吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 1213-1221.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200347

• 车辆工程·机械工程 • 上一篇    

基于SVR的轴向柱塞泵配流盘三角槽结构优化

张斌(),程国赞,洪昊岑(),赵春晓,白大鹏,杨华勇   

  1. 浙江大学 流体动力与机电系统国家重点实验室,杭州 310027
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2021-07-01 发布日期:2021-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 洪昊岑 E-mail:zbzju@zju.edu.cn;honghaocen@163.com
  • 作者简介:张斌(1980-),男,副研究员,博士.研究方向:智能电液元件与装备,增材制造.E-mail: zbzju@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    重点研发计划项目(2020YFB2007100)

Structure optimization of triangular groove of valve plate in axial piston pump based on SVR

Bin ZHANG(),Guo-zan CHENG,Hao-cen HONG(),Chun-xiao ZHAO,Da-peng BAI,Hua-yong YANG   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027,China
  • Received:2020-05-12 Online:2021-07-01 Published:2021-07-14
  • Contact: Hao-cen HONG E-mail:zbzju@zju.edu.cn;honghaocen@163.com

摘要:

为优化轴向柱塞泵的输出动态特性,提出了一种基于支持向量回归机(SVR)的柱塞泵配流盘三角槽结构优化方法。首先,根据轴向柱塞泵的工作原理对其输出特性进行建模,并通过试验对仿真模型的准确性和可行性进行验证,试验与仿真结果误差约为0.31%,理论模型与试验具有较好的一致性。然后,通过计算获取不同配流盘三角槽结构条件下的样本数据,基于SVR模型找出柱塞泵出口流量脉动与三角槽的深度角、宽度角间的对应关系,计算得到深度角与宽度角的最优解分别为11.2°和51.7°。最后,在相同工况条件下,将三角槽结构优化前和优化后计算结果进行对比分析,结果显示,柱塞泵优化后的流量脉动相比优化前降低了1.87%,为制作新产品缩短了研发周期和成本。

关键词: 流体传动与控制, 轴向柱塞泵, 流量脉动, 三角槽, 支持向量回归, 参数优化

Abstract:

In order to optimize the outlet dynamic characteristics of the axial piston pump, a method based on support vector regression machine (SVR) is proposed to optimize the triangular groove of the valve plate. First, the outlet characteristics of the axial piston pump are modeled. The accuracy and feasibility of the simulation model are verified through experiments. The error between the experiment and simulation results is 0.31%, which proves that the theoretical model is in good agreement with the test. Second, the sample data under different conditions of triangular groove structures are obtained through simulation. Based on the SVR model, the corresponding relationship between the outlet flow pulsation and the depth and width angles was found out, and the optimal solutions of the depth and width angles are obtained as 11.2° and 51.7° respectively. Finally, under the same working condition, the optimized calculation results of the triangular groove structure are compared and analyzed. The results show that the flow pulsation after the optimization of the pump is 1.87% lower than that before the optimization, so as to shorten the development cycle and cost of new product.

Key words: turn and control of fluid, axial piston pump, flow pulsation, triangle groove, support vector regression(SVR), parameter optimization

中图分类号: 

  • TH322

图1

轴向柱塞泵运动关系图"

图2

配流盘结构"

图3

单柱塞理论流体模型"

图4

仿真程序结构"

图5

泵-管道-阀液压系统"

图6

整泵模型测试系统结构"

图7

试验台三维模型[14]"

图8

柱塞泵试验台[14]"

图9

轴向柱塞泵的出口压力仿真和试验曲线"

图10

轴向柱塞泵的出口流量仿真和试验曲线"

图11

支持向量回归机结构"

图12

支持向量回归基本思想"

表1

L10V71轴向柱塞泵基本参数"

基本参数数值单位
最高压力35MPa
额定压力28MPa
额定转速1500r/min
理论流量106.5L/min
排量71mL
配流盘腰形槽包角134°
柱塞腔出口槽包角29°
腰型槽弧段包角6°
配流盘错配角1.5°
斜盘倾角17.23°
柱塞直径20mm
配流盘内封油内半径28.6mm
配流盘内封油外半径36.5mm
配流盘外封油内半径44.5mm
配流盘外封油外半径52.5mm
柱塞个数9-
节流系数0.74-
油液密度876kg/m3
油液黏性0.048kg/(m·s)
油液体积弹性模量1.7×109Pa
泵工作转速1300r/min
泵的容积效率0.972-

图13

不同宽度角时泵的出口流量变化(深度角为14°)"

图14

不同宽度角时泵的出口脉动率(深度角为14°)"

图15

不同深度角时泵的出口流量变化(宽度角为60°)"

图16

不同深度角时泵的出口脉动率(宽度角为60°)"

图17

深度角、宽度角优化流程"

图18

真实值与模型值对照"

图19

模型寻优结果"

图20

优化前后泵出口流量对比曲线"

表2

优化结果"

