吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 1236-1245.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20180229

• • 上一篇    

基于模型实验的拖拉机配置对稳定性的影响差异

秦嘉浩1,2(),李臻1,2,光岡宗司3,井上英二3,宋正河1,2,朱忠祥1,2()   

  1. 1. 中国农业大学 工学院，北京 100083
    2. 中国农业大学 现代农业装备优化设计北京市重点实验室，北京100083
    3. 日本九州大学 农学部，日本 福岡 8120025
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-29 出版日期:2019-07-01 发布日期:2019-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 朱忠祥 E-mail:qinjh@cau.edu.cn;zhuzhonxiang@cau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:秦嘉浩（1990?），男，博士研究生. 研究方向：拖拉机侧向稳定性控制. E?mail：qinjh@cau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0700504);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2017QC191)

Significance variation of factorial effects on tractor stability employing scale⁃model⁃based experimental approach

Jia⁃hao QIN1,2(),Zhen LI1,2,Muneshi MITSUOKA3,Eiji INOUE3,Zheng⁃he SONG1,2,Zhong⁃xiang ZHU1,2()   

  1. 1. College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Optimized Design for Modern Agricultural Equipment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    3. Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 8120025, Japan
  • Received:2018-03-29 Online:2019-07-01 Published:2019-07-16
  • Contact: Zhong?xiang ZHU E-mail:qinjh@cau.edu.cn;zhuzhonxiang@cau.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 2   

PDF (PC)

82

摘要：

针对不同路况下拖拉机关键配置对其侧向稳定性的影响差异，搭建了模拟拖拉机在全级随机路面下沿侧向斜坡等高线行驶的比例模型试验系统，提出了基于载荷损失率的稳定性评价方法，开展了关键配置因素及其交互作用对侧向稳定性的影响差异研究。结果表明：合理增加前配重质量对提高各种路况下的拖拉机稳定性有显著效果，但对中级不平路面（如旋耕场等），配置大直径低压胎前轮和较宽后轮距则更有效；在犁过的农田等较高级不平路面下，配置的优化效果被明显削弱；配置间的交互作用在所有路况下对整机稳定性均没有显著影响。

关键词: 农业工程, 拖拉机稳定性, 显著性差异, 配置优化, 田口试验

Abstract:

Wheeled farm tractors are widely used in farming and accidents involving tractor rollover remain an ongoing problem. Investigating the significance variation of factorial effects on tractor stability on various terrains provides a theoretical reference for designing tractors with higher stability and provides operators criteria for avoiding rollover. In this paper, adopting the scale?model?based experimental approach, we simulated the progress that the tractor running along the side slope in random road surfaces. In order to interpret the rollover trend, we developed an evaluation index, called the load loss rate (LLR), which characterizes the strength of contact between the ground and tractor uphill wheels. The results showed that the reasonable increase in the front weight has a significant effect on improving the tractor stability in all kinds of road conditions. However, for medium uneven road surfaces such as farmland and rotary farm, the large diameter and low?pressure tire and the wide rear wheelbase will be more effective. Meanwhile, the optimization of the tractor configuration has been significantly impaired in higher uneven terrain such as plowed fields. In addition, the interaction of the configurational factors has no significant effect on the overall machine stability under all road conditions. The results of this paper may provide a theoretical reference for the targeted optimization of tractor configuration, which can help to improve the stability of tractors in complex road conditions.

