利用测井技术评价松辽盆地南部油页岩

利用测井技术评价松辽盆地南部油页岩

贺君玲¹，邓守伟^1，2，陈文龙¹，贾裕鲲³,高金琦¹

1.吉林油田公司勘探开发研究院，吉林松原 138000;2.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所，北京 100029;3.吉林石油集团公司试油测试公司，吉林松原 138000

收稿日期:2006-08-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-11-26 发布日期:2006-11-26
通讯作者: 贺君玲

Evaluation of Oil Shale in the Southern Songliao Basin Using Logging Techniques

HE Jun-ling¹, DENG Shou-wei^1，2, CHEN Wen-long¹, JIA Yu-kun³,Gao Jin-qi¹

1.PetroChina Jilin Oilfield Company, Songyuan,Jilin 138000,China;2.Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100029,China;3.Well Test Company, Jilin Petroleum Group Corporation，Songyuan,Jilin 138000,China

Received:2006-08-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2006-11-26 Published:2006-11-26
Contact: HE Jun-ling1

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了利用松辽盆地南部已有钻井的测井资料评价油页岩，分析了松辽盆地南部嫩二段油页岩的测井响应特征，充分利用测井资料连续性的优势，采用5口井93块油页岩岩心的有机碳、含油率化验分析数据和测井响应特征，建立嫩二段油页岩的有机碳含量与含油率之间定量关系式T^a=0.548 6TOC+0.18和△logR、自然伽玛与有机碳含量之间的定量关系式TOC=6.262 8×△logR+1.05，进而建立利用测井资料定量评价油页岩含油率模型T^a=0.546 8a×△logR＋0.548 6×△TOC＋0.18。通过模型计算出的油页岩段的含油率与油页岩实测含油率数据基本一致，而且计算出的含油率值连续。

关键词: 测井, 油页岩, 含油率, 有机碳, 自然伽玛

Abstract: In order to evaluate the oil shale in the southern Songliao Basin using the logging data of the drilled wells, the logging response characteristics of the oil shale in the second member of the Nenjiang Formation in southern Songliao Basin were analyzed. The advantage of the continuity of logging data was fully utilized, and the data of the organiccarbon content and their logging response characteristics of the cores from 93 oil shale in 5 wells were used to establish the quantitative formula between the organiccarbon content and the oil yield(T^a=0.548 6TOC+0.18) and among △logR, natural gamma ray and organic carbon content (TOC=6.262 8×△logR+1.05) of the oil shale in the second member of the Nenjiang Formation. The oil yield model of the oil shale is also set up as T^a=0.5468a×△logR＋0.548 6×△TOC＋0.18 to quantitatively evaluate the oil shale based on logging data. The calculated oil yield of the oil shale is continuous and is almost same as their real oil yield, which thus solves the problem of having no oil yield data before, and provides rational oil yield and thickness of the oil shale for evaluation of the oil shale in the southern Songliao Basin.

Key words: logging, oil shale, oil yield, organic carbon, natural gamma ray

中图分类号:

P618.12

贺君玲，邓守伟，陈文龙，贾裕鲲,高金琦. 利用测井技术评价松辽盆地南部油页岩[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 909-0914.

HE Jun-ling, DENG Shou-wei, CHEN Wen-long, JIA Yu-kun,Gao Jin-qi. Evaluation of Oil Shale in the Southern Songliao Basin Using Logging Techniques[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 909-0914.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张波, 曹洪恺, 孙建孟, 张鹏云, 闫伟超. 稠油热采地层阵列感应测井响应特性数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1277-1286.
[2]	日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
[3]	刘宗利, 王祝文, 刘菁华, 赵淑琴, 欧伟明. 辽河东部凹陷火山岩相测井响应特征及储集意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 285-297.
[4]	潘保芝, 刘文斌, 张丽华, 郭宇航, 阿茹罕. 一种提高储层裂缝识别准确度的方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 298-306.
[5]	李振苓, 沈金松, 李曦宁, 王磊, 淡伟宁, 郭森, 朱忠民, 于仁江. 用形态学滤波从电导率图像中提取缝洞孔隙度谱[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1295-1307.
[6]	马中良, 郑伦举, 赵中熙. 不同边界条件对油页岩原位转化开采的影响及启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 431-441.
[7]	葛利华, 姜弢, 徐学纯, 贾海青, 杨志超. 辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 616-625.
[8]	姜艳娇, 孙建孟, 高建申, 邵维志, 迟秀荣, 柴细元. 低孔渗储层井周油藏侵入模拟及阵列感应电阻率校正方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 265-278.
[9]	高建申, 孙建孟, 姜艳娇, 崔利凯. 侧向测井电极系结构影响分析及阵列化测量新方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1874-1883.
[10]	尤金凤, 邢立新, 潘军, 单玄龙, 樊瑞雪, 曹会. 基于Hyperion数据的油砂分布遥感研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1589-1597.
[11]	刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.
[12]	杜佰伟, 谢尚克, 董宇, 彭清华, 郑博. 伦坡拉盆地渐新统丁青湖组油页岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 671-680.
[13]	温志良, 姜福平, 钟长林, 姜雪飞, 王果谦, 齐岩. 松辽盆地东南隆起超大型油页岩矿床特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 681-691.
[14]	赵军, 代新雲, 古莉, 祁新忠, 陈伟中. 基于粒度控制的复杂储层渗透性建模方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 279-285.
[15]	郑香伟, 吴健, 何胜林, 胡向阳, 梁玉楠. 基于流动单元的砂砾岩储层渗透率测井精细评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 286-294.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed