Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 1962-1969.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20210969

Previous Articles    

Exclusive phase setting condition of signalized intersection based on risk analysis

Guo-zhu CHENG1(),Lin SHENG1,Hao ZHAO1,Tian-jun FENG2()   

  1. 1.School of Traffic and Transportation,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China
    2.School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Jilin University of Architecture,Changchun 130118,China
  • Received:2021-09-27 Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-07-20
  • Contact: Tian-jun FENG E-mail:guozhucheng@126.com;68202791@qq.com

Abstract:

In order to study the setting conditions of exclusive phase at signalized intersections, the typical intersections in Harbin were selected as the research object, the traffic flow parameter data were obtained by video survey, and the running trajectories of motor vehicles and pedestrians were obtained by simulation with VISSIM and SSAM software. Considering the differences between different individuals in the same type of traffic conflict, the traffic conflict index TTC is introduced to improve the original model. The signalized intersection safety evaluation model based on risk analysis is constructed, and the setting conditions of signalized intersection exclusive phases are put forward. Using the setting condition of exclusive phase based on intersection risk degree, it is judged whether the selected intersection needs to be set with exclusive phase, and the comprehensive risk degree of intersection under different control schemes is compared to verify the rationality of exclusive phase setting. The safety evaluation model of signalized intersection based on risk degree analysis proposed in this paper can distinguish the risk degree of signalized intersection, and provide reference for whether to set exclusive phase at signalized intersection from the safety point of view.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, risk analysis, traffic conflict, safety assessment, exclusive phase

CLC Number: 

  • U491.7

Fig.1

Intersection plan"

Table 1

Intersection signal control scheme"

交叉口绿灯时间/s信号周期/s
学府路?中兴大街南北直行(第一相位)南北左转(第二相位)西直左(第三相位)东直左(第四相位)170
47185340
学府路?复旦街南北直行(第一相位)南北左转(第二相位)东西直行(第三相位)东西左转(第四相位)177
66304623
哈西大街?南兴街南北直行(第一相位)南北左转(第二相位)东西放行(第三相位)114
502035
和谐大道?南兴街南北直行(第一相位)南北左转(第二相位)东西直行(第三相位)东西左转(第四相位)123
39242622

Table 2

Peak hourly vehicle flow rate at intersections(pcu/h)"

交叉口行驶方向东进口道西进口道南进口道北进口道
学府路?中兴大街直行87075212901140
左转248340456596
右转392604324310
学府路?复旦街直行1062141018001038
左转288582594742
右转384420804636
哈西大街?南兴街直行667813441272
左转4227639672
右转5446866366
和谐大道?南兴街直行702750646730
左转17443672348
右转180258168462

Table 3

Peak hourly pedestrian flow rate at inter-sections (ped/h)"

交叉口

东进

口道

西进

口道

南进

口道

北进

口道

学府路?中兴大街360492672300
学府路?复旦街996648864708
哈西大街?南兴街108120156168
和谐大道?南兴街111138165124

Fig.2

Frequency distribution map of vehicle speedat entrance of intersection"

Fig.3

Frequency distribution map of pedestriancrossing speed"

Table 4

Severity of point of conflict"

冲突点类别严重程度
机动车分流冲突点1.00
机动车合流冲突点1.50
机动车交叉冲突点3.00
左转车与过街行人冲突点1.25
右转车与过街行人冲突点1.25

Fig.4

Changing trend of risk degree of intersectionswith flow of left-turn vehicles and direct traffic"

Fig.5

Changing trend of risk degree of intersectionswith flow of right-turning vehicles and pedestrians"

Table 5

Two-phase signal control scheme at intersections"

交叉口绿灯时间/s周期/s
南北放行(第一相位)东西放行(第二相位)
学府路?中兴大街9866170
学府路?复旦街9279177
哈西大街?南兴街6543114
和谐大道?南兴街4770123

Table 6

Improvement control scheme of intersection"

交叉口绿灯时间/s信号周期/s
学府路?中兴大街

南北直行

(第一相位)

南北左转、东西右转

(第二相位)

东西直行

(第三相位)

东西左转、全右转

(第四相位)

178
50364238
学府路?复旦街

南北直行

(第一相位)

南北左转、全右转

(第二相位)

东西直行

(第三相位)

东西右转、南北左转

(第四相位)

175
50364334
哈西大街?南兴街

南北直行

(第一相位)

南北左转、东西右转

(第二相位)

东西放行

(第三相位)

93
402420
和谐大道?南兴街

南北直行

(第一相位)

