吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 2669-2680.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240069

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

基于能量合理分配的外包U型钢-混凝土组合护栏防撞性能

穆长儒1(),徐亮1,程国柱2   

  1. 1.长春工程学院 土木工程学院,长春 130012
    2.东北林业大学 土木与交通学院,哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-19 出版日期:2025-08-01 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 作者简介:穆长儒(1994—),男,讲师,博士. 研究方向:道路交通安全,道路线形设计.E-mail:1939765288@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(2572022AW61);吉林省自然科学基金项目(YDZJ202101ZYTS184)

Collision prevention performance of outsourced U-shaped steel concrete composite guardrail based on reasonable energy allocation

Chang-ru MU1(),Liang XU1,Guo-zhu CHENG2   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering,Changchun Institute of Technology,Changchun 130012,China
    2.School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China
  • Received:2024-01-19 Online:2025-08-01 Published:2025-11-14

摘要:

针对现有混凝土刚性护栏吸能、缓冲能力不佳的问题,提出一种装配泡沫铝的外包U型钢-混凝土新型组合护栏。利用ABAQUS建立护栏-车辆碰撞耦合系统,模拟49 t载重货车碰撞护栏过程,并对护栏的导向功能、缓冲功能、吸能功能进行分析。有限元分析结果表明:装配泡沫铝的外包U型钢-混凝土新型组合护栏与现有普通混凝土护栏相比,其极限强度显著提升。同时,货车碰撞护栏的过程中载重货车未跨越护栏,新型组合护栏导向性好;驾驶员位置处横向加速度与纵向加速度均小于200 m/s2;新型组合护栏防护能量达431 kJ,冲击效率为91.25%,装配泡沫铝的外包U型钢-混凝土新型组合护栏结构具备较好的吸能缓冲效果,可降低乘员伤害程度,具有较好的防撞性能,能有效提高乘车安全性,可为混凝土护栏吸能设计提供参考。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 外包U型钢-混凝土护栏, 碰撞仿真, 防撞性能, 吸能

Abstract:

In view of the poor energy absorption and buffering capacity of existing concrete rigid guardrails, a new type of composite guardrail with U-shaped steel and concrete encased by foam aluminum is proposed. Using ABAQUS to establish a guardrail vehicle collision coupling system, simulate the collision process of a 49 t heavy-duty truck with a guardrail, and analyze the guiding function, buffering function, and energy absorption function of the guardrail. The results of finite element analysis show that the ultimate strength of the new composite guardrail with wrapped U-shaped steel and concrete assembled with foam aluminum is significantly improved compared with the existing ordinary concrete guardrail. At the same time, during the collision of the truck with the guardrail, the loaded truck did not cross the guardrail, and the new combination guardrail has good guidance performance; the lateral acceleration and longitudinal acceleration at the driver's position are both less than 200 m/s2; the protection energy of the new composite guardrail is 431 kJ, and the impact efficiency is 91.25%. The new composite guardrail structure of wrapped U-shaped steel concrete with foam aluminum has a good energy absorption and cushioning effect, which can reduce the degree of injury to passengers, has a good anti-collision performance, can effectively improve the safety of riding, and can provide a reference for the energy absorption design of concrete guardrails.

Key words: engineering of communication and transportation system, outsourcing U-shaped steel-concrete guardrail, collision simulation, collision resistance performance, energy absorption

中图分类号: 

  • U417.1

图1

既有混凝土护栏碰撞系统"

图2

既有混凝土护栏碰撞云图"

图3

新型组合护栏组成结构构造图(mm)"

表1

混凝土受压力学行为"

弹性模量泊松比压缩力学行为压缩损伤
31 0000.2拉伸应力/MPa

非弹性

应变

拉伸

损伤

非弹性

应变

1.30E+01000
2.15E+018.30E-043.06E-018.30E-04
1.88E+016.81E-034.90E-016.81E-03
1.51E+012.75E-036.13E-012.75E-03
1.23E+013.70E-036.93E-013.70E-03
1.03E+014.62E-037.48E-014.62E-03
8.83E+005.52E-037.87E-015.52E-03
7.72E+006.40E-038.17E-016.40E-03
6.17E+008.15E-038.57E-018.15E-03
3.50E+001.49E-029.27E-011.49E-02

表2

混凝土受拉力学行为"