Key words: agricultural engineering, tractor stability, significance variation, optimal configuration, Taguchi experiment

中图分类号: 

  • S219.1

表1

拖拉机不同工作环境路况PSD拟合模型参数"

地形（路况） W Gq (n 0)/(10-6m3)
a：压实的沙路 2.51 50
b：未铺砌的农场 2.4 256
c：草地 2.3 1744
d：农场道路 1.74 48
e：农田 1.31 248
f：旋耕场 1.076 420.9
g：犁过的农田 0.618 1069.9

图1

拖拉机作业环境路况不平度分级"

图2

全级随机路面比例模型"

图3

基本电路系统与数据采集系统"

图4

拖拉机?斜坡全级随机路面试验平台"

表2

信号因素及其水平"

水平 A B C
1 36M 0 0
2 50L 10% 30%
3 50H 20% 60%

表3

前轮轮胎特性参数"

前轮轮胎类型 直径/mm 刚度/(N·m-1)
36M 36 298（中级刚度）
50L 50 152（低级刚度）
50H 50 652（高级刚度）

表4

田口试验方案"

序号 A B (A×B)1 (A×B)2 C (A×C)1 (A×C)2 (B×C)1 (B×C)2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - -
27 3 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 1

图5

评价指标在D、E级路面和全级路面试验中的均值和信噪比主效应对比"

图6

基于前轮稳定性评价指标的均值和信噪比主效应"

图7

不同因素及其相互作用对前轮稳定性影响显著性的变化趋势"

图8

基于后轮稳定性评价指标的均值和信噪比主效应"

图9

不同因素及其相互作用对前轮稳定性影响显著性的变化趋势"

