Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 615-625.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200855

Previous Articles    

Wind load characteristics of double⁃sided spherical shell roof under downburst

Yong YAO1,2(),Liu-feng SU1(),Ming LI3,Yun-peng CHU1,Han-jie HUANG3   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621000,China
    2.Shock and Vibration of Engineering Materials and Structures Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621000,China
    3.China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center,Mianyang 621000,China
  • Received:2020-11-06 Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-03-08
  • Contact: Liu-feng SU E-mail:yy001221@163.com;344107296@qq.com

Abstract:

To study the wind pressure distribution characteristics of double-sided spherical shell roofs in flat and sloping terrain under the action of downbursts, a rigid scale model was made based on the similarity criterion. Through wind tunnel tests, the influence of the change of the flow field position of the model in the two terrains on the distribution of the average wind pressure coefficient of the roof and the position and value of the maximum and minimum values are studied. The results show that as the radial distance increases, the average wind pressure coefficient on the windward side of the upper roof changes from positive to negative, and the maximum negative value appears at the edge of the windward surface. The value of the face-on average wind pressure coefficient of the lower roof gradually decreases, but always remains positive. As the radial distance increases, the average wind pressure coefficient of the upper roof is always negative and the negative value gradually increases. The average wind pressure coefficient on the windward side of the lower roof changes from positive to negative, and the maximum negative value appears at the edge of the windward side. The location of the model in the wind field and the different topographic conditions have great influences on wind pressure distribution characteristics which include the positive and negative wind pressure transitions of the upper and lower roofs and the location of the extreme wind pressure and its numerical values.

Key words: structural engineering, downbrust, different topography, double-sided spherical shell roof, wind tunnel test, wind pressure characteristic

CLC Number: 

  • TU312

Fig.1

Downburst experimental device"

Fig.2

Curve of average wind velocity with height"

Fig.3

Vertical profile comparison ofdownburst wind field"

Fig.4

Schematic diagram of double-sided spherical shell model and arrangement of measuring points"

Fig.5

Schematic diagram of position of flatworking condition model"

Fig.6

Wind pressure distribution of the model roof when the nozzle is directly below"

Fig.7

Wind pressure distribution of upper roofon model under various workingconditions of flat ground"

Fig.8

Variation curve of wind pressure coefficient of upper roof centerline on flat ground"

Fig.9

Wind pressure distribution of lower roof on model under various working conditions offlat ground"

Fig.10

Variation curve of wind pressure coefficient of lower roof centerline on flat ground"

Fig.11

Schematic diagram of the position of each working condition model on the slope"

Fig.12

Wind pressure distribution of upper roof on Model under various working conditions of slope ground"

Fig.13

Variation curve of wind pressure coefficient of upper roof centerline on slope ground"

Fig.14

Wind pressure distribution of lower roof on model under various working conditions of slope ground"

Fig.15

Variation curve of wind pressure coefficient of lower roof centerline on slope ground"

Fig.16

Wind pressure comparison curve of upper roof centerline on two kinds of terrain"

Fig.17

Wind pressure comparison curve of lower roof centerline on two kinds of terrain"

