真空吸盘的仿生设计与吸附性能分析

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20230200

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文从仿生学角度出发，对基于鲍鱼腹足优良吸附性的仿生吸盘吸附性能进行研究。通过提取腹足表面形态设计仿生吸盘，并对吸盘吸附性进行模拟分析，选取模拟结果良好的仿生吸盘进行拉伸实验，根据实验结果探究吸附机理。结果表明，密封环宽度对仿生吸盘Mises应力具有较大影响，而沟槽距吸盘中心距离与沟槽分布数量的影响很小。密封环宽度为1.5 mm的仿生吸盘所受Mises应力要大于宽度为3 mm的仿生吸盘。在40%真空度下，密封环宽度为1.5 mm，沟槽距吸盘中心距离为20 mm，沟槽分布数量为12的仿生吸盘具有最大吸附力，其最大吸附力比标准吸盘提高了5.32%。本研究表明仿生吸盘可以有效提高吸盘的吸附性能。仿生吸盘密封环结构可以有效阻止吸盘边缘向内收缩，同时沟槽结构可以延缓吸盘内腔与外界连通的可能，从而达到提高吸盘吸附性能的目的。

关键词: 工程仿生学, 吸盘, 鲍鱼, 密封环, 条纹沟槽, 吸附性

Abstract:

The adsorption performance of bionic sucker based on the excellent adsorption of abalone abdominal foot was studied from the perspective of bionics. The surface morphology of the abdominal foot was extracted to design the bionic sucker， and the adsorption of the sucker was simulated and analyzed. The bionic sucker with good adsorption was selected for tensile test， and the adsorption mechanism was explored according to the experimental results. The width of the sealing ring has a great effect on the Mises stress of the bionic sucker， while the distance between the groove and the center of the sucker and the number of grooves distribution have little effect. The stress on the sucker bottom with a sealing ring width of 1.5 mm is greater than that of the bionic sucker with a width of 3 mm. The bionic sucker with the width of sealing ring of 1.5 mm， the distance between groove and center of sucker of 20 mm， and the number of grooves distributed is 12 has the largest adsorption force under 40% vacuum degree， and its maximum adsorption force is 5.32% higher than that of standard sucker. The bionic sucker can improve the adsorption performance of the sucker. The bionic sucker sealing ring structure can effectively prevent the edge of the sucker from shrinking inward and the groove structure can delay the connection between the inner cavity of the sucker and the outside， which is the key to improving the adsorption performance of the sucker.

Key words: engineering bionics, sucker, abalone, sealing ring, stripe groove, adsorption

中图分类号:

TB17

熙鹏,丛茜,叶绍波,李红波,张燕青. 真空吸盘的仿生设计与吸附性能分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(1): 382-391.

Peng XI,Qian CONG,Shao-bo YE,Hong-bo LI,Yan-qing ZHANG. Bionic design and adsorption performance analysis of vacuum sucker[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(1): 382-391.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

