吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (8): 2630-2638.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20231054

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

基于天鹰算法的交通自洽能源系统优化控制方法

陈光勇1(),周逸凯1,陶楚青1,万利1,魏巍2()   

  1. 1.山东省交通规划设计院集团有限公司 隧道与地下工程设计研究院,济南 250000
    2.吉林大学 交通学院,长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-07 出版日期:2025-08-01 发布日期:2025-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 魏巍 E-mail:51338031@qq.com;weiwei@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈光勇(1982-),男,高级工程师.研究方向:智慧隧道机电设施.E-mail:51338031@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省交通运输厅科技计划项目(KJ-2019-SDSJTT-04);国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFB1600500)

Optimization control method of traffic self consistent energy system based on aquila optimizer

Guang-yong CHEN1(),Yi-kai ZHOU1,Chu-qing TAO1,Li WAN1,Wei WEI2()   

  1. 1.Tunnel and Underground Engineering Design Branch,Shandong Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institute Group Company Limited,Jinan 250000,China
    2.Transportation College,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2023-10-07 Online:2025-08-01 Published:2025-11-14
  • Contact: Wei WEI E-mail:51338031@qq.com;weiwei@jlu.edu.cn

摘要:

光伏供电系统在交通自洽能源中扮演着重要角色,然而光伏阵列受到外界环境影响,局部阴影效应限制了系统的发电效率。为解决该问题,提出了一种优化控制方法,利用Logistics混沌序列初始化和自适应权重法构建了自适应搜索的天鹰算法。该算法能实时获取光伏阵列的最大功率点,从而实现交通自洽能源系统的最优控制。在仿真平台上设计不同光照条件下的实验结果表明:本文算法相较于扰动观察法、粒子群算法和传统天鹰算法具有更好的跟踪精度和速度,并且不易陷入局部最优解。本文方法对于提高光伏发电系统的发电效率和降低交通运输运营成本具有一定的参考意义。

关键词: 交通工程, 交通自洽能源, 光伏优化控制, 局部阴影, 天鹰算法

Abstract:

Photovoltaic aprays are affected by external environmental factors, and local shading effects limit the system's power generation efficiency. To address this issue, this paper proposes an optimization control method that utilizes Logistics chaotic sequence initialization and adaptive weighting to construct an adaptive search aquila optimizer. This algorithm can dynamically track the maximum power point of the photovoltaic array, thus achieving optimal control of traffic self consistent energy system. Experimental results under different lighting conditions on a simulation platform demonstrate that the algorithm proposed in this paper has better tracking accuracy and speed compared to perturbation observation methods, particle swarm algorithms, and traditional aquila optimizer, and is less likely to get stuck in local optimal solutions. The proposed method has a certain reference value for improving the power generation efficiency of photovoltaic power generation systems and reducing operational costs in transportation.

Key words: transportation engineering, traffic self consistent energy, photovoltaic optimization control, local shadow, aquila optimizer

中图分类号: 

  • U491

图1

理想光照下光伏阵列的输出特性曲线"

图2

局部阴影下光伏阵列的输出特性曲线"

图3

隧道光伏遮光棚"

图4

隧道光伏遮光棚表面的光伏电池板布设示意图"

表1

光伏阵列主要参数"

参 数参数取值
开路电压/V44.2
短路电流/A5.29
最大功率点电压/V35.8
最大功率点电流/A4.95

表2

不同工况下外界光照条件设置 (W/m2)"

光伏板工况1工况2工况3工况4
PV11 0001 000800900
PV21 000800600700
PV31 000600400400
PV41 000400200200

图5

不同工况下的输出特性曲线"

表3

理想光照条件下的仿真结果"

算法

理论最大

功率/W

实际输出

功率/W

平均

时间/s

跟踪

精度/%

P&O692.867690.5090.25599.65
PSO692.867692.5710.24399.95
AO692.867692.6830.12199.97
ASAO692.867692.6790.11699.97

图6

理想光照条件下的仿真效果"

