吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1308-1314.doi: DOI:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210014

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

快速路合流区主线不同交通状态下的安全性分析

张鑫1(),张卫华2   

  1. 1.南京理工大学 自动化学院,南京 210094
    2.合肥工业大学 汽车与交通工程学院,合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2022-06-01 发布日期:2022-06-02
  • 作者简介:张鑫(1993-),男,博士研究生. 研究方向:交通规划,交通安全以及交通控制. E-mail:zxxsrs@sina.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51878236);合肥市重点工程建设管理局科研项目(2019FFCJ4364)

Safety analysis of main line under different traffic conditions in expressway confluence area

Xin ZHANG1(),Wei-hua ZHANG2   

  1. 1.School of Automation,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China
    2.School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Online:2022-06-01 Published:2022-06-02

摘要:

为了探究快速路合流区主线的安全性,首先结合交通数据和有关研究,运用统计学方法分析了内侧车道和中间车道的平均速度与事故率的关系。接着,结合平均速度-事故率、Greenberg和Underwood模型,分别构建了交通密度k较大和较小时内侧车道和中间车道的事故率-交通密度模型(AR-k)。然后,从定性和定量的角度依次分析了两车道的k和累计车辆数n对交通安全的影响,结果表明,无论在哪个车道以及k较小或较大,nkAR都存在着较大的影响。最后,从控制合流区交通量和限制车速两个方面提出了改善交通安全的措施。

关键词: 交通工程, 快速路合流区, 交通密度, 事故率, 交通安全

Abstract:

In order to explore the safety of the mainline in expressway confluence area, firstly, based on the traffic data and related research, the relationship between average speed and accident rate of the inner lane and the middle lane is analyzed by using statistical methods, then, combined with models of average speed-accident rate, Greenberg and Underwood, traffic density-accident rate models(AR-k) of inner lane and middle lane with larger and smaller traffic density k are constructed respectively, and then, influence of k of two lane and cumulative number of vehicles n on traffic safety is analyzed from the qualitative and quantitative point of view, results show that that n and k have a great influence on AR no matter in which lane and whether k is small or large. Finally, some measures to improve traffic safety are put forward from two aspects of controlling traffic volume and limiting the speed in confluence area.

Key words: traffic engineering, expressway confluence area, traffic density, accident rates, traffic safety

中图分类号: 

  • U491.31

图1

平均速度-事故率散点分布"

图2

内侧车道AR-k-n的变化"

图3

中间车道AR-k-n的变化"

图4

内侧车道AR-k的变化"

图5

中间车道AR-k的变化"

