吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 511-523.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200025

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

车均延误最小情况下的相位差优化方法

王殿海(),沈辛夷,罗小芹,金盛()   

  1. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,杭州 310027
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-11 出版日期:2021-03-01 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 金盛 E-mail:wangdianhai@zju.edu.cn;jinsheng@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王殿海(1962-),男,教授,博士.研究方向:交通控制.E-mail:wangdianhai@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(61773338)

Offset optimization with minimum average vehicle delay

Dian-hai WANG(),Xin-yi SHEN,Xiao-qin LUO,Sheng JIN()   

  1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027,China
  • Received:2020-01-11 Online:2021-03-01 Published:2021-02-09
  • Contact: Sheng JIN E-mail:wangdianhai@zju.edu.cn;jinsheng@zju.edu.cn

摘要:

基于到达-驶离图式,以相位差为自变量建立了协调控制车均延误模型。以车均延误最小为目标,提出了单向和双向协调下的相位差优化方法,通过数值算例说明了该方法的应用过程。基于微观仿真,分析了最优相位差取值的影响因素。结果表明:初始排队对最优相位差取值没有影响;存在滞留排队时,最优相位差在头车到达时刻截停数秒后取到,交叉口间距增大,则头车截停时间增大;协调流率或转入流率增大,则最优相位差增大。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 协调控制, 相位差, 车均延误, 到达图式

Abstract:

Based on arrival-departure pattern, a unit delay model of coordinated control was proposed with the offset as the independent variable. The offset was optimized with the goal of minimizing unit delay. A numerical case was used to illustratd the application process of the offset optimization algorithm. Based on microscopic simulation, the influencing factors of the optimal offset value were analyzed. The results indicate that initial queuing has no effect on the optimal offset value. If there exists is a stranded queue, the optimal offset is postponed a few seconds after the head car arrives. When the distance between two intersections increases, the postponed time increases, and when the coordinated flow or the flow-in increases, the optimal offset increases.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, coordinated control, offset, unit delay, arrival pattern

中图分类号: 

  • U491

图1

控制场景和信号设置"

图2

总延误图式"

图3

n=0下的累计延误D1"

图4

n=0下的初始排队延误D2"

图5

n>0下的累计延误D1"

图6

n>0下的初始排队延误D2"

图7

简化到达图式"

表1

简化到达图式的参数设置"

参数协调方向
i-1iii-1
初始排队车辆数m/veh00
[p,p+T)时间段/s[20,60)[20,60)
[p,p+T)段内到达流率q1/(veh·h-1)12001200
非[p,p+T)段内到达流率q2/(veh·h-1)200200

图8

数值算例结果"

图9

仿真场景示意图"

表2

仿真相关交通变量"

变量取值
交叉口间距l/m-
路段行驶车速/(m·s-1)13.9
公共周期时长/s80
上游协调相位绿灯时长/s46
上游释放协调流率qt/(veh·h-1)-
上游释放转入流率ql,r/(veh·h-1)-
下游协调相位绿灯时长/s52
下游协调相位初始排队车辆数m/veh-

表3

非固定变量取值范围"

变量取值范围
交叉口间距l/m4006008001000
协调流率qt/(veh·h-1)4006008001000
转入流率ql,r/(veh·h-1)0100200300

图10

仿真算例结果"

图11

不同初始排队下的算例结果"

图12

不同到达车辆数下的算例结果"

图13

不同到达车辆数下的延误图线"

图14

不同交叉口间距下的延误图线"

图15

不同到达车流流量组合下的延误图线A"

图16

不同到达车流流量组合下的延误图线B"