表4

局部阴影条件下的仿真结果"

算法

理论最大

功率/W

实际输出

功率/W

平均

时间/s

跟踪

精度/%

P&O323.015284.9450.17288.21
PSO323.015321.8860.25299.66
AO323.015321.9800.12399.68
ASAO323.015322.8740.11599.96

图7

局部阴影条件下的仿真效果"

表5

正确跟踪次数统计"

算法起始光照光照突变1光照突变2光照突变3
PSO48464239
AO50494543
ASAO50505050
[1] 黄志玮. 光伏发电并网及其相关技术发展现状与展望 [J].能源与节能, 2021(7): 39-40.
Huang Zhi-wei. Development statusand prospect of grid connected photovoltaic power generation and related technologies[J]. Energy and Energy Conservation, 2021(7): 39-40.
[2] 万利,陶楚青,陈光勇,等.基于视觉适应性的隧道入口光伏遮光棚设计[J/OL]. [2024-04-02].
Wan Li, Tao Chu-qing, Chen Guang-yong, et al. Design of solar power awning at the entrance of tunnel based on visual adaptability[J/OL]. [2024-04-02]. .
[3] 徐凯, 王湘萍. 光伏发电最大功率点跟踪的智能集成控制[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(2): 536-543.
Xu Kai, Wang Xiang-ping. Intelligent integrated control for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic power generation[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2018, 39(2): 536-543.
[4] 卢旭锦, 谢伟彬.基于恒定电压法结合电导增量法MPPT控制策略研究[J]. 自动化技术与应用, 2018,37(11): 1-5.
Lu Xu-jin, Xie Wei-bin. Research on MPPT control strategy based on constant voltage method combined with conductance increment method[J]. Techniques of Automation and Applications, 2018, 37(11): 1-5.
[5] 郭金智, 潘子峻, 袁绍军, 等. 基于改进电导增量法的变步长MPPT算法[J]. 电气传动, 2022, 52(20): 50-56.
Guo Jin-zhi, Pan Zi-jun, Yuan Shao-jun, et al. Variable step size MPPT algorithm based on improved conductance increment method[J]. Electric Drive, 2022, 52(20): 50-56.
[6] 徐善智, 丁宇, 刘泽禹, 等. 基于改进扰动观察法的光伏MPPT控制策略研究[J]. 集成电路应用, 2022, 39(5): 6-8.
Xu Shan-zhi, Ding Yu, Liu Ze-yu, et al.Study on photovoltaic mppt control strategy based on improved disturbance observation method[J]. Application of IC, 2022, 39(5): 6-8.
[7] Ahmed J, Salam Z. A modified P&O maximum powerpoint tracking method with reduced steady state oscillation and improved tracking efficiency[J].IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2016, 7(4):1506-1511.
[8] 梁国壮, 赵博, 田涵雷, 等. 扰动-模糊结合的双模式MPPT算法研究[J]. 现代电子技术, 2020, 43(16): 131-134.
Liang Guo-zhuang, Zhao Bo, Tian Han-lei, et al. Research on two-mode MPPT algorithms combining perturbation observation method and fuzzy control[J]. Modern Electronic Technology, 2020,43(16): 131-134.
[9] 徐义涛, 姜吉顺, 张宗超, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法光伏的最大功率跟踪[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(34): 180-185.
Xu Yi-tao, Jiang Ji-shun, Zhang Zong-chao,et al.Photovoltaic maximum power tracking based on improved particle swarm optimization[J].Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(34): 180-185.
[10] 党秀娟, 何柏娜, 孙坚, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法的光伏最大功率点跟踪[J]. 山东电力技术, 2022, 49(9): 36-43.
Dang Xiu-juan, He Bai-na, Sun Jian, et al.Photovoltaic maximum power point tracking based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2022, 49(9): 36-43.
