin Characters in the Southern East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2012, 32(3):105-111.
[13] 刘泽,戴黎明,李三忠,等. 东海陆架盆地南部中生代成盆过程的数值模拟[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2017,37(4):167-180. Liu Ze, Dai Liming, Li Sanzhong, et al. Numerical Simulation of Mesozoic Tectonic Processes in the Southern Part of East China Sea Continental Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2017, 37(4):167-180.
[14] Ma Guoqing, Huang Danian, Cai Liu. Step-Edge Detection Filters for the Interpretation of Potential Field Data[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2016, 173(3):795-803.
[15] 梁若冰.东海陆架盆地南部中生界分布浅析[J].海洋石油,2012,32(3):18-22 Liang Ruobing. The Distribution of Mesozoic in the Southern Part of East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Offshore Oil, 2012, 32(3):18-22.
[16] 何家雄,张伟,颜文,等.中国近海盆地幕式构造演化及成盆类型与油气富集规律[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014,34(2):121-134. He Jiaxiong, Zhang Wei, Yan Wen, et al. Episodic Tectonic Evolution Basin Types and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Chinese Marginal Basins[J]. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology, 2014, 34(2):121-134.
[17] Parker R L. The Rapid Calculation of Potential Ano-malies[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1973, 31(4):447-455.
[18] 高德章.东海陆架盆地岩石密度与磁性[J].上海国土资源, 1995(2):38-45. Gao Dezhang. Density and Magnetic of Rocks in the East Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Shanghai Geology, 1995(2):38-45.
[1] 郑国磊, 徐新学, 李世斌, 袁航, 马为, 叶青. 天津市重力数据反演解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1221-1230.
[2] 朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[3] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[4] 杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[5] 展铭望, 付广, 仇翠莹, 杨在增. 一种新的断裂破坏泥岩盖层程度的综合研究方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1687-1694.
[6] 牛子铖, 柳广第, 国殿斌, 王朋, 张家舲, 赵其磊. 查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1047-1059.
[7] 陈鹏, 单玄龙, 郝国丽, 赵容生, 周健. 长白山仙人桥温泉断裂岩溶复合型地热成因模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1236-1246.
[8] 王伟, 付广, 胡欣蕾. 断裂对盖层封气综合能力破坏程度的研究方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 685-693.
[9] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[10] 刘锦, 刘正宏, 赵辰, 彭游博, 王楚杰, 杨仲杰, 豆世勇. 辽宁清河断裂以北新太古代变质表壳岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 497-510.
[11] 刘敬寿, 戴俊生, 徐珂, 张艺, 丁文龙. 构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 84-94.
[12] 林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[13] 姜贵璞. 陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1649-1659.
[14] 宋洋, 谷洪彪, 李海君, 迟宝明. 断裂两盘井水位同震响应特征对比分析——以北京八宝山断裂带中段大灰厂两观测井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1815-1822.
[15] 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!