吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 869-875.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201703025

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国标准动车组前端三维蒙皮件冲压成形

谷诤巍, 吕萌萌, 张文学, 雷娇娇, 徐虹   

  1. 吉林大学 材料科学与工程学院,长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-18 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 徐虹(1972-),女,副教授,博士.研究方向:金属板材成形技术.E-mail:xh@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:谷诤巍(1970-),男,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:金属板材成形技术.E-mail:gzweii@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家青年科学基金项目(51301074); 吉林省科技发展计划项目(2013010201JC,20160204058GX)

Stamping of front-end three-dimensional skin of China electric multiple units

GU Zheng-wei, LYU Meng-meng, ZHANG Wen-xue, LEI Jiao-jiao, XU Hong   

  1. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2016-03-18 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-05-20

摘要:

以中国标准动车组前端三维蒙皮件为例,利用通用有限元软件Autoform对该类厚度大、拉延深度浅、空间结构复杂、非对称的V型截面蒙皮件的成形过程进行了模拟分析。研究了压边力、拉延筋、凹模圆角、拉延深度、摩擦因数及模具间隙等工艺和结构参数对蒙皮件成形的影响。分析了该类构件拉伸不足及轮廓精度差等成形缺陷的成因,并提出了相应的控制方法。结果表明:拉伸不足主要由成形过程中板料的流动阻力不足引起,可通过增大压边力、设置拉延筋进行控制,对于本文所研究的长条形蒙皮件而言,采用变强度拉延筋可以有效控制拉伸不足;轮廓精度差主要由回弹量大引起,优化成形工艺参数可一定程度上提高蒙皮件轮廓精度,工艺参数对轮廓精度的影响程度按照从大到小排序为:凹模圆角、摩擦因数、模具间隙、拉延深度;基于回弹量对模具型面进行补偿可以有效控制蒙皮件的轮廓精度;对于4 mm厚5083-H111铝合金蒙皮件而言,回弹补偿系数取1.2时,蒙皮件的轮廓精度最好。基于模拟结果开展了成形试验,得到合格的成形件,验证了缺陷控制措施的有效性。

关键词: 材料合成与加工工艺, 中国标准动车组, 三维蒙皮, 数值模拟, 工艺参数, 缺陷控制

Abstract:

The forming process of the front-end three-dimensional skin of China Electric Multiple Units (CEMU) was simulated and analyzed using the general finite element software Autoform. The influences of the process parameters such as blankholder force, drawbead, die radius, draw depth, friction coefficient and die gap on the forming of the V-section skin with large thickness, shallow drawing depth and twisted structure were investigated. The reasons for the forming defects such as insufficient stretching and poor contour accuracy were analyzed and the controlling methods were proposed. The results show that insufficient stretching is mainly originated from the lack of flow resistance, which can be controlled by setting proper drawbead and increasing the blankholder force; for the investigated long strip skin in this work, variable intensity drawbead is recommended. Poor contour accuracy is mainly caused by large springback. Process parameter optimization can improve the contour accuracy to some extent, and degrees of the influence parameters are in the order: die radius > friction coefficient > die gap > draw depth. Compensation to the surface based on springback can significantly control the contour accuracy. For the 4 mm 5083-H111 aluminum alloy, the optimal compensation is 1.2 times of the springback amount. Forming tests were conducted according to the simulation results, and high quality compensations were achieved, which prove the validity of the proposed defect controlling methods.

Key words: materials synthesis and processing technology, China electric multiple units, three-dimensional skin, numerical simulation, process parameters, defect control

中图分类号: 

  • TG386
[1] 王胜满. 高速动车组端角柱构件的弯曲成形缺陷[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版,2010,40(增刊1):248-251.
Wang Sheng-man. Stretch bend forming defects of stainless steel profiles of metro vehicles[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition),2010,40(Sup.1):248-251.
[2] 张晓明,刘学之. 高速动车组用铝合金型材双向成形技术[J]. 金属加工:冷加工,2013(16):69-70.
Zhang Xiao-ming,Liu Xue-zhi. Bi-forming of EMU aluminum profiles[J]. Metal Working(Metal Cutting),2013(16):69-70.
[3] 蔡中义,李明哲,兰英武,等. 三维曲面零件连续成形的形状控制[J].吉林大学学报:工学版,2011,41(4):979-983.
Cai Zhong-yi,Li Ming-zhe,Lan Ying-wu,et al. Shape control of 3-dimensional curved surface part in continuous forming[J]. Journal of Jilin University
4 (Engineering and Technology Edition),2011,41(4):979-983.
[4] Wang X Z,Masood S H,Ng D,et al. A study of springback of sheet metal formed parts using ANSYS[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2011,291-294:381-384.
[5] Song J H,Huh H,Kim S H. A simulation-based design parameter study in the stamping process of an automotive member[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2007,189(1-3):450-458.
[6] Wang Ming-wei,Chen Long,Zhao Xiu-jun,et al. Numerical simulation of stamping forming for an automobile reinforced plate based on orthogonal test[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2013,602-604:1899-1902.
[7] Li Da,Deng Lei,Wang Xin-yun. Numerical simulation of residual stress during stamping-forging forming of 2024 aluminum alloy sheet metal[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2013,602-604:1903-1909.
[8] 邱晓刚,黄跃东. 汽车顶盖零件冲压成形的数值模拟研究[J]. 锻压技术,2009,34(4):148-152.
Qiu Xiao-gang,Huang Yue-dong. Study on numerical simulation of automobile covering part stamping process[J]. Forging & Stamping Technology,2009,34(4):148-152.
[1] 郭昊添,徐涛,梁逍,于征磊,刘欢,马龙. 仿鲨鳃扰流结构的过渡段换热表面优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1793-1798.
[2] 姜秋月,杨海峰,檀财旺. 22MnB5超高强钢焊接接头强化性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1806-1810.
[3] 宫亚峰, 王博, 魏海斌, 何自珩, 何钰龙, 申杨凡. 基于Peck公式的双线盾构隧道地表沉降规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1411-1417.
[4] 胡志清, 颜庭旭, 李洪杰, 吕振华, 廖伟, 刘庚. 深冷处理对铝合金薄板冲剪成形性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1524-1530.
[5] 邱小明, 王银雪, 姚汉伟, 房雪晴, 邢飞. 基于灰色关联的DP1180/DP590异质点焊接头工艺参数优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1147-1152.
[6] 陈俊甫, 管志平, 杨昌海, 牛晓玲, 姜振涛, 宋玉泉. 金属棒试样拉伸和扭转试验应变范围和力学特性对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1153-1160.
[7] 梁晓波, 蔡中义, 高鹏飞. 夹芯复合板柱面成形的数值模拟及试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 828-834.
[8] 刘子武, 李剑峰. 叶片材料FV520B再制造熔覆层冲蚀损伤行为及评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 835-844.
[9] 刘纯国, 刘伟东, 邓玉山. 多点冲头主动加载路径对薄板拉形的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 221-228.
[10] 付文智, 刘晓东, 王洪波, 闫德俊, 刘晓莉, 李明哲, 董玉其, 曾振华, 刘桂彬. 关于1561铝合金曲面件的多点成形工艺[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1822-1828.
[11] 张志强, 刘从豪, 何东野, 李湘吉, 李纪萱. 基于性能梯度分布的硼钢热冲压工艺对形状精度的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1829-1833.
[12] 吕萌萌, 谷诤巍, 徐虹, 李欣. 超高强度防撞梁热冲压成形工艺优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1834-1841.
[13] 王辉, 周杰, 熊煜, 陶亚平, 向荣. 基于逆向工程的复杂曲面冲压件回弹补偿[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1842-1847.
[14] 王春生, 邹丽, 杨鑫华. 基于邻域粗糙集的铝合金焊接接头疲劳寿命影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1848-1853.
[15] 邢海燕, 葛桦, 李思岐, 杨文光, 孙晓军. 基于模糊隶属度最大似然估计的焊缝隐性缺陷磁记忆信号识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1854-1860.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨庆芳, 张彪, 韩振波, 梅朵. 冰雪天气下的区域交通状态实时判别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(04): 861 -865 .
[2] 高振海, 高菲, 胡宏宇, 何磊, 兰巍, 程悦. 车辆驾乘人员不同坐姿时腰腹部骨肌力学特性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 35 -40 .
[3] 李玲, 施树明, 王宪彬, 于壮. 发动机制动下高速转弯车辆稳定性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 64 -70 .