[11] 钟黎萍, 张水平, 顾启民. 基于基因排序遗传算法的串联光伏组件MPPT研究[J]. 可再生能源, 2017, 35(3): 384-388.
Zhong Li-ping, Zhang Shui-ping, Gu Qi-min.Research on MPPT of series photovoltaic modules based on genetic algorithm of gene sequencing[J]. Renewable Energy Sources, 2017, 35(3): 384-388.
[12] 赵华芳, 马文忠, 王仁让, 等. 基于改进神经网络的一种新型MPPT预测方法[J]. 电气应用, 2021, 40(1): 12-18.
Zhao Hua-fang, Ma Wen-zhong, Wang Ren-rang, et al. A new MPPT prediction method based on improved neural network[J]. Electrical Application, 2021,40(1):12-18.
[13] 赵子睿, 潘鹏程, 吴婷. 基于APID-RBF神经网络的光伏MPPT方法[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报,2024, 36(2): 152-158.
Zhao Zi-rui, Pan Peng-cheng, Wu Ting. Photovoltaic MPPT method based on APID-RBF neural network[J]. Journal of Power Systems and Automation, 2024, 36(2): 152-158.
[14] 王玥, 鞠振河. 基于MALTAB/Simulink的光伏阵列模型仿真研究[J]. 电工技术, 2021(3): 27-30.
Wang Yue, Ju Zhen-he.Simulation research of photovoltaic array model based on MALTAB/Simulink[J]. Electric Engineering, 2021(3): 27-30.
[15] Abualigah L, Yousri D, Elaziz M A, et al. Matlab code of aquila optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021, 157: 107250.
[16] Anderson C, Christine M. Practical genetic algorithms[J]. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 2004, 1004711099.
[1] 葛洪成,郭忠印,宋灿灿,王世伟. 半地下枢纽互通匝道隧道出口与二次分流点间安全距离[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(7): 2223-2232.
[2] 闫晟煜,温福华,武瑾,郑毅,郝时杰,尤文博. 基于公路通行数据的节假日山地景区运力适配方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(5): 1576-1587.
[3] 方华珍,刘立,顾青,肖小凤,孟宇. 基于轨迹预测和极限梯度提升的驾驶意图识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(2): 623-630.
[4] 姚荣涵,祁文彦,胡宏宇,杜筱婧,乔延峰,王立冰. 考虑公交-合乘车道的多车道元胞自动机模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(1): 162-174.
[5] 李怀鑫,晏长根,林斌,石玉玲. 黏土-混凝土组合体强度及全过程统计损伤模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(1): 245-255.
[6] 周荣贵,高沛,李雨璇,周建. 基于轨迹数据的高速公路小客车异常驾驶行为[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(9): 2581-2587.
[7] 马庆禄,闫浩,聂振宇,李杨梅. 匝道合流区智能网联车辆协同控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(5): 1332-1346.
[8] 蒲云,徐银,刘海旭,谭一帆. 考虑多车影响的智能网联车跟驰模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(5): 1285-1292.
[9] 许清津,付锐,郭应时,吴付威. 载货汽车弯道侧翻路侧预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(5): 1302-1310.
[10] 曹倩,李志慧,陶鹏飞,李海涛,马永建. 面向交通事故检测及预防的异质传感器布设方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(4): 969-978.
[11] 张鑫,胡启洲,何君,吴啸宇. 考虑交通梗塞的合流区交通状况诊断[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(2): 478-484.
[12] 张卫华,刘嘉茗,解立鹏,丁恒. 网联混合环境快速路交织区自动驾驶车辆换道模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(2): 469-477.
[13] 宋慧,曲大义,王少杰,王韬,杨子奕. 考虑多车响应的网联混行车流跟驰模型及稳态分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(11): 3220-3230.
[14] 温惠英,何梓琦,李秋灵,赵胜. 高速公路货车换道冲突预测及其影响因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(10): 2827-2836.
[15] 潘义勇,吴静婷,缪炫烨. 老年驾驶员事故严重程度影响因素时间不稳定性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(10): 2819-2826.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!