Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1773-1781.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20230069

Previous Articles    

Toughness analysis and improvement of road structure under action of debris flow

Zhi-jia XUE1(),Zhao-yang WANG1,Jiu-peng ZHANG1(),Chang-gen YAN1,Zi-kai XU1,Ying-li ZHANG1,Xiao-ming Huang2,Tao Ma2   

  1. 1.School of Highway，Chang'an University，Xi'an 710064，China
    2.School of Transportation，Southeast University，Nanjing 211189，China
  • Received:2023-01-28 Online:2023-06-01 Published:2023-07-23
  • Contact: Jiu-peng ZHANG E-mail:xuegeneral@126.com;zhjiupeng@chd.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 4   

PDF (PC)

421

Abstract:

Due to the deficiency of the study on the resilience of road structure， the response function of road structure performance under the impact and siltation of debris flow was proposed. And the response function was solved by analyzing the characteristics of debris flow protection and toughness of road structure. Furthermore， the cumulative loss degree of road structure performance after debris flow is used to characterize the safety toughness， and a theoretical model of road structure safety toughness is established. Taking Shuiyugou debris flow in Shawan Town， Gansu Province as an example， the toughness curve and safety toughness of road structure at 394 km+800 m of Shuiyugou National Road was analyzed. The results show that the safety toughness value of road structure is only 63.92% when no measures are taken. After taking the emergency treatment， the safety toughness value of road structure increased to 81.98%. After taking measures to resist debris flow， the ability of road structure to deal with disasters further increased to 85.76%， which significantly improved the toughness. The results quantified the resistance and resilience of road structure under the impact and siltation of debris flow and provided a decision basis for improving the toughness of road structure under the impact and siltation of debris flow.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, road structure, toughness improvement, debris flow, defensive measures

CLC Number: 

  • U491

Fig.1

Comprehensive treatment scheme focusing on "Stability""

Fig.2

Comprehensive treatment scheme focusing on "Barrier""

Fig.3

Comprehensive treatment scheme focusing on "Drainage""

Fig.4

Toughness curve of road structure"

Table 1

Toughness component of Shuiyugou National Road 394 km+800 m"

时间/min韧性分量数值
t0=0惯性分量R01.1×107
t1=90抵抗韧性R1583.504
t2=9000恢复韧性R20.033

Fig.5

Toughness curve and safety toughness at 394 km +800 m of Shuiyugou National Road"

Table 2

Toughness component at 394 km+800 m of Shuiyugou National Road after emergency treatment"

时间/min韧性分量数值
t0=0惯性分量R01.1×107
t1=90抵抗韧性R1583.504
t2=4410恢复韧性R21.396

Fig.6

Toughness curve at 394 km+800 m of Shuiyugou National Road after taking emergency response measures"

Fig.7

Safety toughness at 394 km+800 m of Shuiyugou National Road under three different conditions"

Fig.8

Comparison of toughness curve between taking emergency response measures and taking mitigation measures during disaster"