表3

图12

参考文献 22

1	白联强,宋仲康,王鹏.不同泄漏情况下真空吸盘内部流场仿真分析[J].机械工程师, 2018(7): 33-35, 38.
	Bai Lian-qiang, Song Zhong-kang, Wang Peng. Simulation Analysis on Internal Flow Field of a Vacuum Suction Cup under Different Leakage Conditions[J]. Mechanical Engineer, 2018(7): 33-35, 38.
2	秦建华,邓晨韵,王敦球,等.基于有限元的不同布局方式对真空吸附装置的影响[J].桂林理工大学学报, 2017, 37(4): 713-717.
	Qin Jian-hua, Deng Chen-yun, Wang Dun-qiu, et al. Influence analysis of different layout methods on the vacuum adsorption device based on ANSYS method[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2017, 37(4): 713-717.
3	聂俊峰,王涛,许英南,等.柔性吸盘真空吸附性能试验[J].液压与气动,2020(5): 131-137.
	Nie Jun-feng, Wang Tao, Xu Ying-nan, et al. Vacuum Adsorption Test of Flexible Suction Cup[J]. Chinese Hydraulics＆Pneumatics, 2020(5): 131-137.
4	施迈茨.施迈茨——用于包装行业的新型波纹吸盘SPB 4f[EB/OL]. [2023-06-25]. .
5	AIRBEST.SOP系列圆形海绵吸盘[EB/OL]. [2023-06-25]. .
6	Peng X Y, Ma C D, Ji J X, et al. Underwater adhesion mechanisms and biomimetic study of marine life[J]. Tribology, 2020, 40(6): 816-830.
7	Maie T, Blob R W. Adhesive force and endurance of the pelvic sucker across different modes of waterfall-climbing in gobiid fishes: contrasting climbing mechanisms share aspects of ontogenetic change[J]. Zoology, 2021, 149:No. 125969.
8	Palecek A M, Schoenfuss H L, Blob R W. Sucker shapes, skeletons, and bioinspiration: how hard and soft tissue morphology generates adhesive performance in waterfall climbing goby fishes[J]. Integrative And Comparative Biology, 2022, 62(4):No.094.
9	Wang S H, Luo H Y, Linghu C H, et al. Elastic energy storage enabled magnetically actuated, octopus‐inspired smart adhesive[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(9): No.2009217.
10	Baik S, Hwang G W, Jang S, et al. Bioinspired microsphere-embedded adhesive architectures for an electrothermally actuating transport device of dry/wet pliable surfaces[J]. ACS Applied Materials And Interfaces, 2021, 13(5): 6930-6940.
11	Huie J M, Summers A P. The effects of soft and rough substrates on suction-based adhesion[J]. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2022, 225(9): No.243773.
12	Kazuma T, Yasutaka M, Masatsugu S, et al. A New Concept for an Adhesive Material Inspired by Clingfish Sucker Nanofilaments[J]. Langmuir: The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, 2022, 38(3): 1215-1222.
13	丛茜,徐金,史孝杰,等.仿生凹坑型吸盘设计与试验[J].吉林大学学报:工学版: 2024,54(4):1144-1152.
	Cong Qian, Xu Jin, Shi Xiao-jie, et al. Bionic pit design and experiment of the sucker[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024,54(4):1144-1152.
14	Popov V L, Filippov A E, Gorb S N. Biological microstructures with high adhesion and friction: numerical approach[J]. Physics-Uspekhi, 2016, 59(9): 829-845.
15	Ditsche P, Wainwright D K, Summers A P. Attachment to challenging substrates-fouling, roughness and limits of adhesion in the northern clingfish(Gobiesox maeandricus)[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 217(14): 2548-2554.
16	Ditsche P, Summers A P. Learning from Northern clingfish (Gobiesox maeandricus): bioinspired suction cups attach to rough surfaces[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2019, 374(1784): No.20190204.
17	Chuang Y C, Chang H K, Liu G L, et al. Climbing upstream: Multi-scale structural characterization and underwater adhesion of the Pulin river loach (Sinogastromyzon puliensis)[J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017, 73:76-85.
18	Zhang Y, Li S, Zuo P, et al. Adhesion behaviors of abalone under the action of water flow[J]. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 2021(7): No.659468.
19	Zhang Y, Li S, Zuo P, et al. A mechanics study on the self-righting of abalone from the substrate[J]. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2020(1): No.8825451.
20	Li J, Ma C, Liu J, et al. The co-effect of microstructures and mucus on the adhesion of abalone from a mechanical perspective[J]. Biosurface and Biotribology, 2021, 7(4): 180-186.
21	Lin A Y M, Brunner R, Chen P Y, et al. Underwater adhesion of abalone: the role of van der Waals and capillary forces[J]. Acta Materialia, 2009, 57(14): 4178-4185.
22	Li J, Zhang Y, Liu S, et al. Insights into adhesion of abalone: a mechanical approach[J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2018, (77): 331-336.