深度角/(°)宽度角/(°)流量脉动率/%
优化前14.060.015.79
优化后11.251.713.92
1 张静,谢世聪,杨馥霖,等. 基于PumpLinx柱塞泵配流盘三角槽结构的优化[J]. 液压气动与密封, 2019, 39(12): 14-19.
Zhang Jing, Xie Shi-cong, Yang Fu-lin, et al. The optimization of axis pump valve plate triangular groove structure based on pumpLinx[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2019, 39(12): 14-19.
2 马吉恩. 轴向柱塞泵流量脉动及配流盘优化设计研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学机械工程学院, 2009.
Ma Ji-en. Study on flow ripple and valve plate optimization of axial piston pump[D]. Hangzhou: School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, 2009.
3 杨华勇,马吉恩,徐兵. 轴向柱塞泵流体噪声的研究现状[J]. 机械工程学报, 2009, 45(8): 71-79.
Yang Hua-yong, Ma Ji-en, Xu Bing. Research status of axial piston pump fluid-borne noise[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(8): 71-79.
4 邓海顺,黄坤,王传礼,等. 平衡式两排轴向柱塞泵缸体倾覆力矩[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2015, 45(5): 1468-1473.
Deng Hai-shun, Huang Kun, Wang Chuan-li, et al. Overturning moment of cylinder of balanced two-ring axial piston pump[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2015, 45(5): 1468-1473.
5 潘阳,李毅波,黄明辉,等. 双联轴向柱塞泵配流盘优化与流量脉动特性分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(4): 391-398.
Pan Yang, Li Yi-bo, Huang Ming-hui, et al. Valve plate improvement and flow ripple characteristic analysis for double compound axial piston pump[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(4): 391-398.
6 童水光,王相兵,钟崴,等. 基于虚拟样机技术的轴向柱塞泵动态特性分析[J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 49(2): 174-182.
Tong Shui-guang, Wang Xiang-bing, Zhong Wei, et al. Dynamic characteristics analysis on axial piston pump based on virtual prototype technology[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(2): 174-182.
7 Xu B, Ye S, Zhang Jun-hui. Flow ripple reduction of an axial piston pump by a combination of cross-angle and pressure relief grooves: analysis and optimization[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(6): 2531-2545.
8 钟鸣. A4V型轴向柱塞泵的动态特性分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学机电工程学院, 2014.
Zhong Ming. Analysis of the dynamic characteristics of A4V axial piston pump[D]. Haerbin: School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014.
9 Hong Hao-cen, Zhang Bin, Yu Min, et al. Analysis and optimization on U-shaped damping groove for flow ripple reduction of fixed displacement axial-piston pump[J]. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2020, 13(1): 126-135.
10 申屠胜男,阮健,钱家圆,等. 2D泵流动特性与配流窗口优化分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(12): 403-410.
Shentu Sheng-nan, Ruan Jian, Qian Jia-yuan, et al. Optimization analysis of flow characteristic and distribution window of 2D pump[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(12): 403-410.
11 郝希阳,王玉林,耿超,等. 轴向柱塞泵配流盘阻尼槽的模拟分析[J]. 农业装备与车辆工程, 2018, 56(7): 48-51.
Hao Xi-yang, Wang Yu-lin, Geng Chao,et al. Study on damping groove characteristics of axial plunger pump[J]. Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering, 2018, 56(7): 48-51.
12 王安麟,吴小锋,马博,等.柱塞泵配流结构与流动特性的动态响应关系[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,39(4): 586-590.
Wang An-lin, Wu Xiao-feng, Ma Bo, et al. Dynamic response relationship between swashplate's structural parameters of piston pump and hydrodynamics features[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2011, 39(4): 586-590.
13 李鑫, 王少萍,黄伯超. 航空柱塞泵流量脉动仿真分析与结构优化[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2010, 36(3): 60-64.
Li Xin, Wang Shao-ping, Huang Bo-chao. Simulation analysis of flow fluctuation in aviation piston pump and its structure optimization[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2010, 36(3): 60-64.
14 王毅翔. 轴向柱塞泵配流盘阻尼槽特性分析及优化设计[D]. 杭州:浙江大学机械工程学院, 2014.
Wang Yi-xiang. Study on damping groove characteristics and optimization of axial piston pump[D]. Hangzhou: School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, 2014.
[1] 杜常清,曹锡良,何彪,任卫群. 基于混合粒子群算法的双离合变速器参数优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(5): 1556-1564.
[2] 魏巍,刘旭,韩雪永,闫清东. 液力缓速器全充液工况下本征正交基对流场重构精度的影响规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1959-1968.
[3] 谷远利, 张源, 芮小平, 陆文琦, 李萌, 王硕. 基于免疫算法优化LSSVM的短时交通流预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1852-1857.
[4] 何仁,涂琨. 基于温度补偿气隙宽度的电磁制动器[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1777-1785.
[5] 刘俊龙,孙冬野,刘小军,尤勇. 基于耦合特性的机电控制无级变速器速比控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1951-1958.
[6] 王晓晶,刘美珍,陈帅,李嵩. 仿真转台用连续回转电液伺服马达预测滑模控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1547-1557.
[7] 卢秀泉,胡春玉,柴亚龙,马文星,张剑楠. 大功率液力偶合器调速工况瞬态流场特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1539-1546.
[8] 闻德生,隋广东,田山恒,王少朋,冯佩坤,刘小雪. 内外啮合齿轮马达泄漏与容积效率分析及试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(4): 1186-1193.
[9] 刘建芳, 王记波, 刘国君, 李新波, 梁实海, 杨志刚. 基于PMMA内嵌三维流道的压电驱动微混合器[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1500-1507.
[10] 姜继海, 葛泽华, 杨晨, 梁海健. 基于微分器的直驱电液伺服系统离散滑模控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1492-1499.
[11] 刘国君, 马祥, 杨志刚, 王聪慧, 吴越, 王腾飞. 集成式三相流脉动微混合芯片[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1063-1071.
[12] 刘祥勇, 李万莉. 包含蓄能器的电液比例控制模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1072-1084.
[13] 李静, 丁明慧, 李立刚, 陈立军. 基于活塞形状的空气弹簧动特性分析与参数优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 355-363.
[14] 胡云峰, 王长勇, 于树友, 孙鹏远, 陈虹. 缸内直喷汽油机共轨系统结构参数优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 236-244.
[15] 王佳怡, 刘昕晖, 王昕, 齐海波, 孙晓宇, 王丽. 数字二次元件变量冲击机理及其抑制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1775-1781.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!