吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1571-1577.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201406006

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

汽车侧面碰撞乘员骨盆生物力学模型建立及分析

陈吉清1, 2, 马正伟1, 2, 兰凤崇1, 2, 杜天亚1, 2   

  1. 1.华南理工大学 机械与汽车工程学院,广州 510640;
    2.广东省汽车工程重点实验室,广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-03 出版日期:2014-11-01 发布日期:2014-11-01
  • 通讯作者: 兰凤崇(1959-),男,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:车身结构与安全.E-mail:fclan@scut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈吉清(1966-),女,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:车身结构与安全.E-mail:
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAG03B02); 浙江省汽车安全控制技术重点实验室开放基金项目(2011E10002)

Development and analysis of a biomechanical model of occupant pelvis in automobile side impact

CHEN Ji-qing1, 2, MA Zheng-wei1, 2, LAN Feng-chong1, 2, DU Tian-ya1, 2   

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640, China;
    2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Automotive Engineering, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2013-08-03 Online:2014-11-01 Published:2014-11-01

摘要:

为了研究碰撞过程中骨盆的生物力学响应和损伤机理,构建了一个基于50百分位中国男性CT影像的骨盆三维有限元模型。模型采用Guillemot实验和Salzar实验进行仿生可靠性验证,并比较了皮质骨分别采用六面体单元和壳单元模拟时模型的准确性。结果表明:两者均能有效地预测骨盆的碰撞响应和损伤,但皮质骨采用六面体单元模拟时,与试验结果具有更好的一致性。此外,通过与同等条件下女性骨盆碰撞仿真及试验结果的对比分析,发现男女骨盆由于几何形状以及外部尺寸差异,导致两者在碰撞条件下抵抗变形的能力不同。

关键词: 车辆工程, 侧面碰撞, 骨盆, 有限元模型, 仿生可靠性, 损伤

Abstract:

In order to study the biomechanical response and injury mechanisms of the occupant pelvis during impact, a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvis based the CT data of a 50th percentile Chinese male was developed. Then the experimental methods used by Guillemot et al. and Salzar et al. were adopted to validate the biofidelity of the model; the accuracy of the model was examined by simulation of cortical bone with hexahedral elements and simulation of trabecular bone with shell elements. Simulation results indicate that both mesh methods can be applied to simulate the pelvis impact responses and injuries, however, the results of the model with cortical bone meshed by hexahedral elements are more consistent with that of experiments. Moreover, the comparative analysis of simulation results with female pelvis under the same conditions reveals that geometrical differences between male and female pelvises affect their deformation resistant capacities in impact.

Key words: vehicle engineering, side impact, pelvis, finite element model, biofidelity, injury

中图分类号: 