1 刘坤. 我国基础设施整体水平跨越式提升[N]. 光明日报, 2022-09-27.
2 黄琦, 谢涛, 陈欢欢, 等. 2020年8月甘肃武都群发泥石流基本特征及减灾建议[J]. 公路, 2022, 67(9): 30-37.
Huang Qi, Xie Tao, Chen Huan-huan, et al. Basic characteristics of mass debris flows in wudu, gansu province in august 2020 and suggestions for disaster reduction[J]. Highway, 2022, 67(9): 30-37.
3 马敏, 胡大伟, 舒兰, 等. 城市轨道交通网络韧性评估及恢复策略分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2023, 53(2): 396-404.
Ma Min, Hu Da-wei, Shu Lan, et al. Resilience assessment and recovery strategy analysis of urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 396-404.
4 殷凯. 城市交通网络韧性综合评估研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学交通运输工程学院, 2021.
Yin Kai. Research on comprehensive assessment of urban transport network resilience [D]. Beijing: School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021.
5 Bruneau M, Chang S E, Eguchi R T. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2003, 19(4): 733-752.
6 唐少虎, 朱伟, 程光, 等. 暴雨内涝下城市道路交通系统安全韧性评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(7): 143-150.
Tang Shao-hu, Zhu Wei, Cheng Guang, et al. Assessment of urban road traffic system safety resilience under rainstorm and water logging[J]. Chinese Journal of Safety Science, 2022, 32(7): 143-150.
7 Cimellaro G P, Reinhorn A M, Bruneau M. Seismic resilience of a hospital system[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2010, 6(1/2): 127-144.
8 刘杰. 泥石流路基破坏机理与拦挡结构设计研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学交通运输工程学院, 2018.
Liu Jie. Research on damage mechanism of debris flow subgrade and design of retaining structure[D]. Chongqing: College of Transportation Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2018.
9 王林峰, 唐红梅, 陈洪凯. 泥石流冲击作用下路基的毁损机制研究[J]. 公路, 2011(11): 31-35.
Wang Lin-feng, Tang Hong-mei, Chen Hong-kai. Research on damage mechanism of subgrade under debris flow impact[J]. Highway, 2011(11): 31-35.
10 沈志红. 泥石流堆积区对公路工程的影响[D]. 西安:长安大学公路学院, 2010.
Shen Zhi-hong. Impact of debris flow accumulation area on highway engineering[D]. Xi'an: College of Highway, Chang'an University, 2010.
11 胡涛. 汶川震区震后大型泥石流致灾机理及防治对策研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学地质勘察学院, 2017.
Hu Tao. Research on the disaster mechanism and prevention countermeasures of large-scale debris flow after the Wenchuan earthquake[D]. Chengdu: College of Geological Exploration, Chengdu University of Technology, 2017.
12 冯明硕. 干旱半干旱地区暴雨型稀性泥石流运动学特征及防治研究[D]. 西安:长安大学水资源与环境学院, 2007.
Feng Ming-shuo. Study on the kinematic characteristics and prevention of rainstorm type rare debris flow in arid and semi arid areas[D]. Xi'an: College of Water Resources and Environment, Chang'an University, 2007.
13 罗恒. 云南省元谋县城泥石流治理工程效果评价[D]. 成都:成都理工大学地质勘察学院, 2018.
Luo Heng. Effect evaluation of debris flow control project in yuanmou county, yunnan province[D]. Chengdu: College of Geological Exploration, Chengdu University of Technology, 2018.
14 陈娱. 大箐泥石流对桥墩的冲击动力作用及灾害治理措施研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学国土资源学院, 2017.
Chen Yu. Research on impact dynamic effect of daqing debris flow on piers and disaster control measures[D]. Kunming: College of Land and Resources, Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2017.
15 瞿华南. 考虑坝后淤积作用下的泥石流冲击拦挡坝动力响应研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学地质勘查学院, 2021.
Qu Hua-nan. Study on the dynamic response of debris flow impacting the retaining dam under the consideration of sedimentation behind the dam[D]. Chengdu: College of Geological Exploration, Chengdu University of Technology, 2021.
16 杨再智. 云南大盈江浑水沟泥石流防治工程效益分析[D]. 昆明: 云南大学生态与环境学院, 2021.
Yang Zai-zhi. Benefit analysis of debris flow control project in Hunshui gully of Daying River in Yunnan[D]. Yunnan: School of Ecology and Environment, Yunnan University, 2021.
17 张文涛. 泥石流防治岩土-生态工程综合治理效果分析与评价[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学建筑与土木工程学院, 2021.
Zhang Wen-tao. Analysis and evaluation of comprehensive control effect of geotechnical ecological engineering for debris flow control[D]. Beijing: School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021.
18 熊木齐, 郭富赟, 崔志杰, 等. 甘肃省武都区马槽沟泥石流特征及其治理工程效应[J]. 兰州大学学报, 2015, 51(6): 831-836.
Xiong Mu-qi, Guo Fu-yun, Cui Zhi-jie, et al. Characteristics of debris flow in Machao valley, Wudu district, Gansu province and its control engineering effects[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University, 2015, 51(6): 831-836.
19 周海波, 陈宁生, 卢阳, 等. 泥石流沟谷坊坝群治理效应——以地震极重灾区北川县化石板沟为例[J]. 山地学报, 2012, 30(3): 347-354.
Zhou Hai-bo, Chen Ning-sheng, Lu Yang, et al. The harnessing effect of debris flow gullies and gufang dams—taking Huashiban Gully in Beichuan County, a severely earthquake stricken area, as an example[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2012, 30(3): 347-354.
20 李彪. G310线牛背至麦积公路泥石流灾害处治设计研[J]. 甘肃科技, 2018, 34(16): 39-40.
Li Biao. Research on design of debris flow disaster treatment for Niubei Maiji Highway of G310 Line[J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2018, 34 (16): 39-40.
