Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 989-997.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20210778

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tool wear prediction method based on particle swarm optimizationlong and short time memory model

Fei WU(),Hao-ye NONG,Chen-hao MA   

  1. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering，Wuhan University of Technology，Wuhan 430070，China
  • Received:2021-08-12 Online:2023-04-01 Published:2023-04-20

RICH HTML

 19   

PDF (PC)

1055

Abstract:

In order to ensure the surface quality and machining stability of turning， the real-time and accurate monitoring of turning tool wear state is realized. A tool wear state prediction model based on wavelet threshold denoising， Long and Short Time Memory（LSTM） network and Particle Swarm Optimization（PSO） was proposed. The improved polynomial threshold function was used to denoise the tool acceleration vibration signal， and the high quality signal input sample was constructed. The wear values of the tool rear face were predicted and the wear states were classified by training the LSTM network. The proposed PSO-LSTM model is superior to the unoptimized LSTM network in terms of prediction and classification accuracy by using PSO.

Key words: mechanical manufacturing and automation, turning, tool wear, condition monitoring, deep learning, long and short time memory network

CLC Number: 

  • TP183

Fig.1

Metallograph of worn flank surface"

Fig.2

Sensor arrangement of CNC lathe"

Table 1

Combinations of cutting parameters"

主轴转速/（r·min-1）进给量/（mm·min-1）背吃刀量/mm
8501000.4
8501500.5
8502000.6
9501000.5
9501500.6
9502000.4
11501000.6
11501500.4
11502000.5

Table 2

Tool wear stages"

状态后刀面磨损/mm定制后刀面磨损值/mm
初期磨损0.00~0.100， 0.05
正常磨损0.10~0.250.10， 0.15， 0.20
剧烈磨损0.25~0.300.25
磨钝失效≥0.300.30

Fig.3

Wavelet threshold denoising"

Fig.4

Function image of improved threshold function at λ=1"

Fig.5

LSTM cell structure"

Fig.6

Comparison of signal denoising results"

Table 3

Initial parameters of the PSO-LSTM model"

网络参数初始值
初始化权重［-0.5， 0.5］
遗忘门偏置量1或2
输入门偏置量［0， 0.8］
输出门偏置量［0， 0.8］
迭代次数100
种群规模50
学习因子c11.5
学习因子c21.7
隐藏层单元数m100
学习率r0.01

Fig.7

Network structure of LSTM"

Fig.8

PSO optimization results"

Fig.9

Prediction results and MAPE of PSO model and PSO-LSTM model"

Table 4

Evaluations of prediction results of two models"

识别方法MSERMSEMAPE
LSTM2.81221.67690.0111
PSO?LSTM0.89930.94830.0059

Table 5

Recognition accuracy of model before andafter optimization"

模型初期正常剧烈磨钝总体
LSTM90.094.093.387.592.1
PSO?LSTM96.796.096.793.896.0
提升6.72.03.46.33.9
1 Kurada S, Bradley C. A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring[J]. Computers in Industry, 1997, 34(1): 55-72.
2 Mobley R K. An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance [M]. New York: Elsevier, 2002.
3 Gao D, Liao Z R, Lv Z, et al. Multi-scale statistical signal processing of cutting force in cutting tool condition monitoring[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 80(9): 1843-1853.
4 Antić A, Šimunović G, Šarić T, et al. A model of tool wear monitoring system for turning[J]. Tehnicki vjesnik/Technical Gazette, 2013, 20(2): 247-254.
5 Moia D F G, Thomazella I H, Aguiar P R, et al. Tool condition monitoring of aluminum oxide grinding wheel in dressing operation using acoustic emission and neural networks[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2015, 37(2): 627-640.
6 吴雪峰, 刘亚辉, 毕淞泽. 基于卷积神经网络刀具磨损类型的智能识别[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(10): 2762-2771.
Wu Xue-feng, Liu Ya-hui, Bi Song-ze. Intelligent recognition of tool wear type based on convolutional neural networks[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2020, 26(10): 2762-2771.
7 Mohanraj T, Shankar S, Rajasekar R, et al. Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process — a review[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9(1): 1032-1042.
8 Cheng M H, Jiao L, Shi X C, et al. An intelligent prediction model of the tool wear based on machine learning in turning high strength steel[J]. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2020, 234(13): 1580-1597.
9 Kong D D, Chen Y J, Li N. Gaussian process regression for tool wear prediction[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 104: 556-574.
10 Du M H, Wang P X, Wang J H, et al. Intelligent turning tool monitoring with neural network adaptive learning[J]. Complexity, 2019(5A): 1-21.
11 Kong D D, Chen Y J, Li N, et al. Tool wear estimation in end milling of titanium alloy using NPE and a novel WOA-SVM model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020, 69(7): 5219-5232.
12 Yen C L, Lu M C, Chen J. Applying the self-organizing feature map (SOM) algorithm to AE-based tool wear monitoring in micro-cutting[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, 34(1/2): 353-366.
13 Ertunc H M, Loparo K A, Ocak H. Tool wear condition monitoring in drilling operations using hidden Markov models (HMMs)[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2001, 41(9): 1363-1384.
14 郭亮, 高宏力, 张一文, 等. 基于深度学习理论的轴承状态识别研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(12): 166-170, 195.
Guo Liang, Gao Hong-li, Zhang Yi-wen, et al. Research on bearing condition monitoring based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(12): 166-170, 195.
15 Huang Z, Zhu J, Lei J, et al. Tool wear predicting based on multi-domain feature fusion by deep convolutional neural network in milling operations[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2020, 31(4): 953-966.
16 Ma J, Luo D, Liao X, et al. Tool wear mechanism and prediction in milling TC18 titanium alloy using deep learning[J]. Measurement, 2021, 173: No. 108554.
17 Kong D, Chen Y, Li N. Monitoring tool wear using wavelet package decomposition and a novel gravitational search algorithm⁃least square support vector machine model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2019, 234(3): No. 095440621988731.
18 Xie Y, Zhang C, Liu Q. Tool wear status recognition and prediction model of milling cutter based on deep learning[J]. IEEE Access, 2020(9): 1616-1625.
19 Cheng M H, Jiao L, Shi X C, et al. An intelligent prediction model of the tool wear based on machine learning in turning high strength steel[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2020, 234(13): 1580-1597.
20 EN 10084-2008. Case hardening steels⁃technical delivery conditions [S].
21 . Tool-life testing with single-point turning tools [S].
[1] Wen-li JI,Zhong TIAN,Jing CHAI,Ding-ding ZHANG,Bin WANG. Prediction of water⁃flowing height in fractured zone based on distributed optical fiber and multi⁃attribute fusion [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(4): 1200-1210.
[2] Ke HE,Hai-tao DING,Xuan-qi LAI,Nan XU,Kong-hui GUO. Wheel odometry error prediction model based on transformer [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(3): 653-662.
[3] Jin-wu GAO,Zhi-huan JIA,Xiang-yang WANG,Hao XING. Degradation trend prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on PSO⁃LSTM [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(9): 2192-2202.
[4] Xiao-ying LI,Ming YANG,Rui QUAN,Bao-hua TAN. Unbalanced text classification method based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1889-1895.
[5] Xuan-jing SHEN,Xue-feng ZHANG,Yu WANG,Yu-bo JIN. Multi⁃focus image fusion algorithm based on pixel⁃level convolutional neural network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1857-1864.
[6] Dan HU,Xin MENG. Vessel search method by earth observation satellite based on time⁃varying grid [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(8): 1896-1903.
[7] Ming-hua GAO,Can YANG. Traffic target detection method based on improved convolution neural network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1353-1361.
[8] Wen-ying GAO,Jing LIN,Bao-fa LI,Wei WANG,Shi-yan GU. Vibration characteristics analysis and structural optimization of straw deep bury and returning machine [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(4): 970-980.
[9] Ji-hong OUYANG,Ze-qi GUO,Si-guang LIU. Dual⁃branch hybrid attention decision net for diabetic retinopathy classification [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(3): 648-656.
[10] Jian-jun NIE,Xiu-peng YAN,Zong-zheng MA,Xiao-lin XIE,Jia-jie GUO,Ya-lei LYU. Design and trafficability analysis of new bow waist mobile chassis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(3): 515-524.
[11] Lin SONG,Li-ping WANG,Jun WU,Li-wen GUAN,Zhi-gui LIU. Reliability analysis based on cyber⁃physical system and digital twin [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(2): 439-449.
[12] Jie CAO,Jia-lin MA,Dai-lin HUANG,Ping YU. A fault diagnosis method based on multi Markov transition field [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(2): 491-496.
[13] Ren-yan JIANG,Bin-bin XIONG. Modelling degradation processes of machine tools using an equivalent processing time model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(2): 483-490.
[14] Yang YAN,Zi-ru YOU,Yuan YAO,Wen-bo HUANG. Classification and recognition of retinal vessels based on attention U⁃Net [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(12): 2933-2940.
[15] Jun YANG,Zhi-ming GAO. Dense correspondence calculation of 3D models based on unsupervised deformed network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(12): 2971-2983.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-85095297　Fax: +86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd