特大城市居民出行方式选择行为的混合Logit模型

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20170561

吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 1029-1036.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20170561

特大城市居民出行方式选择行为的混合Logit模型

栾鑫¹, 邓卫¹, 程琳¹, 陈新元^2,3

1.东南大学交通学院, 南京 211189;
2. 蒙纳士大学交通研究所, 墨尔本 VIC3168;
3.蒙纳士大学土木工程系,墨尔本 VIC3168

收稿日期:2017-06-01 出版日期:2018-07-01 发布日期:2018-07-01
通讯作者: 程琳(1963-),男,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:交通运输规划与管理.E-mail:gist@seu.edu.cn
作者简介:栾鑫(1992-),男,博士研究生.研究方向:交通运输规划与管理.E-mail:xinluan@seu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51578150,51378119); 国家留学基金项目(201806090195).

Mixed Logit model for understanding travel mode choice behavior of megalopolitan residents

LUAN Xin¹, DENG Wei¹, CHENG Lin¹, CHEN Xin-yuan^2,3

1.School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
2.The Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University, Melbourne VIC3168, Australia;
3.Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne VIC3168, Australia

Received:2017-06-01 Online:2018-07-01 Published:2018-07-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为缓解交通供需冲突、改善居民出行结构模式,基于随机效用最大化理论,以特大城市南京为例,明确了影响出行方式选择行为的多重变量;通过建立混合logit(Mixed logit,ML)数理模型分析了家庭特征、个人属性、出行信息、居民出行OD位置4者的相互作用机理,并分析解读了ML模型输出的统计回归结果。研究结果表明:当时间要求性不高时,慢行方式的竞争性能得以凸显,但随着出行时间的增加,这种优势效用会逐步减弱;而在市郊、长距离行程中,公共交通(含地铁)或小汽车出行方式对旅客吸引力更大。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 出行方式选择, 混合Logit模型, 居民出行结构优化, 政策导向

Abstract: In order to alleviate the conflicts of traffic supply and demand, improve the resident trip structure and mode, multiple variables impacting the travel mode choice were defined based on the random utility maximization theory with Nanjing City as a specific case. Mixed Logit (ML) model was established for analyzing and interpreting the influence and interaction mechanism of behavioral characteristics among household properties, individual attributes, trip information and the locations of trip ODs. The outcomes of ML model were analyzed by statistic regression. Results show that competitiveness of slow modes (non-motorized transport) become better if the time requirement is not high. However, with travel time increasing, the advantages op the slow modes are gradually weaken. Moreover, in suburbs and long distance trips, public transports (including metro) become more attractive to passengers. The results of statistic regression may help urban planners and transportation policy makers to integrate limited road resources systematically to ensure the resident travel comfortable, convenient and efficient.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, travel mode choice, mixed Logit model, structure optimization of residents' trips, policy orientation

中图分类号:

U491.1

栾鑫, 邓卫, 程琳, 陈新元. 特大城市居民出行方式选择行为的混合Logit模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1029-1036.

LUAN Xin, DENG Wei, CHENG Lin, CHEN Xin-yuan. Mixed Logit model for understanding travel mode choice behavior of megalopolitan residents[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1029-1036.

