吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 478-484.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20220963

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

考虑交通梗塞的合流区交通状况诊断

张鑫(),胡启洲,何君,吴啸宇   

  1. 南京理工大学 自动化学院,南京 210094
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-31 出版日期:2024-02-01 发布日期:2024-03-29
  • 作者简介:张鑫(1993-),男,博士研究生. 研究方向:交通控制及交通安全.E-mail:zxxsrs@sina.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省“六大人才高峰”高层次人才项目(JXQC-021);河南省重点科技攻关项目(182102310004)

Traffic condition diagnosis of confluence areas considering traffic infarction

Xin ZHANG(),Qi-zhou HU,Jun HE,Xiao-yu WU   

  1. School of Automation,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210094,China
  • Received:2022-07-31 Online:2024-02-01 Published:2024-03-29

摘要:

为了从交通梗塞角度诊断合流区交通状况,以交通流breakdown概率为交通梗塞指标并提出了合流区交通状况诊断模型。基于该模型,一方面探究了模型参数的满足条件;另一方面结合控制变量法和标定后的模型探究了交通状况,同时讨论了分析结果并提出了管控策略。结果表明:车流在v较小时难以及时驶离合流区,此时qr继续增大将增大P;车流在v较大时可及时驶离合流区,P相对较小,但随着qr继续增大而增大;在已知交通流时,适当调整v可有助于降低P

关键词: 交通工程, 交通状况, 交通梗塞, 合流区, 控制变量法

Abstract:

In order to diagnose the traffic situation in confluence area from the perspective of traffic infarction, a diagnosis model for traffic situation is proposed with the traffic breakdown probability as the traffic infarction indicator. Based on the proposed model, on the one hand, the satisfaction conditions of model parameters were explored, on the other hand, the traffic situation was investigated with the control variable method and the calibrated model, and the analysis results were discussed and control strategies were proposed. Results show that it is difficult for the traffic flow to leave the confluence area in time when v is small, and P increases when q or r continues to increase. The traffic flow can leave the confluence area in time when v is large, and P is relatively small, but P increases with the continuous increase of q or r. When the traffic flow is known, proper adjustment of v can help reduce P.

Key words: traffic engineering, traffic conditions, traffic infarction, confluence area, control variable method

中图分类号: 

  • U491

图1

合流区车流运行图"

图2

原始P值分布和曲面图"

图3

不同v下P随q的变化"

图4

不同v下P随r的变化"

图5

不同交通流下的P-v图"

1 朱洁玉, 马艳丽. 合流区域多车交互风险实时评估方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2022, 52(7): 1574-1581.
Zhu Jie-yu, Ma Yan-li. Real-time risk assessment method of multi-vehicle interaction at merging area[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(7): 1574-1581.
2 温惠英,吴嘉彬,漆巍巍,等. 高速公路入口匝道合流区的 CP-CS 融合模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 48(2): 50-57.
Wen Hui-ying, Wu Jia-bin, Qi Wei-wei, et al. CP-CS fusion model for on-ramp merging area on the Highway[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(2): 50-57.
3 吴文静,战勇斌,杨丽丽,等. 考虑安全间距的合流区可变限速协调控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2022, 52(6): 1315-1323.
Wu Wen-jing, Zhan Yong-bin, Yang Li-li, et al. Coordinated control method of variable speed limit in on⁃ramp area considering safety distance[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1315-1323.
4 Wei H, Rong D L, Zhang Z L, et al. Stability analysis and speed-coordinated control of mixed traffic flow in expressway merging area[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2022, 148(11): 04022098.
5 Cho H W, Laval J A. Combined ramp-metering and variable speed limit system for capacity drop control at merge bottlenecks[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2020, 146(6): 04020033.
6 Jia S, Hui F, Guo J, et al. Study on connected control strategy of urban expressway merging areas[C]∥ 20th COTA International Conference of Transportation, Xi'an, China, 2020: 1962-1973.
7 马庆禄, 闫浩, 聂振宇, 等. 匝道合流区智能网联车辆协同控制方法[J/OL]. [2024-01-02].
Ma Qing-lu, Yan Hao, Nie Zhen-yu, et al. Cooperative control method for intelligent networked vehicles in ramp confluence area[J/OL]. [2024-01-02].
8 薛行健,戈林娟,邓力容,等. 快速路匝道合流区流量, 加速车道长度与通行能力关系[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020,17(2): 509-515.
Xue Xing-jian, Ge Lin-juan, Deng Li-rong, et al. Relationship between acceleration lane length, flow and capacity in the urban expressway ramp merging section[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020,17(2): 509-515.
9 何烈云,杜心全,王镇波. 基于车流波动理论城市快速路匝道间距比例模型研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(36): 81-85.
He Lie-yun, Du Xin-quan, Wang Zhen-bo. The research of urban expressway on-ramp spacing ratio model based on traffic wave theory[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(36): 81-85.
10 吴勇,孙棣华,李蕊,等. 快速路合流区交通事故影响因素研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(9): 98-105.
Wu Yong, Sun Di-hua, Li Rui, et al. Study on crash influencing factors at expressway merge segments[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(9): 98-105.
11 李宗平,李林恒. 快速路合流区加速车道长度计算方法[J].东南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 46(4): 888-892.
Li Zong-ping, Li Lin-heng. Computational method of acceleration lane length in expressway merging area[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46 (4): 888-892.
12 Elefteriadou L, Kondyli A, Brilon W, et al. Enhancing ramp metering algorithms with the use of probability of breakdown models[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2014, 140(4): 634-647.
13 郝媛,孙立军,徐天东. 交通流 Breakdown 现象与交通扰动演化模型[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 37(9): 1178-1184.
Hao Yuan, Sun Li-jun, Xu Tian-dong. Traffic breakdown phenomenon and evolution Model of traffic perturbation[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2009, 37(9): 1178-1184.
14 Banks J H. Two-capacity phenomenon at freeway bottlenecks: a basis for ramp metering?[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1991(1320): 83-90.
15 Persaud B, Yagar S, Tsui D, et al. Breakdown-related capacity for freeway with ramp metering[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2001,1748(1):110-115.
16 王炜,过秀成. 交通工程学[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社, 2000.
17 李林恒,李宗平,李远辉. 合流区匝道交通量控制指标计算方法研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2015, 13(3): 64-69.
Li Lin-heng, Li Zong-ping, Li Yuan-hui. Computational method of control indicators for ramp traffic volume in the merging area[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2015, 13(3): 64-69.
18 丁悦. 基于交通安全的互通立交合流区交通流特性研究[D]. 南京:东南大学交通学院, 2017.
Ding Yue. Study on traffic flow characteristics of interchange merging-areas basing on traffic safety[D]. Nanjing: School of Transportation, Southeast University, 2017.
[1] 张卫华,刘嘉茗,解立鹏,丁恒. 网联混合环境快速路交织区自动驾驶车辆换道模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(2): 469-477.
[2] 岳昊,张琦悦,杨子玉,任孟杰,张旭. 拥堵空间排队的静态交通流分配迭代加权算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(1): 136-145.
[3] 杜筱婧,姚荣涵. 智能网联公交车出站强制换道的演化博弈机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(1): 124-135.
[4] 李义,吕晨阳,梁继才,梁策. 不规则Y形铝型材多点拉弯成形截面变形分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(1): 105-113.
[5] 马壮林,崔姗姗,胡大伟,王晋. 限行政策下传统小汽车出行者出行方式选择[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(7): 1981-1993.
[6] 张雅丽,付锐,袁伟,郭应时. 考虑能耗的进出站驾驶风格分类及识别模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(7): 2029-2042.
[7] 尹超英,陆颖,邵春福,马健霄,许得杰. 考虑空间自相关的建成环境对通勤方式选择的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(7): 1994-2000.
[8] 潘恒彦,王永岗,李德林,陈俊先,宋杰,杨钰泉. 基于交通冲突的长纵坡路段追尾风险评估及预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(5): 1355-1363.
[9] 宋灿灿,荆迪菲,谢俊峰,康可心. 设置广告牌的高速公路平曲线路段驾驶行为分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(5): 1345-1354.
[10] 卢凯,徐广辉,叶志宏,林永杰. 考虑清空时间的双向队首绿波协调控制数解算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2): 421-429.
[11] 曹倩,李志慧,陶鹏飞,马永建,杨晨曦. 考虑风险异质特性的路网交通事故风险评估方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(10): 2817-2825.
[12] 朱洁玉,马艳丽. 合流区域多车交互风险实时评估方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(7): 1574-1581.
[13] 张鑫,张卫华. 快速路合流区主线不同交通状态下的安全性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(6): 1308-1314.
[14] 曲大义,赵梓旭,贾彦峰,王韬,刘琼辉. 基于Lennard-Jones势的车辆跟驰动力学特性及模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(11): 2549-2557.
[15] 董春娇,董黛悦,诸葛承祥,甄理. 电动自行车出行特性及骑行决策行为建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(11): 2618-2625.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!