Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 2644-2652.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210393

Previous Articles    

Human⁃induced vibration analysis and pedestrian comfort evaluation for suspension footbridge with different hunger systems

Yan-ling ZHANG1,2(),Can WANG1,2,Xu ZHANG1,2,Ang-yang WANG3,Yun-sheng LI1,2()   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering,Shijiazhuang Tiedao University,Shijiazhuang 050043,China
    2.Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control of Ministry of Education,Shijiazhuang Tiedao University,Shijiazhuang 050043,China
    3.Cangzhou Power Supply Branch of State Grid Hebei Electric Power Co. ,Ltd. ,Cangzhou 061000,China
  • Received:2021-05-06 Online:2022-11-01 Published:2022-11-16
  • Contact: Yun-sheng LI E-mail:06mzhang@163.com;liysh70@163.com

Abstract:

To research the influence of the structural details on the human-induced vibration and pedestrian comfort of the suspension footbridge, based on a practical suspension footbridge, two different structural models, one with vertical hanger system and the other with inclined hanger system, were built. The influence of different hanger systems on the free vibration and human-induced vibration were analyzed, and the pedestrian comfort was evaluated based on EN03 code. The results show that, the first-order vertical and lateral frequencies of the inclined hanger system model are lower than those of the vertical one, and both two hanger system model have low free vibration frequencies and corresponding high flexibility. When the pedestrian mass is considered, the free vibration frequencies and the maximum accelerator of the main girder under pedestrian load decrease with the increase of the pedestrian flow for both two models. Under the same pedestrian flow, the maximum accelerators according to different mode and free frequency are different, but the inclined hanger system model has lower lateral and vertical accelerators compared to the vertical one. The lateral comfort evaluation result is same for two models, but the vertical comfort evaluation is better for the inclined hanger system model. The inclined hangers can improve both the lateral and vertical rigidities of the suspension footbridge.

Key words: bridge engineering, suspension footbridge, natural vibration characteristics, human-induced vibration, pedestrian comfort

CLC Number: 

  • U448.25

Fig.1

Layout of suspension footbridge"

Fig.2

FE model"

Table 1

Free vibration frequencies and modes in vertical and inclined hanger systems"

模态竖直吊杆模型倾斜吊杆模型
自振频率 /Hz振型描述自振频率 /Hz振型描述
10.185对称横弯0.258反对称横弯
20.190对称竖弯0.266对称横弯
30.211反对称横弯0.319对称竖弯
40.250对称竖弯0.366反对称竖弯
50.329反对称横弯0.393反对称横弯
60.347对称竖弯0.395对称横弯
70.369反对称竖弯0.406反对称竖弯
80.393反对称横弯0.410对称竖弯
90.393对称竖弯0.450对称竖弯
100.393反对称横弯0.451对称竖弯

Table 2

Free vibration frequencies and modes in vertical and inclined hanger systems within pedestrian frequency"

竖直吊杆模型倾斜吊杆模型
方向

模态

阶数

振动

阶数

自振频率/Hz主梁振型图

模态

阶数

振动

阶数

自振频率/Hz主梁振型图
横向2130.5651530.551
2840.7332540.662
4151.0343650.909
4761.1493861.116
竖向53131.3434871.410
60141.4705581.455
65151.6086191.655
70161.74568101.842
75171.89374112.111
82182.04180122.175
87192.200
93202.360

Table 3

Free vibration frequencies in vertical and inclined hanger systems under different pedestrian flows"

振动模态竖直吊杆模型倾斜吊杆模型
振动阶数成桥态行人密度/(人?m-2振动阶数成桥态行人密度/(人?m-2
0.511.520.511.52
主梁横弯30.5650.5530.5440.5300.52030.5510.5490.5470.5460.545
40.7330.7190.7020.6680.66640.6650.6480.6330.6170.602
51.0341.0050.9570.9130.95950.9090.8890.8690.8510.835
61.1491.1211.0961.0671.04561.1161.1141.1091.1001.084
主梁竖弯131.3431.3091.2771.2471.24471.4101.4101.3881.3571.298
141.4701.4331.4231.3651.33581.4551.4211.4101.3541.329
151.6081.5991.5991.5991.45991.6551.6261.5891.5541.521
161.7451.7001.6581.6201.584101.8421.8191.7791.7391.715
171.8931.8451.8001.7581.713112.1112.0622.0362.0332.032
182.0411.9891.9401.8951.853122.3282.2732.2292.2222.222
192.2002.1462.0942.0451.999
202.3602.2992.2432.1912.142

Fig.3

Reduction factor ψ"

Table 4

Harmonic pedestrian loads P(t) on lateral modes in vertical hanger system(1 p/m2)"

振动

阶数

不计入行人质量计入行人质量
步频 /HzPt)/(N·m-2步频 /HzPt)/(N·m-2
30.5655.8cos(3.55t0.5443.9cos(3.42t
40.73317.6cos(4.60t0.70217.6cos(4.40t
51.03414.6cos(6.49t0.95717.6cos(6.00t
61.1494.5cos(7.21t1.0969.2cos(6.88t

