铝合金板材三向应力状态下的成形性能

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201705026

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于覆层板椭圆液压胀形试验对铝合金2B06板材在三向应力作用下的成形性能进行了研究。通过不同椭圆长短轴比的椭圆胀形试验获取成形板材的等效应力-应变曲线,同时,改变包覆层板的材料和厚度,进而探究其对成形板材的流动性的影响。结果表明:在有包覆层板作用的情况下,发生颈缩时等效应力-应变曲线能够达到更大的应变量,并且随着凹模椭圆长短轴比的减小,流动应力曲线与圆(椭圆长短轴之比为1)胀形的曲线偏差也越来越大;当包覆层板的强度系数、加工硬化指数以及厚度越大时,成形板材受到包覆层板的厚度法向应力越大,试件壁厚分布也更加均匀。合适的包覆层板能够显著地改善成形板材的流动特性。

关键词: 机械制造工艺与设备, 流动特性, 覆层板, 椭圆胀形, 厚度法向应力

Abstract: An experiment study on the flow characteristics of aluminum alloy 2B06 sheet under normal stress is carried out on the basis of the elliptical hydraulic bulging. The equivalent stress-strain curves of the target sheet are obtained by the ellipse bulging experiment with different ratio of the length semi-major to semi minor,b/a; meanwhile, the material and the thickness of the overlapping sheet are varied. The results show that, when nicking occurs, the equivalent stress-strain curve of the target sheet can achieve greater strain under the action of overlapping sheet. With the decrease in b/a, the flow stress curves tend move away from the curve obtained by circular (b/a=1) bulging test. At the same time, the larger strength coefficient of overlapping sheet, larger hardening exponent and larger thickness of the overlapping sheet lead the thickness of the target sheet more uniform. Proper overlapping sheet can significantly improve the flow characteristics of the target sheet.

Key words: machine manufacturing technology and equipment, flow characteristics, overlapping sheet, elliptical bulge, thickness normal stress

中图分类号:

TG115.5

郎利辉, 阚鹏, 王耀, 孙志莹, 张泉达. 铝合金板材三向应力状态下的成形性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1527-1533.

LANG Li-hui, KAN Peng, WANG Yao, SUN Zhi-ying, ZHANG Quan-da. Experiment on formability of aluminum alloy sheet under three dimensional stress state[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1527-1533.

参考文献

[1] 郎利辉,王永铭,谢亚苏,等. 铝合金不等高盒形件充液成形过程预胀形效应[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2012, 22: 302-308.
Lang Li-hui, Wang Yong-ming, Xie Ya-su, et al. Pre-bulging effect during sheet hydroforming process of aluminum alloy box with unequal height and flat bottom[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22: 302-308.
[2] Gutscher G, Wu H C, Ngaile G, et al. Determination of flow stress for sheet metal forming using the viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 146: 1-7.
[3] 高铁军,陈鹏,王耀,等. 铝合金半球形件覆不锈钢粘性介质拉深成形及数值模拟[J]. 锻压技术, 2014, 39: 17-20.
Gao Tie-jun,Chen Peng,Wang Yao,et al. Drawing and numerical simulation of hemispherical aluminum alloy part included viscous medium of stainless steel[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2014, 39: 17-20.
[4] Kobayashi M,Hayashi N, Kurosaki Y. Improvement of pure stretchability by overlapping sheet metals[J].塑性と加工, 2001, 42: 50-54.
[5] Hill R. A theory of the plastic bulging of a metal diaphragm by lateral pressure[J]. Philos Mag, 1950, 41: 1133-1142.
[6] Rees D. Plastic flow in the elliptical bulge test[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1995, 37: 373-389.
[7] Banabic D, Balan T, Comsa D S. Closed-form solution for bulging through elliptical dies[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 115: 83-86.
[8] Ragab A R, Habib O E. Determination of the equivalent stress versus equivalent strain rate behaviour of superplastic alloys in biaxial stress systems[J]. Materials Science & Engineering, 1984, 64: 5-14.
[9] Lazarescu L, Comsa D S, Nicodim I, et al. Characterization of plastic behaviour of sheet metals by hydraulic bulge test[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22: 275-279.
[10] Panknin W. The hydraulic bulge test and the determination of the flow stress curves[D]. Berlin: University of Stuttgart, 1959.
[11] Spota J, Spisak E. Determination of flow stress by the hydraulic bulge test[J]. Metabk, 2008, 47: 13-17.
[12] 杨希英,郎利辉,刘康宁,等. 基于韧性断裂准则的修正 MK模型及其在充液热成形中的应用[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2015,23(10): 3389-3398.
Yang Xi-ying, Lang Li-hui, Liu Kang-ning, et al. Modified MK model combined with ductile fracture criterion and its application in warm hydroforming[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015,23(10): 3389-3398.
[13] 高铁军,刘洋,陈鹏,等. 铝合金覆层板胀形过程及成形性能[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2015, 25: 1050-1055.
Gao Tie-jun, Liu Yang, Chen Peng, et al. Analysis of bulging process of aluminum alloy by overlapping sheet metal and its formability[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25: 1050-1055.
[14] 李春峰,杨玉英. 椭圆凹模液压胀形法制作成形法极限图[J]. 材料科学与工艺, 1996(2): 101-105.
Li Chun-feng,Yang Yu-ying. Forming limit diagram by elliptical die hydraulic bulge forming[J]. Material Science & Technology,1996(2):101-105.
[15] Timoshenko S P, Krieger S W. Theory of Plates and Shells[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill,1959.

相关文章 15

[1]	寇淑清, 石舟. 裂解连杆接合面三维重构及其强度与刚度[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1515-1523.
[2]	李俊烨, 胡敬磊, 杨兆军, 张心明, 周曾炜. 离散相磨粒粒径对磨粒流研抛共轨管质量的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 492-499.
[3]	陈超, 赵升吨, 崔敏超, 韩晓兰, 范淑琴, 石田徹. AL5052铝合金板平压重塑形连接试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1512-1518.
[4]	张鹏, 寇淑清, 赵勇, 林宝君. 装配式凸轮轴三点式轴向滚花过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(6): 1953-1960.
[5]	王犇, 王晓力. 硅微球轴承关键工艺[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(3): 824-830.
[6]	郭哲锋, 汤文成. 杯形件二次拉深的应力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(2): 494-499.
[7]	滕菲, 刘博, 张万喜, 高嵩. 柔性三维拉弯成形工艺稳健设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 1481-1487.
[8]	寇淑清, 张鹏, 韩广秘, 杨慎华. 装配式凸轮轴多道次扩径联接工艺[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(2): 398-403.
[9]	寇淑清, 杨宏宇, 高岩, 杨慎华. 裂解连杆断裂结合面缺损面积定量描述与分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(06): 1541-1545.
[10]	洪肇斌, 杨兆军, 张学成, 王佰超. 基于齿面发生线的弧齿锥齿轮铣削加工仿真分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(02): 334-339.
[11]	宋占杰, 张美, 何改云, 刘佩佩. 基于质心Voronoi结构的自由曲面布点策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(01): 34-38.
[12]	曲兴田, 王滨, 张雷, 邵奎伟, 张亮. 焊缝磨抛图像预处理技术[J]. , 2012, (06): 1421-1425.
[13]	李国发, 张栋林, 龚金龙, 王利斌. ZrO₂陶瓷激光加热辅助切削加工技术[J]. , 2012, (06): 1409-1414.
[14]	张雷, 耿伟强, 鲍勇吉, 赵继. 用于羟基磷灰石冷喷涂的超声波送粉系统[J]. , 2012, (06): 1402-1408.
[15]	李栎楠, 杨兆军, 王彦鹍, 张学成. 产形线切齿法加工准双曲面齿轮的产形线建模及代用方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊1): 127-133.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed