吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 2619-2629.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20231193

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

考虑腹杆变形的钢桁腹组合箱梁挠度计算方法

王方旭(),刘世忠,杨霞林,姜宁,刘欣益,马驰   

  1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-02 出版日期:2025-08-01 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 作者简介:王方旭(1988-),男,博士研究生. 研究方向:组合箱梁力学性能. E-mail: 137276178@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51868040);国家自然科学基金项目(52268027);四川省自然科学基金项目(2022NSFSC0427)

Calculation method of deflection of composite box beam with considering the deformation of the steel truss web

Fang-xu WANG(),Shi-zhong LIU,Xia-lin YANG,Ning JIANG,Xin-yi LIU,Chi MA   

  1. School of Civil Engineering,Lanzhou Jiaotong University,Lanzhou 730070,China
  • Received:2023-11-02 Online:2025-08-01 Published:2025-11-14

摘要:

为分析腹杆变形对钢桁腹组合箱梁挠曲性能的影响,首先,从顶板、底板、腹杆以及组合箱梁截面转角出发建立位移函数,采用能量变分法求得组合箱梁挠曲位移表达式;其次,基于有限梁段法推导组合箱梁的梁段分析单元刚度矩阵及节点荷载列阵,求解组合箱梁挠曲位移;再次,分析组合箱梁在不同荷载工况下的挠曲特性,并与初等梁理论进行对比;最后,分析高跨比、腹杆直径、腹杆壁厚及腹杆倾角等构造参数对附加挠度的影响。结果表明,腹杆变形对钢桁腹组合箱梁挠度的影响不可忽略,采用初等梁理论计算组合箱梁挠度的最大误差达到了27.75%。在影响腹杆变形的构造参数中,腹杆壁厚对附加挠度的影响最大,随后依次是腹杆直径、高跨比和腹杆倾角。此外,附加挠度占比与高跨比及腹杆倾角呈正相关,与腹杆直径及腹杆壁厚呈负相关。

关键词: 桥梁与隧道工程, 腹杆变形, 挠度, 能量变分法, 有限梁段法

Abstract:

To analyze the influence of steel truss web deformation on the deflection of the steel truss composite box beam. Firstly, establishing displacement functions based on the rotation angle of the top flange, bottom flange, steel truss web,and composite box beam section, the expression of deflection displacement of composite box beam was obtained by energy variational method. Secondly, the beam segment analysis element stiffness matrix and nodal load array were derived based on the finite beam segment method, and the deflection displacement of the composite box beam was solved. Thirally, the deflection of the composite box beam under different load conditions for the compasite box beam were analyzed and compared with the elementary beam theory. Lastly, the influence of structural parameters such as height-span ratio, diameter of steel truss web, wall thickness of steel truss web and tilt angle of steel truss web on additional deflection were analyzed. The results show that, the influence of the deformation of the steel truss web deformation on the deflection of the composite box beam cannot be ignored, the maximum deflection error of the composite box beam was 27.75% by using the elementary beam theory. Among the structural parameters influence the deformation of the steel truss web, the wall thickness of steel truss web has the greatest influence on the additional deflection, followed by the diameter of steel truss web, the height-span ratio and the tilt angle of steel truss web. In addition, the additional deflection ratio was positively correlated with the height-span ratio and tilt angle of steel truss web, negatively correlated with the diameter of steel truss web and wall thickness of steel truss web.

Key words: bridge and tunnel engineering, steel truss web deformation, deflection, energy variational method, finite beam segment method

中图分类号: 

  • U443.3

图1

钢桁腹组合箱梁示意图"

图2

变形示意图"

图3

组合箱梁横截面示意图"

图4

腹杆等效换算"

图5

有限梁段模型"

图6

组合箱梁示意图(单位:m)"

表1

节点细部参数"

组件几何尺寸/mm数量材料
腹杆351×162Q345C
开孔钢板1 000×450×202Q345C
对穿钢筋2522
键销钢筋251010
连接螺栓M168

图7

计算流程图"

图8

有限元模型"

图9

工况Ⅰ加载简化示意图"

图10

工况Ⅰ荷载-挠度曲线"

图11

工况Ⅱ加载简化示意图"

图12

工况Ⅱ荷载-挠度曲线"

图13

工况Ⅲ加载简化示意图"

图14

工况Ⅲ荷载-挠度曲线"

表2

不同工况跨中挠度对比"

荷载形式wiρ计算方法
EulerANSYS-M1ANSYS-M2

Eq.

(26)

简支梁

集中荷载

wi /mm-2.133-2.469-2.611-2.725
ρ/%15.7422.4127.75

简支梁

均布荷载

wi /mm-1.633-1.835-1.951-2.035
ρ/%12.3419.4724.62

连续梁

均布荷载

wi /mm-0.797-0.892-0.944-0.985
ρ/%11.9118.4123.61

表3

参数取值表"

参数高跨比腹杆直径/mm腹杆壁厚/mm腹杆倾角/(°)
23/1163311460.10
23/1943411664.34
23/2723511867.00
23/3113612069.24
23/3503712271.07

图15

工况Ⅰ下不同高跨比对应跨中挠度"

图16

工况Ⅱ下不同高跨比对应跨中挠度"

图17

工况Ⅰ下不同腹杆直径对应跨中挠度"

图18

工况Ⅱ下不同腹杆直径对应跨中挠度"

图19

工况Ⅰ下不同腹杆壁厚对应跨中挠度"

图20

工况Ⅱ下不同腹杆壁厚对应跨中挠度"

图21

工况Ⅰ下不同腹杆倾角对应跨中挠度"

图22

工况Ⅱ下不同腹杆倾角对应跨中挠度"

表4

显著性指标"

荷载形式高跨比腹杆直径腹杆壁厚腹杆倾角
集中荷载0.1350.1970.2690.132
均布荷载0.1500.1750.2380.099
[1] Jung K H, Kim J H J, Yi J W, et al. Development and evaluation of new connection systems for hybrid truss bridges[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2013, 11(2):61-79.
[2] Tian Z J, Liu Y J, Jiang L, et al. A review on application of composite truss bridges composed of hollow structural section members[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 6(1): 94-108.
[3] Chen B C, Huang W J. Experimental research on ultimate load carrying capacity of truss girders made with circular tubes[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2007, 28(3): 31-36.
[4] Chen S L, Zhang H, Hou C, et al. Reliability calibration for the design of multiple-chord CFST trusses by advanced analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 2021, 89: 102051.
[5] Hu B, Che R Y, Wang J F, et al. Analytical investigation into the flexural behavior of steel tubular truss-and-concrete (STTC) composite beams[J]. Structures, 2023, 50: 670-688.
[6] Chen Y Y, Dong J C, Xu T H. Composite box girder with corrugated steel webs and trusses—A new type of bridge structure[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 166: 354-362.
[7] Chen Y Y, Dong J C, Tong Z J, et al. Flexural behavior of composite box girders with corrugated steel webs and trusses[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 209: 110275.
[8] Hu B, Wang J. Experimental investigation and analysis on flexural behavior of CFSTTC beams[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 116:277-290.
[9] Fong M, Chan S L. Advanced design for trusses of steel and concrete-filled tubular sections[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(12): 3162-3171.
[10] Peng G, Nakamura S, Zhu X, et al. An experimental and numerical study on temperature gradient and thermal stress of CFST truss girders under solar radiation[J]. Computers & Concrete, 2017, 20(5): 605-616.
[11] Huang W, Feng L, Chen B, et al. Experimental study on joint resistance and failure modes of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) truss girders[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 141:241-250.
[12] Chen Y, Feng R, Gao S. Experimental study of concrete-filled multiplanar circular hollow section tubular trusses[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 94:199-213.
[13] Feng R, Chen Y, Gao S, et al. Numerical investigation of concrete-filled multi-planar CHS inverse-triangular tubular truss[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015, 94: 23-37.
[14] Huang Y H, Liu A R, Fu J Y, et al. Experimental investigation of the flexural behavior of CFST trusses with interfacial imperfection[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 137: 52-65.