1 江周, 张存保, 夏银霞. 基于交通冲突的高速公路实时安全状态评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(9): 95-101.
Jiang Zhou, Zhang Cun-bao, Xia Yin-xia. Research on real-time traffic safety state evaluation of freeway based on number of traffic conflicts[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(9): 95-101.
2 胡娟娟, 孙小端, 李凤. 出入口匝道对快速路安全性的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(14): 320-326.
Hu Juan-juan, Sun Xiao-duan, Li Feng. Effect on expressway safety of on and off ramps[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(14): 320-326.
3 戴学臻, 苑仁腾, 周亚男, 等. 城市快速路车流运行状态安全性评价[J].长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 40(2): 90-98.
Dai Xue-zhen, Yuan Ren-teng, Zhou Ya-nan, et al. Safety evaluation of urban expressway traffic flow operation status[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 40(2): 90-98.
4 刘雪. 考虑事故交通影响的快速路地点安全评价研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学交通运输学院,2019.
Liu Xue. Research on expressway location safety evaluation considering traffic impact of accident[D]. Beijing: School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019.
5 殷炬元, 李铁男, 孙剑. 基于贝叶斯空间相关模型的城市快速路安全影响因素研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2016, 34(3): 27-33, 40.
Yin Ju-yuan, Li Tie-nan, Sun Jian. An analysis on effective factors of safety for urban expressways based on bayesian spatial models[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2016, 34(3): 27-33, 40.
6 Zhong L D, Sun X D. Relationship between traffic flow and safety of freeways in China:a case study of Jingjintang freeway[C]∥The 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation. Indianapolis: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Indianapolis, USA, 2011:1-11.
7 陈永恒, 刘鑫山, 熊帅, 等. 冰雪条件下快速路汇流区可变限速控制[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2018, 48(3): 677-687.
Chen Yong-heng, Liu Xin-shan, Xiong Shuai, et al. Variable speed limit control under snow and ice conditions for urban expressway in junction bottleneck area[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(3): 677-687.
8 刘莹莹, 李健, 陈小鸿. 城市快速路车速离散特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(5): 111-120.
Liu Ying-ying, Li Jian, Chen Xiao-hong. Traffic speed dispersion on urban expressways: the characteristics and its influence factors[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(5): 111-120.
9 裴玉龙, 程国柱. 高速公路车速离散性与交通事故的关系及车速管理研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2004, 17(1):78-82.
Pei Yu-long, Cheng Guo-zhu. Research on the relationship between discrete character of speed and traffic accident and speed management of freeway[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2004, 17(1): 78-82.
10 张鑫, 张卫华. 考虑安全的快速路合流区主线车道宽度研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 49(6): 26-30.
Zhang Xin, Zhang Wei-hua. Study on lane width of main line in expressway confluence area considering safety[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(6): 26-30.
11 薛行健, 宋睿, 晏克非. 城市快速路匝道合流区车速限制研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2012, 44(6): 144-148.
Xue Xing-jian, Song Rui, Yan Ke-fei. Speed restriction on ramp merging area of urban expressway[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012, 44(6): 144-148.
12 Greenberg H. Analysis of traffic flow[J]. Operations Research, 1959, 7:79-85.
13 Underwood R T. Speed, Volume and Density Relationships, Quality and Theory of Traffic Flow[M]. New Haven: Yale Bureau of Highway Traffic, 1961.
14 Greenshields B D, Channing W, Miller H. A study of traffic capacity[C]∥Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, Washington DC, 1935: 448-477.
15 钟连德,荣建,孙小端. 关于高架快速路车道宽度设置的探讨[J]. 公路交通科技, 2006, 23(10): 117-119.
Zhong Lian-de, Rong Jian, Sun Xiao-duan. Discussion of lane width of elevated expressway[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2006, 23(10): 117-119.
[1] 曲大义,黑凯先,郭海兵,贾彦峰,王韬. 车联网环境下车辆换道博弈行为及模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(1): 101-109.
[2] 张文会,伊静,刘委,于秋影,王连震. 基于MADYMO的大客车追尾碰撞事故乘员损伤机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(1): 118-126.
[3] 刘志伟,刘建荣,邓卫. 基于潜在类别的无人驾驶汽车选择行为[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(4): 1261-1268.
[4] 徐进,潘存书,符经厚,刘俊,王郸祁. 典型道路场景以及场景切换时的速度行为特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(4): 1331-1341.
[5] 查伟雄,蔡其燕,李剑,严利鑫. 边路车辆出入条件下城市干线信号协调相位差优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 565-574.
[6] 张姝玮,郭忠印,杨轸,柳本民. 驾驶行为多重分形特征在驾驶疲劳检测中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 557-564.
[7] 万平,吴超仲,马晓凤. 基于ROC曲线和驾驶行为特征的驾驶愤怒强度判别阈值[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 121-131.
[8] 王海玮, 温惠英, 刘敏. 夜间环境驾驶员精神负荷的生理特性评估与实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 420-428.
[9] 严利鑫, 黄珍, 朱敦尧, 陈志军, 冉斌. 基于马尔科夫毯和隐朴素贝叶斯的驾驶行为险态辨识[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(6): 1851-1857.
[10] 付锐,马勇,郭应时,袁伟,孙浩. 基于实车试验数据的换道预警规则[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(2): 379-388.
[11] 贾洪飞,谭云龙,李强,杨东. 考虑驾驶员特征的快速路合流区间隙接受模型构建[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 55-61.
[12] 孙轶轩, 邵春福, 岳昊, 朱亮. 基于SVM灵敏度的城市交通事故严重程度影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(5): 1315-1320.
[13] 廖军洪, 邵春福, 邬洪波, 孙轶轩, 王书灵. 公路三维动态视距计算方法及评价技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 640-645.
[14] 高吕和, 田晶晶, 李世武, 孙文财. 基于事故树分析的车辆安全状态模糊综合评价模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊1): 95-100.
[15] 董宏辉,孙晓亮,贾利民,秦勇. 多模态的交通流量预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(03): 645-649.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!