1 徐飞军，黄文倩，陈立平 . 轮式拖拉机在典型路况下轮胎受力仿真分析[J]. 农业工程学报，2009，25(增刊2): 61⁃65.
Xu Fei⁃jun , Huang Wen⁃qian , Chen Li⁃ping . Simulation analysis of tire force of wheeled tractor under typical road conditions[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25(Sup.2): 61⁃65.
2 张文华, 张维强, 鲁植雄, 等 . 基于虚拟样机技术的轮式拖拉机侧倾稳定性研究[J]. 机械强度, 2017, 39(1): 138⁃142.
Zhang Wen⁃hua , Zhang Wei⁃qiang , Lu Zhi⁃xiong , et al . Research of wheeled tractor roll stability based on virtual prototyping technology[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2017, 39(1): 138⁃142.
3 杨忠义 . 拖拉机翻车事故原因分析[J]. 农机使用与维修, 2016(11): 69.
Yang Zhong⁃yi . Analysis of tractor tipping accident[J]. Farm Machinery Using and Maintenance, 2016(11): 69.
4 李俊杰 . 车辆侧翻预警系统动力学仿真及算法研究[D]. 武汉：武汉理工大学汽车工程学院, 2013.
Li Jun⁃jie . Dynamics simulation and algorithm research of vehicle rollover warning system[D]. Wuhan: College of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, 2013.
5 Daris D C , Rehkugler G E . Agricultural wheel⁃tractor overturns part I: mathematical model[J].Transactions of the ASAE, 1974, 17(3):477⁃483.
6 Denis D , Thuilot B , Lenain R . Online adaptive observer for rollover avoidance of reconfigurable agricultural vehicles[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 126: 32⁃43.
7 Nichol C I , Sommer H J , Murphy D J . Simplified overturn stability monitoring of agricultural tractors[J]. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 2005, 11(1): 99⁃108.
8 Vidoni R , Bietresato M , Gasparetto A , et al . Evaluation and stability comparison of different vehicle configurations for robotic agricultural operations on side⁃slopes[J].Biosystems Engineering,2015,129:197⁃211.
9 Yisa M G , Terao H , Kubota M . Dynamics of tractor⁃implement combinations on slopes (Part IV): experimental validation of simulation models[J]. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 1998, 68(1): 17⁃31.
10 Li Z , Mitsuoka M , Inoue E , et al . 2015 Development of stability indicators for dynamic Phase I overturn of conventional farm tractors with front axle pivot[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 134: 55⁃67.
11 赵丁选，王登峰，程悦荪，等 . 铰接式拖拉机静态二级倾翻稳定性分析[J]. 农业机械学报， 1994，25(1)：21⁃26.
Zhao Ding⁃xuan , Wang Deng⁃feng , Cheng Yue⁃sun ,et al . Static torsion stability analysis of articulated tractor[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1994, 25(1): 21⁃26.
12 赵丁选，程悦荪，诸文农，等 . 铰接式拖拉机倾翻稳定性的动力学解法[J]. 农业机械学报，1995，26(3)：1⁃4.
Zhao Ding⁃xuan ， Cheng Yue⁃sun ， Zhu Wen⁃nong ，et al . Dynamic solution of tilting stability of articulated tractor[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1995, 26(3): 1⁃4.
13 田晋跃，贾会星 . 铰接车辆侧倾过程动态仿真[J]. 农业机械学报, 2006, 37(7): 26⁃29.
Tian Jin⁃yue ， Jia Hui⁃xing . Dynamic simulation of the overturning of articulated vehicles[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2006, 37(7): 26⁃29.
14 朱颖，周炜，郭志平，等 . 基于车辆侧倾角侧翻预警算法的研究[J]. 机械设计与制造，2011(2): 52⁃54.
Zhu Ying ， Zhou Wei ， Guo Zhi⁃ping ，et al . Research on vehicle rollover warning algorithm[J]. Machinery Design and Manufacture, 2011(2): 52⁃54.
15 褚端峰，崔剑，邓泽健，等 . 基于改进TTR算法的车辆侧翻预警研究[J]. 中国机械工程，2016，27(11): 1557⁃1561.
Chu Duan⁃feng , Cui Jian , Deng Ze⁃jian ,et al . Vehicle rollover early warning based on improved TTR algorithm[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 27(11): 1557⁃1561.
16 朱天军，宗长富，吴炳胜，等 . 基于改进TTR算法的重型车辆侧翻预警系统[J]. 机械工程学报，2011，47(10): 88⁃94.
Zhu Tian⁃jun ， Zong Chang⁃fu ， Wu Bing⁃sheng ，et al . Heavy vehicle rollover warning system based on improved TTR algorithm[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering，2011,47(10)：88⁃94.
17 张露，张忠富，王国业，等 . 基于电磁机械耦合再生制动系统的电动汽车稳定性控制[J]. 农业机械学报，2017，48(1)：309⁃316.
Zhang Lu , Zhang Zhong⁃fu , Wang Guo⁃ye ,et al . Electric vehicles stability control based on electromagnetic⁃mechanical coupled regenerative braking system[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(1): 309⁃316.
18 Previati G , Gobbi M , Mastinu G . Mathematical models for farm tractor rollover prediction[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2014, 64(2⁃4): 280⁃303.
19 陈东辉，吕建华，龙刚，等 . 基于ADAMS的半悬挂式农业机组静侧翻稳定性[J]. 吉林大学学报：工学版，2016，48(4): 1176⁃1183.
