吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 550-556.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20210258

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

基于三种过街方式的两相位信号交叉口延误

冯天军1,2(),孙学路1,黄家盛1,田秀娟1,2(),宋现敏3   

  1. 1.吉林建筑大学 交通科学与工程学院,长春 130118
    2.吉林建筑大学 严寒地区交通防灾减灾工程研究中心,长春 130118
    3.吉林大学 交通学院,长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-29 出版日期:2022-03-01 发布日期:2022-03-08
  • 通讯作者: 田秀娟 E-mail:68202791@qq.com;1178643296@qq.com
  • 作者简介:冯天军(1978-),男,副教授,博士. 研究方向:交通管理及交通规划.E-mail:68202791@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFB1600501);吉林省教育厅科学技术研究规划项目(JJKH20210270KJ);吉林省教育厅“十三五”科学技术项目(JJKH20200285KJ)

Two-phase signal intersection delay based on three crossing modes

Tian-jun FENG1,2(),Xue-lu SUN1,Jia-sheng HUANG1,Xiu-juan TIAN1,2(),Xian-min SONG3   

  1. 1.School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Jilin Jianzhu University,Changchun 130118,China
    2.Engineering Research Center of Traffic Disaster Prevention and Control in Cold Region,Jilin Jianzhu University,Changchun 130118,China
    3.College of Transportation,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2021-03-29 Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-03-08
  • Contact: Xiu-juan TIAN E-mail:68202791@qq.com;1178643296@qq.com

摘要:

从交通效率的角度出发,寻求两相位交叉口人均延误最小的过街方式,以车辆到达-驶离曲线为依据,结合韦伯斯特机动车延误模型,建立了非机动车传统过街、二次过街及机动车停车线后移3种延误模型。以人均延误为判别指标,描述了3种非机动车过街方式人均延误与车流流量的变化关系。通过对比3种机动车过街方式的交叉口人均延误,取延误最小者作为最优方式,为选择合适的非机动车交叉口过街方式提供了参考。

关键词: 交通运输系统工程, 非机动车, 过街方式, 延误分析, 延误模型

Abstract:

To find the way of crossing intersections efficiently with the least delay per capita at two-phase intersection, three delay models of non-motor vehicle such as traditional crossing, second crossing and motor vehicle parking line moving backward are established by arrival-departure curve and Webster motor vehicle delay model. The relationship between per capita delay of three kinds of non-motor vehicle crossing the street and the traffic flow is described by taking the per capita delay the discriminant criteria. By contrasting average delay of three kinds of motor vehicles crossing street and taking the minimum delay as the optimum crossing way, the critical value of the traffic flow is obtained, which can provide the reference for choosing valuable way of non-motor vehicles crossing the intersection.

Key words: engineering of communication and transportation system, non-motor vehicles, crossing intersection, delay analysis, delay model

中图分类号: 

  • U491

图1

传统过街示意图"

图2

机动车停车线后移示意图"

图3

二次过街示意图"

图4

停车线后移下非机动车到达-释放曲线"

图5

二次过街方式下非机动车到达和释放"

表1

延误分析表(qc=500 pcu/h)"

非机动车到达率qb/(bike?h-1传统过街停车线后移二次过街
d1/sLd/md2/sd3/s
13008.57--10.54
16009.32--11.59
190010.30--12.93
220011.61--14.67
250013.402.4010.4517.01
280015.953.3912.1520.30
310019.784.8714.8125.20
340026.137.3219.3233.23
370038.2712.1028.0048.48

表2

延误分析表(qc=700 pcu/h)"

非机动车到达率qb/(bike?h-1传统过街停车线后移二次过街
d1/sLd/md2/sd3/s
13008.92--11.02
16009.61--11.96
190010.53--13.18
220011.78--14.80
250013.502.4012.8417.01
280015.953.3914.7120.12
310019.664.8717.7224.81
340025.827.3222.7832.52
370037.6212.1032.5547.20

表3

延误分析表(qc=900 pcu/h)"

非机动车到达率qb/(bike?h-1传统过街停车线后移二次过街
d1/sLd/md2/sd3/s
13009.42--11.94
160010.07--12.77
190010.95--13.88
220012.15--15.38
250013.822.4015.5917.46
280016.213.3917.7220.45
310019.864.8721.0724.97
340025.917.3226.7632.46
370037.5212.1037.7846.76

表4

延误分析表(qc=1100 pcu/h)"

非机动车到达率qb/(bike?h-1传统过街停车线后移二次过街
d1/sLd/md2/sd3/s
130010.08--13.41
160010.69--14.13
190011.54--15.12
220012.72--16.50
250014.362.4018.9618.46
280016.743.3921.3421.33
310020.354.8725.1125.74
340026.377.3231.5533.10
370037.9412.1044.0247.20

表5

交叉口交通流量"

入口

方向

高峰时段流量平峰时段流量低峰时段流量
qc/(veh?h-1qb/(bike?h-1qc/(veh?h-1qb/(bike?h-1qc/(veh?h-1qb/(bike?h-1
东进口962283355622573571086
西进口957272460721172961127
南进口106829186832209328968
北进口1035295462719034031035

表6

各个时段交叉口人均延误"