南北左转、东西右转

(第二相位)

东西直行

(第三相位)

东西左转、南北右转

(第四相位)

142
30285034

Table 7

Comprehensive risk degree of intersectionsunder different control schemes"

交叉口两相位现状改善后
学府路?中兴大街0.8350.7470.498
学府路?复旦街0.8780.6920.477
哈西大街?南兴街0.6070.4720.435
和谐大道?南兴街0.5080.4730.429
1 AASHTO. Highway Safety Manual[M]. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,2010.
2 朱顺应,蒋若曦,王红,等. 机动车交通冲突技术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报,2020,33(2):15-33.
Zhu Shun-ying, Jiang Ruo-xi, Wang Hong, et al. Review of research on traffic conflict techniques[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2020,33(2):15-33.
3 El-Basyouny K, Sayed T. Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts[J]. Safety Science,2013,51(1):160-164.
4 Zhang X, Liu P, Chen Y, et al. Modeling the frequency of opposing left-turn conflicts at signalized intersections using generalized linear regression models[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention,2014,15(6):645-651.
5 Hussein M, Sayed T, Reyad P, et al. Automated pedestrian safety analysis at a signalized intersection in New York City: automated data extraction for safety diagnosis and behavioral study[J]. Transportation Research Record,2015,2519(1):17-27.
6 Autey J, Sayed T, Zaki M H. Safety evaluation of right-turn smart channels using automated traffic conflict analysis[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention,2012,45:120-130.
7 Gettman D, Pu L, Sayed T, et al. Surrogate safety assessment model and validation[R]. McLean: Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center at the Federal Highway Administration, 2008.
8 Wang C, Stamatiadis N. Evaluation of a simulation-based surrogate safety metric[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014,71:82-92.
9 Essa M, Sayed T. Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for safety assessment using simulated conflicts[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 84: 41-53.
10 Wang C, Xu C, Xia J, et al. A combined use of microscopic traffic simulation and extreme value methods for traffic safety evaluation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,2018,90:281-291.
11 郭延永,刘攀,徐铖铖,等.基于交通冲突模型的信号交叉口右转设施安全分析[J].中国公路学报,2016,29(11):139-146.
Guo Yan-yong, Liu Pan, Xu Cheng-cheng, et al. Safety analysis of right-turn facility at signalized intersection using traffic conflict model[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2016,29(11):139-146.
12 王雪松,罗楝.信号控制交叉口交通冲突特征与影响因素[J]. 城市交通,2016,14(6):60-66.
Wang Xue-song, Luo Lian. Traffic conflict characteristics and influential factors at signalized intersections[J]. Urban Transport of China,2016,14(6):60-66.
13 朱彤,白玉,杨晓光,等.平面交叉口交通冲突安全评价失效分析及改进方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008(2):157-161, 179.
Zhu Tong, Bai Yu, Yang Xiao-guang, et al. Failure analysis on safety assessment method for traffic conflicts at level crossing and its improvement[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2008(2):157-161, 179.
14 成卫,李江.模糊聚类法在基于交通冲突技术的交叉口安全评价中的应用[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2004(2):48-50, 55.
Cheng Wei, Li Jiang. The application of the fuzzy clustering method in evaluation of traffic safety based on traffic conflict at intersection[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2004(2):48-50, 55.
15 王晨,夏井新,陆振波,等.基于微观仿真与极值理论的城市交叉口安全评价方法[J]. 中国公路学报,2018,31(4):288-295, 303.
Wang Chen, Xia Jing-ran, Lu Zhen-bo, et al. Safety evaluation method based on traffic simulation and extreme value theory[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport,2018,31(4):288-295, 303.
16 Guo Y, Sayed T, Zheng L, et al. An extreme value theory based approach for calibration of microsimulation models for safety analysis[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory,2021,106:102172.
17 杨晓光,蒲文静,龙亮.基于交通冲突分析的交叉口机动车信号灯设置[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2005(12):1596-1599.
Yang Xiao-guang, Pu Wen-jing, Long Liang. Traffic signal warrant study based on traffic conflict analysis for uncontrolled intersections[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2005(12):1596-1599.
18 苏岳龙,姚丹亚,张毅.基于机动车行人冲突分析的右转专用相位设置仿真[J]. 公路交通科技,2009,26(7):133-138.
Su Yue-long, Yao Dan-ya, Zhang Yi. Exclusive right-turn phase setting simulation based on vehicle/pedestrian conflict analysis[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2009,26(7):133-138.
