吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 3862-3874.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240359

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

基于相位队列演进的单交叉口自适应控制策略

王道斌(),赵慧慧,徐缘缘,柳祖鹏   

  1. 武汉科技大学 汽车与交通工程学院,武汉 430065
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-07 出版日期:2025-12-01 发布日期:2026-02-03
  • 作者简介:王道斌(1987-),男,副教授,博士.研究方向:交通系统建模和中微观交通仿真.E-mail:wangdaobin05@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    留学基金委项目(202308420104)

Adaptive control strategy for isolated intersection based on phase queue simulation

Dao-bin WANG(),Hui-hui ZHAO,Yuan-yuan XU,Zu-peng LIU   

  1. College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065,China
  • Received:2024-04-07 Online:2025-12-01 Published:2026-02-03

摘要:

针对现阶段交叉口自适应控制算法存在控制迭代效率低、模型复杂度高的问题,基于相位内队列消散情况提出了一种自适应控制算法。首先,建立参数预测模型实现配时参数优化,并基于车流波动理论计算得到车辆在交叉口处的停车延误;其次,基于速度变化曲线计算得到车辆进入和驶出交叉口时的加、减速延误;最后,提出状态转移矩阵用于延误最小化动态优化模型的构建,进而实现交叉口信号控制的全阶段优化。将固定配时控制和感应控制作为对照组,发现超高负荷交通流场景下本文方法相较于两个对照组,车均延误分别减少了55%和27.8%,平均停车次数减少了58.5%和10.1%;高负荷交通流场景下车均延误分别减少了36.1%和14.6%,平均停车次数减少了23.4%和8.7%;中负荷交通流场景下车均延误分别减少了22.8%和10.5%,平均停车次数减少了3.3%和2.6%。结果表明:在不同的交通流负荷条件下,本文算法均能有效提高交叉口的运行效率。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 自适应控制, 相位队列演进, 流量预测, 动态优化

Abstract:

An adaptive control algorithm based on the in-phase queue dissipation was proposed to address the issues of low control efficiency and high model complexity in existing signal control algorithms. Firstly, a prediction model was established to optimize signal timing parameters, and calculate the vehicle's stopping delay based on traffic shockwave theory. Secondly, the acceleration and deceleration delays of vehicles were calculated based on the speed variation curve. Finally, state transition matrix for constructing dynamic optimization model was proposed to minimize delays, thereby realizing full-stage optimization of intersection signal control. Compared with fixed-time control and actuated control methods, the proposed method respectively reduced the average delay by 55% and 27.8% per vehicle in ultra-high-traffic demand scenario and reduced the average number of stops by 58.5% and 10.1%. In high-traffic demand scenario, the average delay decreased by 36.1% and 14.6% per vehicle, and the average number of stops decreased by 23.4% and 8.7%, respectively. In medium-traffic scenario, the average delay decreased by 22.8% and 10.5% per vehicle, and the average number of stops decreased by 3.3% and 2.6%. The results indicate that the algorithm proposed in this study can effectively improve the traffic operational efficiency at isolated intersections under different traffic demand conditions.

Key words: engineering of communication and transportation, adaptive signal control, phase queue simulation, flow prediction, dynamic optimization

中图分类号: 

  • U491

图1

车辆行驶延误"

图2

车速变化状态示意图"

图3

周期迭代逻辑"

图4

不同消散情景下的车辆轨迹"

图5

加速度变化曲线"

图6

跟随车辆行驶速度恢复曲线"

图7

算法流程"

图8

上海东路-友爱街交叉口"

表1

中负荷实验场景流量"

进口

直行/行人

/[(veh·h-1)/(p·h-1)]

左转/(veh·h-1右转/(veh·h-1合计/(veh·h-1
297/161147114558
西213/13778120411
694/25111160865
660/14010233795

表2

高负荷实验场景流量"

进口

直行/行人

/[(veh·h-1)/(p·h-1)]

左转/(veh·h-1右转/(veh·h-1合计/(veh·h-1
396/214196152744
西284/182104160584
925/334148801 153
880/186136441 060

表3

超高负荷实验场景流量"

进口

直行/行人

/[(veh·h-1)/(p·h-1)]

左转/(veh·h-1右转/(veh·h-1合计/(veh·h-1
495/268245190930
西355/228130200685
1 156/4181851001 441
1 100/233170551 325

表4

配时方案"

进口直行时间/s左转时间/s

左转放行

顺序

固定/感应Gmin固定/感应Gmin
45/3530/25lead
西30/2515/15lag
60/3520/15lag
60/3520/15lag

图9

不同临界值产生的延误比较"

图10

不同交通负荷下控制效益对比"

图11

超高负荷车辆排队长度"

图12

高负荷车辆排队长度"

图13

中负荷车辆排队长度"

[1] Tang K, Boltze M, Nakamura H, et al. Global Practices on Road Traffic Signal Control: Fixed-time Control at Isolated Intersections[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019.
[2] Sims A G, Dobinson K W. The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic (SCAT) system philosophy and benefits[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1980, 29(2): 130-137.
[3] Robertson D I, Bretherton R D. Optimizing networks of traffic signals in real time-the SCOOT method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1991, 40(1): 11-15.
[4] Lin F, Vijayakumar S. Adaptive signal control at isolated intersections[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1988, 114(5): 555-573.
[5] Miller A J. A computer control system for traffic networks[C]∥Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, London, UK,1963: 200-220.
[6] Bang K L, Nilsson L E. Optimal control of isolated traffic signals[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 1976, 9(4): 173-184.
[7] Lin F B, Cooke D, Vrijayakumar S. Use of predicted vehicle arrival information for adaptive signal control-an assessment[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1987, 1112(1): 89-98.
[8] Gartner N. OPAC:a demand-responsive strategy for traffic signal[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1983, 906(1): 75-81.
[9] Zheng X, Recker W. An adaptive control algorithm for traffic-actuated signals[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 30: 93-115.
[10] Head L. Event-based short-term traffic flow prediction model[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1995, 1510(1): 45-52.
[11] Comert G. Simple analytical models for estimating the queue lengths from probe vehicles at traffic signals[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2013, 55: 59-74.
[12] Cai C, Wong C K, Heydecker B G. Adaptive traffic signal control using approximate dynamic programming[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2009, 17(5): 456-474.
[13] Genders W, Razavi S. Asynchronous n-step Q-learning adaptive traffic signal control[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 23(4): 319-331.
[14] Zheng Y, Zhang Y, Hu J. Iterative learning based adaptive traffic signal control[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010, 10(6): 34-40.
[15] 陆丽萍, 程垦, 褚端峰, 等. 基于竞争循环双Q网络的自适应交通信号控制[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(8): 267-2777.
Lu Li-ping, Cheng Ken, Chu Duan-feng, et al. Adaptive traffic signal control based on dueling recurrent double Q network[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 10(6):34-40.
[16] Stevanovic A. Adaptive Traffic Control Systems: Domestic and Foreign State of Practice[M]. Washington, DC:Transportation Research Board, 2010.
[17] Akcelik R. Estimation of green times and cycle time for vehicle-actuated signals[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1994, 1457(1): 63-72.
[18] Viti F, Van Zuylen H J. A probabilistic model for traffic at actuated control signals[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2010, 18(3): 299-310.
[19] Zhang G, Wang Y. Optimizing minimum and maximum green time settings for traffic actuated control at isolated intersections[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(1): 164-173.
[20] Shirvani Shiri M J, Maleki H R. Maximum green time settings for traffic-actuated signal control at isolated intersections using fuzzy logic[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 19(1): 247-256.
[21] Lee S, Wong S C. Group-based approach to predictive delay model based on incremental queue accumulations for adaptive traffic control systems[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 98: 1-20.
[22] Lee S, Wong S C, Varaiya P. Group-based hierarchical adaptive traffic-signal control Part II: Implementation[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2017, 104: 376-397.
[23] Liu H, Balke K N, Lin W H. A reverse causal-effect modeling approach for signal control of an oversaturated intersection[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2008, 16(6): 742-754.
[24] Ren Y, Wang Y, Yu G, et al. An adaptive signal control scheme to prevent intersection traffic blockage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016: 1-10.
[25] 骆旅舟, 谈超鹏, 唐克双. 基于电警数据的单点自适应信号控制优化方法[J]. 同济大学学报, 2022, 50(12): 1798-1808.
Luo Lü-zhou, Tan Chao-peng, Tang Ke-shuang. Adaptive signal control optimization for isolated intersection based on E-police data[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 50(12):1798-1808.
[26] Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Control Devices Handbook[M]. Washington, DC:Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2001.
[27] Wu X, Liu H X. A shockwave profile model for traffic flow on congested urban arterials[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2011, 45(10): 1768-1786.
[28] Billah B, King M L, Snyder R D, et al. Exponential smoothing model selection for forecasting[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2006, 22(2): 239-247.
[29] National Research Council (U.S.). Highway Capacity Manual[M]. Washington DC.:Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 2000.
[30] Akcelik R, Biggs D C. Acceleration profile models for vehicles in road traffic[J]. Transportation Science, 1987, 21(1): 36-54.
[31] Urbanik T, Tanaka A, Lozner B, et al. Signal timing manual-second edition[R]. Washington DC:Transportation Research Board, 2015.
[1] 曲昭伟,王铭阳,王喆,宋现敏,张云翔,黄镜尘. 基于自动驾驶模块化车辆主辅功能分配的公交自适应调度方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2946-2957.
[2] 王琳虹,刘宇阳,刘子昱,鹿应佳,张宇恒,黄桂树. 基于YOLOv5的轻量化桥梁缺陷识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2958-2968.
[3] 范建华,张亮,王宏伟,张磊,于建群. 偏心料斗颗粒速度和体积分数分布自相似特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2913-2925.
[4] 张云翔,宋现敏,谢渝,湛天舒. 基于用户满意度的停车预约服务智能体行为仿真[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(9): 2978-2984.
[5] 穆长儒,徐亮,程国柱. 基于能量合理分配的外包U型钢-混凝土组合护栏防撞性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2669-2680.
[6] 于江波,翁剑成,林鹏飞,孙宇星,柴娇龙. 基于混合Transformer的对外客运枢纽抵站客流预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2251-2259.
[7] 戢晓峰,邓若凡,乔新,关昊天. 建成环境对共享单车时间集聚模式的非线性影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2233-2242.
[8] 李艳波,汪静远,陈圆媛,程绍峰,吕浩楠,陈俊硕. 面向高速公路服务区自洽能源系统的RAMS评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2243-2250.
[9] 柴树山,周志强,李海涛,徐炅旸. 基于图时空模式学习网络的路网实时交通事件自动检测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2145-2161.
[10] 赵红专,吴泽健,张鑫,石胜文,李文勇,展新,许恩永,王佳明. 基于密度离散度和信息传输延迟的网联商用车弯道格子模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 2015-2029.
[11] 闫晟煜,程铭杰,田宏策,王洪瑀,周永恒,马博浩. 封闭式景区纯电动客车调度方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1984-1993.
[12] 潘福全,牛远征,张丽霞,杨金顺,陈秀锋,陈德启. 智能网联环境下无信号交叉口车辆通行控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1948-1962.
[13] 潘义勇,徐家聪,尤逸文,全勇俊. 网约车出行需求影响因素多尺度空间异质性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1567-1575.
[14] 秦严严,肖腾飞,罗钦中,王宝杰. 雾天高速公路车辆跟驰安全分析与控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1241-1249.
[15] 张河山,范梦伟,谭鑫,郑展骥,寇立明,徐进. 基于改进YOLOX的无人机航拍图像密集小目标车辆检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1307-1318.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!