  • U461.91
[1] Jr Lewis P R, Molz IV F J, Schmidtke S Z, et al. A NASS-based investigation of pelvic injury within the motor vehicle crash environment[C]∥Proceedings of the 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Alburquerque NM, 1996:123-129.
[2] Dischinger P C, Cushing B M,Kerns T L. Injury patterns associated with direction of impact: drivers admitted to trauma centers[J]. Journal of Trauma, 1993, 35(3): 454-459.
[3] Cesari D, Ramet M, Clair P Y. Evaluation of pelvic fracture tolerance in side impact[C]∥Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Troy MI, 1980:229-253.
[4] Guillemot H, Besnault B, Robin S, et al. Pelvic injuries in side impact collisions: a field accident analysis and dynamic tests on isolated pelvic bones[C]∥SAE Paper ,973322.
[5] Cesari D, Ramet M. Pelvic tolerance and protection criteria in side impact[C]∥SAE Paper, 821159.
[6] Viano D C. Biomechanical responses and injuries in blunt lateral impact[C]∥Proceedings of the 33rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, Washington DC, 1989:113-142.
[7] Cavanaugh J W, Walilko T J, Malhotr A, et al. Biomechanical response and injury tolerance of the pelvis in twelve sled side impacts[C]∥SAE Paper, 902305.
[8] Guillemot H, Got C, Besnault B, et al. Pelvic behaviour in side collisions: static and dynamic tests on isolated pelvic bones[C]∥Proceedings of the 16th ESV Conference, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 1998: 1412-1424.
[9] Bouquet R, Ramet M, Bermond F, et al. Pelvis human response to lateral impact[C]∥Proceedings of the 16th ESV Conference, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 1998: 1665-1686.
[10] Plummer J W, Bidez M W, Alonso J. Parametric finite element studies of the human pelvis: the influence of load magnitude and duration on pelvic tolerance during side impact[C]∥Proceedings of the 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference, New Mexico,1996:1740-1751.
[11] Besnault B, Guillemot H, Robin S, et al. A parametric finite element model of the human pelvis[C]∥SAE Paper, 983147.
[12] Anderson A E,Peters C L,Tuttle B D, et al. Subject specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies[J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2005, 127(3):364-373.
[13] Ruan J S, El-Jawahri R, Barbat S, et al. Pelvic impact response and injury simulation using a full human body finite element model[C]∥Proceedings of NAFEMS World Congress, Malta, 2005:1-8.
[14] 程秀生. 模拟汽车侧面碰撞的人体骨盆损伤的试验研究[J]. 汽车工程,1998,20(5):266-271. Cheng Xiu-sheng. A research on injury tolerance of the human pelvis in vehicle side impacts through sled tests[J]. Automotive Engineering , 1998,20(5):266-271.
[15] 程秀生,向晋乾,王军,等. 乘员骨盆侧面碰撞响应的数值仿真[J]. 公路交通科技,2004,21(5):137-140. Cheng Xiu-sheng, Xiang Jin-qian,Wang Jun,et al. Numerical simulation on pelvis response in side impact[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2004,21(5):137-140.
[16] 阮世捷,姜颖飞,李海岩,等. 女性骨盆三维有限元模型构建及其侧面碰撞分析[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2011,30(3):398-402. Ruan Shi-jie, Jiang Ying-fei, Li Hai-yan, et al. The establishment and side impact simulation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the Chinese female pelvic[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2011, 30(3):398-402.
[17] Li Z P, Kindig M W,Kerrigan J R,et al. Rib fractures under anterior-posterior dynamic loads: experimental and finite-element study[J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2010, 43(2): 228-234.
[18] GB/T 13547-92. 中华人民共和国标准工作空间人体尺寸[S].
[19] Kim Y S, Choi H H, Cho Y N, et al. Numerical investigations of interactions between the knee-thigh-hip complex with vehicle interior structures[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2005, 49:85-115.
[20] Salzar R S, Genovese D, Bass C R, et al. Load path distribution within the pelvic structure under lateral loading[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2008,14(1): 99-110.
[21] Miwako I, Shunji S, Yasuaki G, et al. Development of an advanced finite element model for a pedestrian pelvis[C]∥Proceedings of 22nd ESV Conference, Washington DC, USA, 2011:1-13.
[22] 原林,高梁斌. 骨盆的解剖和生物力学[J]. 中国创伤骨科杂志,2001, 3(2):144-145. Yuan Lin, Gao Liang-bin. Pelvic anatomy and biomechanics[J]. China Journal of Orthop Trauma, 2001, 3(2):144-145.
[23] Kim J E, Li Z P, Ito Y, et al. Finite element model development of a child pelvis with optimization-based material identification[J]. Journal of Biomechanics,2009,42(13): 2191-2195.
[1] 常成,宋传学,张雅歌,邵玉龙,周放. 双馈电机驱动电动汽车变频器容量最小化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1629-1635.
[2] 席利贺,张欣,孙传扬,王泽兴,姜涛. 增程式电动汽车自适应能量管理策略[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1636-1644.
[3] 何仁,杨柳,胡东海. 冷藏运输车太阳能辅助供电制冷系统设计及分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1645-1652.
[4] 那景新,慕文龙,范以撒,谭伟,杨佳宙. 车身钢-铝粘接接头湿热老化性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1653-1660.
[5] 刘玉梅,刘丽,曹晓宁,熊明烨,庄娇娇. 转向架动态模拟试验台避撞模型的构建[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1661-1668.
[6] 赵伟强, 高恪, 王文彬. 基于电液耦合转向系统的商用车防失稳控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1305-1312.
[7] 宋大凤, 吴西涛, 曾小华, 杨南南, 李文远. 基于理论油耗模型的轻混重卡全生命周期成本分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1313-1323.
[8] 朱剑峰, 张君媛, 陈潇凯, 洪光辉, 宋正超, 曹杰. 基于座椅拉拽安全性能的车身结构改进设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1324-1330.
[9] 那景新, 浦磊鑫, 范以撒, 沈传亮. 湿热环境对Sikaflex-265铝合金粘接接头失效强度的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1331-1338.
[10] 王炎, 高青, 王国华, 张天时, 苑盟. 混流集成式电池组热管理温均特性增效仿真[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1339-1348.
[11] 金立生, 谢宪毅, 高琳琳, 郭柏苍. 基于二次规划的分布式电动汽车稳定性控制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1349-1359.
[12] 隗海林, 包翠竹, 李洪雪, 李明达. 基于最小二乘支持向量机的怠速时间预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1360-1365.
[13] 王德军, 魏薇郦, 鲍亚新. 考虑侧风干扰的电子稳定控制系统执行器故障诊断[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1548-1555.
[14] 胡满江, 罗禹贡, 陈龙, 李克强. 基于纵向频响特性的整车质量估计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 977-983.
[15] 刘国政, 史文库, 陈志勇. 考虑安装误差的准双曲面齿轮传动误差有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 984-989.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘松山, 王庆年, 王伟华, 林鑫. 惯性质量对馈能悬架阻尼特性和幅频特性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 557 -563 .
[2] 初亮, 王彦波, 祁富伟, 张永生. 用于制动压力精确控制的进液阀控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 564 -570 .
[3] 李静, 王子涵, 余春贤, 韩佐悦, 孙博华. 硬件在环试验台整车状态跟随控制系统设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 577 -583 .
[4] 胡兴军, 李腾飞, 王靖宇, 杨博, 郭鹏, 廖磊. 尾板对重型载货汽车尾部流场的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 595 -601 .
[5] 王同建, 陈晋市, 赵锋, 赵庆波, 刘昕晖, 袁华山. 全液压转向系统机液联合仿真及试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 607 -612 .
[6] 张春勤, 姜桂艳, 吴正言. 机动车出行者出发时间选择的影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 626 -632 .
[7] 马万经, 谢涵洲. 双停车线进口道主、预信号配时协调控制模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 633 -639 .
[8] 于德新, 仝倩, 杨兆升, 高鹏. 重大灾害条件下应急交通疏散时间预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 654 -658 .
[9] 肖赟, 雷俊卿, 张坤, 李忠三. 多级变幅疲劳荷载下预应力混凝土梁刚度退化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 665 -670 .
[10] 肖锐, 邓宗才, 兰明章, 申臣良. 不掺硅粉的活性粉末混凝土配合比试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(03): 671 -676 .