21 王天健, 胡桂胜, 陈宁生, 等. 泥石流单双边防护堤防治效果对比——以曾达沟为例[J]. 防灾减灾学报, 2022, 38(1): 1-8.
Wang Tian-jian, Hu Gui-sheng, Chen Ning-sheng, et al. Comparison of prevention and control effects of single and bilateral protective dikes for debris flow—taking Zengda valley as an example[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 2022, 38(1): 1-8.
22 Nipa T J, Kermanshachi S. Resilience measurement in highway and roadway infrastructures: experts' perspectives[J]. Progress in Disaster Science, 2022, 14: No.100230.
23 Ouyang M, Dueñas-Osorio L, Min X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 36/37: 23-31.
24 黄弘, 李瑞奇, 秦挺鑫, 等. 安全韧性城市评价模型与方法研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2021.
25 陈洪凯, 唐红梅. 泥石流两相冲击力及冲击时间计算方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2006, 19(3): 19-23.
Chen Hong-kai, Tang Hong-mei. Mud-rock flow of two phase impact force and impact time calculation method[J]. China Journal of Highway, 2006, 19(3): 19-23.
26 陇南发布. 陇南交通路况信息[DB/OL]. [2023-01-15].
27 梁梦辉, 向灵芝, 沈娜, 等. 白龙江流域水峪沟泥石流危险性分析[J]. 路基工程, 2022(6): 214-219.
Liang Meng-hui, Xiang Ling-zhi, Shen Na, et al. Hazard analysis of debris flow in Shuiyu valley of Bailong river basin[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2022(6): 214-219.
28 高路. 四川省九寨沟县牙屯沟泥石流灾害防治研究[D].成都: 成都理工大学地质勘查学院, 2011.
Gao Lu. Research on the prevention and control of debris flow in Yatun gully, Jiuzhaigou county, Sichuan province[D]. Chengdu: College of Geological Exploration, Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
29 刘传正, 苗天宝, 陈红旗, 等. 甘肃舟曲2010年8月8日特大山洪泥石流灾害的基本特征及成因[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(1): 141-150.
Liu Chuan-zheng, Miao Tian-bao, Chen Hong-qi, et al. Basic characteristics and causes of the catastrophic mountain torrents and debris flows on August 8, 2010 in Zhouqu, Gansu[J]. Bulletin Geological, 2011, 30(1): 141-150.
[1] Guo-zhu CHENG,Lin SHENG,Hao ZHAO,Tian-jun FENG. Exclusive phase setting condition of signalized intersection based on risk analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(7): 1962-1969.
[2] Yong-ming HE,Shi-sheng CHEN,Jia FENG,Ya-nan WAN. Superhighway virtual track system based on high precision map [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(7): 2016-2028.
[3] Rong-han YAO,Wen-tao XU,Wei-wei GUO. Drivers' takeover behavior and intention recognition based on factor and long short⁃term memory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 758-771.
[4] Xue XIAO,Ke-ping LI,Bo PENG,Man-wei CHANG. Integrated lane⁃changing model of decision making and motion planning for autonomous vehicles [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 746-757.
[5] Min MA,Da-wei HU,Lan SHU,Zhuang-lin MA. Resilience assessment and recovery strategy on urban rail transit network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 396-404.
[6] Jing WANG,Feng WAN,Chun-jiao DONG,Chun-fu SHAO. Modelling on catchment area and attraction intensity of urban rail transit stations [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 439-447.
[7] Song FANG,Jian-xiao MA,Gen LI,Ling-hong SHEN,Chu-bo XU. Traffic risk analysis of moving work zone on right lane of city expressway [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1786-1791.
[8] Song-xue GAI,Xiao-qing ZENG,Xiao-yuan YUE,Zi-hao YUAN. Parking guidance model based on user and system bi⁃level optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1344-1352.
[9] Hong-feng XU,Hong-jin CHEN,Dong ZHANG,Qian-hui LU,Na AN,Xian-cai Geng. Fully⁃actuated signal timing technique for isolated signalized intersections in connected vehicle environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1324-1336.
[10] Guo-zhu CHENG,Qiu-yue SUN,Yue-bo LIU,Ji-long CHEN. Cut⁃in behavior model based on game theoretic approach on urban roads [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(12): 2839-2844.
[11] Heng-yan PAN,Wen-hui ZHANG,Bao-yu HU,Zun-yan LIU,Yong-gang WANG,Xiao ZHANG. Construction and robustness analysis of urban weighted subway⁃bus composite network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2582-2591.
[12] Zhuang-lin MA,Shan-shan CUI,Da-wei HU. Urban residents' low⁃carbon travel intention after implementation of driving restriction policy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2607-2617.
[13] Jing-xian WU,Hua-peng SHEN,Yin HAN,Min YANG. Residents' commuting time model under the nonlinear impact of urban built environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2568-2573.
[14] Jie MA,Jia-jun HUANG,Jun TIAN,Yang-hui DONG. Simulation modeling of pedestrian target decision⁃making in evacuation process in transfer corridors of subway stations [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(11): 2600-2606.
[15] Feng XUE,Chuan-lei HE,Qian HUANG,Jian LUO. Coordination degree of multimodal rail transit network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2040-2050.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd