吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 390-398.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201602009

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

信号控制交叉口车均延误模型适用性分析

姚荣涵, 刘美妮, 徐洪峰   

  1. 大连理工大学 交通运输学院,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-03 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 徐洪峰(1978-),男,副教授,博士.研究方向:交通组织,管理与控制.E-mail:hfxu@dlut.edu.cn E-mail:cyanyrh@dlut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:姚荣涵(1979-),女,副教授,博士.研究方向:交通流理论,交通控制,交通规划.E-mail:cyanyrh@dlut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(61374193); 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJCZH213)

Applicability analysis of vehicle delay models for isolated signalized intersection

YAO Rong-han, LIU Mei-ni, XU Hong-feng   

  1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • Received:2014-07-03 Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-02-20

摘要:

构建一种基于一定交通需求和信号控制的实验环境,对比分析了4种经典的信号控制交叉口车均延误模型的适用性.首先,从模型结构和变量个数两个角度比较了4种车均延误模型在使用过程中的难易程度.然后,针对微观交通仿真软件VISSIM,研究了检测区段和分析期对延误测算值的影响.最后,通过对交叉口饱和度与周期时长进行交叉分类设计了多种实验方案,进而对比分析了4种车均延误模型与仿真模型的吻合程度.结果显示,Webster模型简单易用,倾向于低估延误,其适用性最差;ARRB模型较为复杂,其适用性最好;HCM1985模型同样简单易用,其适用性一般;HCM2000模型适用范围广但过于复杂,其适用性一般.总体来讲,对于单点信号控制交叉口,ARRB车均延误模型在估计车辆延误方面有最好的性能表现.本文研究成果能为选用车均延误模型提供理论依据与参考.

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 车均延误模型, 难易程度, 适用性

Abstract:

To analyze the applicability of four vehicle delay models for signalized intersections, the experimental environments were designed on the basis of certain traffic demands and signal control. First, the degree of difficulty for using the four vehicle delay models was compared in view of model structure and the number of variables. Then, for the microscopic traffic simulation software VISSIM, the impacts of the travel time section and analysis duration on the measured delay were discussed. Finally, several experimental scenarios were designed according to the cross-classification of the intersection degree of saturation and cycle length. The goodness of fit between each vehicle delay model and the simulation model was investigated. Results show that the Webster model is easy to use and apt to underestimate vehicle delay and its applicability is the worst; the ARRB model is more complex and its applicability is the best; the HCM1985 model is also easy to use and it applicability is moderate; the HCM2000 model has broad application range but it is too complex, and its applicability is moderate. On the whole, for isolated signalized intersections, the ARRB model displays the best performance in vehicle delay estimation. This research may provide a theoretical basis and reference to the selection of vehicle delay model.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, vehicle delay model, degree of difficulty, applicability

中图分类号: 