Table 5

Harmonic pedestrian loads P(t) on vertical modes in vertical hanger system (1 p/m2)"

振动阶数不计入行人质量计入行人质量
步频/HzPt)/(N·m-2步频/HzPt)/(N·m-2
131.34329.8cos(8.43t1.2779.2cos(8.02t
141.47069.6cos(9.23t1.42354.9cos(8.93t
151.608113cos(10t1.599110cos(10.04t
161.745141cos(11.95t1.658128cos(10.41t
171.893141cos(11.88t1.800141cos(11.3t
182.041141cos(12.81t1.940141cos(12.18t
192.20071cos(13.81t2.094141cos(13.15t
202.360-2.24340.2cos(14.08t

Fig.4

Lateral loading on lateral mode"

Fig.5

Vertical loading on vertical mode"

Fig.6

Mid-span time-accelerator curve of main girder at 1 p/m2"

Fig.7

Maximum lateral accelerator of main girder in vertical hanger system model"

Fig.8

Maximum vertical accelerator of main girder in vertical hanger system model"

Fig. 9

Maximum lateral accelerator of main girder in inclined hanger system model"

Fig.10

Maximum vertical accelerator of main girder in inclined hanger system model"

Table 6

Evaluation standard for pedestrian comfort in EN03 code"

等级舒适度横向加速度 限值/(m·s-2竖向加速度 限值/(m·s-2
1很舒适≤0.1≤0.5
2中等舒适0.1~0.30.5~1.0
3不舒适0.3~0.81.0~2.5
4不可忍受>0.8>2.5

Fig.11

Ultimate accelerator of main girder and comfort evaluation in vertical hanger system model"

Fig.12

Ultimate accelerator of main girder and comfort evaluation in vertical hanger system model"

Table 7

Evaluation for pedestrian comfort in vertical hanger system"

行人密度/(人·m-2不计人群质量计入人群质量
横向竖向综合横向竖向综合
0.5111111
1.0122122
1.5122122
2.0222122

Table 8

Evaluation for pedestrian comfort in inclined hanger system"

