吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (11): 3476-3484.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240206

• 车辆工程·机械工程 • 上一篇    

锈损冷弯薄壁型钢混合连接抗剪性能试验

褚云朋(),陈雪琴,肖雅馨,夏珲   

  1. 西南科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,四川 绵阳 621010
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-01 出版日期:2025-11-01 发布日期:2026-02-03
  • 作者简介:褚云朋(1979-),男,教授,博士.研究方向:结构工程.E-mail:chuyunpeng@swust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(52268029);四川省自然科学基金项目(2023NSFSC0381)

Shear performance test of corroded cold-formed thin-walled steel hybrid connection

Yun-peng CHU(),Xue-qin CHEN,Ya-xin XIAO,Hui XIA   

  1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010,China
  • Received:2024-03-01 Online:2025-11-01 Published:2026-02-03

摘要:

为获得锈蚀对冷弯薄壁型钢纯自攻螺钉连接与自攻螺钉-拉铆钉混合连接抗剪性能的影响,对锈蚀状态下的上述连接试件进行剪切试验。结果表明:连接钢板的力学性能指标随失重率增加呈线性下降的趋势;同失重率下,纯自攻螺钉连接试件抗剪承载力下降幅度大于自攻螺钉-拉铆钉混合连接试件,且锈蚀时间越长此现象越明显;引入锈蚀因子确定此类连接的承载力计算公式,为锈损冷弯薄壁型钢连接承载力安全评估提供相应参考。

关键词: 锈蚀冷弯薄壁型钢连接, 剪切试验, 抗剪承载力, 退化规律, 计算方法

Abstract:

In order to obtain the influence of corrosion on the shear performance of pure self-tapping screw connection and self-tapping screw-pull rivet hybrid connection of cold-formed thin-walled steel, the shear test of the above connection specimens under corrosion condition was carried out. The results show that the mechanical properties of the connecting steel plate decrease linearly with the increase of weight loss rate. Under the same weight loss rate, the shear bearing capacity of the pure self-tapping screw connection specimen decreases more than that of the self-tapping screw-pulling rivet hybrid connection specimen, and the longer the corrosion time, the more obvious the phenomenon. The corrosion factor is introduced to determine the bearing capacity calculation formula of this kind of connection, which provides a corresponding reference for the safety assessment of the bearing capacity of corroded cold-formed thin-walled steel connections.

Key words: corroded cold-formed thin-walled steel connection, shear test, shear bearing capacity, degradation rule, calculation method

中图分类号: 

  • TU33

图1

试件连接方式与锈蚀现场图"

表1

试件基本参数"

组别试件编号锈蚀时间/dt/mm连接方式
12-0.8-d600.8+0.8单一连接
24-0.8-d120----
36-0.8-d180----
42-0.8-h600.8+0.8混合连接
54-0.8-h120----
66-0.8-h180----
72-1.0-d601.0+1.0单一连接
84-1.0-d120----
96-1.0-d180----
102-1.0-h601.0+1.0混合连接
114-1.0-h120----
126-1.0-h180----
132-1.2-d601.2+1.2单一连接
144-1.2-d120----
156-1.2-d180----
162-1.2-h601.2+1.2混合连接
174-1.2-h120----
186-1.2-h180----
192-1.5-d601.5+1.5单一连接
204-1.5-d120----
216-1.5-d180----
222-1.5-h601.5+1.5混合连接
234-1.5-h120----
246-1.5-h180----
252-2.0-d602.0+2.0单一连接
264-2.0-d120----
276-2.0-d180----
282-2.0-h602.0+2.0混合连接
294-2.0-h120----
306-2.0-h180----

图2

不同锈蚀时间连接钢板表面形貌"

图3

连接钢板锈蚀时间与失重率之间的关系"

图4

试件不同周期的应力-应变曲线"