  • U491.2
[1] Webster F V. Traffic signal settings[R]. Road Research Technical Paper No. 39, London: Road Research Laboratory, Her Majesty Stationary Office, 1958.
[2] Akçelik R. Traffic signals: capacity and timing analysis[R]. Research Report No. 123, Vermont South: Australian Road Research Board, 1981.
[3] Transportation Research Board (TRB). Highway capacity manual 1985[R]. Washington DC: National Research Council, 1985.
[4] Transportation Research Board (TRB). Highway capacity manual 2000[R] .Washington DC: National Research Council, 2001.
[5] Arasan V T, Jagadeesh K. Effect of heterogeneity of traffic on delay at signalized intersections[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1995, 121 (5): 397-404.
[6] 沈旅欧, 刘好德. 信号交叉口控制延误算法的适应性研究[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 40(4): 559-563.
Shen Lyu-ou, Liu Hao-de. Applicability study of different control delay calculation methods[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2012, 40(4): 559-563.
[7] Lin F B, Mazdeyasna F. Delay models of traffic-actuated signal controls[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1983, 905: 33-38.
[8] van Zuylen H J, Viti F. Delay at controlled inter-sections: the old theory revised[C]//2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Toronto, Canada,2006: 17-20.
[9] 庄焰, 曾文佳. 信号交叉口延误计算模型研究[J]. 深圳大学学报:理工版, 2006, 23(4): 309-313.
ZhuangYan, Zeng Wen-jia. Study of traffic delay model at signalized intersection[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Science and Engineering), 2006, 23(4): 309-313.
[10] Akgüngör A P. A new delay parameter dependent on variable analysis periods at signalized intersections. part 1: model development[J]. Transport, 2008, 23(1): 31-36.
[11] Mazloumi E, Moridpour S, Mohsenian H. Delay function for signalized intersections in traffic assignment models[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2010, 136(1): 67-74.
[12] Chen P, Liu H, Qi H S, et al. Analysis of delay variability at isolated signalized intersections[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science A), 2013, 14(10): 691-704.
[13] Dion F, Rakha H, Kang Y S. Comparison of delay estimates at under-saturated and over-saturated pre-timed signalized intersections[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2004, 38(2): 99-122.
[14] VISSIM 5.30-05 User Manual[M]. Germany :Planung Transport Verkehr (PTV) AG, 2011.
[15] 姚荣涵, 彭程, 周红媚. 协调控制交叉口短车道长度和配时参数协同优化[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2015, 45(4): 1082-1087.
Yao Rong-han, Peng Cheng, Zhou Hong-mei. Synergistic optimization of short lane length and signal timing parameters for adjacent intersections with coordinated signals[J].Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Editon),2015, 45(4): 1082-1087.
[16] Roess R P, Prassas E S, McShane W R. Traffic Engineering[M]. 3rd ed.Beijing: China Machine Press, 2008.
[1] 陈永恒,刘芳宏,曹宁博. 信控交叉口行人与提前右转机动车冲突影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1669-1676.
[2] 常山,宋瑞,何世伟,黎浩东,殷玮川. 共享单车故障车辆回收模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1677-1684.
[3] 曲大义,杨晶茹,邴其春,王五林,周警春. 基于干线车流排队特性的相位差优化模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1685-1693.
[4] 宗芳, 齐厚成, 唐明, 吕建宇, 于萍. 基于GPS数据的日出行模式-出行目的识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1374-1379.
[5] 刘翔宇, 杨庆芳, 隗海林. 基于随机游走算法的交通诱导小区划分方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1380-1386.
[6] 钟伟, 隽志才, 孙宝凤. 不完全网络的城乡公交一体化枢纽层级选址模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1387-1397.
[7] 刘兆惠, 王超, 吕文红, 管欣. 基于非线性动力学分析的车辆运行状态参数数据特征辨识[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1405-1410.
[8] 宗芳, 路峰瑞, 唐明, 吕建宇, 吴挺. 习惯和路况对小汽车出行路径选择的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1023-1028.
[9] 栾鑫, 邓卫, 程琳, 陈新元. 特大城市居民出行方式选择行为的混合Logit模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1029-1036.
[10] 陈永恒, 刘鑫山, 熊帅, 汪昆维, 谌垚, 杨少辉. 冰雪条件下快速路汇流区可变限速控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 677-687.
[11] 王占中, 卢月, 刘晓峰, 赵利英. 基于改进和声搜索算法的越库车辆排序[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 688-693.
[12] 李志慧, 胡永利, 赵永华, 马佳磊, 李海涛, 钟涛, 杨少辉. 基于车载的运动行人区域估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 694-703.
[13] 陈松, 李显生, 任园园. 公交车钩形转弯交叉口自适应信号控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 423-429.
[14] 苏书杰, 何露. 步行交通规划交叉路口行人瞬时动态拥塞疏散模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 440-447.
[15] 孟品超, 李学源, 贾洪飞, 李延忠. 基于滑动平均法的轨道交通短时客流实时预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 448-453.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!