弹性模量泊松比拉伸力学行为拉伸损伤
31 0000.2

拉伸应力

/MPa

开裂

应变

拉伸

损伤

开裂

应变

2.9000
1.94E+006.62E-053.81E-016.62E-05
1.30E+001.23E-046.17E-011.23E-04
8.73E-011.73E-047.63E-011.73E-04
5.86E-012.20E-048.53E-012.20E-04
3.92E-012.65E-049.09E-012.65E-04
2.63E-013.08E-049.44E-013.08E-04
1.76E-013.51E-049.65E-013.51E-04
1.18E-013.94E-049.79E-013.94E-04
7.92E-024.38E-049.87E-014.38E-04
5.31E-024.82E-049.92E-014.82E-04

图4

钢材理想弹塑性模型"

表3

钢材材料属性"

弹性模量/Mpa泊松比屈服应力塑性应变
210 0000.33450.0
3500.1

图5

部件有限元模型"

图6

屈服线分析法"

图7

护栏静态加载示意图"

图8

护栏屈服示意图"

图9

护栏动态碰撞示意图"

图10

护栏动态加载损伤云图(mm)"

图11

车辆模型"

图12

新型组合护栏模型"

图13

车辆护栏碰撞系统"

图14

车辆与护栏碰撞的数学模型"

图15

新型组合护栏横向碰撞力历程曲线"

图16

能量转换历程"

图17

栓钉应力云图(MPa)"

图18

载重货车碰撞力历程曲线"

图19

载重货车碰撞轨迹图"

图20

载重货车轨迹图"

图21

防撞闭孔泡沫铝缓冲板位移云图(mm)"

图22

载重货车碰撞加速度历程曲线"

图23

吸收能量分配曲线图"