时段传统过街d1停车线后移d2二次过街d3
高峰17.920.221.6
平峰11.910.115.0
低峰8.06.69.8
1 . 交通信号控制指南:德国现行规范(RilSA) [S].
2 李锐,郑长江,袁黎,等. 基于等效流率的两相位信号交叉口车均延误模型[J]. 长安大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 35(): 95-99.
Li Rui, Zheng Chang-jiang, Yuan Li, et al. Average delay model for two-phase signalized intersectionbased on equivalent traffic flow rate[J]. Journal of Ch-ang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 35(Sup.1): 95-99.
3 董亚茹. 人行横道交通延误计算方法与优化控制策略研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学交通运输学院, 2016.
Dong Ya-ru. Research on the calculation method of tra-ffic delay and optimal control strategy at the crosswalk[D]. Beijing: College of Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016.
4 张亚平,陈烨,祁首铭,等. 信号控制交叉口转向延误概率模型[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版,2020,50(6): 2113-2121.
Zhang Ya-ping, Chen Ye, Qi Shou-ming, et al. Model of controlled intersection turning delay based on probabilistic principle[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(6): 2113-2121.
5 李锐,李文权,邱丰. 考虑主路左转延误的主路优先交叉口信号设置流量阈值[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 42(3): 551-554.
Li Rui, Li Wen-quan, Qiu Feng. Signal setting critical volume for two-way stop controlled intersection based on major left-turn delay[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition),2012,42(3): 551-554.
6 周晨静,荣建,冯星宇. 自行车对相邻直行机动车交通流干扰延误研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报,2015,41(5): 742-748.
Zhou Chen-jing, Rong Jian, Feng Xing-Yu. Effects of bicycle traffic on vehicular delays at signalized intersec-tions with pre-right-turn lanes[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2015,41(5): 742-748.
7 别一鸣,汤茹茹,王运豪,等. 信号交叉口进口车道饱和流率估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2019, 49(5): 1459-1464.
Bie Yi-ming, Tang Ru-ru, Wang Yun-hao, et al. Saturation flow rate estimation method of approaching lanes at signalized intersections[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1459-1464.
8 Li Xi-guang, Li Guo-qiang, Pang Su-seng, et al. Signal timing of intersections using integrated optimization of traffic quality, emissions and fuel consumption: anote[J].Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2004, 9(5): 401-407.
9 Gao Yu-hong, Qu Zhao-wei, Jiang Jing-ling, et al. Mix-ed traffic flow signal timing method considering E-Bi-ke expansion influence[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2021, 147(2): No. 04020155.
10 马东方,王殿海,陈永恒. 两相位交叉路口最小信号周期时长[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2011, 41(2): 338-342.
Ma Dong-fang, Wang Dian-hai, Chen Yong-heng. Minimum cycle length of two-phase road intersection[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2011, 41(2): 338-342.
11 陈永恒,白乔文,魏雪延. 设有待转区的左转专用车道车辆释放过程建模[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(1): 174-179.
Chen Yong-heng, Bai Qiao-wen, Wei Xue-yan. Departure processes model for left-turn laneson waiting area[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Infor-Mation Technology, 2014, 14(1): 174-179.
12 顾晨阳. 二相位交叉口左转非机动车交通组织评价与方案比选研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院, 2020.
Gu Chen-yang. Study on evaluation and screme selection of left turn non-motor vehicle traffic organization at two-phase intersections[D]. Chengdu: School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020.
[1] 薛锋,何传磊,黄倩,罗建. 多式轨道交通网络的耦合协调度[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(6): 2040-2050.
[2] 贾彦峰,曲大义,林璐,姚荣涵,马晓龙. 基于运行轨迹的网联混合车流速度协调控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(6): 2051-2060.
[3] 陆文琦,周天,谷远利,芮一康,冉斌. 基于张量分解理论的车道级交通流数据修复算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(5): 1708-1715.
[4] 卢凯,吴蔚,林观荣,田鑫,徐建闽. 基于KNN回归的客运枢纽聚集人数组合预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(4): 1241-1250.
[5] 彭博,张媛媛,王玉婷,唐聚,谢济铭. 基于自动编码机-分类器的视频交通状态自动识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(3): 886-892.
[6] 张健,吴坤润,杨敏,冉斌. 智能网联环境下交叉口双环自适应控制模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 541-548.
[7] 王殿海,沈辛夷,罗小芹,金盛. 车均延误最小情况下的相位差优化方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 511-523.
[8] 宋现敏,张明业,李振建,王鑫,张亚南. 动态公交专用道的设置及其仿真分析评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(5): 1677-1686.
[9] 贾洪飞,丁心茹,杨丽丽. 城市潮汐车道优化设计的双层规划模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 535-542.
[10] 尹超英,邵春福,王晓全,熊志华. 考虑空间异质性的建成环境对通勤方式选择的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 543-548.
[11] 张大伟,祝海涛. 考虑行人差异性的人群疏散最优决策理论模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(2): 549-556.
[12] 常玉林,袁才鸿,孙超,张鹏. 基于改进元胞传输模型的城市路网实际阻抗计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 132-139.
[13] 宗长富,文龙,何磊. 基于欧几里得聚类算法的三维激光雷达障碍物检测技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 107-113.
[14] 隋振,姜源. 基于MIMO类脑情感学习回路的横-纵向综合控制驾驶员模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 140-146.
[15] 别一鸣,姜凯,汤茹茹,王琳虹,熊昕宇. 考虑方案过渡影响的单点交通控制时段划分方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(6): 1844-1851.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!