Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 96-108.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240710

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on multi-band feature map and improved SqueezeNet

Zhi-gang FENG1(),Meng-yuan REN1,Bing DONG2,Ming-yue YU1   

  1. 1.School of Automation,Shenyang Aerospace University,Shenyang 110136,China
    2.Aircraft Industry(Group) Co. ,Ltd. ,Shenyang 110000,China
  • Received:2024-06-25 Online:2026-01-01 Published:2026-02-03

Abstract:

At present, fault diagnosis methods based on deep learning generally have the problems of large model parameters and long diagnosis times, and the diagnostic performance will be greatly reduced in noisy environments. This paper proposes a fast and lightweight intelligent diagnosis model for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Firstly, the parameters of the variational mode decomposition (VMD) are optimized using the osprey optimization algorithm (OOA) to design a unique multi-frequency band grayscale feature map based on the intrinsic mode function (IMF) component. Then a residual attention mechanism module (RAM) is designed based on the efficient channel attention (ECA) module, which is integrated into the SqueezeNet model, and the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) method is used instead of the Softmax function to identify and classify the faults, and the RSqueezeNet-KNN model is established. Experimental results on two bearing datasets show that the model is able to achieve lightweight applications with excellent diagnostic performance compared to other methods in noisy environments.

Key words: bearing fault diagnosis, grayscale feature map, SqueezeNet model, attention mechanism, light-weighting

CLC Number: 

  • TH17

Fig.1

Structure diagram of SqueezeNet model"

Fig.2

Structure diagram of Fire model"

Fig.3

Diagram of ECA module"

Fig.4

OOA-VMD grayscale feature image construction diagram"

Fig.5

Structure diagram of RAM model"

Fig.6

Structure diagram of RSqueezeNet-KNN model"

Fig.7

Flow diagram of proposed method"

Fig.8

CWRU experimental device schematic diagram"

Table 1

CWRU bearing state data description"

轴承状态直径/英寸标签数据类型样本数
正常Nor1 024200
滚动体故障0.007Ba11 024200
0.014Ba21 024200
0.021Ba31 024200
内圈故障0.007In11 024200
0.014In21 024200
0.021In31 024200
外圈故障0.007Ou11 024200
0.014Ou21 024200
0.021Ou31 024200

Fig.9

OOA optimizes VMD iterative curve"

Fig.10

Comparison chart of VMD parameter optimization"

Table 2

The best parameter combinations [K,α]in case one"

标签Kα
No172 000
Ba171 994
Ba261 999
Ba361 845
In171 991
In271 998
In371 996
Ou161 940
Ou272 000
Ou371 995

Fig.11

Comparison of time-domain waveforms and spectra of Ba1 after VMD and OOA-VMD processing"

Fig.12

Grayscale feature images of ten state types in case one"

Table 3

Accuracy and training time in different hyperparameter combinations"

超参数组合正确率/%训练时间/s
A99.01145.6
B99.15101.5
C99.0892.8
D99.43150.6
E99.7085.6
F99.5890.5
G96.02149.5
H95.10105.1
I88.7889.0

Table 4

Diagnosis results of models in different proportions of label"

模型标签噪声率(Label noisy rate, LNR)
0%2%5%10%
RSqueezeNet-KNN

100

±0

99.60

±0.27

99.35

±0.40

99.13

±0.4

RSqueezeNet

99.70

±0.21

99.20

±0.32

99.03

±0.41

98.80

±0.51

SqueezeNet

99.35

±0.4

99.13

±0.4

98.93

±0.53

98.80

±0.53

AlexNet

99.35

±0.49

99.16

±0.61

98.75

±0.88

96.53

±1.97

ResNet

98.70

±0.55

98.45

±0.47

98.33

±0.39

97.50

±0.77

WT-IResNet22

100

±0

99.59

±0.33

99.30

±0.32

98.66

±0.35

WT-ResNet22

99.23

±0.35

98.77

±0.32

97.74

±0.35

95.50

±0.33

Table 5

Comparison of parameters and training time of models"

模型参数/MB训练时间/s
RSqueezeNet-KNN0.01585.849
RSqueezeNet0.01585.6
SqueezeNet0.03195.2
AlexNet24.723143.2
ResNet0.041121.7
WT-IResNet220.132661
WT-ResNet220.148278

Fig.13

Confusion matrices of forecast results in different noise labels"

Fig.14

Comparison of performance of diagnosis models in different noise environments in case one"

Fig.15

Physical diagram of an aero-engine compressor rotor experiment device in case two"

Table 6

Aero-engine compressor rotor tester bearingstate data description"

轴承状态标签数据长度样本数转速/(r·min-1
正常Norm1 0248001 500
滚动体故障Ball1 0248001 500
内圈故障Inner1 0248001 500
外圈故障Outer1 0248001 500