相关文章 15

[1]	丛茜,徐金,史孝杰,金敬福,陈廷坤. 仿生凹坑型吸盘设计与试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(4): 1144-1152.
[2]	杨欣,王阳,宋家锋,朱勇,黄彬兵,许述财. 基于虾螯结构的仿生夹层板设计及数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(3): 842-851.
[3]	于征磊,曹青,张钧栋,沙鹏威,金敬福,魏万祯,梁平,张志辉. 基于增材制造的着陆器仿生缓冲结构的力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(10): 3077-3084.
[4]	黄晗,闫庆昊,向枳昕,杨鑫涛,陈金宝,许述财. 基于虾螯的仿生多胞薄壁管耐撞性分析及优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(3): 716-724.
[5]	陈奕颖,金敬福,丛茜,陈廷坤,任露泉. 不同冰点介质对冰黏附强度的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(5): 1926-1932.
[6]	于征磊,陈立新,徐泽洲,信仁龙,马龙,金敬福,张志辉,江山. 基于增材制造的仿生防护结构力学及回复特性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(4): 1540-1547.
[7]	于征磊,信仁龙,陈立新,朱奕凝,张志辉,曹青,金敬福,赵杰亮. 仿蜂窝防护结构的承载特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(3): 1140-1145.
[8]	刘春宝,陈山石,盛闯,钱志辉,任露泉,任雷. 蜘蛛生物液压驱动原理及其功能仿生探索[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 375-381.
[9]	陈东良,臧睿,段鹏,赵伟鹏,翁旭涛,孙杨,唐艺鹏. 基于新月鱼尾推进理论的多连杆鱼骨仿生设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(4): 1246-1257.
[10]	吴娜,庄健,张克松,王慧鑫,马云海. 毛蚶贝壳曲面承压力学特性及断裂机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(3): 897-902.
[11]	郭昊添,徐涛,梁逍,于征磊,刘欢,马龙. 仿鲨鳃扰流结构的过渡段换热表面优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1793-1798.
[12]	熙鹏,丛茜,王庆波,郭华曦. 仿生条纹形磨辊磨损试验及耐磨机理分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1787-1792.
[13]	田为军, 王骥月, 李明, 张兴旺, 张勇, 丛茜. 面向水上机器人的水黾运动观测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 812-820.
[14]	钱志辉, 周亮, 任雷, 任露泉. 具有仿生距下关节和跖趾关节的完全被动步行机[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 205-211.
[15]	陈东辉, 刘伟, 吕建华, 常志勇, 吴婷, 慕海锋. 基于虾夷扇贝体表结构的玉米茬根捡拾器仿生设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(4): 1185-1193.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

吸盘类别	区域
吸盘类别	1	2	3	4	5
仿生1号	87 403	41 141	45 474	258 360	28 847
仿生2号	85 276	53 017	70 338	259 770	31 627
仿生3号	86 412	33 748	49 430	263 640	33 502
仿生4号	91 859	40 646	49 804	259 450	27 217
仿生5号	89 246	40 174	30 462	293 410	26 033
仿生6号	97 160	44 441	63 827	281 630	23 956
仿生7号	94 946	43 524	34 078	286 280	27 885
仿生8号	93 388	39 552	53 890	289 340	26 849
仿生9号	82 327	35 387	54 487	231 040	28 748
仿生10号	84 822	35 210	62 196	213 630	32 504
仿生11号	92 758	31 612	77 550	205 750	40 407
仿生12号	91 470	34 732	59 046	221 750	29 323
仿生13号	86 831	34 468	59 992	222 950	10 439
仿生14号	97 375	37 329	52 451	208 700	38 393
仿生15号	97 532	47 714	47 961	215 890	47 215
仿生16号	94 075	42 594	56 051	214 230	37 651
标准吸盘	35 200	38 800	45 700	53 000	57 200

吸盘类别实验次数	标准吸盘	仿生 5号	仿生 6号	仿生 7号	仿生 8号
1	41.85	41.56	38.52	43.75	43.84
2	42.61	42.99	38.62	42.51	45.46
3	42.42	42.51	37.1	41.18	45.17
4	41.66	43.08	41.28	41.56	43
5	41.85	42.42	40.99	43.84	44.13
平均值	42.078	42.512	39.3	42.568	44.32
百分比/%	100	101	93.4	101	105