表2

材性试验结果"

t/mm锈蚀时间/d屈服强度/MPa抗拉强度/MPa弹性模量/GPa失重率/%伸长率/%
0.80272.5360.3200.000.0030.7
60195.2277.5126.3128.2025.1
120156.3185.2104.3239.473.1
18081.4104.779.7854.511.5
1.00259.6358.2204.000.0032.8
60230.0293.7131.4021.6625.2
120164.2211.499.2735.7615.5
180152.7185.182.6343.606.3
1.20288.2353.4206.000.0029.5
60272.5329.2142.5018.9826.7
120225.6271.3130.3025.9321.1
180145.1214.189.9043.9810.1
1.50263.2355.1213.000.0030.5
60235.0301.7140.9019.9823.4
120202.9264.6125.6028.4417.9
180165.1212.494.9043.3116.5
20262.4365.8210.000.0031.2
60256.2345.7199.601.2028.7
120244.1322.8185.001.8728.0
180210.5280.2161.4013.4719.7

图5

力学性能指标与失重率的关系"

图6

加载装置示意图"

图7

单一连接破坏模式"

图8

混合连接破坏模式"

图9

锈损试件荷载-位移曲线"

表3

抗剪承载力试验值 (kN)"

试件编号0 d60 d120 d180 d
0.8-d4.753.902.71.20
0.8-h5.395.004.053.30
1.0-d5.034.463.832.00
1.0-h7.437.004.562.90
1.2-d7.186.604.812.40
1.2-h8.718.005.964.25
1.5-d8.938.305.734.90
1.5-h9.569.107.566.00
2.0-d12.149.358.446.70
2.0-h11.4310.209.47.90

表4

未锈蚀单一连接抗剪承载力计算"

t/mmPnsPtPt/Pns
0.8+0.84.444.751.07
1.0+1.06.175.030.82
1.2+1.28.007.170.90
1.5+1.511.238.920.79
2.0+2.015.3912.130.79

表5

未锈蚀混合连接抗剪承载力计算结果"

t/mmPmPhPtPt/PmPt/Ph
0.8+0.83.545.285.391.521.02
1.0+1.04.927.217.431.511.03
1.2+1.26.389.908.711.370.88
1.5+1.58.9612.589.561.070.76
2.0+2.013.2111.6611.430.870.98

表6

锈蚀CFS单一连接抗剪承载力计算结果"

t/mm锈蚀时间/d失重率/%Pc/kNPt/kNPc/Pt
0.86028.203.523.900.90
12039.472.622.700.97
18054.511.051.200.88
1.06021.664.174.460.93
12035.763.123.830.81
18043.602.362.001.18
1.26018.986.396.600.97
12025.935.554.811.15
18043.983.312.401.38
1.56019.988.728.301.05
12028.446.585.731.15
18043.314.244.900.87
2.0601.209.169.350.98
1201.878.648.441.02
18013.476.856.701.02

表7

锈蚀CFS混合连接抗剪承载力计算结果"

