Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 704-712.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20211177

Previous Articles    

Accelerate test method of automated driving system based on hazardous boundary search

Bing ZHU(),Tian-xin FAN,Jian ZHAO(),Pei-xing ZHANG,Yu-hang SUN   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2021-11-08 Online:2023-03-01 Published:2023-03-29
  • Contact: Jian ZHAO E-mail:zhubing@jlu.edu.cn;zhaojian@jlu.edu.cn

Abstract:

Aiming at the problems of computing power waste and repetitive testing in the current accelerate test methods which enhanced generating of hazardous scenarios, an accelerate test method based on hazardous boundary search for the automated driving system is proposed. Firstly, three types of inherent attributes of the scenarios are defined: scenario hazardous degree, exposure frequency and sensitivity, and the scenario test priority is proposed with the three inherent attributes which is treated as the basis of the division of parameter space and the search sequence of scenarios. Next, specific scenarios are extracted according to the scenario test priority; and the scenario test priority is updated according to the scenario hazard degree in test results by iterating the update process. Then, the support vector regression is used to fit the hazardous boundary of the experimental results. Finally, the Matlab/PreScan/CarSim co-simulation platform is built and a black-box automated driving algorithm is tested with the front vehicle cut-in scenario in virtual environment to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can effectively search the hazardous boundary of the tested automated driving algorithm and improve the test efficiency.

Key words: vehicle engineering, automated driving system, accelerate test method, hazardous boundary, scenario test priority

CLC Number: 

  • U461.91

Fig.1

Flowcharts of the accelerate test"

Fig.2

Schematic diagram of parameter space area division"

Fig.3

Front vehicle cut-in scenario"

Fig.4

Prior data hazardous boundary of the front vehicle cut-in scene"

Fig.5

Relationship curve between collision damage and relative speed in rear-end scenario"

Fig.6

Scenario hazardous degree distributionof traversal test"

Fig.7

Scenario hazardous degree distribution of accelerate test"

Fig.8

Fitting result of hazardous boundary"