Table 7

The best parameter combinations [K,α]in case two"

标签Kα
Norm71 999
Ball71 934
Inner71 991
Outer7945

Fig.16

Time-domain waveform and frequency spectrum of Ba1 after OOA-VMD in case two"

Fig.17

Grayscale images of four state types in case two"

Table 8

Diagnosis results of models in differentproportions of label in case two"

模型标签噪声率/LNR
0%2%5%10%
RSqueezeNet-KNN

100

±0

99.97

±0.06

99.91

±0.12

99.89

±0.12

RSqueezeNet

99.95

±0.07

99.87

±0.14

99.84

±0.21

99.75

±0.27

SqueezeNet

99.94

±0.1

99.87

±0.09

98.83

±0.13

99.67

±0.32

AlexNet

99.94

±0.14

99.62

±0.14

99.47

±0.12

99.38

±0.21

ResNet

99.86

±0.08

99.72

±0.13

99.72

±0.13

99.63

±0.17

WT-IResNet22

100

±0

99.91

±0.08

99.91

±0.08

99.87

±0.13

WT-ResNet22

100

±0

99.89

±0.10

99.89

±0.10

99.82

±0.24

Fig.18

Comparison of performance of diagnosis modelsin different noise environments in case two"

[1] Bai R, Xu Q, Meng Z, et al. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on multi-channel convolution neural network and multi-scale clipping fusion data augmentation[J]. Measurement, 2021, 184: No.109885.
[2] 栾孝驰, 佟鑫宇, 沙云东, 等. 基于振动与声发射敏感参数识别的主轴承故障诊断方法[J]. 推进技术, 2024, 45(12): 269-281.
Luan Xiao-chi, Tong Xin-yu, Sha Yun-dong, et al. Main bearing fault diagnosis method based on vibration and acoustic emission snsitive parameter recognition[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2024, 45(12):269-281.
[3] 谷玉海, 朱腾腾, 饶文军, 等.基于EMD二值化图像和CNN的滚动轴承故障诊断[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2021, 41(1): 105-113, 203.
Gu Yu-hai, Zhu Teng-teng, Rao Wen-jun, et al. Fault diagnosis for rolling bearing based on EMD binarization image and CNN[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis,2021,41(1):105-113, 203.
[4] Dragomiretskiy K, Zosso D. Variational mode decomposition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 62(3): 531-544.
[5] 赵德宏, 李永利. 基于GA-VMD分解与支持向量机的刀具故障诊断研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报: 自然科学版, 2024, 40(2): 361-371.
Zhao De-hong, Li Yong-li. Research on tool fault diagnosis based on GA-VMD decomposition and support vector machine[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Natural Science), 2024, 40(2): 361-371.
[6] 余萍, 赵康, 曹洁. 基于优化A-BiLSTM的滚动轴承故障诊断[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(8): 2156-2166.
Yu Ping, Zhao Kang, Cao Jie. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on optimized A-BiLSTM[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(8): 2156-2166.
[7] 杨战社, 孔晨再, 荣相, 等. 基于EEMD能量熵与ANN的矿用异步电机故障诊断[J]. 微电机, 2021, 54(8): 23-27, 61.
Yang Zhan-she, Kong Chen-zai, Rong Xiang, et al. Fault diagnosis of mine asynchronous motor based on EEMD energy entropy and ANN[J]. Micromotors,2021, 54(8): 23-27, 61.
[8] Pandya D H, Upadhyay S H, Harsha S P. Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing with intrinsic mode function of acoustic emission data using APF-KNN[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(10): 4137-4145.
[9] Che C, Wang H, Xiong M, et al. Few-shot fault diagnosis of rolling bearing under variable working conditions based on ensemble meta-learning[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2022, 131: No. 103777.
[10] Gu J, Peng Y, Lu H, et al. A novel fault diagnosis method of rotating machinery via VMD, CWT and improved CNN[J]. Measurement, 2022, 200:No. 111635.
[11] Wang Z, Zhao W, Du W, et al. Data-driven fault diagnosis method based on the conversion of erosion operation signals into images and convolutional neural network[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 149: 591-601.
[12] Iandola F N, Han S, Moskewicz M W, et al. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and<0.5 MB model size[J/OL].[2024-06-12]. .
[13] Ren L, Jiang L, Li C. Label confidence-based noise correction for crowdsourcing[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 117: No.105624.
[14] Dehghani M, Trojovský P. Osprey optimization algorithm: a new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems[J]. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 8:No. 1126450.
[15] Lin G, Lin A. Modified multiscale sample entropy and cross-sample entropy based on horizontal visibility graph[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2022, 165:No. 112802.
[16] Han G, Zhang M, Wu W, et al. Improved U-Net based insulator image segmentation method based on attention mechanism[J]. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 210-217.
[17] Smith W A, Randall R B. Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: a benchmark study[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2015, 64/65: 100-131.
[18] Wu Q L, Lin H X. Short-term wind speed forecasting based on hybrid variational mode decomposition and least squares support vector machine optimized by bat algorithm model[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(3): No.652.
[19] Diao X, Jiang J, Shen G, et al. An improved variational mode decomposition method based on particle swarm optimization for leak detection of liquid pipelines[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 143: No.106787.
[20] Nadirgil O. Carbon price prediction using multiple hybrid machine learning models optimized by genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 342: No.118061.
[21] Wang H, Wu F, Zhang L. Application of variational mode decomposition optimized with improved whale optimization algorithm in bearing failure diagnosis[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2021, 60(5): 4689-4699.
[22] Liang P, Wang W, Yuan X, et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on wavelet transform and improved ResNet under noisy labels and environment[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 115: No.105269.
[23] Hao S, Ge F X, Li Y, et al. Multisensor bearing fault diagnosis based on one-dimensional convolutional long short-term memory networks[J]. Measurement, 2020, 159: No.107802.
[24] Xu Z, Li C, Yang Y. Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing of wind turbines based on the variational mode decomposition and deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2020, 95: No.106515.
[25] Feng Z, Wang S, Yu M. A fault diagnosis for rolling bearing based on multilevel denoising method and improved deep residual network[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2023, 140: No.104106.
[1] Qiu-zhan ZHOU,Xin-meng LI,Hao-qing-zi SHEN,Hui-nan WU,Yuan-yuan LI,Jing RONG,Chun-hua HU,Ping-ping LIU. Non-intrusive load decomposition of unbalanced data based on attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(1): 239-246.
[2] Zhen HUO,Li-sheng JIN,Qiang HUA, HEYang. Edge feature⁃guided semantic segmentation method for intelligent vehicle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 3032-3041.
[3] Qing-lin AI,Yuan-xiao LIU,Jia-hao YANG. Small target swmantic segmentation method based MFF-STDC network in complex outdoor environments [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(8): 2681-2692.
[4] Yan PIAO,Ji-yuan KANG. RAUGAN:infrared image colorization method based on cycle generative adversarial networks [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(8): 2722-2731.
[5] Shan-na ZHUANG,Jun-shuai WANG,Jing BAI,Jing-jin DU,Zheng-you WANG. Video-based person re-identification based on three-dimensional convolution and self-attention mechanism [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(7): 2409-2417.
[6] Zhi-gang FENG,Shou-qi WANG,Ming-yue YU. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on variational mode extraction and lightweight network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 1883-1891.
[7] Ya-li XUE,Tong-an YU,Shan CUI,Li-zun ZHOU. Infrared small target detection based on cascaded nested U-Net [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(5): 1714-1721.
[8] Hua CAI,Yu-yao WANG,Qiang FU,Zhi-yong MA,Wei-gang WANG,Chen-jie ZHANG. Semantic segmentation network based on attention mechanism and feature fusion [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1384-1395.
[9] He-shan ZHANG,Meng-wei FAN,Xin TAN,Zhan-ji ZHENG,Li-ming KOU,Jin XU. Dense small object vehicle detection in UAV aerial images using improved YOLOX [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1307-1318.
[10] Yang LI,Xian-guo LI,Chang-yun MIAO,Sheng XU. Low⁃light image enhancement algorithm based on dual branch channel prior and Retinex [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(3): 1028-1036.
[11] Xiang WANG,Guo-zhen TAN,Yan-fei PENG,Hao REN,Jian-ping LI. Autonomous driving decision⁃making model based on language reasoning and cognitive memory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(12): 3918-3927.
[12] Yun-hong LI,Mei WANG,Xue-ping SU,Li-min LI,Fu-xing ZHANG,Te-ji HAO. Road extraction from remote sensing images combining attention and context fusion [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(12): 4034-4044.
[13] Duo PENG,Ming-shuo LIU,Kun XIE. Observation station parameter error joint multi-feature fusion attention mechanism TDOA/FDOA multi-aircraft passive localization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(11): 3751-3761.
[14] Xiao-ran GUO,Tie-jun WANG,Yue YAN. Entity relationship extraction method based on local attention and local remote supervision [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(1): 307-315.
[15] Lu Li,Jun-qi Song,Ming Zhu,He-qun Tan,Yu-fan Zhou,Chao-qi Sun,Cheng-yu Zhou. Object extraction of yellow catfish based on RGHS image enhancement and improved YOLOv5 network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(9): 2638-2645.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!