1 万绪军, 陆化普. 线控系统中相位差优化模型的研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2001, 14(2): 99-102.
Wan Xu-jun, Lu Hua-pu. An optimal offset model for artery traffic signal control system[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2001, 14(2): 99-102.
2 刘岩. 考虑车辆运动行为的信号交叉口延误研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学交通学院, 2016.
Liu Yan. Study on delay considering movement behavior of vehicle at signalized intersection[D]. Changchun: College of Transportation, Jilin University, 2016.
3 万孟飞, 曲大义, 曹俊业, 等. 考虑关联交叉口排队长度的干线协调相位差模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(30): 135-141.
Wan Meng-fei, Qu Da-yi, Cao Jun-ye, et al. Offset model for arterial traffic coordination control considering queue length at adjacent intersections[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(30): 135-141.
4 卢凯, 徐建闽. 干道协调控制相位差模型及其优化方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2008, 21(1): 83-88.
Lu Kai, Xu Jian-min. Offset model for arterial road coordinate control and its optimization method[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2008, 21(1): 83-88.
5 曲大义, 杨晶茹, 邴其春, 等. 基于干线车流排队特性的相位差优化模型[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2018, 48(6): 1685-1693.
Qu Da-yi, Yang Jing-ru, Bing Qi-chun, et al. Arterial traffic offset optimization based on queue characteristics at adjacent intersection[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1685-1693.
6 Lu K, Liu J, Wang S, et al. Consistency of signal coordinate control models under different traffic conditions[C]∥Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Beijing, China, 2012: 1501-1506.
7 别一鸣, 李轶舜, 王琳虹, 等. 考虑城市干道车队运行特点的交通信号协调控制算法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 48(2): 357-367.
Bie Yi-ming, Li Tie-shun, Wang Lin-hong, et al. Signal coordination algorithm considering vehicle platoon movement characteristics on arterial streets[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(2): 357-367.
8 李江, 傅晓光, 李作敏. 现代道路交通管理[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社,2002.
9 全永燊. 城市交通控制[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 1989.
10 宋现敏, 王殿海, 金盛. 感应式协调控制下绿信比优化方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2009, 39(): 154-157.
Song Xian-min, Wang Dian-hai, Jin Sheng. Green ratio optimization under inductive coordinated control[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2009, 39(Sup.2): 154-157.
11 Chen C, Che X, Huang W, et al. A two-way progression model for arterial signal coordination considering side-street turning traffic[J]. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 2019, 7(1): 1627-1650.
12 Lu K, Xu J, Li L. Two-way bandwidth maximization model with proration impact factor for unbalanced bandwidth demands[EB/OL].[2010-10-09].
13 Zhang C, Xie Y, Gartner N H, et al. AM-band: an asymmetrical multi-band model for arterial traffic signal coordination[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 58: 515-531.
14 Christofa E, Ampountolas K, Skabardonis A. Arterial traffic signal optimization: a person-based approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 66: 27-47.
15 Ma W, Zou L, An K, et al. A partition-enabled multi-mode band approach to arterial traffic signal optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(1): 313-322.
16 王殿海, 杨希锐, 宋现敏. 交通信号干线协调控制经典数值计算法的改进[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2011, 41(1): 29-34.
Wang Dian-hai, Yang Xi-rui, Song Xian-min. Improvement of classical numerical method for arterial road signal coordinate control[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2011, 41(1): 29-34.
17 Ding S Z, Chen X M, Lei Y, et al. Arterial offset optimization considering the delay and emission of platoon: a case study in Beijing[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(14): 1-19.
18 May A D, Keller H E M. A deterministic queuing model[J]. Transportation Research, 1967, 1(2): 117-128.
[1] 宋现敏,张明业,李振建,王鑫,张亚南. 动态公交专用道的设置及其仿真分析评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(5): 1677-1686.
[2] 贾洪飞,丁心茹,杨丽丽. 城市潮汐车道优化设计的双层规划模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 535-542.
[3] 尹超英,邵春福,王晓全,熊志华. 考虑空间异质性的建成环境对通勤方式选择的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 543-548.
[4] 张大伟,祝海涛. 考虑行人差异性的人群疏散最优决策理论模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 549-556.
[5] 常玉林,袁才鸿,孙超,张鹏. 基于改进元胞传输模型的城市路网实际阻抗计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 132-139.
[6] 宗长富,文龙,何磊. 基于欧几里得聚类算法的三维激光雷达障碍物检测技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 107-113.
[7] 隋振,姜源. 基于MIMO类脑情感学习回路的横-纵向综合控制驾驶员模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 140-146.
[8] 别一鸣,姜凯,汤茹茹,王琳虹,熊昕宇. 考虑方案过渡影响的单点交通控制时段划分方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1844-1851.
[9] 谷远利, 张源, 芮小平, 陆文琦, 李萌, 王硕. 基于免疫算法优化LSSVM的短时交通流预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1852-1857.
[10] 程国柱, 冯思鹤, 冯天军. 占用车行道的路内停车泊位设置条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1858-1864.
[11] 龙海波,杨家其,赵学彧. 基于转运延误风险的多方式协同货运载运工具配置优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1492-1499.
[12] 别一鸣,汤茹茹,王运豪,文斌,冯天军,王琳虹. 信号交叉口进口车道饱和流率估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1459-1464.
[13] 梁泉,翁剑成,周伟,荣建. 基于关联规则的公共交通通勤稳定性人群辨识[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1484-1491.
[14] 吴文静,陈润超,贾洪飞,罗清玉,孙迪. 车路协同环境下路段掉头区域车辆协同控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(4): 1100-1106.
[15] 江亮,贺宜. 电动两轮车风险驾驶行为及事故影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(4): 1107-1113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!