1 余荣杰, 田野, 孙剑. 高等级自动驾驶汽车虚拟测试:研究进展与前沿[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(11): 125-138.
Yu Rong-jie, Tian Ye, Sun Jian. Highly automated vehicle virtual testing: a review of recent developmentsand research frontiers[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(11): 125-138.
2 朱冰, 张培兴, 赵健. 面向多维度逻辑场景的自动驾驶安全性聚类评价方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 316(11): 13-18.
Zhu Bing, Zhang Pei-xing, Zhao Jian. Clustering evaluation method of autonomous driving safety for multi-dimensional logical scenario[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 316(11): 13-18.
3 Wang C, Storms K, Winner H. Online safety assessment of automated vehicles using silent testing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 23(8): 13069-13083.
4 朱冰, 张培兴, 赵健, 等.基于场景的自动驾驶汽车虚拟测试研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(6): 1-19.
Zhu Bing, Zhang Pei-xing, Zhao Jian,et al. Research progress on scene-based virtual test of autonomous driving vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(6): 1-19.
5 Riedmaier S, Ponn T, D Ludwig et al. Survey on scenario-based safety assessment of automated vehicles[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 87456-87477.
6 Chen W, Kloul L. An advanced driver assistance test cases generation methodology based on highway traffic situation description ontologies[C]∥Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Berlin, Germany, 2020:93-113.
7 白雪松, 邓伟文, 任秉韬, 等. 一种自动驾驶仿真场景要素的提取方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(7): 1030-1036.
Bai Xue-song, Deng Wei-wen, Ren Bing-tao, et al. Anextraction method of scenario elements for autonomous driving simulation[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(7): 1030-1036.
8 Krajewski R, Moers T, Nerger D, et al. Data-driven maneuver modeling using generative adversarial networks and variational autoencoders for safety validation of highly automated vehicles[C]∥The 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, New York, America, 2018:2383-2390.
9 Khastgir S, Dhadyalla G, Birrell S, et al. Test scenariogeneration for driving simulators using constrained randomization technique[C]∥SAE World Congress Experience, New York, America, 2017-01-1672.
10 Huang Z, Lam H, Zhao D. Towards affordable on track testing for autonomous vehicle—a Kriging-based statistical approach[C]∥2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, NewYork, America, 2017: 1-6.
11 Schwalb E. Accelerated evaluation of autonomous drivers using neural network quantile generators[C]∥2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, New York, America, 2020: 4751-4758.
12 Zhu B, Zhang P, Zhao J, et al. Hazardous scenario enhanced generation for automated vehicle testing based on optimization searching method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2021, 99: 1-11.
13 Zhao D, Lam H, Peng H, et al. Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane-change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques[J]. Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 18(3): 595-607.
14 Jonathan M, Hankey, Miguel A, et al.Dscription of the SHRP 2 naturalistic database and the crash, near-crash, and baseline data sets[R]. New York: Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, 2016.
15 Minderhoud M M, Bovy P H L. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2001, 33(1): 89-97.
16 Balas V E, Balas M M. Driver assisting by inverse time to collision[C]∥2006 World Automation Congress, Budapest, Hungary, 2006: No.376059.
17 Butakov V A, Ioannou P A. Driver/vehicle response diagnostic system for the vehicle-following case[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(5): 1947-1957.
18 李霖,朱西产,董小飞. 自主紧急制动系统避撞策略的研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2015, 37(2): 168-174.
Li Lin, Zhu Xi-chan, Dong Xiao-fei. A research on the collision avoidance strategy for autonomous emergency braking system[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2015, 37(2):168-174.
19 Quante L, Zhang M, Preuk K, et al. Human performance in critical scenarios as a benchmark for highly automated vehicles[J]. Automotive Innovation, 2021, 4(3): 274-283.
20 吴坚,赵阳,何睿.基于支持向量机回归算法的电子机械制动传感器系统故障诊断[J].吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2013, 43(5):1178-1183.
Wu Jian, Zhao Yang, He Rui. Fault detection and diagnosis of EMB sensor system based on SVR[J]. Journalof Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2013, 43(5): 1178-1183.
21 Feng S, Feng Y, Yu C, et al. Testing scenario librarygeneration for connected and automated vehicles, part I: methodology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021,22(3): 1573-1582.
22 Doecke S D, Baldock M R J, Kloeden C N,et al. Impact speed and the risk of serious injury in vehicle crashes[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2020,144:1-7.
23 Doecke S D, Dutschke J K, Baldock M R J,et al. Travel speed and the risk of serious injury in vehicle crashes[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2021,161:1-8.
24 Yong P, Wang X, Peng S, et al. Investigation on the injuries of drivers and copilots in rear-end crashes between trucks based on real world accident data in china[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2017, 86(9):1251-1258.
[1] Yan-tao TIAN,Fu-qiang XU,Kai-ge WANG,Zi-xu HAO. Expected trajectory prediction of vehicle considering surrounding vehicle information [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 674-681.
[2] Ke HE,Hai-tao DING,Xuan-qi LAI,Nan XU,Kong-hui GUO. Wheel odometry error prediction model based on transformer [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 653-662.
[3] Yan-tao TIAN,Yan-shi JI,Huan CHANG,Bo XIE. Deep reinforcement learning augmented decision⁃making model for intelligent driving vehicles [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 682-692.
[4] Ke HE,Hai-tao DING,Nan XU,Kong-hui GUO. Enhanced localization system based on camera and lane markings [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 663-673.
[5] Deng-feng WANG,Hong-li CHEN,Jing-xin NA,Xin CHEN. Failure comparison of single and double lap joints after high temperature aging [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(2): 346-354.
[6] Pei ZHANG,Zhi-wei WANG,Chang-qing DU,Fu-wu YAN,Chi-hua LU. Oxygen excess ratio control method of proton exchange membrane fuel cell air system for vehicle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 1996-2003.
[7] Ke-yong WANG,Da-tong BAO,Su ZHOU. Data-driven online adaptive diagnosis algorithm towards vehicle fuel cell fault diagnosis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2107-2118.
[8] Qi-ming CAO,Hai-tao MIN,Wei-yi SUN,Yuan-bin YU,Jun-yu JIANG. Hydrothermal characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cell start⁃up at low temperature [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2139-2146.
[9] Hai-lin KUI,Ze-zhao WANG,Jia-zhen ZHANG,Yang LIU. Transmission ratio and energy management strategy of fuel cell vehicle based on AVL⁃Cruise [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2119-2129.
[10] Yan LIU,Tian-wei DING,Yu-peng WANG,Jing DU,Hong-hui ZHAO. Thermal management strategy of fuel cell engine based on adaptive control strategy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2168-2174.
[11] Cheng LI,Hao JING,Guang-di HU,Xiao-dong LIU,Biao FENG. High⁃order sliding mode observer for proton exchange membrane fuel cell system [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2203-2212.
[12] Feng-xiang CHEN,Qi WU,Yuan-song LI,Tian-de MO,Yu LI,Li-ping HUANG,Jian-hong SU,Wei-dong ZHANG. Matching,simulation and optimization for 2.5 ton fuel cell/battery hybrid forklift [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2044-2054.
[13] Xiao-hua WU,Zhong-wei YU,Zhang-ling ZHU,Xin-mei GAO. Fuzzy energy management strategy of fuel cell buses [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2077-2084.
[14] Xun-cheng CHI,Zhong-jun HOU,Wei WEI,Zeng-gang XIA,Lin-lin ZHUANG,Rong GUO. Review of model⁃based anode gas concentration estimation techniques of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 1957-1970.
[15] Yao-wang PEI,Feng-xiang CHEN,Zhe HU,Shuang ZHAI,Feng-lai PEI,Wei-dong ZHANG,Jie-ran JIAO. Temperature control of proton exchange membrane fuel cell thermal management system based on adaptive LQR control [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2014-2024.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!