[1] Amirarsalan M M, Mahdi R, Khaled K. Investigating the relationship between crash severity,traffic barrier type, and vehicle type in crashes involving traffic barrier[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering(English Edition), 2020, 7(1): 125-136.
[2] Zou Y, Tarko A P, Chen E, et al. Effectiveness of cable barriers, guardrails, and concrete barrier walls in reducing the risk of injury[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014, 72: 55-65.
[3] Kurtulu E, Yıldız A R, Sait S M, et al. A novel hybrid Harris hawks-simulated annealing algorithm and RBF-based metamodel for design optimization of highway guardrails[J]. Materials Testing, 2020, 62(3): 251-260.
[4] Li Z, Fang H, Fatoki J, et al. A numerical study of strong-post double-faced W-beam and Thrie-beam guardrails under impacts of vehicles of multiple size classes[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 159: 106286.
[5] Noh M H, Lee S Y. Construction tolerance effects of reinforced posts on crash performances of an open-type guardrail system[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 120: 138-152.
[6] Gutowski M, Palta E, Fang H. Crash analysis and evaluation of vehicular impacts on W-beam guardrails placed on sloped medians using finite element simulations[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2017, 112: 88-100.
[7] Vijayakumar K P, Kumar K P, Kottilingam K, et al. An adaptive neuro-fuzzy logic based jamming detection system in WSN[J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(8): 2655-2667.
[8] Shanmugam L, Mani P, Joo Y H. Stabilization of event-triggered-based neural network control system and its application to wind power generation systems[J]. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2020, 14(10):1321-1333.
[9] Yin H, Xiao Y, Wen G, et al. Design optimization of a new W-beam guardrail for enhanced highway safety performance[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2017, 112:154-164.
[10] Yang J, Xu G, Cai C S, et al. Crash performance evaluation of anew movable median guardrail on highways[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 182: 459-472.
[11] Sun S, Li H, Zhu C, et al. Study on the anti-collision performance of basalt fiber reinforced polymer beam-column guardrail[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 276: 114588.
[12] 蒋键锆, 王银辉, 李志勇, 等. 超高性能混凝土节段拼装混凝土护栏受力性能分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(15): 6463-6471.
Jiang Jian-gao, Wang Yin-hui, Li Zhi-yong, et al. Mechanical performance analysis of ultra-high performance concrete segmental assembled concrete barrier[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(15): 6463-6471.
[13] Amudha G, Narayanasamy P. Distributed location and trust based replica detection in wireless sensor networks[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2018, 102: 3303-3321.
[14] 单成林, 黄兆亮. 圆端形夹层结构桥墩防撞浮箱的碰撞性能分析[J]. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 47(2): 113-119.
Shan Cheng-lin, Huang Zhao-liang. Collision performance analysis of curved-shaped anti-collision floating box of bridge pier with sandwich structure[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(2): 113-119.
[15] 宋旭明, 潘鹏宇, 荣亚威, 等. 基于碰撞仿真的新型装配式护栏防护性能[J]. 华南理工大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 49(10): 41-49.
Song Xu-ming, Pan Peng-yu, Rong Ya-wei, et al. Protection performance of new fabricated guardrail based on collision simulation[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition) 2019, 47(2): 113-119.
[16] 郑植, 耿波,王福敏, 等. 既有低等级混凝土护栏防护能力提升[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2022, 52(6): 1362-1374.
Zheng Zhi, Geng Bo, Wang Fu-min, et al. Improvement of protective ability for existing low⁃grade concrete guardrail[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1362-1374.
[17] . 公路交通安全设施设计规范 [S].
[18] .公路护栏安全性能评价标准 [S].
[19] . 钢结构设计标准 [S].
[20] .公路交通安全设施设计细则 [S].
[21] 郭腾峰, 张志伟, 刘冰, 等. 适应6轴铰接列车动力性的高速公路最大纵坡坡度和坡长[J]. 交通运输工程学报. 2018, 18(3): 34-43.
Guo Teng-feng, Zhang Zhi-wei, Liu Bing, et al. Maximum grade and length of longitudinal slope adapted to dynamic performance of six-axis articulated vehicle[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(3): 34-43.
[22] 邓小林, 杨馥模, 覃善甘. 新型仿竹六边形梯度层级多胞管耐撞性对比分析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2024, 54(2): 333-345.
Deng Xiao-lin, Yang Fu-mo, Qin Shan-gan. Comparative analysis on crashworthiness of a novel bamboo-like hexagonal gradient hierarchical multicellular tube[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 333-345.
[1] 于江波,翁剑成,林鹏飞,孙宇星,柴娇龙. 基于混合Transformer的对外客运枢纽抵站客流预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2251-2259.
[2] 柴树山,周志强,李海涛,徐炅旸. 基于图时空模式学习网络的路网实时交通事件自动检测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2145-2161.
[3] 李艳波,汪静远,陈圆媛,程绍峰,吕浩楠,陈俊硕. 面向高速公路服务区自洽能源系统的RAMS评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2243-2250.
[4] 戢晓峰,邓若凡,乔新,关昊天. 建成环境对共享单车时间集聚模式的非线性影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2233-2242.
[5] 闫晟煜,程铭杰,田宏策,王洪瑀,周永恒,马博浩. 封闭式景区纯电动客车调度方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1984-1993.
[6] 赵红专,吴泽健,张鑫,石胜文,李文勇,展新,许恩永,王佳明. 基于密度离散度和信息传输延迟的网联商用车弯道格子模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 2015-2029.
[7] 潘福全,牛远征,张丽霞,杨金顺,陈秀锋,陈德启. 智能网联环境下无信号交叉口车辆通行控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(6): 1948-1962.
[8] 潘义勇,徐家聪,尤逸文,全勇俊. 网约车出行需求影响因素多尺度空间异质性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1567-1575.
[9] 秦严严,肖腾飞,罗钦中,王宝杰. 雾天高速公路车辆跟驰安全分析与控制策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1241-1249.
[10] 张河山,范梦伟,谭鑫,郑展骥,寇立明,徐进. 基于改进YOLOX的无人机航拍图像密集小目标车辆检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1307-1318.
[11] 宋现敏,湛天舒,李海涛,刘博,张云翔. 考虑用户成本和泊位利用率的停车预约分配模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1287-1297.
[12] 卢凯明,陈艳艳,仝瑶,张健,李永行,罗莹. 数据驱动的信号交叉口排队尾车驶离状态预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1275-1286.
[13] 郭祎,魏书威,姜涛. 基于区位势能和多源数据的城市客运交通规划算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1328-1335.
[14] 周成栋,宋菲,赵小梅,姚俊杰. 基于多模式双动态演化的拥堵收费模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1319-1327.
[15] 齐迎春,张照辉,陈立新,王清扬,郭雪,于征磊,张志辉. 受螳螂虾虾螯启发的仿生螺旋结构力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(4): 1474-1482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!