t/mm锈蚀时间/d失重率/%Pc/kNPt/kNPc/Pt
0.86028.204.145.000.83
12039.473.514.050.87
18054.512.563.300.78
1.06021.666.167.000.88
12035.765.144.561.13
18043.604.502.901.55
1.26018.987.818.000.98
12025.936.885.961.15
18043.985.244.251.23
1.56019.989.129.101.00
12028.447.327.560.97
18043.315.826.000.97
2.0601.2010.0010.200.98
1201.879.629.401.02
18013.477.867.900.99
[1] 黄炳生, 顾彪,倪红. 冷弯薄壁型钢结构事故特点与处理[J].南京建筑工程学院学报: 自然科学版, 2001, 42(3): 76-79.
Huang Bing-sheng, Gu Biao, Ni Hong. Accident characteristics and treatment of cold-formed thin-walled steel structures[J]. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Building Engineering (Natural Science Edition), 2001, 42(3): 76-79.
[2] Xu S H, Wang H, Su L. Degradation law of mechanical properties of Q235 steel plate in neutral salt spray corrosion environment [J]. Material Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 40(5): 86-91.
[3] Wang Y, Xu S, Wang H, et al. Predicting the residual strength and deformability of corroded steel plate based on the corrosion morphology[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 152:777-793.
[4] Xu S, Zhang Z, Li R, et al. Effect of cleaned corrosion surface topography on mechanical properties of cold-formed thin-walled steel[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 222: 1-14.
[5] Nie B, Xu S, Zhang Z, et al. Experimental investigation on corroded cold-formed steel beam-columns under compression and major axis bending[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2020, 169: 106026.
[6] Zhang Z, Xu S, Li R. Comparative investigation of the effect of corrosion on the mechanical properties of different parts of thin-walled steel[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 146: 106450.
[7] Kong Z, Yang F, Jin Y, et al. Experimental study on bearing capacity of corroded high-strength bolt connections under shear force [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 309: 125117.
[8] Liao Y X, Wang Y B, Qi H Z,et al. Mechanical degradation and failure behavior of Al/steel electromagnetic assisted clinched joint in chloride salt environment[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 190: 110958.
[9] 徐善华, 古仁俊, 聂彪, 等. 锈蚀冷弯薄壁型钢板材力学性能退化规律[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2021, 53(4): 177-186.
Xu Shan-hua, Gu Ren-jun, Nie Biao, et al. Degradation law of mechanical properties of corroded cold-formed thin-walled steel sheet[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021, 53(4): 177-186.
[10] Roy K, Lau H H, Fang Z, et al. Effects of corrosion on the strength of self-drilling screw connections in cold-formed steel structures-experiments and finite element modeling[C]∥Structures,Amsterdam,Netherlands,2022: 1080-1096.
[11] . 人造气氛腐蚀试验 盐雾试验 [S].
[12] . 金属材料拉伸试验 第1部分: 室温试验方法 [S].
[13] . 冷弯薄壁型钢结构技术规范 [S].
[14] . North American specification for the design of cold-formed steel structural members [S].
[15] PREN1999-1-4. Eurocode 9: design of aluminium structures, part: 1-4: supplementary rules for cold-formed sheeting [S].
[16] 伏金蓉. 采用混合连接的冷弯薄壁型钢双肢拼合构件受力性能研究[D].绵阳:西南科技大学土木工程与建筑学院,2023.
Fu Jin-rong. Study on the mechanical properties of cold-formed thin-walled steel double-limb composite members with hybrid connection[D]. Mianyang:school of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2023.
[1] 张皓,陈宜言,叶俊宇,董桔灿,赵秋. 超大跨波形钢腹板箱梁弯扭耦合性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2026, 56(1): 209-218.
[2] 何化南,吴奇泽,张潇,孙松,李兵,张轩祎. UHPC-NC植筋界面抗剪性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(12): 3976-3985.
[3] 李怀鑫,晏长根,林斌,石玉玲. 黏土-混凝土组合体强度及全过程统计损伤模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(1): 245-255.
[4] 杨果林,杨一凡,徐浩栋,罗桂军,肖洪波. 曲线盾构隧道施工期地表位移计算方法及影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(7): 1997-2008.
[5] 李丽华,李孜健,肖衡林,曹文哲,周鑫隆,黄少平. 土工格栅加筋建筑垃圾土循环剪切试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(6): 1612-1623.
[6] 黄汉辉,陈康明,吴庆雄. 钢管混凝土桁式弦杆组合连续梁抗弯性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(6): 1665-1676.
[7] 戴理朝,王冲,袁平,王磊. 基于可解释机器学习的锈蚀RC构件抗剪承载力预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(11): 3231-3243.
[8] 安然,王有志. 剪力钉连接件拉剪共同作用抗剪性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(9): 2554-2562.
[9] 匡亚川,陈立斌,李超举,贺宇豪. 栓钉剪力连接件力学性能分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2): 538-546.
[10] 戴岩,聂少锋,周天华. 环梁式圆钢管约束H型钢混凝土柱-钢梁节点抗剪承载力[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(3): 977-988.
[11] 王杨,宋占帅,郭孔辉,庄晔. 转动惯量试验台的惯性参数测量[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1795-1801.
[12] 郭俊平1, 邓宗才1, 卢海波2, 林劲松2. 预应力高强钢绞线网抗剪加固钢筋混凝土梁试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(4): 968-977.
[13] 郭睿,陈塑寰,孟广伟 . 特征值高阶灵敏度的有效算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(增刊): 132-0136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!