[15] Zhou W, Chen Y, Wang K, et al. Experimental research on circular concrete filled stainless steel tubular truss[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 117:224-238.
[16] Huang W, Lai Z, Chen B, et al. Concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) truss girders: Experimental tests, analysis, and design[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 156:118-129.
[17] 陈建兵, 蒋明利, 周晨, 等. 钢桁腹混凝土组合梁挠度计算方法研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报: 自然科学版, 2022, 41(6): 66-72.
Chen Jian-bing, Jiang Ming-li, Zhou Chen, et al. Calculation method of deflection of steel truss web concrete composite beam[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 41 (6): 66-72.
[18] 李丽园.考虑剪切变形影响的波形钢腹板组合箱梁挠曲力学特性及其试验研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 土木工程学院, 2019.
Li Li-yuan. Vertical flexural mechanical characteristics and experimental study of composite box girder with corrugated steel web considering shear deformation[D]. Lanzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2019.
[19] 王方旭, 杨霞林, 刘世忠. PBL节点初始平动刚度计算及设计参数优化[J]. 计算力学学报, 2022, 39(5): 574-581.
Wang Fang-xu, Yang Xia-lin, Liu Shi-zhong. Calc-ulation of initial translational stiffness of PBL nod-e and optimization of design parameters[J]. Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2022, 39(5): 574-581.
[20] 中交公路规划设计院有限公司. 公路桥涵设计通用规范: JTG D60—2015[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2015.
[21] 张岩. 钢桁腹式混凝土组合箱梁的力学性能研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院, 2019.
Zhang Yan. Research on mechanical properties of concrete composite box girder with steel truss webs[D]. Lanzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2019.
[1] 薛宇欣,周勇军,王业路,范凯翔,赵煜. 基于悬锤系统的简支梁桥冲击系数测试方法适用性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(9): 2557-2567.
[2] 卜建清,郭至博,张吉仁,荀敬川,黄晓明. 多损伤钢-混组合梁桥力学性能有限元分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(6): 1621-1637.
[3] 毛亚娜,刘世忠,杏剑,杨华,焦峪波. 超高性能玻璃砂混凝土-高强钢筋粘结滑移特性及其声发射参数表征[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(6): 1686-1694.
[4] 韩智强,谢刚,周勇军,刘世忠,晋民杰. 曲线桥梁车桥耦合振动数值分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2): 515-522.
[5] 朱劲松,秦亚婷,刘周强. 预应力UHPC-NC组合梁截面优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(11): 3151-3159.
[6] 杨国俊,田骐玮,吕明航,杜永峰,唐光武,韩宗健,伏一多. 大跨度悬索桥隧道式锚碇力学特性研究综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(6): 1245-1263.
[7] 袁周致远,吉伯海,夏俊元,孙童. 钢箱梁横隔板-纵肋疲劳裂纹气动冲击维修试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(12): 2883-2891.
[8] 李春良,林志豪,赵珞珞. 铰缝及板损伤后对空心板桥横向受力的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 611-619.
[9] 白伦华,沈锐利,张兴标,王路. 自锚式悬索桥的面内稳定性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1500-1508.
[10] 王涛, 伞晓刚, 高世杰, 王惠先, 王晶, 倪迎雪. 光电跟踪转台垂直轴系动态特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1099-1105.
[11] 季文玉, 李旺旺, 过民龙, 王珏. 预应力RPC-NC叠合梁挠度试验及计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 129-136.
[12] 魏海斌, 张仰鹏, 焦峪波, 刘寒冰. 钢-混组合梁挠度增大系数的神经网络计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(4): 963-967.
[13] 肖赟, 雷俊卿, 张坤, 李忠三. 多级变幅疲劳荷载下预应力混凝土梁刚度退化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 665-670.
[14] 宋彦君, 刘寒冰, 谭国金, 王龙林. 基于应变计的梁式桥位移响应测试方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(增刊1): 198-201.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!