Chen Dong⁃hui , Jian⁃hua Lyu , Long Gang , et al . Static rollover stability of agricultural semi⁃mounted unit based on ADAMS[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2016, 48(4): 1176⁃1183.
20 朱勇华，侯建勋，周一鸣 . 研究拖拉机动态翻倾特性的模型试验法——遥控拖拉机翻倾试验模型的研制[J]. 农业机械学报, 1986(3): 17⁃23.
Zhu Yong⁃hua ， Hou Jian⁃xun ， Zhou Yi⁃ming . A model test method for studying dynamic tilting characteristics of tractors⁃development of tilting test model for remote tractor[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 1986(3): 17⁃23.
21 Takeda J , Shimada M , Kikuchi Y , et al . Dynamic behaviors of farm tractor passing over an obstacle. (Part I)—improvement of tractor dynamic model and measurement of tire stiffness[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 72: 457⁃463.
22 Ahmadi I . Dynamics of tractor lateral overturn on slopes under the influence of position disturbances (model development)[J]. Journal of Terramechanics, 2011, 48(5): 339⁃346.
23 张硕，李臻，朱忠祥，等 . 多因素影响下拖拉机侧向稳定性模型试验研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(10): 358⁃363.
Zhang Shuo ， Li Zhen ， Zhu Zhong⁃xiang ，et al . Scale model study of lateral stability of tractor affected by multi⁃factors[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(10): 358⁃363.
24 ISO8608-2016. International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration–road surface profiles–reporting of measured data[S].
25 GB7031-1987.车辆振动输入——路面平度表示方法[S].
26 Ohmiya K . Studies on roughness of meadow[J]. Memoirs of the Faculty of Agriculture, 1990, 17(2):151⁃157.
27 Torisu R , Matsuo M , Morishima S . Characteristics of the agricultural surface undulations as origins of farm tractor vibrations[J]. Science Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, 1979, 34(1/2):7⁃17.
28 Matthews J . Ride comfort for tractor operators[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1966, 11(1): 44⁃57.
29 Yang J H ，Murayama . 車体屈折式ホイールトラクタの等高線走行における動的横転倒 [J]. Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society, 1991, 73(1): 1⁃10.
30 Abubakar M S , Ahmad D , Akande F B . A review of farm tractor overturning accidents and safety[J]. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 2010, 18(2): 377⁃385.
31 徐书雷，冯春凌，岳艳艳 . 拖拉机配重的类型和使用方法[J]. 拖拉机与农用运输车,2007, 34(4):100⁃101.
Xu Shu⁃lei , Feng Chun⁃ling , Yue Yan⁃yan . Type of tractor’s ballast and its application[J]. Tractor and Farm Transporter, 2007, 34(4): 100⁃101.
[1] 梁方,尤泳,王德成,王光辉,贺长彬,李帅. 运动参数对草地切根刀具与土壤作用关系的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(3): 903-911.
[2] 王扬, 王晓梅, 陈泽仁, 于建群. 基于离散元法的玉米籽粒建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1537-1547.
[3] 贾洪雷, 王万鹏, 陈志, 庄健, 王文君, 刘慧力. 基于土壤坚实度的仿形弹性镇压辊镇压力实时测量方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1169-1175.
[4] 陈东辉, 吕建华, 龙刚, 张宇晨, 常志勇. 基于ADAMS的半悬挂式农业机组静侧翻稳定性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1176-1183.
[5] 王占中, 卢月, 刘晓峰, 赵利英. 基于改进和声搜索算法的越库车辆排序[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 688-693.
[6] 王扬, 吕凤妍, 徐天月, 于建群. 大豆籽粒形状和尺寸分析及其建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-517.
[7] 贾洪雷, 郑嘉鑫, 袁洪方, 郭明卓, 王文君, 于路路. 大豆播种机双V型筑沟器设计与试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 323-331.
[8] 肖志锋, 乐建波, 吴南星, 刘相东. 操作压力对过热蒸汽流化床干燥的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 1375-1380.
[9] 张金波，佟金，马云海. 仿生肋条结构表面深松铲刃的磨料磨损特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 174-180.
[10] 齐龙, 谭祖庭, 马旭, 陈国锐, 谢俊锋, 邝健霞. 气动振动式匀种装置工作参数的优化及试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 1684-1691.
[11] 齐龙, 廖文强, 马旭, 林建衡, 区志行, 詹志勋. 水田小型除草机器人平台控制系统设计与测试[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(04): 991-996.
[12] 翟治芬, 严昌荣, 张建华, 张燕卿, 刘爽. 基于蚁群算法和支持向量机的节水灌溉技术优选[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(04): 997-1003.
[13] 张强, 于路路, 贾洪雷. 拖拉机用装卸装置的设计与试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(增刊1): 108-112.
[14] 周德义, 王子佳, 张丹丹, 吴冠军, 周晗宇. 新型玉米收获机的秸秆处理装置[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(增刊1): 113-116.
[15] 张强, 张璐, 刘宪军, 于路路, 贾洪雷. 基于有限元法的仿生钩形深松铲耕作阻力[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(增刊1): 117-121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市人民大街5988号　电话：+86-431-85095297　传真：+86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发