1 Holmes J D. Modeling of extreme thunderstorm winds for wind loading of structures and risk sssessment[C]∥Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Rotterdam, Denmark, 1999: 1409-1415.
2 Letchford C W, Mans C, Chay M T. Thunderstorms their importance in wind engineering: a case for the next generation wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12-15): 1415-1433.
3 Choi E C C, Tanurdjaja A. Extreme wind studiesin Singapore: an area with mixed weather system[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering&Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12-15): 1611-1630.
4 Chen L, Letchford C W. Multi-scale correlation analysis oftwo lateral profiles of full scale downburst wind speeds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2006, 94(9): 675-696.
5 Hjelmfelt M R. Structure and life circle of microburst out flows observed in Colorado[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1988, 27(8): 900-927.
6 Mason M S, Wood G S, Fletcher D F. Impinging jet simulation of stationary downburst flow over topography[J]. Wind and Structures, 2007, 10(5): 437-462.
7 Mason M S, Wood G S, Fletcher D F. Influence of tilt and surface roughness on the outflow wind field of an impinging jet[J]. Wind and Structures, 2009, 12(3): 179-204.
8 Mason M S, Wood G S, Fletcher D F. Numerical simulation of downburst winds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2009, 97(11/12): 523-539.
9 Mason M S. Numerical investigation of the influence of topography on simulated downburst wind fields[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(1): 21-33.
10 瞿伟廉, 梁政平. 下击暴流的特征及其对输电线塔风致倒塌的影响[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2010, 30(6): 120-126.
Qu Wei-lian, Liang Zheng-ping. Downburst's characteristics and its effect on wind-induced collapse of transmission tower[J]. Erathquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010, 30(6): 120-126.
11 瞿伟廉, 王锦文. 下击暴流风荷载的数值模拟[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2008, 30(2): 70-74.
Qu Wei-lian, Wang Jin-wen. Numerical simulation of downburst wind loads[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2008, 30(2): 70-74.
12 Sengupta A, Haan F L, Sarkar P P, et al. Transient loads on buildings in microburst and tornado winds[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(10/11): 2173-2187.
13 陈波,贾蕗宇,田晨. 下击暴流作用下平屋面风荷载CFD数值模拟[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2013, 37(1): 140-144.
Chen Bo, Jia Lu-yu, Tian Chen. CFD numerical simulation of downburst wind effect on flat roofs[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013, 37(1): 140-144.
14 陈勇, 崔碧琪, 余世策, 等. 稳态冲击风作用下拱形屋面风压分布试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(7): 91-99.
Chen Yong, Cui Bi-qi, Yu Shi-ce, et al. Experimental study on the pressure distribution over arch-roof subjected to stationary downbursts[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(7): 91-99.
15 陈勇, 崔碧琪, 余世策, 等. 雷暴冲击风作用下球壳型屋面模型风压特性试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(8): 26-33.
Chen Yong, Cui Bi-qi, Yu Shi-ce, et al. Experimental investigation of spherical roof subjected to thunderstorm downbursts[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011, 32(8): 26-33.
[1] Ya-chuan KUANG,Zhe-xuan SONG,Yin-hu LIU,Xiao-fei MO,Liang-ming FU,Shi-quan LUO. Experiment on mechanical properties of new type assembled double-cabin utility tunnel [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(3): 596-603.
[2] Xue-ping FAN,Guang-hong YANG,Zhi-peng SHANG,Xiao-xiong ZHAO,Qing-kai XIAO,Yue-fei LIU. Dynamic reliability fusion prediction of long-span bridge girder considering structural serviceability [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 144-153.
[3] Fu-shou LIU,Qi WEI,Wen-ting XU,Guo-jin TAN. Damage detection of truss structures based on elastic wave propagation and spectral element method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2087-2095.
[4] Xue-ping FAN,Guang-hong YANG,Qing-kai XIAO,Yue-fei LIU. Optimal R-vine copula information fusion for failure probability analysis of long-span bridge girder [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(4): 1296-1305.
[5] Jiang YU,Zhi-hao ZHAO,Yong-jun QIN. Damage of reinforced concrete shear beams based on acoustic emission and fractal [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 620-630.
[6] Er-gang XIONG,Han XU,Ci TAN,Jing WANG,Ruo-yu DING. Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams based on elastoplastic stress field theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(1): 259-267.
[7] Chen-guang LAI,Qing-yu WANG,Bo HU,Kai-ping WEN,Yan-yu CHEN. Design and optimization of a car empennage with winglet under effect of static aeroelasticity [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 399-407.
[8] Xue-ping FAN,Guang QU,Yue-fei LIU. Bridge extreme stress prediction based on new data assimilation algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 572-580.
[9] De-lei YANG,Le-wei TONG. Calculation formula of SCF for CHS⁃CFSHS welded T⁃joints with brace under axial tension [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1891-1899.
[10] Hua ZHOU,Zhi⁃gang YANG,Hui ZHU. Aerodynamic calculation of MIRA model correlated with wind tunnel test [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(4): 1043-1053.
[11] SU Xiao-ping,WANG Qing. Corrosion damage of concrete under multi-salt soaking, freezing-thawing and dry-wet cycles [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 112-120.
[12] WEI Gan, YANG Zhi-gang, LI Qi-liang. Aerodynamic optimization method for car body based on process costing genetic algorithm [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 1578-1582.
[13] ZHANG Li-ye, GUO Xue-dong, DONG Li-juan. Bridge system mean time to failure with load-sharing process [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(05): 1247-1252.
[14] GUO Xue-dong, ZHANG Li-ye, DONG Li-juan, WU Yun-tao, ZHANG Qiang. Bridge system reliability assessment method [J]. , 2012, (03): 634-638.
[15] XIN Da-bo, WANG Liang, DUAN Zhong-dong, OU Jin-ping, LI Hui, LI Zhong-hua. Static characteristics of bridge deck sections of long-span bridges under simultaneous actions of wind and rain [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊2): 174-179.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!