吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (01): 256-260.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于稀疏表示的特定目标识别

查长军1,2, 孙南3, 张成1, 韦穗1   

  1. 1. 安徽大学 计算智能与信号处理教育部重点实验室, 合肥 230039;
    2. 合肥学院 机器视觉与智能控制技术重点实验室, 合肥 230601;
    3. 中国人民解放军73101部队, 江苏 徐州 221008
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-04 出版日期:2013-01-01 发布日期:2013-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 韦穗(1946-),女,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:图像处理与三维全息显示.E-mail:swei@ahu.edu.cn E-mail:swei@ahu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:查长军(1980-),男,博士研究生.研究方向:光学成像与信号处理.E-mail:zcj_longman@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20113401130001).

Special object recognition based on sparse representation

ZHA Chang-jun1,2, SUN Nan3, ZHANG Cheng1, WEI Sui1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computing & Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Machine Vision and Intelligence Control Technology, Hefei University, Hefei 230601, China;
    3. Troops 73101 of PLA, Xuzhou 221008, China
  • Received:2012-06-04 Online:2013-01-01 Published:2013-01-01

摘要: 针对轮廓检测系统输出采样信号的特点,结合稀疏表示及主成分分析理论,提出了一种基于稀疏表示的特定目标识别方法。该方法首先通过主成分分析提取采样信号的主要成分以消除冗余信息,同时将信号转换为相同维数的特征向量,然后将特征向量投影到低维空间构造出字典,通过该字典对测试信号进行稀疏表示、识别。数值仿真与现场实验结果表明:该方法在低维空间下具有很好的识别效果;并结合实际情况,对有损坏传感器的系统进行测试,结果表明本文方法具有较好的鲁棒性。

关键词: 信息处理技术, 稀疏表示, 轮廓识别, 特征提取

Abstract: According to the output signal characteristics of the profile detecting system, special object recognition method based on sparse representation, combined with the theory of sparse representation and principal component analysis, is proposed. First, using principal component analysis, the method extracts the main components of the sample signal in order to eliminate redundant information. Second, the signal is transformed into the same size of the feature vectors, which is then projected to the lower dimensional space to construct a dictionary. Finally, the testing samples are sparsely represented and recognized by the dictionary. Numerical simulations and experiments show that the proposed method has good classification effect in lower dimensional space, and good robustness for the system with some damage sensors in the actual situation.

Key words: information processing, sparse representation, profiling recognition, feature extraction

中图分类号: 

  • TN911.74
[1] Russomanno David J, Chari Srikan, Emmanuel Kenny, et al. Testing and evaluation of profiling sensors for perimeter security[J]. ITEA, 2010,31(1):121-130.

[2] Sartain Ronald B, Aliberti Keith, Alexander Troy, et al. Long-wave infrared profile feature extractor (PFx) sensor[J]. Proc of SPIE, 2009,7333(11):1-7.

[3] Hastie Trevor, Tibshirani Robert, Friedman Jerome. The Elements of Statistical Learning[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001:14-18.

[4] Chari Srikant, Halford Carl, Jacobs Eddie,et al. Classification of humans and animals using an infrared profiling sensor[J]. Proc of SPIE, 2009,7333(10):1-9.

[5] Russomanno David, Chari Srikan, Halford Carl. Sparse detector imaging sensor with two-class silhouette classification[J]. Sensors, 2008(8):7996-8015.

[6] Chen S, Donoho D, Saunders M. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit[J]. SIAM Review, 2001, 43(1):129-159.

[7] Li Yu-long, Feng Ju-fu. Sparse represention shape model//Proceedings of 2010 IEEE 17th ICIP, 2010:2733-2736.

[8] Estabridis Katia. Automatic target recognition via sparse representations[J]. Proc of SPIE, 2010,7696(O):1-9.

[9] Aharon M, Eald M, Bruckstein A M. The K-SVD: an algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 54(11): 4311-4322.

[10] Wright John, Yang Allen Y, Ganesh Arvind, et al. Robust face recognition via sparse representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 2009, 31(2):1-18.

[11] Chen S B, Donoho D L, Saunders M A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing,1998,20(1):33-61.

[12] Donoho D L, Elad M, Temlyakov V N. Stable recovery of sparse overcomplete representations in the presence of noise[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006,52(1):6-18.

[13] Rubinstein R, Bruckstein A M, Elad M. Dictionaries for sparse representation modeling[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98(6): 1045-1057.

[14] Yeasin M, Russomanno D J, Sorower S M, et al. Robust classification of objects using a sparse detector sensor//Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2008:742-748.
[1] 苏寒松,代志涛,刘高华,张倩芳. 结合吸收Markov链和流行排序的显著性区域检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1887-1894.
[2] 徐岩,孙美双. 基于卷积神经网络的水下图像增强方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1895-1903.
[3] 黄勇,杨德运,乔赛,慕振国. 高分辨合成孔径雷达图像的耦合传统恒虚警目标检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1904-1909.
[4] 李居朋,张祖成,李墨羽,缪德芳. 基于Kalman滤波的电容屏触控轨迹平滑算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1910-1916.
[5] 应欢,刘松华,唐博文,韩丽芳,周亮. 基于自适应释放策略的低开销确定性重放方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1917-1924.
[6] 陆智俊,钟超,吴敬玉. 星载合成孔径雷达图像小特征的准确分割方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1925-1930.
[7] 刘仲民,王阳,李战明,胡文瑾. 基于简单线性迭代聚类和快速最近邻区域合并的图像分割算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1931-1937.
[8] 单泽彪,刘小松,史红伟,王春阳,石要武. 动态压缩感知波达方向跟踪算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1938-1944.
[9] 姚海洋, 王海燕, 张之琛, 申晓红. 双Duffing振子逆向联合信号检测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1282-1290.
[10] 全薇, 郝晓明, 孙雅东, 柏葆华, 王禹亭. 基于实际眼结构的个性化投影式头盔物镜研制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1291-1297.
[11] 耿庆田, 于繁华, 王宇婷, 高琦坤. 基于特征融合的车型检测新算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 929-935.
[12] 陈绵书, 苏越, 桑爱军, 李培鹏. 基于空间矢量模型的图像分类方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 943-951.
[13] 陈涛, 崔岳寒, 郭立民. 适用于单快拍的多重信号分类改进算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 952-956.
[14] 孟广伟, 李荣佳, 王欣, 周立明, 顾帅. 压电双材料界面裂纹的强度因子分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 500-506.
[15] 林金花, 王延杰, 孙宏海. 改进的自适应特征细分方法及其对Catmull-Clark曲面的实时绘制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 625-632.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!