行人密度/(人·m-2不计人群质量计入人群质量
横向竖向综合横向竖向综合
0.5111111
1.0122111
1.5122122
2.0122122
1 陈舟, 颜全胜, 贾布裕, 等. 行走激励下人行桥振动响应简化计算[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2018, 39(3): 483-489.
Chen Zhou, Yan Quan-sheng, Jia Bu-yu, et al. Simplified calculation on the vibration response of a footbridge under human walking loads[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2018, 39(3): 483-489.
2 李泽民,吴冬雁,刘宣含,等. 真实步伐荷载作用下人行桥振动及共振加速分析[J]. 噪声与振动控制, 2019, 39(6): 164-168.
Li Ze-min, Wu Dong-yan, Liu Xuan-han, et al. Vibration and resonance response analysis of footbridges under actual walking load[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2019, 39(6): 164-168.
3 汪志昊,寇琛,刘召朋,等. 人体姿态对人-结构耦合系统竖向动力特性影响试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2019, 38(19): 58-63.
Wang Zhi-hao, Kou Chen, Liu Zhao-peng, et al. Tests for effects of human body posture on vertical dynamic characteristics of a human- structure interaction system[J]. Jounal of Vibation and Shock, 2019, 38(19): 58-63.
4 谢伟平,汤宗恒,何卫. 多人-桥竖向动力相互作用研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(11): 76-82.
Xie Wei-ping, Tang Zong-heng, He Wei. Study on vertical vibration of bridge-pedestrians dynamic interaction system[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(11): 76-82.
5 张琼, 南娜娜, 朱前坤, 等. 基于社会力模型的人群-桥梁竖向动力耦合效应研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2020, 39(9): 71-79.
Zhang Qiong, Na-na Nan, Zhu Qian-kun, et al. Analysis on the vertical coupled dynamic effect of a crowd-bridge system based on the social force model [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(9):71-79.
6 操礼林,吕亚兵,曹栋,等. 行人动力学参数对大跨简支人行桥人致振动的影响分析[J]. 东南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 50(2): 260-266.
Cao Li-lin, Ya-bing Lyu, Cao Dong, et al. Influence analysis of pedestrian dynamic parameters on human- induced vibration of long span simply supported footbridge[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 260-266.
7 王晋平,熊杰程,陈隽.人群步行荷载的互谱模型及应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(7): 12-20.
Wang Jin-ping, Xiong Jie-cheng, Chen Jun. Cross-spectral model for crowd walking load and its application[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(7): 12-20.
8 贾布裕,颜全胜,余晓琳,等. 考虑行人随机性的人行桥人致横向振动稳定性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(1): 155-164.
Jia Bu-yu, Yan Quan-sheng, Yu Xiao-lin, et al. Stability analysis on pedestrian-induced lateral vibration of footbridges considering pedestrian stochastic excitation[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(1): 155-164.
9 Han H, Zhou D, Ji T, et al. Modelling of lateral forces generated by pedestrians walking across footbridges[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2021, 89: 1775-1791.
10 Lai E, Gentile C, Mulas M G. Experimental and numerical serviceability assessment of a steel suspension footbridge[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 132: 16-28.
11 Bedon C. Diagnostic analysis and dynamic identification of a glass suspension footbridge via on-site vibration experiments and FE numerical modeling[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 216: 366-378.
12 Bedon C. Experimental investigation on vibration sensitivity of an indoor glass footbridge to walking conditions[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 29: 1-17.
13 邹卓,宋旭明,李璋,等. 基于TMD的自锚式人行悬索桥人致振动控制研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(10): 2574-2582.
Zou Zhuo, Song Xu-ming, Li Zhang, et al. Study of pedestrian-induced vibration of self-anchored suspension footbridge based on TMD[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(10): 2574-2582.
14 Dong C Z, Bas S, Catbas N. Investigation of vibration serviceability of a footbridge using computer vision-based methods[J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 224: 1-13.
15 Pampa D, Sriram N, Scott W. Reliability-based assessment and calibration of standards for the lateral vibration of pedestrian bridges[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 239: 1-13.
16 Research Fund for Coal and Steel, HiVoSS: Design of Footbridges [S].
17 王保群,张强勇,张凯,等. 自锚式斜拉-悬吊协作体系桥梁动力性能[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2009, 39(3): 686-690.
Wang Bao-qun, Zhang Qiang-yong, Zhang Kai, et al. Dynamic characteristics for self-anchored cable-stayed suspension bridges[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2009, 39(3): 686-690.
18 钟昌均,王忠彬,柳晨阳.悬索桥主索鞍承载力影响因素及结构优化[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
Zhong Chang-jun, Wang Zhong-bin, Liu Chen-yang. Influencing factors and structural optimization of main cable saddle bearing capacity of suspension bridge[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
[1] Hua-wen YE,Zhi-chao DUAN,Ji-lin LIU,Yu ZHOU,Bing HAN. Wheel⁃load diffusion effect on orthotropic steel⁃concrete composite bridge deck [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1808-1816.
[2] Li-feng WANG,Zi-wang XIAO,Sai-sai YU. New risk analysis method based on Bayesian network for hanging basker system of multi-tower cable-stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 865-873.
[3] Chang-jun ZHONG,Zhong-bin WANG,Chen-yang LIU. Influencing factors and structural optimization of main cable saddle bearing capacity of suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
[4] Wei CHEN,Tian-bao WAN,Zhong-bin WANG,Xuan LI,Rui-li SHEN. Design and performance of internal air supply conduit for dehumidification in main cables of suspension bridges [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1749-1755.
[5] Shu-lun GUO,Tie-yi ZHONG,Zhi-gang YAN. Calculation method of buffeting response for stay cables of long⁃span cable⁃stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1756-1762.
[6] Kai GAO,Gang LIU. Effective strength improvement of global critical strength branch and bound method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 597-603.
[7] Ya-feng GONG,Jia-xiang SONG,Guo-jin TAN,Hai-peng BI,Yang LIU,Cheng-xin SHAN. Multi⁃vehicle bridge weigh⁃in⁃motion algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 583-596.
[8] Qing-wen KONG,Guo-jin TAN,Long-lin WANG,Yong WANG,Zhi-gang WEI,Han-bing LIU. Analysis of free vibration characteristics of cracked box girder bridge based on finite element method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(1): 225-232.
[9] Hua CHEN,Yao-jia CHEN,Bin XIE,Peng-kai WANG,Lang-ni DENG. Interface failure mechanism and bonding strength calculation of CFRP tendons bonded anchorage system [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(5): 1698-1708.
[10] Ya-feng GONG,Jia-xiang SONG,Hai-peng BI,Guo-jin TAN,Guo-hai HU,Si-yuan LIN. Static test and finite element analysis of scale model of fabricated box culvert [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(5): 1728-1738.
[11] Hao GAO,Jun-jie WANG,Hui-jie LIU,Jian-ming WANG. Design criterion and applied devices for controlled seismic behavior of continuous girder bridges [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(5): 1718-1727.
[12] Qian-hui PU,Jing-wen LIU,Gang-yun ZHAO,Meng YAN,Xiao-bin LI. Theoretical analysis of bearing capacity of concrete eccentric compressive column reinforced by HTRCS [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 606-612.
[13] Yun-long ZHANG,Yang-yang GUO,Jing WANG,Dong LIANG. Natural frequency and mode of vibration of steel⁃concrete composite beam [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 581-588.
[14] Bo-xin WANG,Hai-tao YANG,Qing WANG,Xin GAO,Xiao-xu CHEN. Bridge vibration signal optimization filtering method based on improved CEEMD⁃multi⁃scale permutation entropy analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 216-226.
[15] Miao ZHANG,Yong-jiu QIAN,Fang ZHANG,Shou-qin ZHU. Experimental analysis of spatial force performance of concrete-reinforced stone arch bridge based on enlarged section method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 210-215.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!