19 徐建闽,王文静,马莹莹,等. 基于延误时间最小的右转专用信号设置条件研究[J]. 公路工程,2018,43(3):101-105, 183.
Xu Jian-min, Wang Wen-jing, Ma Ying-ying, et al. Research on setting exclusive right-turning phase based on minimum delay time[J]. Highway Engineering,2018,43(3):101-105, 183
20 戴学臻,张波.基于人车冲突分析的转向专用相位设置研究[J].武汉理工大学学报:交通科学与工程版,2012,36(1):47-50.
Dai Xue-zhen, Zhang Bo. Research on setting exclusive turn phase based on pedestrian-vehicle conflict analysis[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering),2012,36(1):47-50.
21 潘福全,陆键,项乔君,等. 无信号平面交叉口安全服务水平计算模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2007(4):104-111.
Pan Fu-quan, Lu Jian, Xiang Qiao-jun, et al. Computation model of safety level of service for non-signalized intersection[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering,2007(4):104-111.
22 Hayward J C. Near-miss determination through use of a scale of danger[J]. Highway Research Record, 1972.
23 项乔君,陆健,卢川,等. 道路交通冲突分析技术及应用[M].北京: 科学出版社,2008.
24 陈曦. 基于交通冲突定量分析的交叉口危险度模型研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学交通运输学院,2012.
Chen Xi. Research on the intersection risk degree model based on traffic conflict quantitative analysis[D]. Beijing: School of Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, 2012.
[1] Heng-yan PAN,Yong-gang WANG,De-lin LI,Jun-xian CHEN,Jie SONG,Yu-quan YANG. Evaluating and forecasting rear⁃end collision risk of long longitudinal gradient roadway via traffic conflict [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(5): 1355-1363.
[2] Xue XIAO,Ke-ping LI,Bo PENG,Man-wei CHANG. Integrated lane⁃changing model of decision making and motion planning for autonomous vehicles [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 746-757.
[3] Rong-han YAO,Wen-tao XU,Wei-wei GUO. Drivers' takeover behavior and intention recognition based on factor and long short⁃term memory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 758-771.
[4] Jing WANG,Feng WAN,Chun-jiao DONG,Chun-fu SHAO. Modelling on catchment area and attraction intensity of urban rail transit stations [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 439-447.
[5] Min MA,Da-wei HU,Lan SHU,Zhuang-lin MA. Resilience assessment and recovery strategy on urban rail transit network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 396-404.
[6] Song FANG,Jian-xiao MA,Gen LI,Ling-hong SHEN,Chu-bo XU. Traffic risk analysis of moving work zone on right lane of city expressway [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1786-1791.
[7] Song-xue GAI,Xiao-qing ZENG,Xiao-yuan YUE,Zi-hao YUAN. Parking guidance model based on user and system bi⁃level optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1344-1352.
[8] Hong-feng XU,Hong-jin CHEN,Dong ZHANG,Qian-hui LU,Na AN,Xian-cai Geng. Fully⁃actuated signal timing technique for isolated signalized intersections in connected vehicle environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1324-1336.
[9] Li-feng WANG,Zi-wang XIAO,Sai-sai YU. New risk analysis method based on Bayesian network for hanging basker system of multi-tower cable-stayed bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 865-873.
[10] Xian-yan KUANG,Zi-ru CHEN. Dynamic game comity behavior at pedestrians′ crossing on unsignal-controlled roads based on cellular automata [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 837-846.
[11] Guo-zhu CHENG,Qiu-yue SUN,Yue-bo LIU,Ji-long CHEN. Cut⁃in behavior model based on game theoretic approach on urban roads [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(12): 2839-2844.
[12] Heng-yan PAN,Wen-hui ZHANG,Bao-yu HU,Zun-yan LIU,Yong-gang WANG,Xiao ZHANG. Construction and robustness analysis of urban weighted subway⁃bus composite network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2582-2591.
[13] Zhuang-lin MA,Shan-shan CUI,Da-wei HU. Urban residents' low⁃carbon travel intention after implementation of driving restriction policy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2607-2617.
[14] Jing-xian WU,Hua-peng SHEN,Yin HAN,Min YANG. Residents' commuting time model under the nonlinear impact of urban built environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2568-2573.
[15] Jie MA,Jia-jun HUANG,Jun TIAN,Yang-hui DONG. Simulation modeling of pedestrian target decision⁃making in evacuation process in transfer corridors of subway stations [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2600-2606.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!