参考文献

[1] Mcfadden D.Economic choices[J]. American Economic Review, 2001, 91(3): 351-378.
[2] Krygsman S, Dijst M, Arentze T.Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio[J]. Transport Policy, 2004, 11(3): 265-275.
[3] Krygsman S, Arentze T, Timmermans H.Capturing tour mode and activity choice interdependencies: a co-evolutionary Logit modelling approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A: policy and Practice, 2007, 41(10): 913-933.
[4] Limtanakool N, Dijst M, Schwanen T.The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium-and longer-distance trips[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2006, 14(5): 327-341.
[5] Abane A M.Travel behaviour in Ghana: empirical observations from four metropolitan areas[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(2): 313-322.
[6] Papadimitriou E, Lassarre S, Yannis G.Introducing human factors in pedestrian crossing behaviour models[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 36: 69-82.
[7] 陈坚, 晏启鹏, 杨飞, 等. 出行方式选择行为的SEM-Logit整合模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 41(2): 51-58.
Chen Jian, Yan Qi-peng, Yang Fei, et al.SEM-Logit integration model of travel mode choice behaviors[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(2): 51-58.
[8] 叶茂, 于淼, 过秀成, 等. 历史城区居民出行活动模式选择影响因素分析[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 44(1): 211-215.
Ye Mao, Yu Miao, Guo Xiu-cheng, et al.Analysis of effects of contributing factors on choice of activity pattern in historic urban areas[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2014, 44(1): 211-215.
[9] 景鹏, 隽志才, 查奇芬. 考虑心理潜变量的出行方式选择行为模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(11): 84-92.
Jing Peng, Juan Zhi-cai, Zha Qi-fen.Incorporating psychological latent variables into travel mode choice model[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2014, 27(11): 84-92.
[10] 周伟, 赵胜川. 基于Mixed Logit模型的路线选择行为量化分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2013, 43(2): 304-309.
Zhou Wei, Zhao Sheng-chuan.Quantitative analysis of traveler route choice behavior based on mixed Logit model[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2013, 43(2): 304-309.
[11] Hensher D A, Greene W H.The mixed Logit model: the state of practice and warnings for the unwary[J]. General Information, 2002, 30(2): 133-176.
[12] Kattan L, Barros A G D, Saleemi H. Travel behavior changes and responses to advanced traveler information in prolonged and large-scale network disruptions: a case study of west LRT line construction in the city of calgary[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2013, 21(3): 90-102.
[13] Martínez F, Aguila F, Hurtubia R.The constrained multinomial Logit: a semi-compensatory choice model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2009, 43(3): 365-377.
[14] Mcfadden D, Train K.Mixed MNL models for discrete response[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15(5): 447-470.
[15] 陈艳艳, 刘小明, 陈金川. 城市交通需求管理及应用[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2009: 152-192.

相关文章 15

[1]	陈永恒,刘芳宏,曹宁博. 信控交叉口行人与提前右转机动车冲突影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1669-1676.
[2]	常山,宋瑞,何世伟,黎浩东,殷玮川. 共享单车故障车辆回收模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1677-1684.
[3]	曲大义,杨晶茹,邴其春,王五林,周警春. 基于干线车流排队特性的相位差优化模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1685-1693.
[4]	宗芳, 齐厚成, 唐明, 吕建宇, 于萍. 基于GPS数据的日出行模式-出行目的识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1374-1379.
[5]	刘翔宇, 杨庆芳, 隗海林. 基于随机游走算法的交通诱导小区划分方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1380-1386.
[6]	钟伟, 隽志才, 孙宝凤. 不完全网络的城乡公交一体化枢纽层级选址模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1387-1397.
[7]	刘兆惠, 王超, 吕文红, 管欣. 基于非线性动力学分析的车辆运行状态参数数据特征辨识[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1405-1410.
[8]	宗芳, 路峰瑞, 唐明, 吕建宇, 吴挺. 习惯和路况对小汽车出行路径选择的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1023-1028.
[9]	陈永恒, 刘鑫山, 熊帅, 汪昆维, 谌垚, 杨少辉. 冰雪条件下快速路汇流区可变限速控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 677-687.
[10]	王占中, 卢月, 刘晓峰, 赵利英. 基于改进和声搜索算法的越库车辆排序[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 688-693.
[11]	李志慧, 胡永利, 赵永华, 马佳磊, 李海涛, 钟涛, 杨少辉. 基于车载的运动行人区域估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 694-703.
[12]	陈松, 李显生, 任园园. 公交车钩形转弯交叉口自适应信号控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 423-429.
[13]	苏书杰, 何露. 步行交通规划交叉路口行人瞬时动态拥塞疏散模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 440-447.
[14]	孟品超, 李学源, 贾洪飞, 李延忠. 基于滑动平均法的轨道交通短时客流实时预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 448-453.
[15]	王占中, 赵利英, 焦玉玲, 曹宁博. 信号交叉口自行车和行人混合交通流社会力模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 89-97.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

特大城市居民出行方式选择行为的混合Logit模型

Mixed Logit model for understanding travel mode choice behavior of megalopolitan residents

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10